Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application
Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Makridis, Christos [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2012 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Science and engineering ethics - Springer Netherlands, 1995, 19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:19 ; year:2012 ; number:3 ; day:11 ; month:10 ; pages:1017-1038 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2029174483 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2029174483 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230402075517.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2029174483 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11948-012-9396-1-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |a 500 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 19,2 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Makridis, Christos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Cognitive enhancement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biological cognitive enhancement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Technology change | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public values | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Technology governance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Risk management | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Science and engineering ethics |d Springer Netherlands, 1995 |g 19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038 |w (DE-627)19230397X |w (DE-600)1304534-9 |w (DE-576)051378167 |x 1353-3452 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2012 |g number:3 |g day:11 |g month:10 |g pages:1017-1038 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TGE | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 19 |j 2012 |e 3 |b 11 |c 10 |h 1017-1038 | ||
| author_variant |
c m cm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13533452:2012----::ovrigehooisciiaaayiocgiienacmnf |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2029174483 (DE-He213)s11948-012-9396-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Makridis, Christos verfasserin aut Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated. Cognitive enhancement Biological cognitive enhancement Technology change Public values Technology governance Risk management Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:19 year:2012 number:3 day:11 month:10 pages:1017-1038 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 19 2012 3 11 10 1017-1038 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2029174483 (DE-He213)s11948-012-9396-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Makridis, Christos verfasserin aut Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated. Cognitive enhancement Biological cognitive enhancement Technology change Public values Technology governance Risk management Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:19 year:2012 number:3 day:11 month:10 pages:1017-1038 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 19 2012 3 11 10 1017-1038 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2029174483 (DE-He213)s11948-012-9396-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Makridis, Christos verfasserin aut Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated. Cognitive enhancement Biological cognitive enhancement Technology change Public values Technology governance Risk management Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:19 year:2012 number:3 day:11 month:10 pages:1017-1038 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 19 2012 3 11 10 1017-1038 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2029174483 (DE-He213)s11948-012-9396-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Makridis, Christos verfasserin aut Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated. Cognitive enhancement Biological cognitive enhancement Technology change Public values Technology governance Risk management Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:19 year:2012 number:3 day:11 month:10 pages:1017-1038 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 19 2012 3 11 10 1017-1038 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2029174483 (DE-He213)s11948-012-9396-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Makridis, Christos verfasserin aut Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated. Cognitive enhancement Biological cognitive enhancement Technology change Public values Technology governance Risk management Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:19 year:2012 number:3 day:11 month:10 pages:1017-1038 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 19 2012 3 11 10 1017-1038 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics 19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038 volume:19 year:2012 number:3 day:11 month:10 pages:1017-1038 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics 19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038 volume:19 year:2012 number:3 day:11 month:10 pages:1017-1038 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Cognitive enhancement Biological cognitive enhancement Technology change Public values Technology governance Risk management |
| dewey-raw |
100 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Science and engineering ethics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Makridis, Christos @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-10-11T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
19230397X |
| dewey-sort |
3100 |
| id |
OLC2029174483 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2029174483</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230402075517.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2029174483</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11948-012-9396-1-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Makridis, Christos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cognitive enhancement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biological cognitive enhancement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technology change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public values</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technology governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Science and engineering ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)19230397X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1304534-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)051378167</subfield><subfield code="x">1353-3452</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1017-1038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">1017-1038</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Makridis, Christos |
| spellingShingle |
Makridis, Christos ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Cognitive enhancement misc Biological cognitive enhancement misc Technology change misc Public values misc Technology governance misc Risk management Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application |
| authorStr |
Makridis, Christos |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)19230397X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 500 - Natural sciences & mathematics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1353-3452 |
| topic_title |
100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application Cognitive enhancement Biological cognitive enhancement Technology change Public values Technology governance Risk management |
| topic |
ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Cognitive enhancement misc Biological cognitive enhancement misc Technology change misc Public values misc Technology governance misc Risk management |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Cognitive enhancement misc Biological cognitive enhancement misc Technology change misc Public values misc Technology governance misc Risk management |
| topic_browse |
ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Cognitive enhancement misc Biological cognitive enhancement misc Technology change misc Public values misc Technology governance misc Risk management |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Science and engineering ethics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
19230397X |
| dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy 500 - Science |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Science and engineering ethics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 |
| title |
Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2029174483 (DE-He213)s11948-012-9396-1-p |
| title_full |
Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application |
| author_sort |
Makridis, Christos |
| journal |
Science and engineering ethics |
| journalStr |
Science and engineering ethics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2012 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1017 |
| author_browse |
Makridis, Christos |
| container_volume |
19 |
| class |
100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Makridis, Christos |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 |
| dewey-full |
100 500 |
| title_sort |
converging technologies: a critical analysis of cognitive enhancement for public policy application |
| title_auth |
Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application |
| abstract |
Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
19230397X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:58:27.846Z |
| _version_ |
1803596760715624448 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2029174483</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230402075517.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2029174483</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11948-012-9396-1-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Makridis, Christos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Converging Technologies: A Critical Analysis of Cognitive Enhancement for Public Policy Application</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper investigates cognitive enhancement, specifically biological cognitive enhancement (BCE), as a converging technology, and its implications for public policy. With an increasing rate of technological advancements, the legal, social, and economic frameworks lag behind the scientific advancements that they support. This lag poses significant challenges for policymakers if it is not dealt with sufficiently within the right analytical context. Therefore, the driving question behind this paper is, “What contingencies inform the advancement of biological cognitive enhancement, and what would society look like under this set of assumptions?” The paper is divided into five components: (1) defining the current policy context for BCEs, (2) analyzing the current social and economic outcomes to BCEs, (3) investigating the context of cost-benefit arguments in relation to BCEs, (4) proposing an analytical model for evaluating contingencies for BCE development, and (5) evaluating a simulated policy, social, technological, and economic context given the contingencies. In order to manage the risk and uncertainty inherent in technological change, BCEs’ drivers must be scrutinized and evaluated.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cognitive enhancement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biological cognitive enhancement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technology change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public values</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technology governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Science and engineering ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2012), 3 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1017-1038</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)19230397X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1304534-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)051378167</subfield><subfield code="x">1353-3452</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1017-1038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9396-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">1017-1038</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4003572 |