Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States
In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatu...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Roffey, Roger [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) 2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The journal of Slavic military studies - Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1993, 30(2017), 4, Seite 521 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:30 ; year:2017 ; number:4 ; pages:521 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1998022358 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1998022358 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230512230024.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 171125s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20171228 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1998022358 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1998022358 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)i1134-a81a6159ddf4937c405db8cf71bcd516b731f29e7ffb2ba514e13b4cc5de2e3f0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0173047920170000030000400521biologicalweaponsallegationsarussianpropagandatool | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 320 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 89.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Roffey, Roger |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) 2017 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Biological weapons | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Funding | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research and development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Laboratories | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Threat | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Allegations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biological & chemical weapons | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Weapons | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Generals | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biological warfare | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Weapons development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mass media | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Propaganda | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tunemalm, Anna-Karin |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of Slavic military studies |d Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1993 |g 30(2017), 4, Seite 521 |w (DE-627)171098293 |w (DE-600)1151372-X |w (DE-576)034203176 |x 1351-8046 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g pages:521 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1958202504 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-POL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-OEU | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-HIS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ZGE | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 89.00 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 30 |j 2017 |e 4 |h 521 | ||
| author_variant |
r r rr |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13518046:2017----::ilgclepnalgtosrsinrpgnaoloeaiey |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
89.00 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1998022358 (DE-599)GBVOLC1998022358 (PRQ)i1134-a81a6159ddf4937c405db8cf71bcd516b731f29e7ffb2ba514e13b4cc5de2e3f0 (KEY)0173047920170000030000400521biologicalweaponsallegationsarussianpropagandatool DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.00 bkl Roffey, Roger verfasserin aut Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) 2017 Biological weapons Funding Research and development Laboratories International law Threat Allegations Biological & chemical weapons Weapons Generals Biological warfare Weapons development Mass media Propaganda Tunemalm, Anna-Karin oth Enthalten in The journal of Slavic military studies Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1993 30(2017), 4, Seite 521 (DE-627)171098293 (DE-600)1151372-X (DE-576)034203176 1351-8046 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1958202504 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-OEU SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-ZGE SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 89.00 AVZ AR 30 2017 4 521 |
| spelling |
10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1998022358 (DE-599)GBVOLC1998022358 (PRQ)i1134-a81a6159ddf4937c405db8cf71bcd516b731f29e7ffb2ba514e13b4cc5de2e3f0 (KEY)0173047920170000030000400521biologicalweaponsallegationsarussianpropagandatool DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.00 bkl Roffey, Roger verfasserin aut Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) 2017 Biological weapons Funding Research and development Laboratories International law Threat Allegations Biological & chemical weapons Weapons Generals Biological warfare Weapons development Mass media Propaganda Tunemalm, Anna-Karin oth Enthalten in The journal of Slavic military studies Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1993 30(2017), 4, Seite 521 (DE-627)171098293 (DE-600)1151372-X (DE-576)034203176 1351-8046 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1958202504 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-OEU SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-ZGE SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 89.00 AVZ AR 30 2017 4 521 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1998022358 (DE-599)GBVOLC1998022358 (PRQ)i1134-a81a6159ddf4937c405db8cf71bcd516b731f29e7ffb2ba514e13b4cc5de2e3f0 (KEY)0173047920170000030000400521biologicalweaponsallegationsarussianpropagandatool DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.00 bkl Roffey, Roger verfasserin aut Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) 2017 Biological weapons Funding Research and development Laboratories International law Threat Allegations Biological & chemical weapons Weapons Generals Biological warfare Weapons development Mass media Propaganda Tunemalm, Anna-Karin oth Enthalten in The journal of Slavic military studies Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1993 30(2017), 4, Seite 521 (DE-627)171098293 (DE-600)1151372-X (DE-576)034203176 1351-8046 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1958202504 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-OEU SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-ZGE SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 89.00 AVZ AR 30 2017 4 521 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1998022358 (DE-599)GBVOLC1998022358 (PRQ)i1134-a81a6159ddf4937c405db8cf71bcd516b731f29e7ffb2ba514e13b4cc5de2e3f0 (KEY)0173047920170000030000400521biologicalweaponsallegationsarussianpropagandatool DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.00 bkl Roffey, Roger verfasserin aut Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) 2017 Biological weapons Funding Research and development Laboratories International law Threat Allegations Biological & chemical weapons Weapons Generals Biological warfare Weapons development Mass media Propaganda Tunemalm, Anna-Karin oth Enthalten in The journal of Slavic military studies Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1993 30(2017), 4, Seite 521 (DE-627)171098293 (DE-600)1151372-X (DE-576)034203176 1351-8046 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1958202504 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-OEU SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-ZGE SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 89.00 AVZ AR 30 2017 4 521 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1998022358 (DE-599)GBVOLC1998022358 (PRQ)i1134-a81a6159ddf4937c405db8cf71bcd516b731f29e7ffb2ba514e13b4cc5de2e3f0 (KEY)0173047920170000030000400521biologicalweaponsallegationsarussianpropagandatool DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.00 bkl Roffey, Roger verfasserin aut Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed. Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) 2017 Biological weapons Funding Research and development Laboratories International law Threat Allegations Biological & chemical weapons Weapons Generals Biological warfare Weapons development Mass media Propaganda Tunemalm, Anna-Karin oth Enthalten in The journal of Slavic military studies Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1993 30(2017), 4, Seite 521 (DE-627)171098293 (DE-600)1151372-X (DE-576)034203176 1351-8046 nnns volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1958202504 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-OEU SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-ZGE SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 89.00 AVZ AR 30 2017 4 521 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The journal of Slavic military studies 30(2017), 4, Seite 521 volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:521 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The journal of Slavic military studies 30(2017), 4, Seite 521 volume:30 year:2017 number:4 pages:521 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Biological weapons Funding Research and development Laboratories International law Threat Allegations Biological & chemical weapons Weapons Generals Biological warfare Weapons development Mass media Propaganda |
| dewey-raw |
320 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The journal of Slavic military studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Roffey, Roger @@aut@@ Tunemalm, Anna-Karin @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
171098293 |
| dewey-sort |
3320 |
| id |
OLC1998022358 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1998022358</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230512230024.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171125s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1998022358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1998022358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1134-a81a6159ddf4937c405db8cf71bcd516b731f29e7ffb2ba514e13b4cc5de2e3f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0173047920170000030000400521biologicalweaponsallegationsarussianpropagandatool</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roffey, Roger</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biological weapons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Funding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research and development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laboratories</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Threat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Allegations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biological & chemical weapons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weapons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Generals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biological warfare</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weapons development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mass media</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Propaganda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tunemalm, Anna-Karin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of Slavic military studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2017), 4, Seite 521</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)171098293</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1151372-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)034203176</subfield><subfield code="x">1351-8046</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1958202504</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-OEU</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ZGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">521</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Roffey, Roger |
| spellingShingle |
Roffey, Roger ddc 320 bkl 89.00 misc Biological weapons misc Funding misc Research and development misc Laboratories misc International law misc Threat misc Allegations misc Biological & chemical weapons misc Weapons misc Generals misc Biological warfare misc Weapons development misc Mass media misc Propaganda Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States |
| authorStr |
Roffey, Roger |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)171098293 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
320 - Political science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1351-8046 |
| topic_title |
320 DNB 89.00 bkl Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States Biological weapons Funding Research and development Laboratories International law Threat Allegations Biological & chemical weapons Weapons Generals Biological warfare Weapons development Mass media Propaganda |
| topic |
ddc 320 bkl 89.00 misc Biological weapons misc Funding misc Research and development misc Laboratories misc International law misc Threat misc Allegations misc Biological & chemical weapons misc Weapons misc Generals misc Biological warfare misc Weapons development misc Mass media misc Propaganda |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 320 bkl 89.00 misc Biological weapons misc Funding misc Research and development misc Laboratories misc International law misc Threat misc Allegations misc Biological & chemical weapons misc Weapons misc Generals misc Biological warfare misc Weapons development misc Mass media misc Propaganda |
| topic_browse |
ddc 320 bkl 89.00 misc Biological weapons misc Funding misc Research and development misc Laboratories misc International law misc Threat misc Allegations misc Biological & chemical weapons misc Weapons misc Generals misc Biological warfare misc Weapons development misc Mass media misc Propaganda |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
a k t akt |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The journal of Slavic military studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
171098293 |
| dewey-tens |
320 - Political science |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The journal of Slavic military studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)171098293 (DE-600)1151372-X (DE-576)034203176 |
| title |
Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1998022358 (DE-599)GBVOLC1998022358 (PRQ)i1134-a81a6159ddf4937c405db8cf71bcd516b731f29e7ffb2ba514e13b4cc5de2e3f0 (KEY)0173047920170000030000400521biologicalweaponsallegationsarussianpropagandatool |
| title_full |
Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States |
| author_sort |
Roffey, Roger |
| journal |
The journal of Slavic military studies |
| journalStr |
The journal of Slavic military studies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
521 |
| author_browse |
Roffey, Roger |
| container_volume |
30 |
| class |
320 DNB 89.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Roffey, Roger |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 |
| dewey-full |
320 |
| title_sort |
biological weapons allegations: a russian propaganda tool to negatively implicate the united states |
| title_auth |
Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States |
| abstract |
In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed. |
| abstractGer |
In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-OEU SSG-OLC-HIS SSG-OLC-ZGE SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1958202504 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Tunemalm, Anna-Karin |
| author2Str |
Tunemalm, Anna-Karin |
| ppnlink |
171098293 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T04:12:33.041Z |
| _version_ |
1803620296207368192 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1998022358</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230512230024.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171125s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1998022358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1998022358</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1134-a81a6159ddf4937c405db8cf71bcd516b731f29e7ffb2ba514e13b4cc5de2e3f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0173047920170000030000400521biologicalweaponsallegationsarussianpropagandatool</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roffey, Roger</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biological Weapons Allegations: A Russian Propaganda Tool to Negatively Implicate the United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, biological weapons issues have repeatedly been raised by Russian officials and state-controlled media. Considering that biological weapons development and the use thereof are banned by international law, to insinuate that another state is engaged in activities with offensive signatures is politically sensitive. What are the underlying motives for raising these issues? Is Russia using anti-American propaganda in the biosecurity arena as a tool to discredit the United States for general political reasons, or is it used as a means for internal purposes to motivate increased funding for advanced biodefense research and development? A need for additional funding is also in line with views of the Russian military and security doctrines where the threat from biological weapons is explicitly addressed. Russian discrediting is related to the US support of biosafety/biosecurity upgrades at biological laboratories in the former Soviet republics. This Russian stance toward the United States was also reflected in the run-up to the 8th Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) in 2016, supported by statements of officials indicating that Russia is threatened by US activities in the biological weapons area. This type of unsubstantiated accusations has not been helpful when attempts were badly needed to make progress in the BTWC context. Russian disinformation campaigns, in relation to biological weapons and possible underlying causes, are presented and discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2017 Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biological weapons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Funding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research and development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laboratories</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Threat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Allegations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biological & chemical weapons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weapons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Generals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biological warfare</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weapons development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mass media</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Propaganda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tunemalm, Anna-Karin</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of Slavic military studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2017), 4, Seite 521</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)171098293</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1151372-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)034203176</subfield><subfield code="x">1351-8046</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518046.2017.1377010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1958202504</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-OEU</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ZGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">521</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401288 |