Critical theory and the work–family articulation

We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article pr...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Ba’, Stefano [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2017

Rechteinformationen:	Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2017

Schlagwörter:	Subjectivity Family work relationship Emotions Sociology Social integration Marxism Family life Mediation Economic recession Critical theory Participation Sociology of work Family Capitalism Social reproduction

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Capital & class - London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1977, 41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:41 ; year:2017 ; number:3 ; pages:475-492

Links:	Volltext Link aufrufen Link aufrufen

DOI / URN:	10.1177/0309816817692119

Katalog-ID:	OLC1999051734

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC1999051734
003	DE-627
005	20220215195214.0
007	tu
008	171228s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1177/0309816817692119 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20171228
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC1999051734
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC1999051734
035			\|a (PRQ)c1369-d7775798626211d7d90b0b536452e6c775e2cbcec3cb5a5d084a9b9e4a18e68c0
035			\|a (KEY)0065475220170000041000300475criticaltheoryandtheworkfamilyarticulation
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 330 \|q DNB
084			\|a 83.22 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Ba’, Stefano \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Critical theory and the work–family articulation
264		1	\|c 2017
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures.
540			\|a Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2017
650		4	\|a Subjectivity
650		4	\|a Family work relationship
650		4	\|a Emotions
650		4	\|a Sociology
650		4	\|a Social integration
650		4	\|a Marxism
650		4	\|a Family life
650		4	\|a Mediation
650		4	\|a Economic recession
650		4	\|a Critical theory
650		4	\|a Participation
650		4	\|a Sociology of work
650		4	\|a Family
650		4	\|a Capitalism
650		4	\|a Social reproduction
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Capital & class \|d London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1977 \|g 41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492 \|w (DE-627)130479470 \|w (DE-600)751231-4 \|w (DE-576)9130479479 \|x 0309-8168 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:41 \|g year:2017 \|g number:3 \|g pages:475-492
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692119 \|3 Volltext
856	4	2	\|u http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309816817692119
856	4	2	\|u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977770325
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-WIW
912			\|a SSG-OLC-SOW
912			\|a GBV_ILN_21
912			\|a GBV_ILN_26
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4238
936	b	k	\|a 83.22 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 41 \|j 2017 \|e 3 \|h 475-492

Indexfelder

author_variant	s b sb
matchkey_str	article:03098168:2017----::rtclhoynteokaiy
hierarchy_sort_str	2017
bklnumber	83.22
publishDate	2017
allfields	10.1177/0309816817692119 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999051734 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999051734 (PRQ)c1369-d7775798626211d7d90b0b536452e6c775e2cbcec3cb5a5d084a9b9e4a18e68c0 (KEY)0065475220170000041000300475criticaltheoryandtheworkfamilyarticulation DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.22 bkl Ba’, Stefano verfasserin aut Critical theory and the work–family articulation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2017 Subjectivity Family work relationship Emotions Sociology Social integration Marxism Family life Mediation Economic recession Critical theory Participation Sociology of work Family Capitalism Social reproduction Enthalten in Capital & class London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1977 41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492 (DE-627)130479470 (DE-600)751231-4 (DE-576)9130479479 0309-8168 nnns volume:41 year:2017 number:3 pages:475-492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692119 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309816817692119 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977770325 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4238 83.22 AVZ AR 41 2017 3 475-492
spelling	10.1177/0309816817692119 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999051734 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999051734 (PRQ)c1369-d7775798626211d7d90b0b536452e6c775e2cbcec3cb5a5d084a9b9e4a18e68c0 (KEY)0065475220170000041000300475criticaltheoryandtheworkfamilyarticulation DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.22 bkl Ba’, Stefano verfasserin aut Critical theory and the work–family articulation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2017 Subjectivity Family work relationship Emotions Sociology Social integration Marxism Family life Mediation Economic recession Critical theory Participation Sociology of work Family Capitalism Social reproduction Enthalten in Capital & class London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1977 41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492 (DE-627)130479470 (DE-600)751231-4 (DE-576)9130479479 0309-8168 nnns volume:41 year:2017 number:3 pages:475-492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692119 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309816817692119 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977770325 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4238 83.22 AVZ AR 41 2017 3 475-492
allfields_unstemmed	10.1177/0309816817692119 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999051734 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999051734 (PRQ)c1369-d7775798626211d7d90b0b536452e6c775e2cbcec3cb5a5d084a9b9e4a18e68c0 (KEY)0065475220170000041000300475criticaltheoryandtheworkfamilyarticulation DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.22 bkl Ba’, Stefano verfasserin aut Critical theory and the work–family articulation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2017 Subjectivity Family work relationship Emotions Sociology Social integration Marxism Family life Mediation Economic recession Critical theory Participation Sociology of work Family Capitalism Social reproduction Enthalten in Capital & class London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1977 41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492 (DE-627)130479470 (DE-600)751231-4 (DE-576)9130479479 0309-8168 nnns volume:41 year:2017 number:3 pages:475-492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692119 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309816817692119 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977770325 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4238 83.22 AVZ AR 41 2017 3 475-492
allfieldsGer	10.1177/0309816817692119 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999051734 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999051734 (PRQ)c1369-d7775798626211d7d90b0b536452e6c775e2cbcec3cb5a5d084a9b9e4a18e68c0 (KEY)0065475220170000041000300475criticaltheoryandtheworkfamilyarticulation DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.22 bkl Ba’, Stefano verfasserin aut Critical theory and the work–family articulation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2017 Subjectivity Family work relationship Emotions Sociology Social integration Marxism Family life Mediation Economic recession Critical theory Participation Sociology of work Family Capitalism Social reproduction Enthalten in Capital & class London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1977 41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492 (DE-627)130479470 (DE-600)751231-4 (DE-576)9130479479 0309-8168 nnns volume:41 year:2017 number:3 pages:475-492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692119 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309816817692119 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977770325 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4238 83.22 AVZ AR 41 2017 3 475-492
allfieldsSound	10.1177/0309816817692119 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999051734 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999051734 (PRQ)c1369-d7775798626211d7d90b0b536452e6c775e2cbcec3cb5a5d084a9b9e4a18e68c0 (KEY)0065475220170000041000300475criticaltheoryandtheworkfamilyarticulation DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 DNB 83.22 bkl Ba’, Stefano verfasserin aut Critical theory and the work–family articulation 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures. Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2017 Subjectivity Family work relationship Emotions Sociology Social integration Marxism Family life Mediation Economic recession Critical theory Participation Sociology of work Family Capitalism Social reproduction Enthalten in Capital & class London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1977 41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492 (DE-627)130479470 (DE-600)751231-4 (DE-576)9130479479 0309-8168 nnns volume:41 year:2017 number:3 pages:475-492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692119 Volltext http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309816817692119 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977770325 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4238 83.22 AVZ AR 41 2017 3 475-492
language	English
source	Enthalten in Capital & class 41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492 volume:41 year:2017 number:3 pages:475-492
sourceStr	Enthalten in Capital & class 41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492 volume:41 year:2017 number:3 pages:475-492
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Subjectivity Family work relationship Emotions Sociology Social integration Marxism Family life Mediation Economic recession Critical theory Participation Sociology of work Family Capitalism Social reproduction
dewey-raw	330
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Capital & class
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Ba’, Stefano @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	130479470
dewey-sort	3330
id	OLC1999051734
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1999051734</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215195214.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171228s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1177/0309816817692119</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1999051734</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1999051734</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1369-d7775798626211d7d90b0b536452e6c775e2cbcec3cb5a5d084a9b9e4a18e68c0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0065475220170000041000300475criticaltheoryandtheworkfamilyarticulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.22</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ba’, Stefano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Critical theory and the work–family articulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Subjectivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family work relationship</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emotions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sociology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social integration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marxism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family life</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mediation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic recession</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Critical theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Participation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sociology of work</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Capitalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social reproduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Capital & class</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130479470</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)751231-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9130479479</subfield><subfield code="x">0309-8168</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:41</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:475-492</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692119</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309816817692119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977770325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4238</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.22</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">41</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">475-492</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Ba’, Stefano
spellingShingle	Ba’, Stefano ddc 330 bkl 83.22 misc Subjectivity misc Family work relationship misc Emotions misc Sociology misc Social integration misc Marxism misc Family life misc Mediation misc Economic recession misc Critical theory misc Participation misc Sociology of work misc Family misc Capitalism misc Social reproduction Critical theory and the work–family articulation
authorStr	Ba’, Stefano
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)130479470
format	Article
dewey-ones	330 - Economics
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0309-8168
topic_title	330 DNB 83.22 bkl Critical theory and the work–family articulation Subjectivity Family work relationship Emotions Sociology Social integration Marxism Family life Mediation Economic recession Critical theory Participation Sociology of work Family Capitalism Social reproduction
topic	ddc 330 bkl 83.22 misc Subjectivity misc Family work relationship misc Emotions misc Sociology misc Social integration misc Marxism misc Family life misc Mediation misc Economic recession misc Critical theory misc Participation misc Sociology of work misc Family misc Capitalism misc Social reproduction
topic_unstemmed	ddc 330 bkl 83.22 misc Subjectivity misc Family work relationship misc Emotions misc Sociology misc Social integration misc Marxism misc Family life misc Mediation misc Economic recession misc Critical theory misc Participation misc Sociology of work misc Family misc Capitalism misc Social reproduction
topic_browse	ddc 330 bkl 83.22 misc Subjectivity misc Family work relationship misc Emotions misc Sociology misc Social integration misc Marxism misc Family life misc Mediation misc Economic recession misc Critical theory misc Participation misc Sociology of work misc Family misc Capitalism misc Social reproduction
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Capital & class
hierarchy_parent_id	130479470
dewey-tens	330 - Economics
hierarchy_top_title	Capital & class
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)130479470 (DE-600)751231-4 (DE-576)9130479479
title	Critical theory and the work–family articulation
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC1999051734 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999051734 (PRQ)c1369-d7775798626211d7d90b0b536452e6c775e2cbcec3cb5a5d084a9b9e4a18e68c0 (KEY)0065475220170000041000300475criticaltheoryandtheworkfamilyarticulation
title_full	Critical theory and the work–family articulation
author_sort	Ba’, Stefano
journal	Capital & class
journalStr	Capital & class
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2017
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	475
author_browse	Ba’, Stefano
container_volume	41
class	330 DNB 83.22 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Ba’, Stefano
doi_str_mv	10.1177/0309816817692119
dewey-full	330
title_sort	critical theory and the work–family articulation
title_auth	Critical theory and the work–family articulation
abstract	We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures.
abstractGer	We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures.
abstract_unstemmed	We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4238
container_issue	3
title_short	Critical theory and the work–family articulation
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692119 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309816817692119 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977770325
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	130479470
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1177/0309816817692119
up_date	2024-07-04T06:16:22.084Z
_version_	1803628086110978048
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1999051734</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215195214.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171228s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1177/0309816817692119</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1999051734</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1999051734</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1369-d7775798626211d7d90b0b536452e6c775e2cbcec3cb5a5d084a9b9e4a18e68c0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0065475220170000041000300475criticaltheoryandtheworkfamilyarticulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">83.22</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ba’, Stefano</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Critical theory and the work–family articulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We are living in an era characterised by the repercussions of recession and austerity, and the fields of work and family are directly affected by historical changes, making the need for reformulating concepts used in the sociology of work and family quite apparent. In order to do so, this article proposes an approach inspired by Open Marxism and critical theory that will assess the contribution of specialised literature in the work–family articulation to advance original analyses and investigate relevant issues around social reproduction under capitalism. The tension between capitalism and contemporary forms of family will be framed through the concept of the dual nature of labour and family life, insofar as they entail both sensuous and abstract forms of human involvement – most notably abstract labour. Issues around the emotional patterns of family life and the mediation that families operate between ‘home’ and ‘work’ spheres will take centre stage. One of the main points is that the development of labour as abstract labour under capitalism marginalises family forms in terms of the mediation between the private and the public spheres, because it relies on a more direct social integration (or ‘synthesis’) of its subjects. However, members of families, as active subjects, create social forms and resist disruptions caused by socio-economic changes. In that sense, ‘subjectivity’ is thought to be a key concept to avoid thinking work and family as reified structures.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © The Author(s) 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Subjectivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family work relationship</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emotions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sociology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social integration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marxism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family life</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mediation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic recession</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Critical theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Participation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sociology of work</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Capitalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social reproduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Capital & class</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">41(2017), 3, Seite 475-492</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130479470</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)751231-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9130479479</subfield><subfield code="x">0309-8168</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:41</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:475-492</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692119</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309816817692119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977770325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4238</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">83.22</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">41</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">475-492</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399276

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Critical theory and the work–family articulation

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?