The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community
In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) th...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Karen M Gebbia [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The American bankruptcy law journal - Bangor, Me. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1971, 91(2017), 2, Seite 183 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:91 ; year:2017 ; number:2 ; pages:183 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1994903783 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1994903783 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220214151441.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170721 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1994903783 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1994903783 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)proquest_journals_19164506030 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0124277620170000091000200183keepersofthecodeevolutionofthebankruptcycommunity | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |q ZDB |
| 084 | |a 86.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Karen M Gebbia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Credit card industry | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bankruptcy laws | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Credit cards | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consumer credit | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Collaboration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bankruptcy reorganization | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The American bankruptcy law journal |d Bangor, Me. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1971 |g 91(2017), 2, Seite 183 |w (DE-627)166455903 |w (DE-600)195011-3 |w (DE-576)022670092 |x 0027-9048 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:91 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:183 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916450603 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-JUR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2062 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 86.00 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 91 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 183 | ||
| author_variant |
k m g kmg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00279048:2017----::hkeesfhcdeouinfhbnr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
86.00 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1994903783 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994903783 (PRQ)proquest_journals_19164506030 (KEY)0124277620170000091000200183keepersofthecodeevolutionofthebankruptcycommunity DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Karen M Gebbia verfasserin aut The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin. Credit card industry Bankruptcy laws Credit cards Consumer credit Collaboration Bankruptcy reorganization Enthalten in The American bankruptcy law journal Bangor, Me. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1971 91(2017), 2, Seite 183 (DE-627)166455903 (DE-600)195011-3 (DE-576)022670092 0027-9048 nnns volume:91 year:2017 number:2 pages:183 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916450603 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2062 86.00 AVZ AR 91 2017 2 183 |
| spelling |
PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1994903783 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994903783 (PRQ)proquest_journals_19164506030 (KEY)0124277620170000091000200183keepersofthecodeevolutionofthebankruptcycommunity DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Karen M Gebbia verfasserin aut The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin. Credit card industry Bankruptcy laws Credit cards Consumer credit Collaboration Bankruptcy reorganization Enthalten in The American bankruptcy law journal Bangor, Me. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1971 91(2017), 2, Seite 183 (DE-627)166455903 (DE-600)195011-3 (DE-576)022670092 0027-9048 nnns volume:91 year:2017 number:2 pages:183 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916450603 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2062 86.00 AVZ AR 91 2017 2 183 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1994903783 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994903783 (PRQ)proquest_journals_19164506030 (KEY)0124277620170000091000200183keepersofthecodeevolutionofthebankruptcycommunity DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Karen M Gebbia verfasserin aut The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin. Credit card industry Bankruptcy laws Credit cards Consumer credit Collaboration Bankruptcy reorganization Enthalten in The American bankruptcy law journal Bangor, Me. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1971 91(2017), 2, Seite 183 (DE-627)166455903 (DE-600)195011-3 (DE-576)022670092 0027-9048 nnns volume:91 year:2017 number:2 pages:183 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916450603 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2062 86.00 AVZ AR 91 2017 2 183 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1994903783 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994903783 (PRQ)proquest_journals_19164506030 (KEY)0124277620170000091000200183keepersofthecodeevolutionofthebankruptcycommunity DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Karen M Gebbia verfasserin aut The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin. Credit card industry Bankruptcy laws Credit cards Consumer credit Collaboration Bankruptcy reorganization Enthalten in The American bankruptcy law journal Bangor, Me. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1971 91(2017), 2, Seite 183 (DE-627)166455903 (DE-600)195011-3 (DE-576)022670092 0027-9048 nnns volume:91 year:2017 number:2 pages:183 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916450603 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2062 86.00 AVZ AR 91 2017 2 183 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20170721 (DE-627)OLC1994903783 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994903783 (PRQ)proquest_journals_19164506030 (KEY)0124277620170000091000200183keepersofthecodeevolutionofthebankruptcycommunity DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Karen M Gebbia verfasserin aut The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin. Credit card industry Bankruptcy laws Credit cards Consumer credit Collaboration Bankruptcy reorganization Enthalten in The American bankruptcy law journal Bangor, Me. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1971 91(2017), 2, Seite 183 (DE-627)166455903 (DE-600)195011-3 (DE-576)022670092 0027-9048 nnns volume:91 year:2017 number:2 pages:183 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916450603 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2062 86.00 AVZ AR 91 2017 2 183 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The American bankruptcy law journal 91(2017), 2, Seite 183 volume:91 year:2017 number:2 pages:183 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The American bankruptcy law journal 91(2017), 2, Seite 183 volume:91 year:2017 number:2 pages:183 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Credit card industry Bankruptcy laws Credit cards Consumer credit Collaboration Bankruptcy reorganization |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The American bankruptcy law journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Karen M Gebbia @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
166455903 |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC1994903783 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1994903783</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214151441.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1994903783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1994903783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)proquest_journals_19164506030</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0124277620170000091000200183keepersofthecodeevolutionofthebankruptcycommunity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Karen M Gebbia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Credit card industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bankruptcy laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Credit cards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Consumer credit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Collaboration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bankruptcy reorganization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The American bankruptcy law journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Bangor, Me. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">91(2017), 2, Seite 183</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)166455903</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)195011-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)022670092</subfield><subfield code="x">0027-9048</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:91</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916450603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">91</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">183</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Karen M Gebbia |
| spellingShingle |
Karen M Gebbia ddc 340 bkl 86.00 misc Credit card industry misc Bankruptcy laws misc Credit cards misc Consumer credit misc Collaboration misc Bankruptcy reorganization The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community |
| authorStr |
Karen M Gebbia |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)166455903 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0027-9048 |
| topic_title |
340 ZDB 86.00 bkl The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community Credit card industry Bankruptcy laws Credit cards Consumer credit Collaboration Bankruptcy reorganization |
| topic |
ddc 340 bkl 86.00 misc Credit card industry misc Bankruptcy laws misc Credit cards misc Consumer credit misc Collaboration misc Bankruptcy reorganization |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 bkl 86.00 misc Credit card industry misc Bankruptcy laws misc Credit cards misc Consumer credit misc Collaboration misc Bankruptcy reorganization |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 bkl 86.00 misc Credit card industry misc Bankruptcy laws misc Credit cards misc Consumer credit misc Collaboration misc Bankruptcy reorganization |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The American bankruptcy law journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
166455903 |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The American bankruptcy law journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)166455903 (DE-600)195011-3 (DE-576)022670092 |
| title |
The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1994903783 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994903783 (PRQ)proquest_journals_19164506030 (KEY)0124277620170000091000200183keepersofthecodeevolutionofthebankruptcycommunity |
| title_full |
The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community |
| author_sort |
Karen M Gebbia |
| journal |
The American bankruptcy law journal |
| journalStr |
The American bankruptcy law journal |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
183 |
| author_browse |
Karen M Gebbia |
| container_volume |
91 |
| class |
340 ZDB 86.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Karen M Gebbia |
| dewey-full |
340 |
| title_sort |
keepers of the code: evolution of the bankruptcy community |
| title_auth |
The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community |
| abstract |
In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin. |
| abstractGer |
In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2062 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community |
| url |
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916450603 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
166455903 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:42:13.975Z |
| _version_ |
1803588189788569600 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1994903783</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214151441.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1994903783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1994903783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)proquest_journals_19164506030</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0124277620170000091000200183keepersofthecodeevolutionofthebankruptcycommunity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Karen M Gebbia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Keepers of the Code: Evolution of the Bankruptcy Community</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this Article, Professor Gebbia demonstrates how three dynamics have profoundly influenced the trajectory of bankruptcy law since the enactment of the first federal bankruptcy law in the early 1800s. These three dynamics are (i) the emergence and evolution of a modern bankruptcy community, (ii) the varying degrees to which the bankruptcy community has collaborated toward consensus on bankruptcy legislation, and (iii) the changing content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy legislation. Professor Gebbia articulates the essential characteristics that define the bankruptcy community, traces the emergence of its precursors in the 1800s, explains why the mid-1920s mark the birth of the modern bankruptcy community, and describes the ways in which the bankruptcy community has evolved over the ensuing ninety years. She explains how the bankruptcy community developed collaborative venues and consensus-building agenda early in its history, and how those venues and agenda have evolved over time. She then suggests that the content of the debate surrounding bankruptcy reform affects the community's ability to achieve consensus and influence bankruptcy legislation. In this regard, she identifies three interrelated strands that form the content of bankruptcy law: bankruptcy law's substantive balancing of equities among creditors and debtors, the locus of control over and essential nature of the system that administers bankruptcy law, and the clarity and coherence of bankruptcy law. Professor Gebbia summarizes how community, collaboration, and content have interacted across history, and considers how those historical interactions inform today's debates over the future of bankruptcy law. She concludes that the influence of today's bankruptcy community depends upon a renewed commitment to collaborate and create consensus-building agenda in changed and challenging circumstances. She identifies specific topics around which she believes that type of collaboration and consensus might begin.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Credit card industry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bankruptcy laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Credit cards</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Consumer credit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Collaboration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bankruptcy reorganization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The American bankruptcy law journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Bangor, Me. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">91(2017), 2, Seite 183</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)166455903</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)195011-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)022670092</subfield><subfield code="x">0027-9048</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:91</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1916450603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">91</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">183</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4028378 |