Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy
This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the e...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Emma Carmel [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Systematik: |
|
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Comparative European politics - Basingstoke : Macmillan, 2003, 15(2017), 5, Seite 771 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:15 ; year:2017 ; number:5 ; pages:771 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1999778731 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1999778731 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220214183648.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 171228s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20171228 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1999778731 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1999778731 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)p935-8872bfcc8909b5fafc282dfec9fe8d7ad021028866b3404c325c5fd34573718a0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0517850920170000015000500771reinterpretingknowledgeexpertiseandeugovernancethe | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 320 |q ZDB |
| 084 | |a MA 1000: |q AVZ |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 89.73 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Emma Carmel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Social science research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Scientific research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Corporations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Policy making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Investment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Governance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Security policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Politicians | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Comparative European politics |d Basingstoke : Macmillan, 2003 |g 15(2017), 5, Seite 771 |w (DE-627)363772049 |w (DE-600)2108689-8 |w (DE-576)120989913 |x 1472-4790 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2017 |g number:5 |g pages:771 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/1946300703 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-POL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_49 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 936 | r | v | |a MA 1000: |
| 936 | b | k | |a 89.73 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 15 |j 2017 |e 5 |h 771 | ||
| author_variant |
e c ec |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14724790:2017----::enepeignwegeprienegvracteaeoscaplc |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
89.73 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999778731 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999778731 (PRQ)p935-8872bfcc8909b5fafc282dfec9fe8d7ad021028866b3404c325c5fd34573718a0 (KEY)0517850920170000015000500771reinterpretingknowledgeexpertiseandeugovernancethe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 ZDB MA 1000: AVZ rvk 89.73 bkl Emma Carmel verfasserin aut Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed. Social science research Scientific research Corporations Policy making Research Investment Social policy Governance Security policy Politicians Enthalten in Comparative European politics Basingstoke : Macmillan, 2003 15(2017), 5, Seite 771 (DE-627)363772049 (DE-600)2108689-8 (DE-576)120989913 1472-4790 nnns volume:15 year:2017 number:5 pages:771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 Volltext https://search.proquest.com/docview/1946300703 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 MA 1000: 89.73 AVZ AR 15 2017 5 771 |
| spelling |
10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999778731 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999778731 (PRQ)p935-8872bfcc8909b5fafc282dfec9fe8d7ad021028866b3404c325c5fd34573718a0 (KEY)0517850920170000015000500771reinterpretingknowledgeexpertiseandeugovernancethe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 ZDB MA 1000: AVZ rvk 89.73 bkl Emma Carmel verfasserin aut Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed. Social science research Scientific research Corporations Policy making Research Investment Social policy Governance Security policy Politicians Enthalten in Comparative European politics Basingstoke : Macmillan, 2003 15(2017), 5, Seite 771 (DE-627)363772049 (DE-600)2108689-8 (DE-576)120989913 1472-4790 nnns volume:15 year:2017 number:5 pages:771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 Volltext https://search.proquest.com/docview/1946300703 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 MA 1000: 89.73 AVZ AR 15 2017 5 771 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999778731 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999778731 (PRQ)p935-8872bfcc8909b5fafc282dfec9fe8d7ad021028866b3404c325c5fd34573718a0 (KEY)0517850920170000015000500771reinterpretingknowledgeexpertiseandeugovernancethe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 ZDB MA 1000: AVZ rvk 89.73 bkl Emma Carmel verfasserin aut Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed. Social science research Scientific research Corporations Policy making Research Investment Social policy Governance Security policy Politicians Enthalten in Comparative European politics Basingstoke : Macmillan, 2003 15(2017), 5, Seite 771 (DE-627)363772049 (DE-600)2108689-8 (DE-576)120989913 1472-4790 nnns volume:15 year:2017 number:5 pages:771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 Volltext https://search.proquest.com/docview/1946300703 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 MA 1000: 89.73 AVZ AR 15 2017 5 771 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999778731 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999778731 (PRQ)p935-8872bfcc8909b5fafc282dfec9fe8d7ad021028866b3404c325c5fd34573718a0 (KEY)0517850920170000015000500771reinterpretingknowledgeexpertiseandeugovernancethe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 ZDB MA 1000: AVZ rvk 89.73 bkl Emma Carmel verfasserin aut Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed. Social science research Scientific research Corporations Policy making Research Investment Social policy Governance Security policy Politicians Enthalten in Comparative European politics Basingstoke : Macmillan, 2003 15(2017), 5, Seite 771 (DE-627)363772049 (DE-600)2108689-8 (DE-576)120989913 1472-4790 nnns volume:15 year:2017 number:5 pages:771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 Volltext https://search.proquest.com/docview/1946300703 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 MA 1000: 89.73 AVZ AR 15 2017 5 771 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 doi PQ20171228 (DE-627)OLC1999778731 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999778731 (PRQ)p935-8872bfcc8909b5fafc282dfec9fe8d7ad021028866b3404c325c5fd34573718a0 (KEY)0517850920170000015000500771reinterpretingknowledgeexpertiseandeugovernancethe DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 ZDB MA 1000: AVZ rvk 89.73 bkl Emma Carmel verfasserin aut Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed. Social science research Scientific research Corporations Policy making Research Investment Social policy Governance Security policy Politicians Enthalten in Comparative European politics Basingstoke : Macmillan, 2003 15(2017), 5, Seite 771 (DE-627)363772049 (DE-600)2108689-8 (DE-576)120989913 1472-4790 nnns volume:15 year:2017 number:5 pages:771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 Volltext https://search.proquest.com/docview/1946300703 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 MA 1000: 89.73 AVZ AR 15 2017 5 771 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Comparative European politics 15(2017), 5, Seite 771 volume:15 year:2017 number:5 pages:771 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Comparative European politics 15(2017), 5, Seite 771 volume:15 year:2017 number:5 pages:771 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Social science research Scientific research Corporations Policy making Research Investment Social policy Governance Security policy Politicians |
| dewey-raw |
320 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Comparative European politics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Emma Carmel @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
363772049 |
| dewey-sort |
3320 |
| id |
OLC1999778731 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1999778731</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214183648.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171228s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1999778731</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1999778731</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p935-8872bfcc8909b5fafc282dfec9fe8d7ad021028866b3404c325c5fd34573718a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0517850920170000015000500771reinterpretingknowledgeexpertiseandeugovernancethe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MA 1000:</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.73</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emma Carmel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social science research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Scientific research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corporations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policy making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politicians</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Comparative European politics</subfield><subfield code="d">Basingstoke : Macmillan, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2017), 5, Seite 771</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)363772049</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2108689-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)120989913</subfield><subfield code="x">1472-4790</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:771</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1946300703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">MA 1000:</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.73</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">771</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Emma Carmel |
| spellingShingle |
Emma Carmel ddc 320 rvk MA 1000: bkl 89.73 misc Social science research misc Scientific research misc Corporations misc Policy making misc Research misc Investment misc Social policy misc Governance misc Security policy misc Politicians Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy |
| authorStr |
Emma Carmel |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)363772049 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
320 - Political science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1472-4790 |
| topic_title |
320 ZDB MA 1000: AVZ rvk 89.73 bkl Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy Social science research Scientific research Corporations Policy making Research Investment Social policy Governance Security policy Politicians |
| topic |
ddc 320 rvk MA 1000: bkl 89.73 misc Social science research misc Scientific research misc Corporations misc Policy making misc Research misc Investment misc Social policy misc Governance misc Security policy misc Politicians |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 320 rvk MA 1000: bkl 89.73 misc Social science research misc Scientific research misc Corporations misc Policy making misc Research misc Investment misc Social policy misc Governance misc Security policy misc Politicians |
| topic_browse |
ddc 320 rvk MA 1000: bkl 89.73 misc Social science research misc Scientific research misc Corporations misc Policy making misc Research misc Investment misc Social policy misc Governance misc Security policy misc Politicians |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Comparative European politics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
363772049 |
| dewey-tens |
320 - Political science |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Comparative European politics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)363772049 (DE-600)2108689-8 (DE-576)120989913 |
| title |
Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1999778731 (DE-599)GBVOLC1999778731 (PRQ)p935-8872bfcc8909b5fafc282dfec9fe8d7ad021028866b3404c325c5fd34573718a0 (KEY)0517850920170000015000500771reinterpretingknowledgeexpertiseandeugovernancethe |
| title_full |
Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy |
| author_sort |
Emma Carmel |
| journal |
Comparative European politics |
| journalStr |
Comparative European politics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
771 |
| author_browse |
Emma Carmel |
| container_volume |
15 |
| class |
320 ZDB MA 1000: AVZ rvk 89.73 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Emma Carmel |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 |
| dewey-full |
320 |
| title_sort |
re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and eu governance: the cases of social policy and security research policy |
| title_auth |
Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy |
| abstract |
This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed. |
| abstractGer |
This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1946300703 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
363772049 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:26:55.723Z |
| _version_ |
1803572127435063296 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1999778731</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214183648.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">171228s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20171228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1999778731</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1999778731</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p935-8872bfcc8909b5fafc282dfec9fe8d7ad021028866b3404c325c5fd34573718a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0517850920170000015000500771reinterpretingknowledgeexpertiseandeugovernancethe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MA 1000:</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.73</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emma Carmel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Re-interpreting knowledge, expertise and EU governance: The cases of social policy and security research policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article examines how ideas about what is to be governed, how and by whom, are made sense of in European Union governance. It interrogates the complex relationships of knowledge generation, knowledge circulation, expertise and policymaking in two contrasting policy areas. In social policy, the emergence and later privileging of a discourse of the ‘social investment state’ are traced through the ‘linked ecologies’ (Abbott, 2005 ) of formal ‘European’ social science research, academic politicians and the Open Methods of Co-ordination. In security research policy, mētis, or practical knowledge (Scott, 1998 ), has enabled major European corporations to assert a privileged discursive and political position in the ‘linked ecologies’ of formal scientific research, product development and EU policymaking. These two cases demonstrate the partial integration of elite discourses with scientific rationalities into EU governance. In each case, the generation of knowledge and expertise is articulated in governance practices in ways that generate politically specific and limited – but not the same – versions of ‘the’ EU to be governed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social science research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Scientific research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corporations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policy making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politicians</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Comparative European politics</subfield><subfield code="d">Basingstoke : Macmillan, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2017), 5, Seite 771</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)363772049</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2108689-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)120989913</subfield><subfield code="x">1472-4790</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:771</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0079-1</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/1946300703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">MA 1000:</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.73</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">771</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399497 |