The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators
Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ganguly, Sumit [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Foreign policy analysis - Cary, NC : Oxford University Press, 2005, 13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:13 ; year:2017 ; number:2 ; pages:416-438 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1093/fpa/orw036 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1995538981 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1995538981 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220214133242.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/fpa/orw036 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170901 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1995538981 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1995538981 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c1019-dc47870de6cf8e2db56427db983c42a7927a969d9511161247ae6fac141a8e840 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0569598820170000013000200416foreignpolicyattitudesofindianelitesvariancestruct | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 320 |q DE-600 |
| 084 | |a 89.90 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ganguly, Sumit |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Hellwig, Timothy |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thompson, William R |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Foreign policy analysis |d Cary, NC : Oxford University Press, 2005 |g 13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438 |w (DE-627)482418273 |w (DE-600)2182536-1 |w (DE-576)116955864 |x 1743-8586 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:416-438 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw036 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4310 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 89.90 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 13 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 416-438 | ||
| author_variant |
s g sg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:17438586:2017----::hfrinoiytiueoidaeievracsrcue |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
89.90 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1093/fpa/orw036 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995538981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995538981 (PRQ)c1019-dc47870de6cf8e2db56427db983c42a7927a969d9511161247ae6fac141a8e840 (KEY)0569598820170000013000200416foreignpolicyattitudesofindianelitesvariancestruct DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DE-600 89.90 bkl Ganguly, Sumit verfasserin aut The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016 Hellwig, Timothy oth Thompson, William R oth Enthalten in Foreign policy analysis Cary, NC : Oxford University Press, 2005 13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438 (DE-627)482418273 (DE-600)2182536-1 (DE-576)116955864 1743-8586 nnns volume:13 year:2017 number:2 pages:416-438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw036 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_4310 89.90 AVZ AR 13 2017 2 416-438 |
| spelling |
10.1093/fpa/orw036 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995538981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995538981 (PRQ)c1019-dc47870de6cf8e2db56427db983c42a7927a969d9511161247ae6fac141a8e840 (KEY)0569598820170000013000200416foreignpolicyattitudesofindianelitesvariancestruct DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DE-600 89.90 bkl Ganguly, Sumit verfasserin aut The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016 Hellwig, Timothy oth Thompson, William R oth Enthalten in Foreign policy analysis Cary, NC : Oxford University Press, 2005 13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438 (DE-627)482418273 (DE-600)2182536-1 (DE-576)116955864 1743-8586 nnns volume:13 year:2017 number:2 pages:416-438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw036 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_4310 89.90 AVZ AR 13 2017 2 416-438 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1093/fpa/orw036 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995538981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995538981 (PRQ)c1019-dc47870de6cf8e2db56427db983c42a7927a969d9511161247ae6fac141a8e840 (KEY)0569598820170000013000200416foreignpolicyattitudesofindianelitesvariancestruct DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DE-600 89.90 bkl Ganguly, Sumit verfasserin aut The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016 Hellwig, Timothy oth Thompson, William R oth Enthalten in Foreign policy analysis Cary, NC : Oxford University Press, 2005 13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438 (DE-627)482418273 (DE-600)2182536-1 (DE-576)116955864 1743-8586 nnns volume:13 year:2017 number:2 pages:416-438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw036 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_4310 89.90 AVZ AR 13 2017 2 416-438 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1093/fpa/orw036 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995538981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995538981 (PRQ)c1019-dc47870de6cf8e2db56427db983c42a7927a969d9511161247ae6fac141a8e840 (KEY)0569598820170000013000200416foreignpolicyattitudesofindianelitesvariancestruct DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DE-600 89.90 bkl Ganguly, Sumit verfasserin aut The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016 Hellwig, Timothy oth Thompson, William R oth Enthalten in Foreign policy analysis Cary, NC : Oxford University Press, 2005 13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438 (DE-627)482418273 (DE-600)2182536-1 (DE-576)116955864 1743-8586 nnns volume:13 year:2017 number:2 pages:416-438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw036 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_4310 89.90 AVZ AR 13 2017 2 416-438 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1093/fpa/orw036 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1995538981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995538981 (PRQ)c1019-dc47870de6cf8e2db56427db983c42a7927a969d9511161247ae6fac141a8e840 (KEY)0569598820170000013000200416foreignpolicyattitudesofindianelitesvariancestruct DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DE-600 89.90 bkl Ganguly, Sumit verfasserin aut The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016 Hellwig, Timothy oth Thompson, William R oth Enthalten in Foreign policy analysis Cary, NC : Oxford University Press, 2005 13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438 (DE-627)482418273 (DE-600)2182536-1 (DE-576)116955864 1743-8586 nnns volume:13 year:2017 number:2 pages:416-438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw036 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_4310 89.90 AVZ AR 13 2017 2 416-438 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Foreign policy analysis 13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438 volume:13 year:2017 number:2 pages:416-438 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Foreign policy analysis 13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438 volume:13 year:2017 number:2 pages:416-438 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
320 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Foreign policy analysis |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ganguly, Sumit @@aut@@ Hellwig, Timothy @@oth@@ Thompson, William R @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
482418273 |
| dewey-sort |
3320 |
| id |
OLC1995538981 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1995538981</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214133242.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1093/fpa/orw036</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1995538981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1995538981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1019-dc47870de6cf8e2db56427db983c42a7927a969d9511161247ae6fac141a8e840</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0569598820170000013000200416foreignpolicyattitudesofindianelitesvariancestruct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ganguly, Sumit</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hellwig, Timothy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thompson, William R</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Foreign policy analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">Cary, NC : Oxford University Press, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)482418273</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2182536-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)116955864</subfield><subfield code="x">1743-8586</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:416-438</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw036</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.90</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">416-438</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ganguly, Sumit |
| spellingShingle |
Ganguly, Sumit ddc 320 bkl 89.90 The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators |
| authorStr |
Ganguly, Sumit |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)482418273 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
320 - Political science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1743-8586 |
| topic_title |
320 DE-600 89.90 bkl The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators |
| topic |
ddc 320 bkl 89.90 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 320 bkl 89.90 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 320 bkl 89.90 |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
t h th w r t wr wrt |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Foreign policy analysis |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
482418273 |
| dewey-tens |
320 - Political science |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Foreign policy analysis |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)482418273 (DE-600)2182536-1 (DE-576)116955864 |
| title |
The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1995538981 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995538981 (PRQ)c1019-dc47870de6cf8e2db56427db983c42a7927a969d9511161247ae6fac141a8e840 (KEY)0569598820170000013000200416foreignpolicyattitudesofindianelitesvariancestruct |
| title_full |
The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators |
| author_sort |
Ganguly, Sumit |
| journal |
Foreign policy analysis |
| journalStr |
Foreign policy analysis |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
416 |
| author_browse |
Ganguly, Sumit |
| container_volume |
13 |
| class |
320 DE-600 89.90 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ganguly, Sumit |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1093/fpa/orw036 |
| dewey-full |
320 |
| title_sort |
foreign policy attitudes of indian elites: variance, structure, and common denominators |
| title_auth |
The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators |
| abstract |
Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_4310 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw036 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Hellwig, Timothy Thompson, William R |
| author2Str |
Hellwig, Timothy Thompson, William R |
| ppnlink |
482418273 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1093/fpa/orw036 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:06:49.803Z |
| _version_ |
1803597287054639104 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1995538981</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214133242.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170721s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1093/fpa/orw036</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1995538981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1995538981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1019-dc47870de6cf8e2db56427db983c42a7927a969d9511161247ae6fac141a8e840</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0569598820170000013000200416foreignpolicyattitudesofindianelitesvariancestruct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ganguly, Sumit</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Foreign Policy Attitudes of Indian Elites: Variance, Structure, and Common Denominators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Foreign policy belief systems have received much attention. Yet nearly all work examines attitudes in western democracies, chiefly the United States. The current security environment requires that we ask whether the foreign policy views of individuals in other nations—particularly regional powers—are similar in structure to those found in the US case. This article does so for the Indian case. Drawing on studies of US opinion, we develop a set of claims and test them on an original data set on Indian elites. We make four contributions. First, we show that Wittkopf’s framework applies to the Indian case. Second, we demonstrate how this framework can be made more generally applicable by revising its emphases on different types of internationalism and on rethinking the meaning of isolationist preferences. Third, we place the Indian case in comparative perspective. And last, we model the dimensions of Indian attitudes as a function of domestic ideology. Results of our analyses provide insights into the structure of foreign policy belief systems outside the Global North.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hellwig, Timothy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thompson, William R</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Foreign policy analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">Cary, NC : Oxford University Press, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2017), 2, Seite 416-438</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)482418273</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2182536-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)116955864</subfield><subfield code="x">1743-8586</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:416-438</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw036</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.90</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">416-438</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399618 |