Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera)
Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic propert...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Schmuck, Richard [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2016 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Ecotoxicology - Springer US, 1992, 25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:2016 ; number:9 ; day:05 ; month:10 ; pages:1617-1629 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2027709231 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2027709231 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503044724.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2027709231 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10646-016-1734-7-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 630 |q VZ |
084 | |a 12 |2 ssgn | ||
084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schmuck, Richard |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2016 | ||
520 | |a Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Neonicotinoids | |
650 | 4 | |a Risk assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a Bee monitoring | |
650 | 4 | |a Honey bees | |
650 | 4 | |a Bumble bees | |
650 | 4 | |a Solitary bees | |
700 | 1 | |a Lewis, Gavin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ecotoxicology |d Springer US, 1992 |g 25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629 |w (DE-627)165922230 |w (DE-600)34042-X |w (DE-576)055556809 |x 0963-9292 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2016 |g number:9 |g day:05 |g month:10 |g pages:1617-1629 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_252 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 25 |j 2016 |e 9 |b 05 |c 10 |h 1617-1629 |
author_variant |
r s rs g l gl |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:09639292:2016----::eiwfiladoioigtdeivsiaighrlontousiuenoioiodnetcdsnhrpre |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2027709231 (DE-He213)s10646-016-1734-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Schmuck, Richard verfasserin aut Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2016 Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue. Neonicotinoids Risk assessment Bee monitoring Honey bees Bumble bees Solitary bees Lewis, Gavin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology Springer US, 1992 25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629 (DE-627)165922230 (DE-600)34042-X (DE-576)055556809 0963-9292 nnns volume:25 year:2016 number:9 day:05 month:10 pages:1617-1629 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 25 2016 9 05 10 1617-1629 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2027709231 (DE-He213)s10646-016-1734-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Schmuck, Richard verfasserin aut Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2016 Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue. Neonicotinoids Risk assessment Bee monitoring Honey bees Bumble bees Solitary bees Lewis, Gavin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology Springer US, 1992 25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629 (DE-627)165922230 (DE-600)34042-X (DE-576)055556809 0963-9292 nnns volume:25 year:2016 number:9 day:05 month:10 pages:1617-1629 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 25 2016 9 05 10 1617-1629 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2027709231 (DE-He213)s10646-016-1734-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Schmuck, Richard verfasserin aut Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2016 Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue. Neonicotinoids Risk assessment Bee monitoring Honey bees Bumble bees Solitary bees Lewis, Gavin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology Springer US, 1992 25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629 (DE-627)165922230 (DE-600)34042-X (DE-576)055556809 0963-9292 nnns volume:25 year:2016 number:9 day:05 month:10 pages:1617-1629 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 25 2016 9 05 10 1617-1629 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2027709231 (DE-He213)s10646-016-1734-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Schmuck, Richard verfasserin aut Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2016 Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue. Neonicotinoids Risk assessment Bee monitoring Honey bees Bumble bees Solitary bees Lewis, Gavin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology Springer US, 1992 25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629 (DE-627)165922230 (DE-600)34042-X (DE-576)055556809 0963-9292 nnns volume:25 year:2016 number:9 day:05 month:10 pages:1617-1629 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 25 2016 9 05 10 1617-1629 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2027709231 (DE-He213)s10646-016-1734-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Schmuck, Richard verfasserin aut Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2016 Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue. Neonicotinoids Risk assessment Bee monitoring Honey bees Bumble bees Solitary bees Lewis, Gavin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology Springer US, 1992 25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629 (DE-627)165922230 (DE-600)34042-X (DE-576)055556809 0963-9292 nnns volume:25 year:2016 number:9 day:05 month:10 pages:1617-1629 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 AR 25 2016 9 05 10 1617-1629 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Ecotoxicology 25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629 volume:25 year:2016 number:9 day:05 month:10 pages:1617-1629 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Ecotoxicology 25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629 volume:25 year:2016 number:9 day:05 month:10 pages:1617-1629 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Neonicotinoids Risk assessment Bee monitoring Honey bees Bumble bees Solitary bees |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Ecotoxicology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Schmuck, Richard @@aut@@ Lewis, Gavin @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-10-05T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
165922230 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
OLC2027709231 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2027709231</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503044724.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2027709231</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10646-016-1734-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schmuck, Richard</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neonicotinoids</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bee monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Honey bees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bumble bees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Solitary bees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lewis, Gavin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecotoxicology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)165922230</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)34042-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)055556809</subfield><subfield code="x">0963-9292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:05</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1617-1629</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">05</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">1617-1629</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Schmuck, Richard |
spellingShingle |
Schmuck, Richard ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Neonicotinoids misc Risk assessment misc Bee monitoring misc Honey bees misc Bumble bees misc Solitary bees Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) |
authorStr |
Schmuck, Richard |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)165922230 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 630 - Agriculture & related technologies |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0963-9292 |
topic_title |
570 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) Neonicotinoids Risk assessment Bee monitoring Honey bees Bumble bees Solitary bees |
topic |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Neonicotinoids misc Risk assessment misc Bee monitoring misc Honey bees misc Bumble bees misc Solitary bees |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Neonicotinoids misc Risk assessment misc Bee monitoring misc Honey bees misc Bumble bees misc Solitary bees |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 fid BIODIV misc Neonicotinoids misc Risk assessment misc Bee monitoring misc Honey bees misc Bumble bees misc Solitary bees |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Ecotoxicology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
165922230 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 630 - Agriculture |
hierarchy_top_title |
Ecotoxicology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)165922230 (DE-600)34042-X (DE-576)055556809 |
title |
Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2027709231 (DE-He213)s10646-016-1734-7-p |
title_full |
Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) |
author_sort |
Schmuck, Richard |
journal |
Ecotoxicology |
journalStr |
Ecotoxicology |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1617 |
author_browse |
Schmuck, Richard Lewis, Gavin |
container_volume |
25 |
class |
570 630 VZ 12 ssgn BIODIV DE-30 fid |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Schmuck, Richard |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 |
dewey-full |
570 630 |
title_sort |
review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (apis mellifera) |
title_auth |
Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) |
abstract |
Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue. © The Author(s) 2016 |
abstractGer |
Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue. © The Author(s) 2016 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue. © The Author(s) 2016 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-GEO GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4219 |
container_issue |
9 |
title_short |
Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Lewis, Gavin |
author2Str |
Lewis, Gavin |
ppnlink |
165922230 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T16:25:24.539Z |
_version_ |
1803575806701600768 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2027709231</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503044724.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2027709231</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10646-016-1734-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schmuck, Richard</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Review of field and monitoring studies investigating the role of nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides in the reported losses of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides, which include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin, are widely used to control a range of important agricultural pests both by foliar applications and also as seed dressings and by soil application. Since they exhibit systemic properties, exposure of bees may occur as a result of residues present in the nectar and/or pollen of seed- or soil-treated crop plants and so they have been the subject of much debate about whether they cause adverse effects in pollinating insects under field conditions. Due to these perceived concerns, the use of the three neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam has been temporarily suspended in the European Union for seed treatment, soil application and foliar treatment in crops attractive to bees. Monitoring data from a number of countries are available to assess the presence of neonicotinoid residues in honey bee samples and possible impacts at the colony level and these are reviewed here together with a number of field studies which have looked at the impact of clothiandin on honey bees in relation to specific crop use and in particular with oilseed rape. Currently there is considerable uncertainty with regards to the regulatory testing requirements for field studies. Accordingly, a testing protocol was developed to address any acute and chronic risks from oilseed rape seeds containing a coating with 10 g clothianidin and 2 g beta-cyfluthrin per kg seeds ($ Elado^{®} $) for managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, commercially bred bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies and red mason bees (Osmia bicornis) as a representative solitary bee species. This is described here together with a summary of the results obtained as an introduction to the study details given in the following papers in this issue.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neonicotinoids</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bee monitoring</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Honey bees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bumble bees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Solitary bees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lewis, Gavin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecotoxicology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2016), 9 vom: 05. Okt., Seite 1617-1629</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)165922230</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)34042-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)055556809</subfield><subfield code="x">0963-9292</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:05</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1617-1629</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1734-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">05</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">1617-1629</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4011803 |