A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II
Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Alkhatib, Omar J. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Science and engineering ethics - Springer Netherlands, 1995, 23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:23 ; year:2016 ; number:6 ; day:02 ; month:12 ; pages:1617-1641 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2029178640 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2029178640 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230402075606.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2029178640 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11948-016-9851-5-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |a 500 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 19,2 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Alkhatib, Omar J. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Normative framework | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral judgment framework | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Universal moral values | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Decision-making model | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judgment framework in construction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral and immoral judgment | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Science and engineering ethics |d Springer Netherlands, 1995 |g 23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641 |w (DE-627)19230397X |w (DE-600)1304534-9 |w (DE-576)051378167 |x 1353-3452 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2016 |g number:6 |g day:02 |g month:12 |g pages:1617-1641 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-CHE | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TGE | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 23 |j 2016 |e 6 |b 02 |c 12 |h 1617-1641 | ||
| author_variant |
o j a oj oja |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13533452:2016----::mrlomtvfaeokoteugetfcinadeiiniteosrcinn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029178640 (DE-He213)s11948-016-9851-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Alkhatib, Omar J. verfasserin aut A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry. Normative framework Moral judgment framework Universal moral values Decision-making model Judgment framework in construction Moral and immoral judgment Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:23 year:2016 number:6 day:02 month:12 pages:1617-1641 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 23 2016 6 02 12 1617-1641 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029178640 (DE-He213)s11948-016-9851-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Alkhatib, Omar J. verfasserin aut A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry. Normative framework Moral judgment framework Universal moral values Decision-making model Judgment framework in construction Moral and immoral judgment Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:23 year:2016 number:6 day:02 month:12 pages:1617-1641 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 23 2016 6 02 12 1617-1641 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029178640 (DE-He213)s11948-016-9851-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Alkhatib, Omar J. verfasserin aut A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry. Normative framework Moral judgment framework Universal moral values Decision-making model Judgment framework in construction Moral and immoral judgment Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:23 year:2016 number:6 day:02 month:12 pages:1617-1641 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 23 2016 6 02 12 1617-1641 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029178640 (DE-He213)s11948-016-9851-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Alkhatib, Omar J. verfasserin aut A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry. Normative framework Moral judgment framework Universal moral values Decision-making model Judgment framework in construction Moral and immoral judgment Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:23 year:2016 number:6 day:02 month:12 pages:1617-1641 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 23 2016 6 02 12 1617-1641 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 doi (DE-627)OLC2029178640 (DE-He213)s11948-016-9851-5-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn Alkhatib, Omar J. verfasserin aut A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II 2016 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry. Normative framework Moral judgment framework Universal moral values Decision-making model Judgment framework in construction Moral and immoral judgment Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Springer Netherlands, 1995 23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641 (DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 1353-3452 nnns volume:23 year:2016 number:6 day:02 month:12 pages:1617-1641 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 AR 23 2016 6 02 12 1617-1641 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics 23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641 volume:23 year:2016 number:6 day:02 month:12 pages:1617-1641 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics 23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641 volume:23 year:2016 number:6 day:02 month:12 pages:1617-1641 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Normative framework Moral judgment framework Universal moral values Decision-making model Judgment framework in construction Moral and immoral judgment |
| dewey-raw |
100 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Science and engineering ethics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Alkhatib, Omar J. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-12-02T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
19230397X |
| dewey-sort |
3100 |
| id |
OLC2029178640 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2029178640</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230402075606.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2029178640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11948-016-9851-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alkhatib, Omar J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Normative framework</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Moral judgment framework</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Universal moral values</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Decision-making model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgment framework in construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Moral and immoral judgment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Science and engineering ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)19230397X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1304534-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)051378167</subfield><subfield code="x">1353-3452</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1617-1641</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1617-1641</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Alkhatib, Omar J. |
| spellingShingle |
Alkhatib, Omar J. ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Normative framework misc Moral judgment framework misc Universal moral values misc Decision-making model misc Judgment framework in construction misc Moral and immoral judgment A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II |
| authorStr |
Alkhatib, Omar J. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)19230397X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 500 - Natural sciences & mathematics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1353-3452 |
| topic_title |
100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II Normative framework Moral judgment framework Universal moral values Decision-making model Judgment framework in construction Moral and immoral judgment |
| topic |
ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Normative framework misc Moral judgment framework misc Universal moral values misc Decision-making model misc Judgment framework in construction misc Moral and immoral judgment |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Normative framework misc Moral judgment framework misc Universal moral values misc Decision-making model misc Judgment framework in construction misc Moral and immoral judgment |
| topic_browse |
ddc 100 ssgn 19,2 misc Normative framework misc Moral judgment framework misc Universal moral values misc Decision-making model misc Judgment framework in construction misc Moral and immoral judgment |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Science and engineering ethics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
19230397X |
| dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy 500 - Science |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Science and engineering ethics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)19230397X (DE-600)1304534-9 (DE-576)051378167 |
| title |
A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2029178640 (DE-He213)s11948-016-9851-5-p |
| title_full |
A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II |
| author_sort |
Alkhatib, Omar J. |
| journal |
Science and engineering ethics |
| journalStr |
Science and engineering ethics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1617 |
| author_browse |
Alkhatib, Omar J. |
| container_volume |
23 |
| class |
100 500 VZ 19,2 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Alkhatib, Omar J. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 |
| dewey-full |
100 500 |
| title_sort |
a moral (normative) framework for the judgment of actions and decisions in the construction industry and engineering: part ii |
| title_auth |
A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II |
| abstract |
Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-TGE GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
6 |
| title_short |
A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
19230397X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:59:31.645Z |
| _version_ |
1803596827612676096 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2029178640</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230402075606.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2029178640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11948-016-9851-5-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">500</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alkhatib, Omar J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The construction industry is typically characterized as a fragmented, multi-organizational setting in which members from different technical backgrounds and moral values join together to develop a particular business or project. The most challenging obstacle in the construction process is to achieve a successful practice and to identify and apply an ethical framework to manage the behavior of involved specialists and contractors and to ensure the quality of all completed construction activities. The framework should reflect a common moral ground for myriad people involved in this process to survive and compete ethically in today’s turbulent construction market. This study establishes a framework for moral judgment of behavior and actions conducted in the construction process. The moral framework provides the basis of judging actions as “moral” or “immoral” based on three levels of moral accountability: personal, professional, and social. The social aspect of the proposed framework is developed primarily from the essential attributes of normative business decision-making models identified in the literature review and subsequently incorporates additional attributes related to professional and personal moral values. The normative decision-making models reviewed are based primarily on social attributes as related to moral theories (e.g., utilitarianism, duty, rights, virtue, etc.). The professional and moral attributes are established by identifying a set of common moral values recognized by professionals in the construction industry and required to prevent common construction breaches. The moral framework presented here is the complementary part of the ethical framework developed in Part I of this article and is based primarily on the personal behavior or the moral aspect of professional responsibility. The framework can be implemented as a form of preventive personal ethics, which would help avoid ethical dilemmas and moral implications in the first place. Furthermore, the moral framework can be considered as a decision-making model to guide actions and improve the moral reasoning process, which would help individuals think through possible implications and the consequences of ethical and moral issues in the construction industry.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Normative framework</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Moral judgment framework</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Universal moral values</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Decision-making model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgment framework in construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Moral and immoral judgment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Science and engineering ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2016), 6 vom: 02. Dez., Seite 1617-1641</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)19230397X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1304534-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)051378167</subfield><subfield code="x">1353-3452</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1617-1641</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1617-1641</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4002237 |