Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis
Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also m...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hevelke, Alexander [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2014 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Science and engineering ethics - Springer Netherlands, 1995, 21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:21 ; year:2014 ; number:3 ; day:11 ; month:06 ; pages:619-630 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2029175854 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2029175854 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230402075537.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2029175854 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11948-014-9565-5-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |a 500 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 19,2 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hevelke, Alexander |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2014 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethical | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomous car | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Self-driving car | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Responsibility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Duty to intervene | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nida-Rümelin, Julian |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Science and engineering ethics |d Springer Netherlands, 1995 |g 21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630 |w (DE-627)19230397X |w (DE-600)1304534-9 |w (DE-576)051378167 |x 1353-3452 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g day:11 |g month:06 |g pages:619-630 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TGE | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 2014 |e 3 |b 11 |c 06 |h 619-630 | ||
| author_variant |
a h ah j n r jnr |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13533452:2014----::epniiiyocahsfuoooseils |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029175854 (DE-He213)s11948-014-9565-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Hevelke, Alexander verfasserin aut Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2014 Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible. Ethics Ethical Moral Autonomous car Self-driving car Responsibility Liability Duty to intervene Nida-Rümelin, Julian aut Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:21 year:2014 number:3 day:11 month:06 pages:619-630 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 21 2014 3 11 06 619-630 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029175854 (DE-He213)s11948-014-9565-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Hevelke, Alexander verfasserin aut Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2014 Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible. Ethics Ethical Moral Autonomous car Self-driving car Responsibility Liability Duty to intervene Nida-Rümelin, Julian aut Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:21 year:2014 number:3 day:11 month:06 pages:619-630 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 21 2014 3 11 06 619-630 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029175854 (DE-He213)s11948-014-9565-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Hevelke, Alexander verfasserin aut Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2014 Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible. Ethics Ethical Moral Autonomous car Self-driving car Responsibility Liability Duty to intervene Nida-Rümelin, Julian aut Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:21 year:2014 number:3 day:11 month:06 pages:619-630 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 21 2014 3 11 06 619-630 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029175854 (DE-He213)s11948-014-9565-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Hevelke, Alexander verfasserin aut Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2014 Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible. Ethics Ethical Moral Autonomous car Self-driving car Responsibility Liability Duty to intervene Nida-Rümelin, Julian aut Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:21 year:2014 number:3 day:11 month:06 pages:619-630 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 21 2014 3 11 06 619-630 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029175854 (DE-He213)s11948-014-9565-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Hevelke, Alexander verfasserin aut Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2014 Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible. Ethics Ethical Moral Autonomous car Self-driving car Responsibility Liability Duty to intervene Nida-Rümelin, Julian aut Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:21 year:2014 number:3 day:11 month:06 pages:619-630 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 21 2014 3 11 06 619-630 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics 21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630 volume:21 year:2014 number:3 day:11 month:06 pages:619-630 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics 21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630 volume:21 year:2014 number:3 day:11 month:06 pages:619-630 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Ethics Ethical Moral Autonomous car Self-driving car Responsibility Liability Duty to intervene |
| dewey-raw |
100 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Science and engineering ethics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hevelke, Alexander @@aut@@ Nida-Rümelin, Julian @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-06-11T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
19230397X |
| dewey-sort |
3100 |
| id |
OLC2029175854 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2029175854</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230402075537.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2029175854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11948-014-9565-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hevelke, Alexander</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethical</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Moral</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Autonomous car</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-driving car</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Responsibility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Duty to intervene</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nida-Rümelin, Julian</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Science and engineering ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)19230397X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1304534-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)051378167</subfield><subfield code="x">1353-3452</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:619-630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">619-630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Hevelke, Alexander |
| spellingShingle |
Hevelke, Alexander ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Ethics misc Ethical misc Moral misc Autonomous car misc Self-driving car misc Responsibility misc Liability misc Duty to intervene Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis |
| authorStr |
Hevelke, Alexander |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)19230397X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 500 - Natural sciences & mathematics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1353-3452 |
| topic_title |
100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis Ethics Ethical Moral Autonomous car Self-driving car Responsibility Liability Duty to intervene |
| topic |
ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Ethics misc Ethical misc Moral misc Autonomous car misc Self-driving car misc Responsibility misc Liability misc Duty to intervene |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Ethics misc Ethical misc Moral misc Autonomous car misc Self-driving car misc Responsibility misc Liability misc Duty to intervene |
| topic_browse |
ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Ethics misc Ethical misc Moral misc Autonomous car misc Self-driving car misc Responsibility misc Liability misc Duty to intervene |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Science and engineering ethics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
19230397X |
| dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy 500 - Science |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Science and engineering ethics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 |
| title |
Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2029175854 (DE-He213)s11948-014-9565-5-p |
| title_full |
Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis |
| author_sort |
Hevelke, Alexander |
| journal |
Science and engineering ethics |
| journalStr |
Science and engineering ethics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
619 |
| author_browse |
Hevelke, Alexander Nida-Rümelin, Julian |
| container_volume |
21 |
| class |
100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hevelke, Alexander |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 |
| dewey-full |
100 500 |
| title_sort |
responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis |
| title_auth |
Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis |
| abstract |
Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible. © The Author(s) 2014 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible. © The Author(s) 2014 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible. © The Author(s) 2014 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Nida-Rümelin, Julian |
| author2Str |
Nida-Rümelin, Julian |
| ppnlink |
19230397X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:58:49.294Z |
| _version_ |
1803596783213871105 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2029175854</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230402075537.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2029175854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11948-014-9565-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hevelke, Alexander</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract A number of companies including Google and BMW are currently working on the development of autonomous cars. But if fully autonomous cars are going to drive on our roads, it must be decided who is to be held responsible in case of accidents. This involves not only legal questions, but also moral ones. The first question discussed is whether we should try to design the tort liability for car manufacturers in a way that will help along the development and improvement of autonomous vehicles. In particular, Patrick Lin’s concern that any security gain derived from the introduction of autonomous cars would constitute a trade-off in human lives will be addressed. The second question is whether it would be morally permissible to impose liability on the user based on a duty to pay attention to the road and traffic and to intervene when necessary to avoid accidents. Doubts about the moral legitimacy of such a scheme are based on the notion that it is a form of defamation if a person is held to blame for causing the death of another by his inattention if he never had a real chance to intervene. Therefore, the legitimacy of such an approach would depend on the user having an actual chance to do so. The last option discussed in this paper is a system in which a person using an autonomous vehicle has no duty (and possibly no way) of interfering, but is still held (financially, not criminally) responsible for possible accidents. Two ways of doing so are discussed, but only one is judged morally feasible.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethical</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Moral</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Autonomous car</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-driving car</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Responsibility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Duty to intervene</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nida-Rümelin, Julian</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Science and engineering ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">21(2014), 3 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 619-630</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)19230397X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1304534-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)051378167</subfield><subfield code="x">1353-3452</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:619-630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">619-630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399374 |