Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments
Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measu...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jing, Xuedong [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2005 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer-Verlag 2005 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology - Springer-Verlag, 1985, 27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:27 ; year:2005 ; number:11-12 ; day:30 ; month:03 ; pages:1202-1210 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2026005192 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2026005192 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230506014400.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200820s2005 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2026005192 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s00170-004-2293-2-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Jing, Xuedong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments |
264 | 1 | |c 2005 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer-Verlag 2005 | ||
520 | |a Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Direct measurement | |
650 | 4 | |a Gram-Chariler series | |
650 | 4 | |a Indirect measurement | |
650 | 4 | |a Measurement uncertainty | |
650 | 4 | |a Relative uncertainty | |
650 | 4 | |a Virtual instrument | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Chengtao |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pu, Gengqiang |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Xu, Binshi |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Sheng |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dong, Shiyun |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |d Springer-Verlag, 1985 |g 27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210 |w (DE-627)129185299 |w (DE-600)52651-4 |w (DE-576)014456192 |x 0268-3768 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2005 |g number:11-12 |g day:30 |g month:03 |g pages:1202-1210 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2241 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 27 |j 2005 |e 11-12 |b 30 |c 03 |h 1202-1210 |
author_variant |
x j xj c w cw g p gp b x bx s z sz s d sd |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:02683768:2005----::vlainfesrmnucranisfit |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2005 |
publishDate |
2005 |
allfields |
10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2026005192 (DE-He213)s00170-004-2293-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Jing, Xuedong verfasserin aut Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches. Direct measurement Gram-Chariler series Indirect measurement Measurement uncertainty Relative uncertainty Virtual instrument Wang, Chengtao aut Pu, Gengqiang aut Xu, Binshi aut Zhu, Sheng aut Dong, Shiyun aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer-Verlag, 1985 27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:27 year:2005 number:11-12 day:30 month:03 pages:1202-1210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2241 GBV_ILN_2333 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 27 2005 11-12 30 03 1202-1210 |
spelling |
10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2026005192 (DE-He213)s00170-004-2293-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Jing, Xuedong verfasserin aut Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches. Direct measurement Gram-Chariler series Indirect measurement Measurement uncertainty Relative uncertainty Virtual instrument Wang, Chengtao aut Pu, Gengqiang aut Xu, Binshi aut Zhu, Sheng aut Dong, Shiyun aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer-Verlag, 1985 27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:27 year:2005 number:11-12 day:30 month:03 pages:1202-1210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2241 GBV_ILN_2333 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 27 2005 11-12 30 03 1202-1210 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2026005192 (DE-He213)s00170-004-2293-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Jing, Xuedong verfasserin aut Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches. Direct measurement Gram-Chariler series Indirect measurement Measurement uncertainty Relative uncertainty Virtual instrument Wang, Chengtao aut Pu, Gengqiang aut Xu, Binshi aut Zhu, Sheng aut Dong, Shiyun aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer-Verlag, 1985 27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:27 year:2005 number:11-12 day:30 month:03 pages:1202-1210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2241 GBV_ILN_2333 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 27 2005 11-12 30 03 1202-1210 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2026005192 (DE-He213)s00170-004-2293-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Jing, Xuedong verfasserin aut Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches. Direct measurement Gram-Chariler series Indirect measurement Measurement uncertainty Relative uncertainty Virtual instrument Wang, Chengtao aut Pu, Gengqiang aut Xu, Binshi aut Zhu, Sheng aut Dong, Shiyun aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer-Verlag, 1985 27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:27 year:2005 number:11-12 day:30 month:03 pages:1202-1210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2241 GBV_ILN_2333 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 27 2005 11-12 30 03 1202-1210 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 doi (DE-627)OLC2026005192 (DE-He213)s00170-004-2293-2-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Jing, Xuedong verfasserin aut Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches. Direct measurement Gram-Chariler series Indirect measurement Measurement uncertainty Relative uncertainty Virtual instrument Wang, Chengtao aut Pu, Gengqiang aut Xu, Binshi aut Zhu, Sheng aut Dong, Shiyun aut Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Springer-Verlag, 1985 27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210 (DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 0268-3768 nnns volume:27 year:2005 number:11-12 day:30 month:03 pages:1202-1210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2241 GBV_ILN_2333 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 27 2005 11-12 30 03 1202-1210 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology 27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210 volume:27 year:2005 number:11-12 day:30 month:03 pages:1202-1210 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology 27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210 volume:27 year:2005 number:11-12 day:30 month:03 pages:1202-1210 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Direct measurement Gram-Chariler series Indirect measurement Measurement uncertainty Relative uncertainty Virtual instrument |
dewey-raw |
670 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jing, Xuedong @@aut@@ Wang, Chengtao @@aut@@ Pu, Gengqiang @@aut@@ Xu, Binshi @@aut@@ Zhu, Sheng @@aut@@ Dong, Shiyun @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2005-03-30T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129185299 |
dewey-sort |
3670 |
id |
OLC2026005192 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2026005192</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506014400.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2005 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2026005192</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s00170-004-2293-2-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jing, Xuedong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag 2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Direct measurement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gram-Chariler series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Indirect measurement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Measurement uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relative uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Virtual instrument</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chengtao</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pu, Gengqiang</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Binshi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Sheng</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong, Shiyun</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129185299</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)52651-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014456192</subfield><subfield code="x">0268-3768</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11-12</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1202-1210</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2241</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">11-12</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1202-1210</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jing, Xuedong |
spellingShingle |
Jing, Xuedong ddc 670 misc Direct measurement misc Gram-Chariler series misc Indirect measurement misc Measurement uncertainty misc Relative uncertainty misc Virtual instrument Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments |
authorStr |
Jing, Xuedong |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129185299 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0268-3768 |
topic_title |
670 VZ Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments Direct measurement Gram-Chariler series Indirect measurement Measurement uncertainty Relative uncertainty Virtual instrument |
topic |
ddc 670 misc Direct measurement misc Gram-Chariler series misc Indirect measurement misc Measurement uncertainty misc Relative uncertainty misc Virtual instrument |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 670 misc Direct measurement misc Gram-Chariler series misc Indirect measurement misc Measurement uncertainty misc Relative uncertainty misc Virtual instrument |
topic_browse |
ddc 670 misc Direct measurement misc Gram-Chariler series misc Indirect measurement misc Measurement uncertainty misc Relative uncertainty misc Virtual instrument |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129185299 |
dewey-tens |
670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129185299 (DE-600)52651-4 (DE-576)014456192 |
title |
Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2026005192 (DE-He213)s00170-004-2293-2-p |
title_full |
Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments |
author_sort |
Jing, Xuedong |
journal |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
journalStr |
The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2005 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1202 |
author_browse |
Jing, Xuedong Wang, Chengtao Pu, Gengqiang Xu, Binshi Zhu, Sheng Dong, Shiyun |
container_volume |
27 |
class |
670 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jing, Xuedong |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 |
dewey-full |
670 |
title_sort |
evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments |
title_auth |
Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments |
abstract |
Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches. © Springer-Verlag 2005 |
abstractGer |
Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches. © Springer-Verlag 2005 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches. © Springer-Verlag 2005 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2241 GBV_ILN_2333 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4307 |
container_issue |
11-12 |
title_short |
Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Wang, Chengtao Pu, Gengqiang Xu, Binshi Zhu, Sheng Dong, Shiyun |
author2Str |
Wang, Chengtao Pu, Gengqiang Xu, Binshi Zhu, Sheng Dong, Shiyun |
ppnlink |
129185299 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T02:52:51.682Z |
_version_ |
1803615282590121984 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2026005192</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506014400.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2005 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2026005192</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s00170-004-2293-2-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jing, Xuedong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag 2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Direct measurement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gram-Chariler series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Indirect measurement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Measurement uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relative uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Virtual instrument</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chengtao</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pu, Gengqiang</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Binshi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Sheng</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong, Shiyun</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2005), 11-12 vom: 30. März, Seite 1202-1210</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129185299</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)52651-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014456192</subfield><subfield code="x">0268-3768</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11-12</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1202-1210</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2241</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">11-12</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1202-1210</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3980455 |