Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model
Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Wang, Chaonan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Quality and reliability engineering international - Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1985, 33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:33 ; year:2017 ; number:4 ; pages:823-837 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1002/qre.2060 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1994947446 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1994947446 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220217093016.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/qre.2060 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20171125 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1994947446 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1994947446 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)p1916-274ea8035de722a87abd34ae25966d7152afc9c987f63fe9296e0464e7d9e5893 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0136540120170000033000400823communicationreliabilityanalysisofwirelesssensorne | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 650 |a 690 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 50.16 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 85.38 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wang, Chaonan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a communication reliability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a binary decision diagram | |
| 650 | 4 | |a wireless sensor networks | |
| 650 | 4 | |a link reliability model | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Energy harvesting | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xing, Liudong |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zonouz, Amir Ehsani |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vokkarane, Vinod M |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sun, Yan (Lindsay) |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Quality and reliability engineering international |d Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1985 |g 33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837 |w (DE-627)129167614 |w (DE-600)50641-2 |w (DE-576)028403312 |x 0748-8017 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g pages:823-837 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2060 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qre.2060/abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899276726 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 50.16 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 85.38 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 33 |j 2017 |e 4 |h 823-837 | ||
| author_variant |
c w cw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:07488017:2017----::omnctorlaiiynlssfieesesrewrs |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
50.16 85.38 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1002/qre.2060 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1994947446 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994947446 (PRQ)p1916-274ea8035de722a87abd34ae25966d7152afc9c987f63fe9296e0464e7d9e5893 (KEY)0136540120170000033000400823communicationreliabilityanalysisofwirelesssensorne DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 690 DNB 50.16 bkl 85.38 bkl Wang, Chaonan verfasserin aut Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. communication reliability binary decision diagram wireless sensor networks link reliability model Energy harvesting Xing, Liudong oth Zonouz, Amir Ehsani oth Vokkarane, Vinod M oth Sun, Yan (Lindsay) oth Enthalten in Quality and reliability engineering international Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1985 33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837 (DE-627)129167614 (DE-600)50641-2 (DE-576)028403312 0748-8017 nnns volume:33 year:2017 number:4 pages:823-837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2060 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qre.2060/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899276726 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 50.16 AVZ 85.38 AVZ AR 33 2017 4 823-837 |
| spelling |
10.1002/qre.2060 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1994947446 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994947446 (PRQ)p1916-274ea8035de722a87abd34ae25966d7152afc9c987f63fe9296e0464e7d9e5893 (KEY)0136540120170000033000400823communicationreliabilityanalysisofwirelesssensorne DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 690 DNB 50.16 bkl 85.38 bkl Wang, Chaonan verfasserin aut Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. communication reliability binary decision diagram wireless sensor networks link reliability model Energy harvesting Xing, Liudong oth Zonouz, Amir Ehsani oth Vokkarane, Vinod M oth Sun, Yan (Lindsay) oth Enthalten in Quality and reliability engineering international Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1985 33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837 (DE-627)129167614 (DE-600)50641-2 (DE-576)028403312 0748-8017 nnns volume:33 year:2017 number:4 pages:823-837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2060 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qre.2060/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899276726 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 50.16 AVZ 85.38 AVZ AR 33 2017 4 823-837 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1002/qre.2060 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1994947446 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994947446 (PRQ)p1916-274ea8035de722a87abd34ae25966d7152afc9c987f63fe9296e0464e7d9e5893 (KEY)0136540120170000033000400823communicationreliabilityanalysisofwirelesssensorne DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 690 DNB 50.16 bkl 85.38 bkl Wang, Chaonan verfasserin aut Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. communication reliability binary decision diagram wireless sensor networks link reliability model Energy harvesting Xing, Liudong oth Zonouz, Amir Ehsani oth Vokkarane, Vinod M oth Sun, Yan (Lindsay) oth Enthalten in Quality and reliability engineering international Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1985 33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837 (DE-627)129167614 (DE-600)50641-2 (DE-576)028403312 0748-8017 nnns volume:33 year:2017 number:4 pages:823-837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2060 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qre.2060/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899276726 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 50.16 AVZ 85.38 AVZ AR 33 2017 4 823-837 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1002/qre.2060 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1994947446 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994947446 (PRQ)p1916-274ea8035de722a87abd34ae25966d7152afc9c987f63fe9296e0464e7d9e5893 (KEY)0136540120170000033000400823communicationreliabilityanalysisofwirelesssensorne DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 690 DNB 50.16 bkl 85.38 bkl Wang, Chaonan verfasserin aut Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. communication reliability binary decision diagram wireless sensor networks link reliability model Energy harvesting Xing, Liudong oth Zonouz, Amir Ehsani oth Vokkarane, Vinod M oth Sun, Yan (Lindsay) oth Enthalten in Quality and reliability engineering international Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1985 33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837 (DE-627)129167614 (DE-600)50641-2 (DE-576)028403312 0748-8017 nnns volume:33 year:2017 number:4 pages:823-837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2060 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qre.2060/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899276726 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 50.16 AVZ 85.38 AVZ AR 33 2017 4 823-837 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1002/qre.2060 doi PQ20171125 (DE-627)OLC1994947446 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994947446 (PRQ)p1916-274ea8035de722a87abd34ae25966d7152afc9c987f63fe9296e0464e7d9e5893 (KEY)0136540120170000033000400823communicationreliabilityanalysisofwirelesssensorne DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 690 DNB 50.16 bkl 85.38 bkl Wang, Chaonan verfasserin aut Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. communication reliability binary decision diagram wireless sensor networks link reliability model Energy harvesting Xing, Liudong oth Zonouz, Amir Ehsani oth Vokkarane, Vinod M oth Sun, Yan (Lindsay) oth Enthalten in Quality and reliability engineering international Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1985 33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837 (DE-627)129167614 (DE-600)50641-2 (DE-576)028403312 0748-8017 nnns volume:33 year:2017 number:4 pages:823-837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2060 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qre.2060/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899276726 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 50.16 AVZ 85.38 AVZ AR 33 2017 4 823-837 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Quality and reliability engineering international 33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837 volume:33 year:2017 number:4 pages:823-837 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Quality and reliability engineering international 33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837 volume:33 year:2017 number:4 pages:823-837 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
communication reliability binary decision diagram wireless sensor networks link reliability model Energy harvesting |
| dewey-raw |
650 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Quality and reliability engineering international |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wang, Chaonan @@aut@@ Xing, Liudong @@oth@@ Zonouz, Amir Ehsani @@oth@@ Vokkarane, Vinod M @@oth@@ Sun, Yan (Lindsay) @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129167614 |
| dewey-sort |
3650 |
| id |
OLC1994947446 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1994947446</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217093016.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/qre.2060</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1994947446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1994947446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1916-274ea8035de722a87abd34ae25966d7152afc9c987f63fe9296e0464e7d9e5893</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0136540120170000033000400823communicationreliabilityanalysisofwirelesssensorne</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.16</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chaonan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">communication reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">binary decision diagram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wireless sensor networks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">link reliability model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy harvesting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xing, Liudong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zonouz, Amir Ehsani</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vokkarane, Vinod M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Yan (Lindsay)</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Quality and reliability engineering international</subfield><subfield code="d">Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129167614</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)50641-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)028403312</subfield><subfield code="x">0748-8017</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:823-837</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2060</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qre.2060/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899276726</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.16</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.38</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">823-837</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Wang, Chaonan |
| spellingShingle |
Wang, Chaonan ddc 650 bkl 50.16 bkl 85.38 misc communication reliability misc binary decision diagram misc wireless sensor networks misc link reliability model misc Energy harvesting Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model |
| authorStr |
Wang, Chaonan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129167614 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
650 - Management & auxiliary services 690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0748-8017 |
| topic_title |
650 690 DNB 50.16 bkl 85.38 bkl Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model communication reliability binary decision diagram wireless sensor networks link reliability model Energy harvesting |
| topic |
ddc 650 bkl 50.16 bkl 85.38 misc communication reliability misc binary decision diagram misc wireless sensor networks misc link reliability model misc Energy harvesting |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 650 bkl 50.16 bkl 85.38 misc communication reliability misc binary decision diagram misc wireless sensor networks misc link reliability model misc Energy harvesting |
| topic_browse |
ddc 650 bkl 50.16 bkl 85.38 misc communication reliability misc binary decision diagram misc wireless sensor networks misc link reliability model misc Energy harvesting |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
l x lx a e z ae aez v m v vm vmv y l s yl yls |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Quality and reliability engineering international |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129167614 |
| dewey-tens |
650 - Management & public relations 690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Quality and reliability engineering international |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129167614 (DE-600)50641-2 (DE-576)028403312 |
| title |
Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1994947446 (DE-599)GBVOLC1994947446 (PRQ)p1916-274ea8035de722a87abd34ae25966d7152afc9c987f63fe9296e0464e7d9e5893 (KEY)0136540120170000033000400823communicationreliabilityanalysisofwirelesssensorne |
| title_full |
Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model |
| author_sort |
Wang, Chaonan |
| journal |
Quality and reliability engineering international |
| journalStr |
Quality and reliability engineering international |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
823 |
| author_browse |
Wang, Chaonan |
| container_volume |
33 |
| class |
650 690 DNB 50.16 bkl 85.38 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Wang, Chaonan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1002/qre.2060 |
| dewey-full |
650 690 |
| title_sort |
communication reliability analysis of wireless sensor networks using phased‐mission model |
| title_auth |
Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model |
| abstract |
Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| abstractGer |
Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2060 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qre.2060/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899276726 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Xing, Liudong Zonouz, Amir Ehsani Vokkarane, Vinod M Sun, Yan (Lindsay) |
| author2Str |
Xing, Liudong Zonouz, Amir Ehsani Vokkarane, Vinod M Sun, Yan (Lindsay) |
| ppnlink |
129167614 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1002/qre.2060 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:52:59.484Z |
| _version_ |
1803588866654863360 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1994947446</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217093016.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/qre.2060</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1994947446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1994947446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1916-274ea8035de722a87abd34ae25966d7152afc9c987f63fe9296e0464e7d9e5893</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0136540120170000033000400823communicationreliabilityanalysisofwirelesssensorne</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.16</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chaonan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Communication Reliability Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Phased‐Mission Model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Communication reliability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential to ensure the correct and reliable operation of the network. Two distinct communication paradigms exist in WSNs: infrastructure communication and application communication, and a practical communication task typically involves both types of communications. To the best of our knowledge, no reliability studies on WSNs have been dedicated to combining the two communication paradigms. In this paper, we advance the state‐of‐the‐art by proposing a phased‐mission framework to analyze the communication reliability of WSNs considering both infrastructure communication and application communication, as well as K ‐coverage requirements. WSNs containing two types of sensor nodes (energy harvesting sensor nodes and battery‐powered sensor nodes) are modeled. Corresponding to the two types of sensor nodes, two different link reliability models are first presented. Binary decision diagram (BDD) based algorithms are then developed for the phased‐mission communication reliability analysis of WSNs. Case studies are given to illustrate the application of the proposed algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">communication reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">binary decision diagram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wireless sensor networks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">link reliability model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy harvesting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xing, Liudong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zonouz, Amir Ehsani</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vokkarane, Vinod M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Yan (Lindsay)</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Quality and reliability engineering international</subfield><subfield code="d">Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2017), 4, Seite 823-837</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129167614</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)50641-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)028403312</subfield><subfield code="x">0748-8017</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:823-837</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.2060</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qre.2060/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1899276726</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.16</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.38</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">823-837</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399392 |