Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward
We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supporte...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Parker, Stacey L [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Taylor & Francis 2017 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Human performance - Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1988, 30(2017), 4, Seite 169 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:30 ; year:2017 ; number:4 ; pages:169 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1997994259 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1997994259 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211209080314.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 171125s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20171228 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1997994259 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1997994259 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)i1492-1ddbfb6cd791d454f63cbf3ffb773adf20b727d168b0cebcc595a90eafa245f0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0166941920170000030000400169usingstressandresourcetheoriestoexaminetheincentiv | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 150 |a 370 |a 650 |q DNB |
100 | 1 | |a Parker, Stacey L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Taylor & Francis 2017 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Compensation | |
650 | 4 | |a Incentives | |
650 | 4 | |a Motivation | |
650 | 4 | |a Human factors research | |
700 | 1 | |a Jimmieson, Nerina L |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Techakesari, Pirathat |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Human performance |d Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1988 |g 30(2017), 4, Seite 169 |w (DE-627)130842583 |w (DE-600)1021644-3 |w (DE-576)026320630 |x 0895-9285 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g pages:169 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1945080843 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PSY | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-SPO | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4598 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 30 |j 2017 |e 4 |h 169 |
author_variant |
s l p sl slp |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:08959285:2017----::snsrsadeorehoisoxmntenetvefcsfprom |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1997994259 (DE-599)GBVOLC1997994259 (PRQ)i1492-1ddbfb6cd791d454f63cbf3ffb773adf20b727d168b0cebcc595a90eafa245f0 (KEY)0166941920170000030000400169usingstressandresourcetheoriestoexaminetheincentiv DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 650 DNB Parker, Stacey L verfasserin aut Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Taylor & Francis 2017 Compensation Incentives Motivation Human factors research Jimmieson, Nerina L oth Techakesari, Pirathat oth Enthalten in Human performance Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1988 30(2017), 4, Seite 169 (DE-627)130842583 (DE-600)1021644-3 (DE-576)026320630 0895-9285 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1945080843 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PSY SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4598 AR 30 2017 4 169 |
spelling |
10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1997994259 (DE-599)GBVOLC1997994259 (PRQ)i1492-1ddbfb6cd791d454f63cbf3ffb773adf20b727d168b0cebcc595a90eafa245f0 (KEY)0166941920170000030000400169usingstressandresourcetheoriestoexaminetheincentiv DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 650 DNB Parker, Stacey L verfasserin aut Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Taylor & Francis 2017 Compensation Incentives Motivation Human factors research Jimmieson, Nerina L oth Techakesari, Pirathat oth Enthalten in Human performance Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1988 30(2017), 4, Seite 169 (DE-627)130842583 (DE-600)1021644-3 (DE-576)026320630 0895-9285 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1945080843 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PSY SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4598 AR 30 2017 4 169 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1997994259 (DE-599)GBVOLC1997994259 (PRQ)i1492-1ddbfb6cd791d454f63cbf3ffb773adf20b727d168b0cebcc595a90eafa245f0 (KEY)0166941920170000030000400169usingstressandresourcetheoriestoexaminetheincentiv DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 650 DNB Parker, Stacey L verfasserin aut Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Taylor & Francis 2017 Compensation Incentives Motivation Human factors research Jimmieson, Nerina L oth Techakesari, Pirathat oth Enthalten in Human performance Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1988 30(2017), 4, Seite 169 (DE-627)130842583 (DE-600)1021644-3 (DE-576)026320630 0895-9285 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1945080843 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PSY SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4598 AR 30 2017 4 169 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1997994259 (DE-599)GBVOLC1997994259 (PRQ)i1492-1ddbfb6cd791d454f63cbf3ffb773adf20b727d168b0cebcc595a90eafa245f0 (KEY)0166941920170000030000400169usingstressandresourcetheoriestoexaminetheincentiv DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 650 DNB Parker, Stacey L verfasserin aut Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Taylor & Francis 2017 Compensation Incentives Motivation Human factors research Jimmieson, Nerina L oth Techakesari, Pirathat oth Enthalten in Human performance Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1988 30(2017), 4, Seite 169 (DE-627)130842583 (DE-600)1021644-3 (DE-576)026320630 0895-9285 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1945080843 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PSY SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4598 AR 30 2017 4 169 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1997994259 (DE-599)GBVOLC1997994259 (PRQ)i1492-1ddbfb6cd791d454f63cbf3ffb773adf20b727d168b0cebcc595a90eafa245f0 (KEY)0166941920170000030000400169usingstressandresourcetheoriestoexaminetheincentiv DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 370 650 DNB Parker, Stacey L verfasserin aut Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Taylor & Francis 2017 Compensation Incentives Motivation Human factors research Jimmieson, Nerina L oth Techakesari, Pirathat oth Enthalten in Human performance Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1988 30(2017), 4, Seite 169 (DE-627)130842583 (DE-600)1021644-3 (DE-576)026320630 0895-9285 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1945080843 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PSY SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4598 AR 30 2017 4 169 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Human performance 30(2017), 4, Seite 169 volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:169 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Human performance 30(2017), 4, Seite 169 volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:169 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Compensation Incentives Motivation Human factors research |
dewey-raw |
150 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Human performance |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Parker, Stacey L @@aut@@ Jimmieson, Nerina L @@oth@@ Techakesari, Pirathat @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130842583 |
dewey-sort |
3150 |
id |
OLC1997994259 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1997994259</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20211209080314.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171125s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1997994259</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1997994259</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1492-1ddbfb6cd791d454f63cbf3ffb773adf20b727d168b0cebcc595a90eafa245f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0166941920170000030000400169usingstressandresourcetheoriestoexaminetheincentiv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parker, Stacey L</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Taylor & Francis 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compensation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Incentives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Motivation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human factors research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jimmieson, Nerina L</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Techakesari, Pirathat</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Human performance</subfield><subfield code="d">Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2017), 4, Seite 169</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130842583</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1021644-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)026320630</subfield><subfield code="x">0895-9285</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:169</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1945080843</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PSY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SPO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">169</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Parker, Stacey L |
spellingShingle |
Parker, Stacey L ddc 150 misc Compensation misc Incentives misc Motivation misc Human factors research Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward |
authorStr |
Parker, Stacey L |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130842583 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
150 - Psychology 370 - Education 650 - Management & auxiliary services |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0895-9285 |
topic_title |
150 370 650 DNB Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward Compensation Incentives Motivation Human factors research |
topic |
ddc 150 misc Compensation misc Incentives misc Motivation misc Human factors research |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 150 misc Compensation misc Incentives misc Motivation misc Human factors research |
topic_browse |
ddc 150 misc Compensation misc Incentives misc Motivation misc Human factors research |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
n l j nl nlj p t pt |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Human performance |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130842583 |
dewey-tens |
150 - Psychology 370 - Education 650 - Management & public relations |
hierarchy_top_title |
Human performance |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130842583 (DE-600)1021644-3 (DE-576)026320630 |
title |
Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1997994259 (DE-599)GBVOLC1997994259 (PRQ)i1492-1ddbfb6cd791d454f63cbf3ffb773adf20b727d168b0cebcc595a90eafa245f0 (KEY)0166941920170000030000400169usingstressandresourcetheoriestoexaminetheincentiv |
title_full |
Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward |
author_sort |
Parker, Stacey L |
journal |
Human performance |
journalStr |
Human performance |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
169 |
author_browse |
Parker, Stacey L |
container_volume |
30 |
class |
150 370 650 DNB |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Parker, Stacey L |
doi_str_mv |
10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 |
dewey-full |
150 370 650 |
title_sort |
using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward |
title_auth |
Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward |
abstract |
We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources. |
abstractGer |
We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources. |
abstract_unstemmed |
We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PSY SSG-OLC-SPO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4598 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1945080843 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Jimmieson, Nerina L Techakesari, Pirathat |
author2Str |
Jimmieson, Nerina L Techakesari, Pirathat |
ppnlink |
130842583 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T04:08:45.226Z |
_version_ |
1803620057326026752 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1997994259</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20211209080314.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171125s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1997994259</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1997994259</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1492-1ddbfb6cd791d454f63cbf3ffb773adf20b727d168b0cebcc595a90eafa245f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0166941920170000030000400169usingstressandresourcetheoriestoexaminetheincentiv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parker, Stacey L</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Using stress and resource theories to examine the incentive effects of a performance-based extrinsic reward</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We expected a positive boosting effect of a performance-based extrinsic reward on motivation and performance for those with higher control-related resources (i.e., perceived task control and trait self-control) and a positive compensating effect for those who lacked these resources. Study 1 supported compensation. Those with lower resources experienced a beneficial effect of reward on motivation and performance (i.e., compared to no reward). In Study 2, coping was examined as a mechanism. Again, reward compensated for lower resources, enhancing motivation, and performance due to enhanced coping. For those with higher resources, reward boosted motivation and performance due to coping. Thus, the interactive effects of reward and resources are paradoxical: higher resources can maximize the utility of a reward, but reward can also compensate for low resources.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Taylor & Francis 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compensation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Incentives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Motivation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human factors research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jimmieson, Nerina L</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Techakesari, Pirathat</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Human performance</subfield><subfield code="d">Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2017), 4, Seite 169</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130842583</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1021644-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)026320630</subfield><subfield code="x">0895-9285</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:169</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08959285.2017.1347174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1945080843</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PSY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SPO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">169</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4015245 |