Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity
Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, eviden...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
O'Leary, Timothy M [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 by the National Council on Measurement in Education |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
interpretability of score reports |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Educational measurement - Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982, 36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:36 ; year:2017 ; number:2 ; pages:16-23 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/emip.12141 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1996161989 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1996161989 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230715064743.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170901s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/emip.12141 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170901 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1996161989 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1996161989 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)p1301-30ec7f57dc7c0a3c482f53d0670adda2ae5dd442bbfa5faa7bf9fd4533d3eb600 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0134678420170000036000200016actualinterpretationsanduseofscoresasaspectsofvali | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 370 |a 150 |q DNB |
| 100 | 1 | |a O'Leary, Timothy M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 by the National Council on Measurement in Education | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a validity evidence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a interpretability of score reports | |
| 650 | 4 | |a score reports | |
| 650 | 4 | |a validation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a validity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Educational evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Educational tests & measurements | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Validity | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hattie, John A. C |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Griffin, Patrick |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Educational measurement |d Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982 |g 36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23 |w (DE-627)168618389 |w (DE-600)785138-8 |w (DE-576)053004507 |x 0731-1745 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:16-23 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12141 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12141/abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1929749234 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-BIF | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 36 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 16-23 | ||
| author_variant |
t m o tm tmo |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:07311745:2017----::culnepeainadsosoeaa |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1111/emip.12141 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1996161989 (DE-599)GBVOLC1996161989 (PRQ)p1301-30ec7f57dc7c0a3c482f53d0670adda2ae5dd442bbfa5faa7bf9fd4533d3eb600 (KEY)0134678420170000036000200016actualinterpretationsanduseofscoresasaspectsofvali DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 DNB O'Leary, Timothy M verfasserin aut Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 by the National Council on Measurement in Education validity evidence interpretability of score reports score reports validation validity Educational evaluation Educational tests & measurements Validity Hattie, John A. C oth Griffin, Patrick oth Enthalten in Educational measurement Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982 36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23 (DE-627)168618389 (DE-600)785138-8 (DE-576)053004507 0731-1745 nnns volume:36 year:2017 number:2 pages:16-23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12141 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12141/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1929749234 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4012 AR 36 2017 2 16-23 |
| spelling |
10.1111/emip.12141 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1996161989 (DE-599)GBVOLC1996161989 (PRQ)p1301-30ec7f57dc7c0a3c482f53d0670adda2ae5dd442bbfa5faa7bf9fd4533d3eb600 (KEY)0134678420170000036000200016actualinterpretationsanduseofscoresasaspectsofvali DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 DNB O'Leary, Timothy M verfasserin aut Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 by the National Council on Measurement in Education validity evidence interpretability of score reports score reports validation validity Educational evaluation Educational tests & measurements Validity Hattie, John A. C oth Griffin, Patrick oth Enthalten in Educational measurement Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982 36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23 (DE-627)168618389 (DE-600)785138-8 (DE-576)053004507 0731-1745 nnns volume:36 year:2017 number:2 pages:16-23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12141 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12141/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1929749234 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4012 AR 36 2017 2 16-23 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/emip.12141 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1996161989 (DE-599)GBVOLC1996161989 (PRQ)p1301-30ec7f57dc7c0a3c482f53d0670adda2ae5dd442bbfa5faa7bf9fd4533d3eb600 (KEY)0134678420170000036000200016actualinterpretationsanduseofscoresasaspectsofvali DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 DNB O'Leary, Timothy M verfasserin aut Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 by the National Council on Measurement in Education validity evidence interpretability of score reports score reports validation validity Educational evaluation Educational tests & measurements Validity Hattie, John A. C oth Griffin, Patrick oth Enthalten in Educational measurement Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982 36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23 (DE-627)168618389 (DE-600)785138-8 (DE-576)053004507 0731-1745 nnns volume:36 year:2017 number:2 pages:16-23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12141 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12141/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1929749234 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4012 AR 36 2017 2 16-23 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/emip.12141 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1996161989 (DE-599)GBVOLC1996161989 (PRQ)p1301-30ec7f57dc7c0a3c482f53d0670adda2ae5dd442bbfa5faa7bf9fd4533d3eb600 (KEY)0134678420170000036000200016actualinterpretationsanduseofscoresasaspectsofvali DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 DNB O'Leary, Timothy M verfasserin aut Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 by the National Council on Measurement in Education validity evidence interpretability of score reports score reports validation validity Educational evaluation Educational tests & measurements Validity Hattie, John A. C oth Griffin, Patrick oth Enthalten in Educational measurement Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982 36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23 (DE-627)168618389 (DE-600)785138-8 (DE-576)053004507 0731-1745 nnns volume:36 year:2017 number:2 pages:16-23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12141 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12141/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1929749234 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4012 AR 36 2017 2 16-23 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/emip.12141 doi PQ20170901 (DE-627)OLC1996161989 (DE-599)GBVOLC1996161989 (PRQ)p1301-30ec7f57dc7c0a3c482f53d0670adda2ae5dd442bbfa5faa7bf9fd4533d3eb600 (KEY)0134678420170000036000200016actualinterpretationsanduseofscoresasaspectsofvali DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 370 150 DNB O'Leary, Timothy M verfasserin aut Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 by the National Council on Measurement in Education validity evidence interpretability of score reports score reports validation validity Educational evaluation Educational tests & measurements Validity Hattie, John A. C oth Griffin, Patrick oth Enthalten in Educational measurement Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982 36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23 (DE-627)168618389 (DE-600)785138-8 (DE-576)053004507 0731-1745 nnns volume:36 year:2017 number:2 pages:16-23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12141 Volltext http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12141/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1929749234 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4012 AR 36 2017 2 16-23 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Educational measurement 36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23 volume:36 year:2017 number:2 pages:16-23 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Educational measurement 36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23 volume:36 year:2017 number:2 pages:16-23 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
validity evidence interpretability of score reports score reports validation validity Educational evaluation Educational tests & measurements Validity |
| dewey-raw |
370 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Educational measurement |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
O'Leary, Timothy M @@aut@@ Hattie, John A. C @@oth@@ Griffin, Patrick @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
168618389 |
| dewey-sort |
3370 |
| id |
OLC1996161989 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1996161989</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230715064743.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170901s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/emip.12141</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1996161989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1996161989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1301-30ec7f57dc7c0a3c482f53d0670adda2ae5dd442bbfa5faa7bf9fd4533d3eb600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0134678420170000036000200016actualinterpretationsanduseofscoresasaspectsofvali</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O'Leary, Timothy M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 by the National Council on Measurement in Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">validity evidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interpretability of score reports</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">score reports</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">validation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">validity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Educational evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Educational tests & measurements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Validity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hattie, John A. C</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Griffin, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Educational measurement</subfield><subfield code="d">Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168618389</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)785138-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)053004507</subfield><subfield code="x">0731-1745</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12141</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12141/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1929749234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BIF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">16-23</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
O'Leary, Timothy M |
| spellingShingle |
O'Leary, Timothy M ddc 370 misc validity evidence misc interpretability of score reports misc score reports misc validation misc validity misc Educational evaluation misc Educational tests & measurements misc Validity Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity |
| authorStr |
O'Leary, Timothy M |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)168618389 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
370 - Education 150 - Psychology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0731-1745 |
| topic_title |
370 150 DNB Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity validity evidence interpretability of score reports score reports validation validity Educational evaluation Educational tests & measurements Validity |
| topic |
ddc 370 misc validity evidence misc interpretability of score reports misc score reports misc validation misc validity misc Educational evaluation misc Educational tests & measurements misc Validity |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 370 misc validity evidence misc interpretability of score reports misc score reports misc validation misc validity misc Educational evaluation misc Educational tests & measurements misc Validity |
| topic_browse |
ddc 370 misc validity evidence misc interpretability of score reports misc score reports misc validation misc validity misc Educational evaluation misc Educational tests & measurements misc Validity |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
j a c h jac jach p g pg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Educational measurement |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
168618389 |
| dewey-tens |
370 - Education 150 - Psychology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Educational measurement |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)168618389 (DE-600)785138-8 (DE-576)053004507 |
| title |
Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1996161989 (DE-599)GBVOLC1996161989 (PRQ)p1301-30ec7f57dc7c0a3c482f53d0670adda2ae5dd442bbfa5faa7bf9fd4533d3eb600 (KEY)0134678420170000036000200016actualinterpretationsanduseofscoresasaspectsofvali |
| title_full |
Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity |
| author_sort |
O'Leary, Timothy M |
| journal |
Educational measurement |
| journalStr |
Educational measurement |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
16 |
| author_browse |
O'Leary, Timothy M |
| container_volume |
36 |
| class |
370 150 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
O'Leary, Timothy M |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/emip.12141 |
| dewey-full |
370 150 |
| title_sort |
actual interpretations and use of scores as aspects of validity |
| title_auth |
Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity |
| abstract |
Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm. |
| abstractGer |
Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12141 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12141/abstract https://search.proquest.com/docview/1929749234 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Hattie, John A. C Griffin, Patrick |
| author2Str |
Hattie, John A. C Griffin, Patrick |
| ppnlink |
168618389 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1111/emip.12141 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:01:40.638Z |
| _version_ |
1803604512620937216 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1996161989</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230715064743.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170901s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/emip.12141</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20170901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1996161989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1996161989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1301-30ec7f57dc7c0a3c482f53d0670adda2ae5dd442bbfa5faa7bf9fd4533d3eb600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0134678420170000036000200016actualinterpretationsanduseofscoresasaspectsofvali</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O'Leary, Timothy M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Actual Interpretations and Use of Scores as Aspects of Validity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Validity is the most fundamental consideration in test development. Understandably, much time, effort, and money is spent in its pursuit. Central to the modern conception of validity are the interpretations made, and uses planned, on the basis of test scores. There is, unfortunately, however, evidence that test users have difficulty understanding scores as intended. That is, although the proposed interpretations and use of test scores might be theoretically valid they might never come to be because the meaning of the message is lost in translation. This necessitates pause. It is almost absurd to think that the intended interpretations and uses of test scores might fail because there is a lack of alignment with the actual interpretations made and uses enacted by the audience. Despite this, there has only recently been contributions to the literature regarding the interpretability of score reports, the mechanisms by which scores are communicated to their audience, and their relevance to validity. These contributions have focused upon linking, through evidence, the intended interpretation and use with the actual interpretations being made and actions being planned by score users. This article reviews the current conception of validity, validation, and validity evidence with the goal of positioning the emerging notion of validity of usage within the current paradigm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 by the National Council on Measurement in Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">validity evidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interpretability of score reports</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">score reports</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">validation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">validity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Educational evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Educational tests & measurements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Validity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hattie, John A. C</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Griffin, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Educational measurement</subfield><subfield code="d">Malden, Mass. [u.a.] : Wiley, 1982</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2017), 2, Seite 16-23</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)168618389</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)785138-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)053004507</subfield><subfield code="x">0731-1745</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12141</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12141/abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1929749234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BIF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">16-23</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399414 |