The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations
Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were impleme...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Uehleke, Reinhard [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Environmental & resource economics - Springer Netherlands, 1991, 67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:67 ; year:2016 ; number:3 ; day:21 ; month:05 ; pages:429-454 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2027458387 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2027458387 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503042755.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2027458387 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10640-016-0028-0-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 333.7 |a 300 |a 330 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Uehleke, Reinhard |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public goods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Collective action | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hypothetical bias | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sturm, Bodo |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental & resource economics |d Springer Netherlands, 1991 |g 67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454 |w (DE-627)170881725 |w (DE-600)1121258-5 |w (DE-576)032741359 |x 0924-6460 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:67 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g day:21 |g month:05 |g pages:429-454 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 67 |j 2016 |e 3 |b 21 |c 05 |h 429-454 | ||
| author_variant |
r u ru b s bs |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09246460:2016----::hifunefolciecinnhdmnfroutrciaehneiiainn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2027458387 (DE-He213)s10640-016-0028-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 300 330 VZ Uehleke, Reinhard verfasserin aut The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation Public goods Collective action Hypothetical bias Sturm, Bodo aut Enthalten in Environmental & resource economics Springer Netherlands, 1991 67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454 (DE-627)170881725 (DE-600)1121258-5 (DE-576)032741359 0924-6460 nnns volume:67 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:05 pages:429-454 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4313 AR 67 2016 3 21 05 429-454 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2027458387 (DE-He213)s10640-016-0028-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 300 330 VZ Uehleke, Reinhard verfasserin aut The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation Public goods Collective action Hypothetical bias Sturm, Bodo aut Enthalten in Environmental & resource economics Springer Netherlands, 1991 67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454 (DE-627)170881725 (DE-600)1121258-5 (DE-576)032741359 0924-6460 nnns volume:67 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:05 pages:429-454 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4313 AR 67 2016 3 21 05 429-454 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2027458387 (DE-He213)s10640-016-0028-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 300 330 VZ Uehleke, Reinhard verfasserin aut The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation Public goods Collective action Hypothetical bias Sturm, Bodo aut Enthalten in Environmental & resource economics Springer Netherlands, 1991 67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454 (DE-627)170881725 (DE-600)1121258-5 (DE-576)032741359 0924-6460 nnns volume:67 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:05 pages:429-454 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4313 AR 67 2016 3 21 05 429-454 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2027458387 (DE-He213)s10640-016-0028-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 300 330 VZ Uehleke, Reinhard verfasserin aut The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation Public goods Collective action Hypothetical bias Sturm, Bodo aut Enthalten in Environmental & resource economics Springer Netherlands, 1991 67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454 (DE-627)170881725 (DE-600)1121258-5 (DE-576)032741359 0924-6460 nnns volume:67 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:05 pages:429-454 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4313 AR 67 2016 3 21 05 429-454 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 doi (DE-627)OLC2027458387 (DE-He213)s10640-016-0028-0-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 300 330 VZ Uehleke, Reinhard verfasserin aut The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation Public goods Collective action Hypothetical bias Sturm, Bodo aut Enthalten in Environmental & resource economics Springer Netherlands, 1991 67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454 (DE-627)170881725 (DE-600)1121258-5 (DE-576)032741359 0924-6460 nnns volume:67 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:05 pages:429-454 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4313 AR 67 2016 3 21 05 429-454 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Environmental & resource economics 67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454 volume:67 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:05 pages:429-454 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Environmental & resource economics 67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454 volume:67 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:05 pages:429-454 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation Public goods Collective action Hypothetical bias |
| dewey-raw |
333.7 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Environmental & resource economics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Uehleke, Reinhard @@aut@@ Sturm, Bodo @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-05-21T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
170881725 |
| dewey-sort |
3333.7 |
| id |
OLC2027458387 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2027458387</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503042755.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2027458387</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10640-016-0028-0-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uehleke, Reinhard</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public goods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Collective action</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hypothetical bias</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sturm, Bodo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental & resource economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170881725</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1121258-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)032741359</subfield><subfield code="x">0924-6460</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:429-454</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">429-454</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Uehleke, Reinhard |
| spellingShingle |
Uehleke, Reinhard ddc 333.7 misc Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation misc Public goods misc Collective action misc Hypothetical bias The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations |
| authorStr |
Uehleke, Reinhard |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)170881725 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
333 - Economics of land & energy 300 - Social sciences 330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0924-6460 |
| topic_title |
333.7 300 330 VZ The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation Public goods Collective action Hypothetical bias |
| topic |
ddc 333.7 misc Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation misc Public goods misc Collective action misc Hypothetical bias |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 333.7 misc Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation misc Public goods misc Collective action misc Hypothetical bias |
| topic_browse |
ddc 333.7 misc Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation misc Public goods misc Collective action misc Hypothetical bias |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Environmental & resource economics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
170881725 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Environmental & resource economics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)170881725 (DE-600)1121258-5 (DE-576)032741359 |
| title |
The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2027458387 (DE-He213)s10640-016-0028-0-p |
| title_full |
The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations |
| author_sort |
Uehleke, Reinhard |
| journal |
Environmental & resource economics |
| journalStr |
Environmental & resource economics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
429 |
| author_browse |
Uehleke, Reinhard Sturm, Bodo |
| container_volume |
67 |
| class |
333.7 300 330 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Uehleke, Reinhard |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 |
| dewey-full |
333.7 300 330 |
| title_sort |
the influence of collective action on the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation in hypothetical and real situations |
| title_auth |
The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations |
| abstract |
Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4313 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Sturm, Bodo |
| author2Str |
Sturm, Bodo |
| ppnlink |
170881725 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:31:07.811Z |
| _version_ |
1803572391774781440 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2027458387</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503042755.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2027458387</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10640-016-0028-0-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uehleke, Reinhard</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this experiment, we investigate demand for voluntary climate change mitigation. Subjects decide between a cash prize and an allowance from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for one ton of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ that will be deleted after the completion of the experiment. Decisions were implemented either as purely individual or as a collective action using majority voting. We vary the incentives of the decision situation in which we distinguish between real monetary incentives and a hypothetical decision situation with, and without, a cheap talk script. Collective decision making affects demand positively in the hypothetical decision situation only and we observe a significant hypothetical bias in the demand for voluntary climate change mitigation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Demand for voluntary climate change mitigation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public goods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Collective action</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hypothetical bias</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sturm, Bodo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental & resource economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">67(2016), 3 vom: 21. Mai, Seite 429-454</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170881725</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1121258-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)032741359</subfield><subfield code="x">0924-6460</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:429-454</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0028-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">429-454</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3990602 |