Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy
The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field stre...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
BROWNING, R [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of microscopy - Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1969, 267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:267 ; year:2017 ; number:2 ; pages:176-192 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1111/jmi.12558 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1995849987 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1995849987 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230715063443.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 170901s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jmi.12558 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20171228 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1995849987 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1995849987 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)p1338-9e92d04aa828a9b2ea977b52b99c20a6eae7792f1b289598ba67d041d0f300170 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0031376920170000267000200176enhancedspatialresolutioninvectorpotentialphotoele | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q DE-600 |
084 | |a BIODIV |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a BROWNING, R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society | ||
650 | 4 | |a Materials microanalysis | |
650 | 4 | |a VPPEM | |
650 | 4 | |a photoelectron microscopy | |
650 | 4 | |a Electron energy | |
650 | 4 | |a Calcium | |
650 | 4 | |a Thermodynamics | |
650 | 4 | |a Light (illumination) | |
650 | 4 | |a Photoelectrons | |
650 | 4 | |a Spatial resolution | |
650 | 4 | |a Image enhancement | |
650 | 4 | |a Orbits | |
650 | 4 | |a Mathematical analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Magnetic fields | |
650 | 4 | |a Binding energy | |
650 | 4 | |a Energy | |
650 | 4 | |a Aluminum | |
650 | 4 | |a Microscopy | |
650 | 4 | |a X rays | |
650 | 4 | |a Cyclotrons | |
650 | 4 | |a Low energy | |
650 | 4 | |a Calcium base alloys | |
650 | 4 | |a Calcium aluminate | |
650 | 4 | |a Chemical analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Nuclear electric power generation | |
650 | 4 | |a Spatial discrimination | |
650 | 4 | |a Field strength | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of microscopy |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1969 |g 267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192 |w (DE-627)129550426 |w (DE-600)219263-9 |w (DE-576)015003884 |x 0022-2720 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:267 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:176-192 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12558 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.12558/abstract |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1919652861 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2219 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 267 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 176-192 |
author_variant |
r b rb |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00222720:2017----::nacdptarsltoivcoptnilhte |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.1111/jmi.12558 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1995849987 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995849987 (PRQ)p1338-9e92d04aa828a9b2ea977b52b99c20a6eae7792f1b289598ba67d041d0f300170 (KEY)0031376920170000267000200176enhancedspatialresolutioninvectorpotentialphotoele DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 DE-600 BIODIV fid BROWNING, R verfasserin aut Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution. Nutzungsrecht: 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society Materials microanalysis VPPEM photoelectron microscopy Electron energy Calcium Thermodynamics Light (illumination) Photoelectrons Spatial resolution Image enhancement Orbits Mathematical analysis Magnetic fields Binding energy Energy Aluminum Microscopy X rays Cyclotrons Low energy Calcium base alloys Calcium aluminate Chemical analysis Nuclear electric power generation Spatial discrimination Field strength Enthalten in Journal of microscopy Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1969 267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192 (DE-627)129550426 (DE-600)219263-9 (DE-576)015003884 0022-2720 nnns volume:267 year:2017 number:2 pages:176-192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12558 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.12558/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1919652861 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2219 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 267 2017 2 176-192 |
spelling |
10.1111/jmi.12558 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1995849987 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995849987 (PRQ)p1338-9e92d04aa828a9b2ea977b52b99c20a6eae7792f1b289598ba67d041d0f300170 (KEY)0031376920170000267000200176enhancedspatialresolutioninvectorpotentialphotoele DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 DE-600 BIODIV fid BROWNING, R verfasserin aut Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution. Nutzungsrecht: 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society Materials microanalysis VPPEM photoelectron microscopy Electron energy Calcium Thermodynamics Light (illumination) Photoelectrons Spatial resolution Image enhancement Orbits Mathematical analysis Magnetic fields Binding energy Energy Aluminum Microscopy X rays Cyclotrons Low energy Calcium base alloys Calcium aluminate Chemical analysis Nuclear electric power generation Spatial discrimination Field strength Enthalten in Journal of microscopy Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1969 267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192 (DE-627)129550426 (DE-600)219263-9 (DE-576)015003884 0022-2720 nnns volume:267 year:2017 number:2 pages:176-192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12558 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.12558/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1919652861 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2219 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 267 2017 2 176-192 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/jmi.12558 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1995849987 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995849987 (PRQ)p1338-9e92d04aa828a9b2ea977b52b99c20a6eae7792f1b289598ba67d041d0f300170 (KEY)0031376920170000267000200176enhancedspatialresolutioninvectorpotentialphotoele DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 DE-600 BIODIV fid BROWNING, R verfasserin aut Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution. Nutzungsrecht: 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society Materials microanalysis VPPEM photoelectron microscopy Electron energy Calcium Thermodynamics Light (illumination) Photoelectrons Spatial resolution Image enhancement Orbits Mathematical analysis Magnetic fields Binding energy Energy Aluminum Microscopy X rays Cyclotrons Low energy Calcium base alloys Calcium aluminate Chemical analysis Nuclear electric power generation Spatial discrimination Field strength Enthalten in Journal of microscopy Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1969 267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192 (DE-627)129550426 (DE-600)219263-9 (DE-576)015003884 0022-2720 nnns volume:267 year:2017 number:2 pages:176-192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12558 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.12558/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1919652861 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2219 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 267 2017 2 176-192 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1111/jmi.12558 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1995849987 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995849987 (PRQ)p1338-9e92d04aa828a9b2ea977b52b99c20a6eae7792f1b289598ba67d041d0f300170 (KEY)0031376920170000267000200176enhancedspatialresolutioninvectorpotentialphotoele DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 DE-600 BIODIV fid BROWNING, R verfasserin aut Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution. Nutzungsrecht: 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society Materials microanalysis VPPEM photoelectron microscopy Electron energy Calcium Thermodynamics Light (illumination) Photoelectrons Spatial resolution Image enhancement Orbits Mathematical analysis Magnetic fields Binding energy Energy Aluminum Microscopy X rays Cyclotrons Low energy Calcium base alloys Calcium aluminate Chemical analysis Nuclear electric power generation Spatial discrimination Field strength Enthalten in Journal of microscopy Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1969 267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192 (DE-627)129550426 (DE-600)219263-9 (DE-576)015003884 0022-2720 nnns volume:267 year:2017 number:2 pages:176-192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12558 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.12558/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1919652861 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2219 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 267 2017 2 176-192 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1111/jmi.12558 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1995849987 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995849987 (PRQ)p1338-9e92d04aa828a9b2ea977b52b99c20a6eae7792f1b289598ba67d041d0f300170 (KEY)0031376920170000267000200176enhancedspatialresolutioninvectorpotentialphotoele DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 DE-600 BIODIV fid BROWNING, R verfasserin aut Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution. Nutzungsrecht: 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society Materials microanalysis VPPEM photoelectron microscopy Electron energy Calcium Thermodynamics Light (illumination) Photoelectrons Spatial resolution Image enhancement Orbits Mathematical analysis Magnetic fields Binding energy Energy Aluminum Microscopy X rays Cyclotrons Low energy Calcium base alloys Calcium aluminate Chemical analysis Nuclear electric power generation Spatial discrimination Field strength Enthalten in Journal of microscopy Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1969 267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192 (DE-627)129550426 (DE-600)219263-9 (DE-576)015003884 0022-2720 nnns volume:267 year:2017 number:2 pages:176-192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12558 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.12558/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1919652861 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2219 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 267 2017 2 176-192 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of microscopy 267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192 volume:267 year:2017 number:2 pages:176-192 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of microscopy 267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192 volume:267 year:2017 number:2 pages:176-192 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Materials microanalysis VPPEM photoelectron microscopy Electron energy Calcium Thermodynamics Light (illumination) Photoelectrons Spatial resolution Image enhancement Orbits Mathematical analysis Magnetic fields Binding energy Energy Aluminum Microscopy X rays Cyclotrons Low energy Calcium base alloys Calcium aluminate Chemical analysis Nuclear electric power generation Spatial discrimination Field strength |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of microscopy |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
BROWNING, R @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129550426 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
OLC1995849987 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1995849987</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230715063443.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170901s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/jmi.12558</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1995849987</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1995849987</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1338-9e92d04aa828a9b2ea977b52b99c20a6eae7792f1b289598ba67d041d0f300170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0031376920170000267000200176enhancedspatialresolutioninvectorpotentialphotoele</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BROWNING, R</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Materials microanalysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">VPPEM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">photoelectron microscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electron energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Calcium</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Thermodynamics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Light (illumination)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Photoelectrons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spatial resolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Image enhancement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Orbits</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mathematical analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Magnetic fields</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Binding energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aluminum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Microscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">X rays</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cyclotrons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Low energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Calcium base alloys</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Calcium aluminate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear electric power generation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spatial discrimination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Field strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of microscopy</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1969</subfield><subfield code="g">267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129550426</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)219263-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015003884</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-2720</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:267</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:176-192</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12558</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.12558/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1919652861</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">267</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">176-192</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
BROWNING, R |
spellingShingle |
BROWNING, R ddc 570 fid BIODIV misc Materials microanalysis misc VPPEM misc photoelectron microscopy misc Electron energy misc Calcium misc Thermodynamics misc Light (illumination) misc Photoelectrons misc Spatial resolution misc Image enhancement misc Orbits misc Mathematical analysis misc Magnetic fields misc Binding energy misc Energy misc Aluminum misc Microscopy misc X rays misc Cyclotrons misc Low energy misc Calcium base alloys misc Calcium aluminate misc Chemical analysis misc Nuclear electric power generation misc Spatial discrimination misc Field strength Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy |
authorStr |
BROWNING, R |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129550426 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0022-2720 |
topic_title |
570 DE-600 BIODIV fid Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy Materials microanalysis VPPEM photoelectron microscopy Electron energy Calcium Thermodynamics Light (illumination) Photoelectrons Spatial resolution Image enhancement Orbits Mathematical analysis Magnetic fields Binding energy Energy Aluminum Microscopy X rays Cyclotrons Low energy Calcium base alloys Calcium aluminate Chemical analysis Nuclear electric power generation Spatial discrimination Field strength |
topic |
ddc 570 fid BIODIV misc Materials microanalysis misc VPPEM misc photoelectron microscopy misc Electron energy misc Calcium misc Thermodynamics misc Light (illumination) misc Photoelectrons misc Spatial resolution misc Image enhancement misc Orbits misc Mathematical analysis misc Magnetic fields misc Binding energy misc Energy misc Aluminum misc Microscopy misc X rays misc Cyclotrons misc Low energy misc Calcium base alloys misc Calcium aluminate misc Chemical analysis misc Nuclear electric power generation misc Spatial discrimination misc Field strength |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 fid BIODIV misc Materials microanalysis misc VPPEM misc photoelectron microscopy misc Electron energy misc Calcium misc Thermodynamics misc Light (illumination) misc Photoelectrons misc Spatial resolution misc Image enhancement misc Orbits misc Mathematical analysis misc Magnetic fields misc Binding energy misc Energy misc Aluminum misc Microscopy misc X rays misc Cyclotrons misc Low energy misc Calcium base alloys misc Calcium aluminate misc Chemical analysis misc Nuclear electric power generation misc Spatial discrimination misc Field strength |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 fid BIODIV misc Materials microanalysis misc VPPEM misc photoelectron microscopy misc Electron energy misc Calcium misc Thermodynamics misc Light (illumination) misc Photoelectrons misc Spatial resolution misc Image enhancement misc Orbits misc Mathematical analysis misc Magnetic fields misc Binding energy misc Energy misc Aluminum misc Microscopy misc X rays misc Cyclotrons misc Low energy misc Calcium base alloys misc Calcium aluminate misc Chemical analysis misc Nuclear electric power generation misc Spatial discrimination misc Field strength |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of microscopy |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129550426 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of microscopy |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129550426 (DE-600)219263-9 (DE-576)015003884 |
title |
Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1995849987 (DE-599)GBVOLC1995849987 (PRQ)p1338-9e92d04aa828a9b2ea977b52b99c20a6eae7792f1b289598ba67d041d0f300170 (KEY)0031376920170000267000200176enhancedspatialresolutioninvectorpotentialphotoele |
title_full |
Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy |
author_sort |
BROWNING, R |
journal |
Journal of microscopy |
journalStr |
Journal of microscopy |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
176 |
author_browse |
BROWNING, R |
container_volume |
267 |
class |
570 DE-600 BIODIV fid |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
BROWNING, R |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/jmi.12558 |
dewey-full |
570 |
title_sort |
enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy |
title_auth |
Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy |
abstract |
The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution. |
abstractGer |
The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2219 GBV_ILN_4012 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12558 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.12558/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1919652861 |
remote_bool |
false |
ppnlink |
129550426 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1111/jmi.12558 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T22:57:17.308Z |
_version_ |
1803600461624770560 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1995849987</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230715063443.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170901s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/jmi.12558</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1995849987</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1995849987</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1338-9e92d04aa828a9b2ea977b52b99c20a6eae7792f1b289598ba67d041d0f300170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0031376920170000267000200176enhancedspatialresolutioninvectorpotentialphotoele</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BROWNING, R</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Enhanced spatial resolution in vector potential photoelectron microscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The spatial resolution of the vector potential photoelectron microscope is determined by the maximum size of the cyclotron orbits of the imaged electrons at the surface of a sample. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy given the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. Vector potential photoelectron microscopy (VPPEM) is a new method being developed for the chemical analysis of the surface and near surface of advanced materials at the mesoscopic scale (10–100 nm). The microscope is a full field imaging technique used with a monochromatic synchrotron x‐ray light source illuminating a sample to produce photoelectrons. The monochromatic x‐ray energy is scanned over a region that includes the binding energies of atomic core electrons of the sample. As the x‐ray energy is scanned, an increase in absorption of the x‐rays at the core electron‐binding energy edge causes an increase in the photoelectron yield. The exact position of the core edge energy gives detailed information about the chemical state of the atoms in the sample. When the x‐ray energy is scanned, a stack of images from each step in the x‐ray scan is collected. This image stack is processed to give a picture of the chemical distribution of the sample. The sample sits in a strong magnetic field. The spatial resolution of the VPPEM is determined by the size of the cyclotron orbits of the photoelectrons at the surface of the sample. A strong magnetic field and low‐energy electrons (1.0 eV) give the highest spatial resolution. These low‐energy electrons are energy analyzed by the VPPEM and imaged. It is straightforward to calculate the spatial resolution for any imaged electron energy for the magnetic field strength. However, in low‐energy secondary photoelectron images from an aluminium–calcium metal matrix alloy, we find the apparent spatial resolution of the chemical‐specific images is significantly higher than expected. A possible explanation for the enhanced resolution is that the low‐energy cyclotron orbits are distorted when passing from one area of work function to another and the image is dependent on the surface field distribution. This opens the possibility that the chemical state and the related surface potential can be simultaneously imaged at high spatial resolution.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Materials microanalysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">VPPEM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">photoelectron microscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electron energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Calcium</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Thermodynamics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Light (illumination)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Photoelectrons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spatial resolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Image enhancement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Orbits</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mathematical analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Magnetic fields</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Binding energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aluminum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Microscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">X rays</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cyclotrons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Low energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Calcium base alloys</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Calcium aluminate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear electric power generation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spatial discrimination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Field strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of microscopy</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1969</subfield><subfield code="g">267(2017), 2, Seite 176-192</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129550426</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)219263-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015003884</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-2720</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:267</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:176-192</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12558</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.12558/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1919652861</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">267</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">176-192</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4001293 |