On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source
By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kupryaev, N. V. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Russian physics journal - Springer US, 1992, 57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:57 ; year:2015 ; number:9 ; month:01 ; pages:1220-1224 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2033081524 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2033081524 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504035952.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2033081524 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11182-015-0366-3-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |a 370 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kupryaev, N. V. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 | ||
| 520 | |a By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a ultrarelativistic source | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities | |
| 650 | 4 | |a independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source | |
| 650 | 4 | |a absolute synchronization of clocks | |
| 650 | 4 | |a impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Russian physics journal |d Springer US, 1992 |g 57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224 |w (DE-627)131169718 |w (DE-600)1138228-4 |w (DE-576)033029253 |x 1064-8887 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:57 |g year:2015 |g number:9 |g month:01 |g pages:1220-1224 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 57 |j 2015 |e 9 |c 01 |h 1220-1224 | ||
| author_variant |
n v k nv nvk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:10648887:2015----::nhmaueetfhvlctolgtmtebaut |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2033081524 (DE-He213)s11182-015-0366-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 370 VZ Kupryaev, N. V. verfasserin aut On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it. ultrarelativistic source Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source absolute synchronization of clocks impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light Enthalten in Russian physics journal Springer US, 1992 57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224 (DE-627)131169718 (DE-600)1138228-4 (DE-576)033029253 1064-8887 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:9 month:01 pages:1220-1224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 57 2015 9 01 1220-1224 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2033081524 (DE-He213)s11182-015-0366-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 370 VZ Kupryaev, N. V. verfasserin aut On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it. ultrarelativistic source Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source absolute synchronization of clocks impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light Enthalten in Russian physics journal Springer US, 1992 57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224 (DE-627)131169718 (DE-600)1138228-4 (DE-576)033029253 1064-8887 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:9 month:01 pages:1220-1224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 57 2015 9 01 1220-1224 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2033081524 (DE-He213)s11182-015-0366-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 370 VZ Kupryaev, N. V. verfasserin aut On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it. ultrarelativistic source Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source absolute synchronization of clocks impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light Enthalten in Russian physics journal Springer US, 1992 57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224 (DE-627)131169718 (DE-600)1138228-4 (DE-576)033029253 1064-8887 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:9 month:01 pages:1220-1224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 57 2015 9 01 1220-1224 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2033081524 (DE-He213)s11182-015-0366-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 370 VZ Kupryaev, N. V. verfasserin aut On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it. ultrarelativistic source Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source absolute synchronization of clocks impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light Enthalten in Russian physics journal Springer US, 1992 57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224 (DE-627)131169718 (DE-600)1138228-4 (DE-576)033029253 1064-8887 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:9 month:01 pages:1220-1224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 57 2015 9 01 1220-1224 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2033081524 (DE-He213)s11182-015-0366-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 370 VZ Kupryaev, N. V. verfasserin aut On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it. ultrarelativistic source Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source absolute synchronization of clocks impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light Enthalten in Russian physics journal Springer US, 1992 57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224 (DE-627)131169718 (DE-600)1138228-4 (DE-576)033029253 1064-8887 nnns volume:57 year:2015 number:9 month:01 pages:1220-1224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 AR 57 2015 9 01 1220-1224 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Russian physics journal 57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224 volume:57 year:2015 number:9 month:01 pages:1220-1224 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Russian physics journal 57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224 volume:57 year:2015 number:9 month:01 pages:1220-1224 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
ultrarelativistic source Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source absolute synchronization of clocks impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light |
| dewey-raw |
530 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Russian physics journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kupryaev, N. V. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
131169718 |
| dewey-sort |
3530 |
| id |
OLC2033081524 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2033081524</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504035952.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2033081524</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11182-015-0366-3-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kupryaev, N. V.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ultrarelativistic source</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">absolute synchronization of clocks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Russian physics journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)131169718</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1138228-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)033029253</subfield><subfield code="x">1064-8887</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:57</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1220-1224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">57</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">1220-1224</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kupryaev, N. V. |
| spellingShingle |
Kupryaev, N. V. ddc 530 misc ultrarelativistic source misc Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities misc independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source misc absolute synchronization of clocks misc impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source |
| authorStr |
Kupryaev, N. V. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)131169718 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
530 - Physics 370 - Education |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1064-8887 |
| topic_title |
530 370 VZ On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source ultrarelativistic source Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source absolute synchronization of clocks impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light |
| topic |
ddc 530 misc ultrarelativistic source misc Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities misc independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source misc absolute synchronization of clocks misc impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 misc ultrarelativistic source misc Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities misc independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source misc absolute synchronization of clocks misc impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light |
| topic_browse |
ddc 530 misc ultrarelativistic source misc Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities misc independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source misc absolute synchronization of clocks misc impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Russian physics journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
131169718 |
| dewey-tens |
530 - Physics 370 - Education |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Russian physics journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)131169718 (DE-600)1138228-4 (DE-576)033029253 |
| title |
On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2033081524 (DE-He213)s11182-015-0366-3-p |
| title_full |
On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source |
| author_sort |
Kupryaev, N. V. |
| journal |
Russian physics journal |
| journalStr |
Russian physics journal |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1220 |
| author_browse |
Kupryaev, N. V. |
| container_volume |
57 |
| class |
530 370 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kupryaev, N. V. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 |
| dewey-full |
530 370 |
| title_sort |
on the measurement of the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source |
| title_auth |
On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source |
| abstract |
By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 |
| abstractGer |
By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
9 |
| title_short |
On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
131169718 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:37:21.784Z |
| _version_ |
1803572783910748160 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2033081524</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504035952.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2033081524</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11182-015-0366-3-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kupryaev, N. V.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the Measurement of the Velocity of Light Emitted by an Ultrarelativistic Source</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">By analytical calculations it has been shown that in papers on the measurement of the velocity of light published in 2011 in the journals Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk [Physics–Uspekhi] and Pis’ma v ZhETF [JRTP Letters], in actual fact the velocity of a light pulse from a relativistic clot of electrons was not measured. All that was done was to compare the velocity of light emitted by an ultrarelativistic source with the velocity of light from a fixed source, i.e., both in the first and second variants (one independent quantity was compared with another), in essence, it was simply postulated. In the first variant a glass plate was used as the fixed light source, and in the second variants, a synchrotron pulse was used as the reference signal. The velocity of light was calculated using a calculated time based on the postulate of the special theory of relativity (STR) on the invariance of the velocity of light. This, of course, contradicts the Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities, but at the present time this idea is not taken seriously. Practically none of the serious contemporary critics of STR, apart, of course, from amateurs, holds this point of view. The result cannot be considered as a direct experimental confirmation of the second postulate of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, i.e., its main part, which speaks of the constancy of the velocity of light in all inertial reference frames, but only of that part which speaks of the independence of the velocity of light on motion of the source. Moreover, this same result stands as equal proof of the so-called theory of the luminiferous ether, which held sway up to the creation of the special theory of relativity and which has now been revived, i.e., it does not distinguish between these two theories. It is fundamentally impossible in principle to measure the velocity of light by the proposed method, it is only possible to postulate it.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ultrarelativistic source</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Newton–Ritz hypothesis on ballistic addition of velocities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">independence of the velocity of light of the velocity of the source</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">absolute synchronization of clocks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">impossibility of absolute synchronization of clocks with the help of signals of an electromagnetic nature and measurement of the velocity of light</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Russian physics journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">57(2015), 9 vom: Jan., Seite 1220-1224</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)131169718</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1138228-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)033029253</subfield><subfield code="x">1064-8887</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:57</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1220-1224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0366-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">57</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">1220-1224</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.39777 |