Belief Revision And Epistemology

Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Pollock, John L. [verfasserIn] Gillies, Anthony S.

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2000

Schlagwörter:	Belief Revision Logical Relation Revision Operator Proper Account Postulational Theory

Anmerkung:	© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Synthese - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1936, 122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:122 ; year:2000 ; number:1-2 ; month:02 ; pages:69-92

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1023/A:1005220010407

Katalog-ID:	OLC2037229402

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	OLC2037229402
003	DE-627
005	20230504054426.0
007	tu
008	200819s2000 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1023/A:1005220010407 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC2037229402
035			\|a (DE-He213)A:1005220010407-p
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 400 \|a 150 \|a 300 \|q VZ
084			\|a 5,2 \|a 7,11 \|a 11 \|a 5,1 \|2 ssgn
084			\|a LING \|q DE-30 \|2 fid
100	1		\|a Pollock, John L. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Belief Revision And Epistemology
264		1	\|c 2000
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000
520			\|a Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory.
650		4	\|a Belief Revision
650		4	\|a Logical Relation
650		4	\|a Revision Operator
650		4	\|a Proper Account
650		4	\|a Postulational Theory
700	1		\|a Gillies, Anthony S. \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Synthese \|d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1936 \|g 122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92 \|w (DE-627)129479187 \|w (DE-600)204075-X \|w (DE-576)014860856 \|x 0039-7857 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:122 \|g year:2000 \|g number:1-2 \|g month:02 \|g pages:69-92
856	4	1	\|u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005220010407 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a FID-LING
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHY
912			\|a SSG-OLC-CHE
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHI
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_21
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_72
912			\|a GBV_ILN_130
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2093
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2410
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4028
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4082
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4103
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4193
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4310
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4311
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4317
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4318
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 122 \|j 2000 \|e 1-2 \|c 02 \|h 69-92

Indexfelder

author_variant	j l p jl jlp a s g as asg
matchkey_str	article:00397857:2000----::eifeiinnei
hierarchy_sort_str	2000
publishDate	2000
allfields	10.1023/A:1005220010407 doi (DE-627)OLC2037229402 (DE-He213)A:1005220010407-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Pollock, John L. verfasserin aut Belief Revision And Epistemology 2000 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000 Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory. Belief Revision Logical Relation Revision Operator Proper Account Postulational Theory Gillies, Anthony S. aut Enthalten in Synthese Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1936 122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:122 year:2000 number:1-2 month:02 pages:69-92 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005220010407 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 122 2000 1-2 02 69-92
spelling	10.1023/A:1005220010407 doi (DE-627)OLC2037229402 (DE-He213)A:1005220010407-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Pollock, John L. verfasserin aut Belief Revision And Epistemology 2000 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000 Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory. Belief Revision Logical Relation Revision Operator Proper Account Postulational Theory Gillies, Anthony S. aut Enthalten in Synthese Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1936 122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:122 year:2000 number:1-2 month:02 pages:69-92 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005220010407 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 122 2000 1-2 02 69-92
allfields_unstemmed	10.1023/A:1005220010407 doi (DE-627)OLC2037229402 (DE-He213)A:1005220010407-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Pollock, John L. verfasserin aut Belief Revision And Epistemology 2000 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000 Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory. Belief Revision Logical Relation Revision Operator Proper Account Postulational Theory Gillies, Anthony S. aut Enthalten in Synthese Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1936 122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:122 year:2000 number:1-2 month:02 pages:69-92 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005220010407 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 122 2000 1-2 02 69-92
allfieldsGer	10.1023/A:1005220010407 doi (DE-627)OLC2037229402 (DE-He213)A:1005220010407-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Pollock, John L. verfasserin aut Belief Revision And Epistemology 2000 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000 Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory. Belief Revision Logical Relation Revision Operator Proper Account Postulational Theory Gillies, Anthony S. aut Enthalten in Synthese Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1936 122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:122 year:2000 number:1-2 month:02 pages:69-92 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005220010407 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 122 2000 1-2 02 69-92
allfieldsSound	10.1023/A:1005220010407 doi (DE-627)OLC2037229402 (DE-He213)A:1005220010407-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Pollock, John L. verfasserin aut Belief Revision And Epistemology 2000 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000 Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory. Belief Revision Logical Relation Revision Operator Proper Account Postulational Theory Gillies, Anthony S. aut Enthalten in Synthese Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1936 122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92 (DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856 0039-7857 nnns volume:122 year:2000 number:1-2 month:02 pages:69-92 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005220010407 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 AR 122 2000 1-2 02 69-92
language	English
source	Enthalten in Synthese 122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92 volume:122 year:2000 number:1-2 month:02 pages:69-92
sourceStr	Enthalten in Synthese 122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92 volume:122 year:2000 number:1-2 month:02 pages:69-92
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Belief Revision Logical Relation Revision Operator Proper Account Postulational Theory
dewey-raw	400
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Synthese
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Pollock, John L. @@aut@@ Gillies, Anthony S. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2000-02-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	129479187
dewey-sort	3400
id	OLC2037229402
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2037229402</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504054426.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2000 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1005220010407</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2037229402</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)A:1005220010407-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">400</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">7,11</subfield><subfield code="a">11</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pollock, John L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Belief Revision And Epistemology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Belief Revision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logical Relation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Revision Operator</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proper Account</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Postulational Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gillies, Anthony S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Synthese</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1936</subfield><subfield code="g">122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129479187</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)204075-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014860856</subfield><subfield code="x">0039-7857</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:122</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2000</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:69-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005220010407</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2410</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">122</subfield><subfield code="j">2000</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">69-92</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Pollock, John L.
spellingShingle	Pollock, John L. ddc 400 ssgn 5,2 fid LING misc Belief Revision misc Logical Relation misc Revision Operator misc Proper Account misc Postulational Theory Belief Revision And Epistemology
authorStr	Pollock, John L.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)129479187
format	Article
dewey-ones	400 - Language 150 - Psychology 300 - Social sciences
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0039-7857
topic_title	400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid Belief Revision And Epistemology Belief Revision Logical Relation Revision Operator Proper Account Postulational Theory
topic	ddc 400 ssgn 5,2 fid LING misc Belief Revision misc Logical Relation misc Revision Operator misc Proper Account misc Postulational Theory
topic_unstemmed	ddc 400 ssgn 5,2 fid LING misc Belief Revision misc Logical Relation misc Revision Operator misc Proper Account misc Postulational Theory
topic_browse	ddc 400 ssgn 5,2 fid LING misc Belief Revision misc Logical Relation misc Revision Operator misc Proper Account misc Postulational Theory
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Synthese
hierarchy_parent_id	129479187
dewey-tens	400 - Language 150 - Psychology 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
hierarchy_top_title	Synthese
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)129479187 (DE-600)204075-X (DE-576)014860856
title	Belief Revision And Epistemology
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC2037229402 (DE-He213)A:1005220010407-p
title_full	Belief Revision And Epistemology
author_sort	Pollock, John L.
journal	Synthese
journalStr	Synthese
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	400 - Language 100 - Philosophy & psychology 300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2000
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	69
author_browse	Pollock, John L. Gillies, Anthony S.
container_volume	122
class	400 150 300 VZ 5,2 7,11 11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Pollock, John L.
doi_str_mv	10.1023/A:1005220010407
dewey-full	400 150 300
title_sort	belief revision and epistemology
title_auth	Belief Revision And Epistemology
abstract	Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000
abstractGer	Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-CHE SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4317 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325
container_issue	1-2
title_short	Belief Revision And Epistemology
url	https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005220010407
remote_bool	false
author2	Gillies, Anthony S.
author2Str	Gillies, Anthony S.
ppnlink	129479187
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1023/A:1005220010407
up_date	2024-07-03T14:20:48.256Z
_version_	1803567967256969216
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2037229402</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504054426.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2000 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1005220010407</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2037229402</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)A:1005220010407-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">400</subfield><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">7,11</subfield><subfield code="a">11</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pollock, John L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Belief Revision And Epistemology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Postulational approaches attempt to understand the dynamics of belief revision by appealing to no more than the set of beliefs held by an agent and the logical relations between them. It is argued there that such an approach cannot work. A proper account of belief revision must also appeal to the arguments supporting beliefs, and recognize that those arguments can be defeasible. If we begin with a mature epistemological theory that accommodates this, it can be seen that the belief revision operators on which the postulational theories are based are ill-defined. It is further argued that there is no way to repair the definitions so as to retain the spirit of those theory. Belief revision is better studied from within an independently motivated epistemological theory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Belief Revision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logical Relation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Revision Operator</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proper Account</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Postulational Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gillies, Anthony S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Synthese</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1936</subfield><subfield code="g">122(2000), 1-2 vom: Feb., Seite 69-92</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129479187</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)204075-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014860856</subfield><subfield code="x">0039-7857</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:122</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2000</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:69-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005220010407</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-CHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2410</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">122</subfield><subfield code="j">2000</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">69-92</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.398264

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Belief Revision And Epistemology

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?