Systematic variability in repetitious travel
Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individua...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Hanson, Susan [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
1988 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Transportation - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1972, 15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:15 ; year:1988 ; number:1-2 ; month:03 ; pages:111-135 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/BF00167983 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2035086159 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2035086159 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230504011814.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s1988 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF00167983 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2035086159 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)BF00167983-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 380 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Hanson, Susan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Systematic variability in repetitious travel |
264 | 1 | |c 1988 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 | ||
520 | |a Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Travel Behavior | |
650 | 4 | |a Weekly Cycle | |
650 | 4 | |a Considerable Portion | |
650 | 4 | |a Intraindividual Variability | |
650 | 4 | |a Travel Pattern | |
700 | 1 | |a Huff, O. James |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Transportation |d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1972 |g 15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135 |w (DE-627)129299804 |w (DE-600)121857-8 |w (DE-576)014492407 |x 0049-4488 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:1988 |g number:1-2 |g month:03 |g pages:111-135 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167983 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4028 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4082 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4317 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4319 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 15 |j 1988 |e 1-2 |c 03 |h 111-135 |
author_variant |
s h sh o j h oj ojh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00494488:1988----::ytmtcaibltirptt |
hierarchy_sort_str |
1988 |
publishDate |
1988 |
allfields |
10.1007/BF00167983 doi (DE-627)OLC2035086159 (DE-He213)BF00167983-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 VZ Hanson, Susan verfasserin aut Systematic variability in repetitious travel 1988 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques. Travel Behavior Weekly Cycle Considerable Portion Intraindividual Variability Travel Pattern Huff, O. James aut Enthalten in Transportation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1972 15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135 (DE-627)129299804 (DE-600)121857-8 (DE-576)014492407 0049-4488 nnns volume:15 year:1988 number:1-2 month:03 pages:111-135 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167983 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 15 1988 1-2 03 111-135 |
spelling |
10.1007/BF00167983 doi (DE-627)OLC2035086159 (DE-He213)BF00167983-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 VZ Hanson, Susan verfasserin aut Systematic variability in repetitious travel 1988 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques. Travel Behavior Weekly Cycle Considerable Portion Intraindividual Variability Travel Pattern Huff, O. James aut Enthalten in Transportation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1972 15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135 (DE-627)129299804 (DE-600)121857-8 (DE-576)014492407 0049-4488 nnns volume:15 year:1988 number:1-2 month:03 pages:111-135 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167983 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 15 1988 1-2 03 111-135 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/BF00167983 doi (DE-627)OLC2035086159 (DE-He213)BF00167983-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 VZ Hanson, Susan verfasserin aut Systematic variability in repetitious travel 1988 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques. Travel Behavior Weekly Cycle Considerable Portion Intraindividual Variability Travel Pattern Huff, O. James aut Enthalten in Transportation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1972 15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135 (DE-627)129299804 (DE-600)121857-8 (DE-576)014492407 0049-4488 nnns volume:15 year:1988 number:1-2 month:03 pages:111-135 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167983 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 15 1988 1-2 03 111-135 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/BF00167983 doi (DE-627)OLC2035086159 (DE-He213)BF00167983-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 VZ Hanson, Susan verfasserin aut Systematic variability in repetitious travel 1988 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques. Travel Behavior Weekly Cycle Considerable Portion Intraindividual Variability Travel Pattern Huff, O. James aut Enthalten in Transportation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1972 15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135 (DE-627)129299804 (DE-600)121857-8 (DE-576)014492407 0049-4488 nnns volume:15 year:1988 number:1-2 month:03 pages:111-135 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167983 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 15 1988 1-2 03 111-135 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/BF00167983 doi (DE-627)OLC2035086159 (DE-He213)BF00167983-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 380 VZ Hanson, Susan verfasserin aut Systematic variability in repetitious travel 1988 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques. Travel Behavior Weekly Cycle Considerable Portion Intraindividual Variability Travel Pattern Huff, O. James aut Enthalten in Transportation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1972 15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135 (DE-627)129299804 (DE-600)121857-8 (DE-576)014492407 0049-4488 nnns volume:15 year:1988 number:1-2 month:03 pages:111-135 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167983 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4319 AR 15 1988 1-2 03 111-135 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Transportation 15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135 volume:15 year:1988 number:1-2 month:03 pages:111-135 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Transportation 15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135 volume:15 year:1988 number:1-2 month:03 pages:111-135 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Travel Behavior Weekly Cycle Considerable Portion Intraindividual Variability Travel Pattern |
dewey-raw |
380 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Transportation |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hanson, Susan @@aut@@ Huff, O. James @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
1988-03-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129299804 |
dewey-sort |
3380 |
id |
OLC2035086159 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2035086159</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504011814.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1988 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00167983</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2035086159</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00167983-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">380</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hanson, Susan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Systematic variability in repetitious travel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Travel Behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weekly Cycle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Considerable Portion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intraindividual Variability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Travel Pattern</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huff, O. James</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Transportation</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1972</subfield><subfield code="g">15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129299804</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)121857-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014492407</subfield><subfield code="x">0049-4488</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:111-135</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167983</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">111-135</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Hanson, Susan |
spellingShingle |
Hanson, Susan ddc 380 misc Travel Behavior misc Weekly Cycle misc Considerable Portion misc Intraindividual Variability misc Travel Pattern Systematic variability in repetitious travel |
authorStr |
Hanson, Susan |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129299804 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
380 - Commerce, communications & transportation |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0049-4488 |
topic_title |
380 VZ Systematic variability in repetitious travel Travel Behavior Weekly Cycle Considerable Portion Intraindividual Variability Travel Pattern |
topic |
ddc 380 misc Travel Behavior misc Weekly Cycle misc Considerable Portion misc Intraindividual Variability misc Travel Pattern |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 380 misc Travel Behavior misc Weekly Cycle misc Considerable Portion misc Intraindividual Variability misc Travel Pattern |
topic_browse |
ddc 380 misc Travel Behavior misc Weekly Cycle misc Considerable Portion misc Intraindividual Variability misc Travel Pattern |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Transportation |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129299804 |
dewey-tens |
380 - Commerce, communications & transportation |
hierarchy_top_title |
Transportation |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129299804 (DE-600)121857-8 (DE-576)014492407 |
title |
Systematic variability in repetitious travel |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2035086159 (DE-He213)BF00167983-p |
title_full |
Systematic variability in repetitious travel |
author_sort |
Hanson, Susan |
journal |
Transportation |
journalStr |
Transportation |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
1988 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
111 |
author_browse |
Hanson, Susan Huff, O. James |
container_volume |
15 |
class |
380 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Hanson, Susan |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/BF00167983 |
dewey-full |
380 |
title_sort |
systematic variability in repetitious travel |
title_auth |
Systematic variability in repetitious travel |
abstract |
Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 |
abstractGer |
Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4319 |
container_issue |
1-2 |
title_short |
Systematic variability in repetitious travel |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167983 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Huff, O. James |
author2Str |
Huff, O. James |
ppnlink |
129299804 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/BF00167983 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T23:45:30.349Z |
_version_ |
1803603495198130176 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2035086159</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504011814.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1988 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00167983</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2035086159</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00167983-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">380</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hanson, Susan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Systematic variability in repetitious travel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The focus of this paper is the degree to which day-to-day variability in the individual's travel pattern has a systematic, or nonrandom, component. We first review the different sources of variability in travel, emphasizing the difference between between-individual and within-individual variation and the implications of this difference for travel analysis. After discussing the impact of measurement (i.e. the way in which travel behavior is measured) on the study of repetition and variability, we use the Uppsala data to examine the level of systematic variability in an individual's longitudinal travel record. The analysis focuses on two questions:- How well does observation over one week capture longer-term (five-week) travel behavior; in other words, is behavior highly repetitive from week to week?- How systematic is within-individual variability; in other words, are certain stops distributed over the five-week record in a nonrandom, that is either regular or clustered, fashion? Using measures of travel that include more than one stop attribute (e.g. activity, mode, time of day, and location), we found that:- A seven-day record of travel does not capture most of the separate behaviors exhibited by the individual over a five-week period, but it does capture, for most people, a good sampling of the person's different typical daily travel patterns.- Whereas a considerable portion of intraindividual variability is systematic (nonrandom), clustering is a more important source of nonrandom variation than is regularity. The results suggest that behavior does not follow a weekly cycle closely enough for a one-week travel record to measure the longer-term frequency with which the individual makes certain stops or to assess the level of day-to-day variation present in the individual's record. Because these results are likely to reflect the particular measures of behavior we used, one conclusion of this study is the need for other studies that replicate the aims of this one but use a variety of other travel measures. Only through such additional work can we truly assess the sensitivity of our findings to measurement techniques.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Travel Behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Weekly Cycle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Considerable Portion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intraindividual Variability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Travel Pattern</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huff, O. James</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Transportation</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1972</subfield><subfield code="g">15(1988), 1-2 vom: März, Seite 111-135</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129299804</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)121857-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014492407</subfield><subfield code="x">0049-4488</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:111-135</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167983</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">111-135</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3980513 |