Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies
Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jackson, Corey [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2018 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Computer supported cooperative work - Springer Netherlands, 1992, 27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:27 ; year:2018 ; number:3-6 ; day:10 ; month:05 ; pages:647-678 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2027468110 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2027468110 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503033754.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2027468110 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10606-018-9327-z-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 650 |a 004 |q VZ |
084 | |a 54.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Jackson, Corey |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-0828-4506 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Citizen science | |
650 | 4 | |a Structuration | |
650 | 4 | |a Coordination | |
650 | 4 | |a Online communities | |
650 | 4 | |a Zooniverse | |
700 | 1 | |a Crowston, Kevin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Østerlund, Carsten |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Harandi, Mahboobeh |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Computer supported cooperative work |d Springer Netherlands, 1992 |g 27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678 |w (DE-627)131155458 |w (DE-600)1132237-8 |w (DE-576)032863365 |x 0925-9724 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2018 |g number:3-6 |g day:10 |g month:05 |g pages:647-678 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 54.00 |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 27 |j 2018 |e 3-6 |b 10 |c 05 |h 647-678 |
author_variant |
c j cj k c kc c ø cø m h mh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:09259724:2018----::okooisouprcodntoadoria |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
bklnumber |
54.00 |
publishDate |
2018 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z doi (DE-627)OLC2027468110 (DE-He213)s10606-018-9327-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 004 VZ 54.00 bkl Jackson, Corey verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0828-4506 aut Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions. Citizen science Structuration Coordination Online communities Zooniverse Crowston, Kevin aut Østerlund, Carsten aut Harandi, Mahboobeh aut Enthalten in Computer supported cooperative work Springer Netherlands, 1992 27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678 (DE-627)131155458 (DE-600)1132237-8 (DE-576)032863365 0925-9724 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:3-6 day:10 month:05 pages:647-678 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4336 54.00 VZ AR 27 2018 3-6 10 05 647-678 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z doi (DE-627)OLC2027468110 (DE-He213)s10606-018-9327-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 004 VZ 54.00 bkl Jackson, Corey verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0828-4506 aut Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions. Citizen science Structuration Coordination Online communities Zooniverse Crowston, Kevin aut Østerlund, Carsten aut Harandi, Mahboobeh aut Enthalten in Computer supported cooperative work Springer Netherlands, 1992 27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678 (DE-627)131155458 (DE-600)1132237-8 (DE-576)032863365 0925-9724 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:3-6 day:10 month:05 pages:647-678 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4336 54.00 VZ AR 27 2018 3-6 10 05 647-678 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z doi (DE-627)OLC2027468110 (DE-He213)s10606-018-9327-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 004 VZ 54.00 bkl Jackson, Corey verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0828-4506 aut Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions. Citizen science Structuration Coordination Online communities Zooniverse Crowston, Kevin aut Østerlund, Carsten aut Harandi, Mahboobeh aut Enthalten in Computer supported cooperative work Springer Netherlands, 1992 27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678 (DE-627)131155458 (DE-600)1132237-8 (DE-576)032863365 0925-9724 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:3-6 day:10 month:05 pages:647-678 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4336 54.00 VZ AR 27 2018 3-6 10 05 647-678 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z doi (DE-627)OLC2027468110 (DE-He213)s10606-018-9327-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 004 VZ 54.00 bkl Jackson, Corey verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0828-4506 aut Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions. Citizen science Structuration Coordination Online communities Zooniverse Crowston, Kevin aut Østerlund, Carsten aut Harandi, Mahboobeh aut Enthalten in Computer supported cooperative work Springer Netherlands, 1992 27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678 (DE-627)131155458 (DE-600)1132237-8 (DE-576)032863365 0925-9724 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:3-6 day:10 month:05 pages:647-678 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4336 54.00 VZ AR 27 2018 3-6 10 05 647-678 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z doi (DE-627)OLC2027468110 (DE-He213)s10606-018-9327-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 004 VZ 54.00 bkl Jackson, Corey verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-0828-4506 aut Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions. Citizen science Structuration Coordination Online communities Zooniverse Crowston, Kevin aut Østerlund, Carsten aut Harandi, Mahboobeh aut Enthalten in Computer supported cooperative work Springer Netherlands, 1992 27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678 (DE-627)131155458 (DE-600)1132237-8 (DE-576)032863365 0925-9724 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:3-6 day:10 month:05 pages:647-678 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4336 54.00 VZ AR 27 2018 3-6 10 05 647-678 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Computer supported cooperative work 27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678 volume:27 year:2018 number:3-6 day:10 month:05 pages:647-678 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Computer supported cooperative work 27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678 volume:27 year:2018 number:3-6 day:10 month:05 pages:647-678 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Citizen science Structuration Coordination Online communities Zooniverse |
dewey-raw |
650 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Computer supported cooperative work |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jackson, Corey @@aut@@ Crowston, Kevin @@aut@@ Østerlund, Carsten @@aut@@ Harandi, Mahboobeh @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-05-10T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
131155458 |
dewey-sort |
3650 |
id |
OLC2027468110 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2027468110</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503033754.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2027468110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10606-018-9327-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jackson, Corey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0828-4506</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Citizen science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Structuration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coordination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Online communities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Zooniverse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Crowston, Kevin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Østerlund, Carsten</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Harandi, Mahboobeh</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Computer supported cooperative work</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)131155458</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1132237-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)032863365</subfield><subfield code="x">0925-9724</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:647-678</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">3-6</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">647-678</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jackson, Corey |
spellingShingle |
Jackson, Corey ddc 650 bkl 54.00 misc Citizen science misc Structuration misc Coordination misc Online communities misc Zooniverse Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies |
authorStr |
Jackson, Corey |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)131155458 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
650 - Management & auxiliary services 004 - Data processing & computer science |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0925-9724 |
topic_title |
650 004 VZ 54.00 bkl Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies Citizen science Structuration Coordination Online communities Zooniverse |
topic |
ddc 650 bkl 54.00 misc Citizen science misc Structuration misc Coordination misc Online communities misc Zooniverse |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 650 bkl 54.00 misc Citizen science misc Structuration misc Coordination misc Online communities misc Zooniverse |
topic_browse |
ddc 650 bkl 54.00 misc Citizen science misc Structuration misc Coordination misc Online communities misc Zooniverse |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Computer supported cooperative work |
hierarchy_parent_id |
131155458 |
dewey-tens |
650 - Management & public relations 000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
hierarchy_top_title |
Computer supported cooperative work |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)131155458 (DE-600)1132237-8 (DE-576)032863365 |
title |
Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2027468110 (DE-He213)s10606-018-9327-z-p |
title_full |
Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies |
author_sort |
Jackson, Corey |
journal |
Computer supported cooperative work |
journalStr |
Computer supported cooperative work |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 000 - Computer science, information & general works |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
647 |
author_browse |
Jackson, Corey Crowston, Kevin Østerlund, Carsten Harandi, Mahboobeh |
container_volume |
27 |
class |
650 004 VZ 54.00 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jackson, Corey |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-0828-4506 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-0828-4506 |
dewey-full |
650 004 |
title_sort |
folksonomies to support coordination and coordination of folksonomies |
title_auth |
Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies |
abstract |
Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4336 |
container_issue |
3-6 |
title_short |
Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Crowston, Kevin Østerlund, Carsten Harandi, Mahboobeh |
author2Str |
Crowston, Kevin Østerlund, Carsten Harandi, Mahboobeh |
ppnlink |
131155458 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:33:44.707Z |
_version_ |
1803572556291112961 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2027468110</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503033754.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2027468110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10606-018-9327-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">54.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jackson, Corey</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-0828-4506</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Folksonomies to Support Coordination and Coordination of Folksonomies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Members of highly-distributed groups in online production communities face challenges in achieving coordinated action. Existing CSCW research highlights the importance of shared language and artifacts when coordinating actions in such settings. To better understand how such shared language and artifacts are, not only a guide for, but also a result of collaborative work we examine the development of folksonomies (i.e., volunteer-generated classification schemes) to support coordinated action. Drawing on structuration theory, we conceptualize a folksonomy as an interpretive schema forming a structure of signification. Our study is set in the context of an online citizen-science project, Gravity Spy, in which volunteers label “glitches” (noise events recorded by a scientific instrument) to identify and name novel classes of glitches. Through a multi-method study combining virtual and trace ethnography, we analyze folksonomies and the work of labelling as mutually constitutive, giving folksonomies a dual role: an emergent folksonomy supports the volunteers in labelling images at the same time that the individual work of labelling images supports the development of a folksonomy. However, our analysis suggests that the lack of supporting norms and authoritative resources (structures of legitimation and domination) undermines the power of the folksonomy and so the ability of volunteers to coordinate their decisions about naming novel glitch classes. These results have implications for system design. If we hope to support the development of emergent folksonomies online production communities need to facilitate 1) tag gardening, a process of consolidating overlapping terms of artifacts; 2) demarcate a clear home for discourses around folksonomy disagreements; 3) highlight clearly when decisions have been reached; and 4) inform others about those decisions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Citizen science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Structuration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coordination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Online communities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Zooniverse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Crowston, Kevin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Østerlund, Carsten</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Harandi, Mahboobeh</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Computer supported cooperative work</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2018), 3-6 vom: 10. Mai, Seite 647-678</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)131155458</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1132237-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)032863365</subfield><subfield code="x">0925-9724</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:647-678</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9327-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">54.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">3-6</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">647-678</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399131 |