The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD
We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This rese...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Baek, Pyounggu [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Human resource development quarterly - Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1990, 28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:28 ; year:2017 ; number:2 ; pages:135-161 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1002/hrdq.21275 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1995187526 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1995187526 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230715061035.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/hrdq.21275 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170901 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1995187526 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1995187526 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)p1065-2d134bfc768ca2e4088cd384a79742cbb34e14709992bfc9198701331e1f04883 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0199949420170000028000200135subjectiveperceptionsofcriticalhrdscholarsonthecur | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DNB |
| 100 | 1 | |a Baek, Pyounggu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD . | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Q methodology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a critical management studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a subjectivity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a critical human resource development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a critical pedagogy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Perceptions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human resource management | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Namhee |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Human resource development quarterly |d Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1990 |g 28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161 |w (DE-627)170669432 |w (DE-600)1089081-6 |w (DE-576)080986307 |x 1044-8004 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:135-161 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21275 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21275/abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1912085071 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 28 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 135-161 | ||
| author_variant |
p b pb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:10448004:2017----::hsbetvpretosfrtclrshlroteurnsa |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1002/hrdq.21275 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995187526 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995187526 (PRQ)p1065-2d134bfc768ca2e4088cd384a79742cbb34e14709992bfc9198701331e1f04883 (KEY)0199949420170000028000200135subjectiveperceptionsofcriticalhrdscholarsonthecur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Baek, Pyounggu verfasserin aut The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD . Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Q methodology critical management studies subjectivity critical human resource development critical pedagogy Perceptions Human resource management Kim, Namhee oth Enthalten in Human resource development quarterly Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1990 28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161 (DE-627)170669432 (DE-600)1089081-6 (DE-576)080986307 1044-8004 nnns volume:28 year:2017 number:2 pages:135-161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21275 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21275/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1912085071 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 28 2017 2 135-161 |
| spelling |
10.1002/hrdq.21275 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995187526 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995187526 (PRQ)p1065-2d134bfc768ca2e4088cd384a79742cbb34e14709992bfc9198701331e1f04883 (KEY)0199949420170000028000200135subjectiveperceptionsofcriticalhrdscholarsonthecur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Baek, Pyounggu verfasserin aut The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD . Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Q methodology critical management studies subjectivity critical human resource development critical pedagogy Perceptions Human resource management Kim, Namhee oth Enthalten in Human resource development quarterly Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1990 28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161 (DE-627)170669432 (DE-600)1089081-6 (DE-576)080986307 1044-8004 nnns volume:28 year:2017 number:2 pages:135-161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21275 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21275/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1912085071 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 28 2017 2 135-161 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1002/hrdq.21275 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995187526 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995187526 (PRQ)p1065-2d134bfc768ca2e4088cd384a79742cbb34e14709992bfc9198701331e1f04883 (KEY)0199949420170000028000200135subjectiveperceptionsofcriticalhrdscholarsonthecur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Baek, Pyounggu verfasserin aut The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD . Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Q methodology critical management studies subjectivity critical human resource development critical pedagogy Perceptions Human resource management Kim, Namhee oth Enthalten in Human resource development quarterly Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1990 28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161 (DE-627)170669432 (DE-600)1089081-6 (DE-576)080986307 1044-8004 nnns volume:28 year:2017 number:2 pages:135-161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21275 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21275/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1912085071 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 28 2017 2 135-161 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1002/hrdq.21275 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995187526 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995187526 (PRQ)p1065-2d134bfc768ca2e4088cd384a79742cbb34e14709992bfc9198701331e1f04883 (KEY)0199949420170000028000200135subjectiveperceptionsofcriticalhrdscholarsonthecur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Baek, Pyounggu verfasserin aut The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD . Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Q methodology critical management studies subjectivity critical human resource development critical pedagogy Perceptions Human resource management Kim, Namhee oth Enthalten in Human resource development quarterly Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1990 28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161 (DE-627)170669432 (DE-600)1089081-6 (DE-576)080986307 1044-8004 nnns volume:28 year:2017 number:2 pages:135-161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21275 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21275/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1912085071 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 28 2017 2 135-161 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1002/hrdq.21275 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995187526 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995187526 (PRQ)p1065-2d134bfc768ca2e4088cd384a79742cbb34e14709992bfc9198701331e1f04883 (KEY)0199949420170000028000200135subjectiveperceptionsofcriticalhrdscholarsonthecur DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB Baek, Pyounggu verfasserin aut The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD . Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Q methodology critical management studies subjectivity critical human resource development critical pedagogy Perceptions Human resource management Kim, Namhee oth Enthalten in Human resource development quarterly Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1990 28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161 (DE-627)170669432 (DE-600)1089081-6 (DE-576)080986307 1044-8004 nnns volume:28 year:2017 number:2 pages:135-161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21275 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21275/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1912085071 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 28 2017 2 135-161 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Human resource development quarterly 28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161 volume:28 year:2017 number:2 pages:135-161 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Human resource development quarterly 28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161 volume:28 year:2017 number:2 pages:135-161 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Q methodology critical management studies subjectivity critical human resource development critical pedagogy Perceptions Human resource management |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Human resource development quarterly |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Baek, Pyounggu @@aut@@ Kim, Namhee @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
170669432 |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
OLC1995187526 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1995187526</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230715061035.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/hrdq.21275</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1995187526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1995187526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1065-2d134bfc768ca2e4088cd384a79742cbb34e14709992bfc9198701331e1f04883</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0199949420170000028000200135subjectiveperceptionsofcriticalhrdscholarsonthecur</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baek, Pyounggu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD .</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Q methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">critical management studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">subjectivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">critical human resource development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">critical pedagogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Perceptions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human resource management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, Namhee</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Human resource development quarterly</subfield><subfield code="d">Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170669432</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1089081-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)080986307</subfield><subfield code="x">1044-8004</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:135-161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21275</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21275/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1912085071</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">135-161</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Baek, Pyounggu |
| spellingShingle |
Baek, Pyounggu ddc 330 misc Q methodology misc critical management studies misc subjectivity misc critical human resource development misc critical pedagogy misc Perceptions misc Human resource management The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD |
| authorStr |
Baek, Pyounggu |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)170669432 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1044-8004 |
| topic_title |
330 DNB The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD Q methodology critical management studies subjectivity critical human resource development critical pedagogy Perceptions Human resource management |
| topic |
ddc 330 misc Q methodology misc critical management studies misc subjectivity misc critical human resource development misc critical pedagogy misc Perceptions misc Human resource management |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 misc Q methodology misc critical management studies misc subjectivity misc critical human resource development misc critical pedagogy misc Perceptions misc Human resource management |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 misc Q methodology misc critical management studies misc subjectivity misc critical human resource development misc critical pedagogy misc Perceptions misc Human resource management |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
n k nk |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Human resource development quarterly |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
170669432 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Human resource development quarterly |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)170669432 (DE-600)1089081-6 (DE-576)080986307 |
| title |
The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1995187526 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995187526 (PRQ)p1065-2d134bfc768ca2e4088cd384a79742cbb34e14709992bfc9198701331e1f04883 (KEY)0199949420170000028000200135subjectiveperceptionsofcriticalhrdscholarsonthecur |
| title_full |
The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD |
| author_sort |
Baek, Pyounggu |
| journal |
Human resource development quarterly |
| journalStr |
Human resource development quarterly |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
135 |
| author_browse |
Baek, Pyounggu |
| container_volume |
28 |
| class |
330 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Baek, Pyounggu |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1002/hrdq.21275 |
| dewey-full |
330 |
| title_sort |
subjective perceptions of critical hrd scholars on the current state and the future of chrd |
| title_auth |
The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD |
| abstract |
We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD . |
| abstractGer |
We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD . |
| abstract_unstemmed |
We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD . |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21275 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21275/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1912085071 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Kim, Namhee |
| author2Str |
Kim, Namhee |
| ppnlink |
170669432 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1002/hrdq.21275 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:48:39.353Z |
| _version_ |
1803592368766582784 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1995187526</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230715061035.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1002/hrdq.21275</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1995187526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1995187526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1065-2d134bfc768ca2e4088cd384a79742cbb34e14709992bfc9198701331e1f04883</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0199949420170000028000200135subjectiveperceptionsofcriticalhrdscholarsonthecur</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baek, Pyounggu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Subjective Perceptions of Critical HRD Scholars on the Current State and the Future of CHRD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We intended to understand the currently predominant viewpoints or bodies of knowledge relative to critical human resource development ( CHRD ) based on personal meanings and viewpoints to a particular concept of CHRD naturalistically rather than in a theoretically induced meaning of CHRD . This research was designed to examine the subjective perceptions of CHRD scholars on the current state and the future of CHRD using Q methodology. A total of 13 CHRD scholars from the United States and the United Kingdom were asked to impose their opinions using 36 statements that were constructed according to a conceptual framework of theory–practice–research about CHRD in the current study. As a result, we identified three unique perspectives with regard to the current state and future of CHRD : (a) CHRD as an alternative HRD theoretical lens; (b) pluralistic views on CHRD practice in a broader context; and (c) the future prominence of CHRD in the HRD academic community. This revealed several implications in terms of content and practical application of criticality in organizations, which are expanded to the implications for theory, practice, and education of HRD .</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Q methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">critical management studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">subjectivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">critical human resource development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">critical pedagogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Perceptions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human resource management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, Namhee</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Human resource development quarterly</subfield><subfield code="d">Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2017), 2, Seite 135-161</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170669432</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1089081-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)080986307</subfield><subfield code="x">1044-8004</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:135-161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21275</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21275/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1912085071</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">135-161</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4028378 |