Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options
Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented wi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Tavoni, Massimo [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2011 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Environmental modeling & assessment - Springer Netherlands, 1996, 16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:2011 ; number:5 ; day:11 ; month:05 ; pages:431-440 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2036519008 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2036519008 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503052833.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2036519008 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10666-011-9259-1-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 690 |a 333.7 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 12 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a 43.03 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tavoni, Massimo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic competition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Electricity sector | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nuclear power | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Coal power | |
| 650 | 4 | |a CCS | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Renewables | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Climate policy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van der Zwaan, Bob |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental modeling & assessment |d Springer Netherlands, 1996 |g 16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440 |w (DE-627)214127214 |w (DE-600)1332060-9 |w (DE-576)481324054 |x 1420-2026 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2011 |g number:5 |g day:11 |g month:05 |g pages:431-440 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 43.03 |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2011 |e 5 |b 11 |c 05 |h 431-440 | ||
| author_variant |
m t mt d z b v dzb dzbv |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14202026:2011----::ulavrucapucscmaiootoopttvbslac |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
| bklnumber |
43.03 |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2036519008 (DE-He213)s10666-011-9259-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 333.7 VZ 12 ssgn 43.03 bkl Tavoni, Massimo verfasserin aut Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants. Economic competition Electricity sector Nuclear power Coal power CCS Renewables Climate policy van der Zwaan, Bob aut Enthalten in Environmental modeling & assessment Springer Netherlands, 1996 16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440 (DE-627)214127214 (DE-600)1332060-9 (DE-576)481324054 1420-2026 nnns volume:16 year:2011 number:5 day:11 month:05 pages:431-440 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 43.03 VZ AR 16 2011 5 11 05 431-440 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2036519008 (DE-He213)s10666-011-9259-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 333.7 VZ 12 ssgn 43.03 bkl Tavoni, Massimo verfasserin aut Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants. Economic competition Electricity sector Nuclear power Coal power CCS Renewables Climate policy van der Zwaan, Bob aut Enthalten in Environmental modeling & assessment Springer Netherlands, 1996 16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440 (DE-627)214127214 (DE-600)1332060-9 (DE-576)481324054 1420-2026 nnns volume:16 year:2011 number:5 day:11 month:05 pages:431-440 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 43.03 VZ AR 16 2011 5 11 05 431-440 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2036519008 (DE-He213)s10666-011-9259-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 333.7 VZ 12 ssgn 43.03 bkl Tavoni, Massimo verfasserin aut Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants. Economic competition Electricity sector Nuclear power Coal power CCS Renewables Climate policy van der Zwaan, Bob aut Enthalten in Environmental modeling & assessment Springer Netherlands, 1996 16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440 (DE-627)214127214 (DE-600)1332060-9 (DE-576)481324054 1420-2026 nnns volume:16 year:2011 number:5 day:11 month:05 pages:431-440 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 43.03 VZ AR 16 2011 5 11 05 431-440 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2036519008 (DE-He213)s10666-011-9259-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 333.7 VZ 12 ssgn 43.03 bkl Tavoni, Massimo verfasserin aut Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants. Economic competition Electricity sector Nuclear power Coal power CCS Renewables Climate policy van der Zwaan, Bob aut Enthalten in Environmental modeling & assessment Springer Netherlands, 1996 16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440 (DE-627)214127214 (DE-600)1332060-9 (DE-576)481324054 1420-2026 nnns volume:16 year:2011 number:5 day:11 month:05 pages:431-440 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 43.03 VZ AR 16 2011 5 11 05 431-440 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2036519008 (DE-He213)s10666-011-9259-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 333.7 VZ 12 ssgn 43.03 bkl Tavoni, Massimo verfasserin aut Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants. Economic competition Electricity sector Nuclear power Coal power CCS Renewables Climate policy van der Zwaan, Bob aut Enthalten in Environmental modeling & assessment Springer Netherlands, 1996 16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440 (DE-627)214127214 (DE-600)1332060-9 (DE-576)481324054 1420-2026 nnns volume:16 year:2011 number:5 day:11 month:05 pages:431-440 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 43.03 VZ AR 16 2011 5 11 05 431-440 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Environmental modeling & assessment 16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440 volume:16 year:2011 number:5 day:11 month:05 pages:431-440 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Environmental modeling & assessment 16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440 volume:16 year:2011 number:5 day:11 month:05 pages:431-440 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Economic competition Electricity sector Nuclear power Coal power CCS Renewables Climate policy |
| dewey-raw |
570 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Environmental modeling & assessment |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Tavoni, Massimo @@aut@@ van der Zwaan, Bob @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2011-05-11T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
214127214 |
| dewey-sort |
3570 |
| id |
OLC2036519008 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2036519008</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503052833.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2036519008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10666-011-9259-1-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.03</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tavoni, Massimo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic competition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electricity sector</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coal power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CCS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Renewables</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Climate policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van der Zwaan, Bob</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental modeling & assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)214127214</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1332060-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)481324054</subfield><subfield code="x">1420-2026</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:431-440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.03</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">431-440</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Tavoni, Massimo |
| spellingShingle |
Tavoni, Massimo ddc 570 ssgn 12 bkl 43.03 misc Economic competition misc Electricity sector misc Nuclear power misc Coal power misc CCS misc Renewables misc Climate policy Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options |
| authorStr |
Tavoni, Massimo |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)214127214 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 690 - Buildings 333 - Economics of land & energy |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1420-2026 |
| topic_title |
570 690 333.7 VZ 12 ssgn 43.03 bkl Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options Economic competition Electricity sector Nuclear power Coal power CCS Renewables Climate policy |
| topic |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 bkl 43.03 misc Economic competition misc Electricity sector misc Nuclear power misc Coal power misc CCS misc Renewables misc Climate policy |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 bkl 43.03 misc Economic competition misc Electricity sector misc Nuclear power misc Coal power misc CCS misc Renewables misc Climate policy |
| topic_browse |
ddc 570 ssgn 12 bkl 43.03 misc Economic competition misc Electricity sector misc Nuclear power misc Coal power misc CCS misc Renewables misc Climate policy |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Environmental modeling & assessment |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
214127214 |
| dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 690 - Building & construction 330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Environmental modeling & assessment |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)214127214 (DE-600)1332060-9 (DE-576)481324054 |
| title |
Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2036519008 (DE-He213)s10666-011-9259-1-p |
| title_full |
Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options |
| author_sort |
Tavoni, Massimo |
| journal |
Environmental modeling & assessment |
| journalStr |
Environmental modeling & assessment |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2011 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
431 |
| author_browse |
Tavoni, Massimo van der Zwaan, Bob |
| container_volume |
16 |
| class |
570 690 333.7 VZ 12 ssgn 43.03 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Tavoni, Massimo |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 |
| dewey-full |
570 690 333.7 |
| title_sort |
nuclear versus coal plus ccs: a comparison of two competitive base-load climate control options |
| title_auth |
Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options |
| abstract |
Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
van der Zwaan, Bob |
| author2Str |
van der Zwaan, Bob |
| ppnlink |
214127214 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T03:35:45.732Z |
| _version_ |
1803617981682417664 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2036519008</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503052833.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2036519008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10666-011-9259-1-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.03</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tavoni, Massimo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this paper, we analyze the relative importance and mutual behavior of two competing base-load electricity generation options that each are capable of contributing significantly to the abatement of global $ CO_{2} $ emissions: nuclear energy and coal-based power production complemented with $ CO_{2} $ capture and storage (CCS). We also investigate how, in scenarios developed with an integrated assessment model that simulates the economics of a climate-constrained world, the prospects for nuclear energy would change if exogenous limitations on the spread of nuclear technology were relaxed. Using the climate change economics model World Induced Technical Change Hybrid, we find that until 2050 the growth rates of nuclear electricity generation capacity would become comparable to historical rates observed during the 1980s. Given that nuclear energy continues to face serious challenges and contention, we inspect how extensive the improvements of coal-based power equipped with CCS technology would need to be if our economic optimization model is to significantly scale down the construction of new nuclear power plants.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic competition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electricity sector</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coal power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CCS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Renewables</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Climate policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van der Zwaan, Bob</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental modeling & assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2011), 5 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 431-440</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)214127214</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1332060-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)481324054</subfield><subfield code="x">1420-2026</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:431-440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9259-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.03</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">431-440</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4018154 |