The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite
Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respe...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Sharma, A. K. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics - Springer US, 1990, 28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:28 ; year:2016 ; number:4 ; day:08 ; month:11 ; pages:3752-3761 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC202631702X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC202631702X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230518115741.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200820s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC202631702X | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10854-016-5984-1-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 600 |a 670 |a 620 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Sharma, A. K. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 | ||
520 | |a Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Barrier Height | |
650 | 4 | |a Hydrogen Sulfide | |
650 | 4 | |a Chemical Bath Deposition | |
650 | 4 | |a Intergrain Boundary | |
650 | 4 | |a Chemical Bath Deposition Method | |
700 | 1 | |a Potdar, S. S. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pakhare, K. S. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sargar, B. M. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rokade, M. V. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tarwal, N. L. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics |d Springer US, 1990 |g 28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761 |w (DE-627)130863289 |w (DE-600)1030929-9 |w (DE-576)023106719 |x 0957-4522 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g day:08 |g month:11 |g pages:3752-3761 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 28 |j 2016 |e 4 |b 08 |c 11 |h 3752-3761 |
author_variant |
a k s ak aks s s p ss ssp k s p ks ksp b m s bm bms m v r mv mvr n l t nl nlt |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:09574522:2016----::hslcietaogsesnpromnefd_x |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 doi (DE-627)OLC202631702X (DE-He213)s10854-016-5984-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 670 620 VZ Sharma, A. K. verfasserin aut The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration. Barrier Height Hydrogen Sulfide Chemical Bath Deposition Intergrain Boundary Chemical Bath Deposition Method Potdar, S. S. aut Pakhare, K. S. aut Sargar, B. M. aut Rokade, M. V. aut Tarwal, N. L. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics Springer US, 1990 28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761 (DE-627)130863289 (DE-600)1030929-9 (DE-576)023106719 0957-4522 nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:4 day:08 month:11 pages:3752-3761 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 28 2016 4 08 11 3752-3761 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 doi (DE-627)OLC202631702X (DE-He213)s10854-016-5984-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 670 620 VZ Sharma, A. K. verfasserin aut The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration. Barrier Height Hydrogen Sulfide Chemical Bath Deposition Intergrain Boundary Chemical Bath Deposition Method Potdar, S. S. aut Pakhare, K. S. aut Sargar, B. M. aut Rokade, M. V. aut Tarwal, N. L. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics Springer US, 1990 28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761 (DE-627)130863289 (DE-600)1030929-9 (DE-576)023106719 0957-4522 nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:4 day:08 month:11 pages:3752-3761 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 28 2016 4 08 11 3752-3761 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 doi (DE-627)OLC202631702X (DE-He213)s10854-016-5984-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 670 620 VZ Sharma, A. K. verfasserin aut The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration. Barrier Height Hydrogen Sulfide Chemical Bath Deposition Intergrain Boundary Chemical Bath Deposition Method Potdar, S. S. aut Pakhare, K. S. aut Sargar, B. M. aut Rokade, M. V. aut Tarwal, N. L. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics Springer US, 1990 28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761 (DE-627)130863289 (DE-600)1030929-9 (DE-576)023106719 0957-4522 nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:4 day:08 month:11 pages:3752-3761 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 28 2016 4 08 11 3752-3761 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 doi (DE-627)OLC202631702X (DE-He213)s10854-016-5984-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 670 620 VZ Sharma, A. K. verfasserin aut The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration. Barrier Height Hydrogen Sulfide Chemical Bath Deposition Intergrain Boundary Chemical Bath Deposition Method Potdar, S. S. aut Pakhare, K. S. aut Sargar, B. M. aut Rokade, M. V. aut Tarwal, N. L. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics Springer US, 1990 28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761 (DE-627)130863289 (DE-600)1030929-9 (DE-576)023106719 0957-4522 nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:4 day:08 month:11 pages:3752-3761 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 28 2016 4 08 11 3752-3761 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 doi (DE-627)OLC202631702X (DE-He213)s10854-016-5984-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 670 620 VZ Sharma, A. K. verfasserin aut The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration. Barrier Height Hydrogen Sulfide Chemical Bath Deposition Intergrain Boundary Chemical Bath Deposition Method Potdar, S. S. aut Pakhare, K. S. aut Sargar, B. M. aut Rokade, M. V. aut Tarwal, N. L. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics Springer US, 1990 28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761 (DE-627)130863289 (DE-600)1030929-9 (DE-576)023106719 0957-4522 nnns volume:28 year:2016 number:4 day:08 month:11 pages:3752-3761 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 28 2016 4 08 11 3752-3761 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics 28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761 volume:28 year:2016 number:4 day:08 month:11 pages:3752-3761 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics 28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761 volume:28 year:2016 number:4 day:08 month:11 pages:3752-3761 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Barrier Height Hydrogen Sulfide Chemical Bath Deposition Intergrain Boundary Chemical Bath Deposition Method |
dewey-raw |
600 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sharma, A. K. @@aut@@ Potdar, S. S. @@aut@@ Pakhare, K. S. @@aut@@ Sargar, B. M. @@aut@@ Rokade, M. V. @@aut@@ Tarwal, N. L. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-11-08T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130863289 |
dewey-sort |
3600 |
id |
OLC202631702X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC202631702X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518115741.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC202631702X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10854-016-5984-1-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sharma, A. K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Barrier Height</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hydrogen Sulfide</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical Bath Deposition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intergrain Boundary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical Bath Deposition Method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Potdar, S. S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pakhare, K. S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sargar, B. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rokade, M. V.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tarwal, N. L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130863289</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1030929-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023106719</subfield><subfield code="x">0957-4522</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3752-3761</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">3752-3761</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Sharma, A. K. |
spellingShingle |
Sharma, A. K. ddc 600 misc Barrier Height misc Hydrogen Sulfide misc Chemical Bath Deposition misc Intergrain Boundary misc Chemical Bath Deposition Method The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite |
authorStr |
Sharma, A. K. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130863289 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
600 - Technology 670 - Manufacturing 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0957-4522 |
topic_title |
600 670 620 VZ The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite Barrier Height Hydrogen Sulfide Chemical Bath Deposition Intergrain Boundary Chemical Bath Deposition Method |
topic |
ddc 600 misc Barrier Height misc Hydrogen Sulfide misc Chemical Bath Deposition misc Intergrain Boundary misc Chemical Bath Deposition Method |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 600 misc Barrier Height misc Hydrogen Sulfide misc Chemical Bath Deposition misc Intergrain Boundary misc Chemical Bath Deposition Method |
topic_browse |
ddc 600 misc Barrier Height misc Hydrogen Sulfide misc Chemical Bath Deposition misc Intergrain Boundary misc Chemical Bath Deposition Method |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130863289 |
dewey-tens |
600 - Technology 670 - Manufacturing 620 - Engineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130863289 (DE-600)1030929-9 (DE-576)023106719 |
title |
The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC202631702X (DE-He213)s10854-016-5984-1-p |
title_full |
The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite |
author_sort |
Sharma, A. K. |
journal |
Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics |
journalStr |
Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
3752 |
author_browse |
Sharma, A. K. Potdar, S. S. Pakhare, K. S. Sargar, B. M. Rokade, M. V. Tarwal, N. L. |
container_volume |
28 |
class |
600 670 620 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Sharma, A. K. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 |
dewey-full |
600 670 620 |
title_sort |
the selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ cdo_{1−x} $$ zno_{x} $ nanocomposite |
title_auth |
The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite |
abstract |
Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 |
abstractGer |
Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Potdar, S. S. Pakhare, K. S. Sargar, B. M. Rokade, M. V. Tarwal, N. L. |
author2Str |
Potdar, S. S. Pakhare, K. S. Sargar, B. M. Rokade, M. V. Tarwal, N. L. |
ppnlink |
130863289 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T03:40:05.940Z |
_version_ |
1803618254531330048 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC202631702X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518115741.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC202631702X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10854-016-5984-1-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sharma, A. K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The selective ethanol gas sensing performance of $ CdO_{1−X} $$ ZnO_{X} $ nanocomposite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ composite films have been deposited onto the glass substrate by simple and inexpensive chemical bath deposition (CBD) method. In synthesis of composite thin films, 0.1 M Cd ($ NO_{3} $)2 and 0.1 M Zn($ NO_{3} $)2 were used as a sources of cadmium and zinc ions, respectively. Liquor ammonia was added as complexing agent in precursor solution. The XRD patterns of composite samples revealed distinct peaks of ZnO and CdO, which clearly indicates formation of CdO–ZnO nanocomposites in thin film form. SEM micrographs of (CdO)1−X$ ZnO_{X} $ samples with x = 0.25 shows nanowire-like morphology grown over the entire glass substrate while the samples with x = 0.75 shows the development of nanoflakes. Spherical granular morphology have been observed for sample with x = 0.50. Elemental compositions of the all deposited films have been confirmed by EDAX. The gas sensing behavior of the pure and composite sensor was systematically investigated for three different test gases such as ethanol, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Under optimum operating temperature of 275 °C and 24 ppm ethanol, the CdO–ZnO sensor showed maximum response of 58.69% among other test gases. The response and recovery time of CdO–ZnO sensor for ethanol was found to be 54 and 59 s, respectively. The CdO–ZnO composite sensor showed better response than pure ZnO and CdO sensor, which is attributed n–n heterojunction at intergrain boundaries. In addition, the energy band structure of CdO–ZnO heterojunction and the ethanol sensing mechanism are analyzed. The CdO–ZnO sensor is found to be selective towards ethanol even at lower concentration.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Barrier Height</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hydrogen Sulfide</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical Bath Deposition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intergrain Boundary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical Bath Deposition Method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Potdar, S. S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pakhare, K. S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sargar, B. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rokade, M. V.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tarwal, N. L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials science / Materials in electronics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2016), 4 vom: 08. Nov., Seite 3752-3761</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130863289</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1030929-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023106719</subfield><subfield code="x">0957-4522</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3752-3761</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5984-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">3752-3761</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4001293 |