Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate
Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take i...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Wray, K. Brad [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2009 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Scientometrics - Springer Netherlands, 1978, 83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:83 ; year:2009 ; number:2 ; day:10 ; month:06 ; pages:471-476 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2033193144 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2033193144 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504041716.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2033193144 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11192-009-0060-8-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 050 |a 370 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 11 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wray, K. Brad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Scientific specialty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Specialization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Price | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Size | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scientometrics |d Springer Netherlands, 1978 |g 83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476 |w (DE-627)13005352X |w (DE-600)435652-4 |w (DE-576)015591697 |x 0138-9130 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:83 |g year:2009 |g number:2 |g day:10 |g month:06 |g pages:471-476 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-BUB | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-HSW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-BBI | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_754 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4193 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4319 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 83 |j 2009 |e 2 |b 10 |c 06 |h 471-476 | ||
| author_variant |
k b w kb kbw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:01389130:2009----::ehnighszosiniiseilisorci |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2009 |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2033193144 (DE-He213)s11192-009-0060-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 370 VZ 11 ssgn Wray, K. Brad verfasserin aut Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists. Scientific specialty Specialization Price Size Enthalten in Scientometrics Springer Netherlands, 1978 83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476 (DE-627)13005352X (DE-600)435652-4 (DE-576)015591697 0138-9130 nnns volume:83 year:2009 number:2 day:10 month:06 pages:471-476 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 83 2009 2 10 06 471-476 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2033193144 (DE-He213)s11192-009-0060-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 370 VZ 11 ssgn Wray, K. Brad verfasserin aut Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists. Scientific specialty Specialization Price Size Enthalten in Scientometrics Springer Netherlands, 1978 83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476 (DE-627)13005352X (DE-600)435652-4 (DE-576)015591697 0138-9130 nnns volume:83 year:2009 number:2 day:10 month:06 pages:471-476 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 83 2009 2 10 06 471-476 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2033193144 (DE-He213)s11192-009-0060-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 370 VZ 11 ssgn Wray, K. Brad verfasserin aut Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists. Scientific specialty Specialization Price Size Enthalten in Scientometrics Springer Netherlands, 1978 83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476 (DE-627)13005352X (DE-600)435652-4 (DE-576)015591697 0138-9130 nnns volume:83 year:2009 number:2 day:10 month:06 pages:471-476 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 83 2009 2 10 06 471-476 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2033193144 (DE-He213)s11192-009-0060-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 370 VZ 11 ssgn Wray, K. Brad verfasserin aut Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists. Scientific specialty Specialization Price Size Enthalten in Scientometrics Springer Netherlands, 1978 83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476 (DE-627)13005352X (DE-600)435652-4 (DE-576)015591697 0138-9130 nnns volume:83 year:2009 number:2 day:10 month:06 pages:471-476 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 83 2009 2 10 06 471-476 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2033193144 (DE-He213)s11192-009-0060-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 370 VZ 11 ssgn Wray, K. Brad verfasserin aut Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists. Scientific specialty Specialization Price Size Enthalten in Scientometrics Springer Netherlands, 1978 83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476 (DE-627)13005352X (DE-600)435652-4 (DE-576)015591697 0138-9130 nnns volume:83 year:2009 number:2 day:10 month:06 pages:471-476 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 83 2009 2 10 06 471-476 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Scientometrics 83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476 volume:83 year:2009 number:2 day:10 month:06 pages:471-476 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Scientometrics 83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476 volume:83 year:2009 number:2 day:10 month:06 pages:471-476 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Scientific specialty Specialization Price Size |
| dewey-raw |
050 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Scientometrics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wray, K. Brad @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2009-06-10T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
13005352X |
| dewey-sort |
250 |
| id |
OLC2033193144 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2033193144</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504041716.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2033193144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11192-009-0060-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">050</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wray, K. Brad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Scientific specialty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Specialization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Price</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Size</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientometrics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1978</subfield><subfield code="g">83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)13005352X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)435652-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015591697</subfield><subfield code="x">0138-9130</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:83</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:471-476</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HSW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">83</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">471-476</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Wray, K. Brad |
| spellingShingle |
Wray, K. Brad ddc 050 ssgn 11 misc Scientific specialty misc Specialization misc Price misc Size Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate |
| authorStr |
Wray, K. Brad |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)13005352X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
050 - General serial publications 370 - Education |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0138-9130 |
| topic_title |
050 370 VZ 11 ssgn Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate Scientific specialty Specialization Price Size |
| topic |
ddc 050 ssgn 11 misc Scientific specialty misc Specialization misc Price misc Size |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 050 ssgn 11 misc Scientific specialty misc Specialization misc Price misc Size |
| topic_browse |
ddc 050 ssgn 11 misc Scientific specialty misc Specialization misc Price misc Size |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Scientometrics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
13005352X |
| dewey-tens |
050 - Magazines, journals & serials 370 - Education |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Scientometrics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)13005352X (DE-600)435652-4 (DE-576)015591697 |
| title |
Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2033193144 (DE-He213)s11192-009-0060-8-p |
| title_full |
Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate |
| author_sort |
Wray, K. Brad |
| journal |
Scientometrics |
| journalStr |
Scientometrics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2009 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
471 |
| author_browse |
Wray, K. Brad |
| container_volume |
83 |
| class |
050 370 VZ 11 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Wray, K. Brad |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 |
| dewey-full |
050 370 |
| title_sort |
rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting price’s estimate |
| title_auth |
Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate |
| abstract |
Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists. © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists. © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists. © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OLC-HSW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4319 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
13005352X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T16:04:16.779Z |
| _version_ |
1803574477355745280 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2033193144</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504041716.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2033193144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11192-009-0060-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">050</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wray, K. Brad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: correcting Price’s estimate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract I aim to advance our understanding of the size of scientific specialties. Derek Price’s groundbreaking work has provided us with valuable conceptual tools and data for making progress on this issue. But, I argue that his estimate of 100 scientists per specialty is flawed. He fails to take into account the fact that the average publishing scientist publishes only 3.5 articles throughout her career. Hence, rather than consisting of 100 scientists, I have suggested that specialties are probably somewhat larger, perhaps somewhere between 250 and 600 scientists.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Scientific specialty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Specialization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Price</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Size</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientometrics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1978</subfield><subfield code="g">83(2009), 2 vom: 10. Juni, Seite 471-476</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)13005352X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)435652-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015591697</subfield><subfield code="x">0138-9130</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:83</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:471-476</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0060-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-HSW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">83</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">471-476</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4018574 |