Autonomy and private ordering in contract law
Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Parisi, Francesco [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1994 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: European journal of law and economics - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994, 1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:1994 ; number:3 ; month:11 ; pages:213-227 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/BF01552471 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2038352011 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2038352011 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503050400.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s1994 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF01552471 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2038352011 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)BF01552471-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |a 330 |a 360 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Parisi, Francesco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Autonomy and private ordering in contract law |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1994 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Legal Issue | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic Approach | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Legal Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contract Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Balance Position | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal of law and economics |d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994 |g 1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227 |w (DE-627)184980658 |w (DE-600)1231592-8 |w (DE-576)046704884 |x 0929-1261 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:1994 |g number:3 |g month:11 |g pages:213-227 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552471 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2062 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1 |j 1994 |e 3 |c 11 |h 213-227 | ||
| author_variant |
f p fp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09291261:1994----::uooynpiaereig |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1994 |
| publishDate |
1994 |
| allfields |
10.1007/BF01552471 doi (DE-627)OLC2038352011 (DE-He213)BF01552471-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 330 360 VZ Parisi, Francesco verfasserin aut Autonomy and private ordering in contract law 1994 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes. Legal Issue Economic Approach Legal Theory Contract Theory Balance Position Enthalten in European journal of law and economics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994 1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227 (DE-627)184980658 (DE-600)1231592-8 (DE-576)046704884 0929-1261 nnns volume:1 year:1994 number:3 month:11 pages:213-227 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552471 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 1 1994 3 11 213-227 |
| spelling |
10.1007/BF01552471 doi (DE-627)OLC2038352011 (DE-He213)BF01552471-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 330 360 VZ Parisi, Francesco verfasserin aut Autonomy and private ordering in contract law 1994 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes. Legal Issue Economic Approach Legal Theory Contract Theory Balance Position Enthalten in European journal of law and economics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994 1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227 (DE-627)184980658 (DE-600)1231592-8 (DE-576)046704884 0929-1261 nnns volume:1 year:1994 number:3 month:11 pages:213-227 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552471 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 1 1994 3 11 213-227 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/BF01552471 doi (DE-627)OLC2038352011 (DE-He213)BF01552471-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 330 360 VZ Parisi, Francesco verfasserin aut Autonomy and private ordering in contract law 1994 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes. Legal Issue Economic Approach Legal Theory Contract Theory Balance Position Enthalten in European journal of law and economics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994 1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227 (DE-627)184980658 (DE-600)1231592-8 (DE-576)046704884 0929-1261 nnns volume:1 year:1994 number:3 month:11 pages:213-227 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552471 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 1 1994 3 11 213-227 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/BF01552471 doi (DE-627)OLC2038352011 (DE-He213)BF01552471-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 330 360 VZ Parisi, Francesco verfasserin aut Autonomy and private ordering in contract law 1994 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes. Legal Issue Economic Approach Legal Theory Contract Theory Balance Position Enthalten in European journal of law and economics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994 1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227 (DE-627)184980658 (DE-600)1231592-8 (DE-576)046704884 0929-1261 nnns volume:1 year:1994 number:3 month:11 pages:213-227 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552471 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 1 1994 3 11 213-227 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/BF01552471 doi (DE-627)OLC2038352011 (DE-He213)BF01552471-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 330 360 VZ Parisi, Francesco verfasserin aut Autonomy and private ordering in contract law 1994 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes. Legal Issue Economic Approach Legal Theory Contract Theory Balance Position Enthalten in European journal of law and economics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994 1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227 (DE-627)184980658 (DE-600)1231592-8 (DE-576)046704884 0929-1261 nnns volume:1 year:1994 number:3 month:11 pages:213-227 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552471 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4326 AR 1 1994 3 11 213-227 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in European journal of law and economics 1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227 volume:1 year:1994 number:3 month:11 pages:213-227 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in European journal of law and economics 1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227 volume:1 year:1994 number:3 month:11 pages:213-227 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Legal Issue Economic Approach Legal Theory Contract Theory Balance Position |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
European journal of law and economics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Parisi, Francesco @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1994-11-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
184980658 |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC2038352011 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2038352011</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503050400.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1994 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01552471</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2038352011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF01552471-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">360</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parisi, Francesco</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Autonomy and private ordering in contract law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legal Issue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic Approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legal Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Contract Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Balance Position</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">European journal of law and economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994</subfield><subfield code="g">1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)184980658</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1231592-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)046704884</subfield><subfield code="x">0929-1261</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1994</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:213-227</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552471</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">1994</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">213-227</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Parisi, Francesco |
| spellingShingle |
Parisi, Francesco ddc 340 misc Legal Issue misc Economic Approach misc Legal Theory misc Contract Theory misc Balance Position Autonomy and private ordering in contract law |
| authorStr |
Parisi, Francesco |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)184980658 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law 330 - Economics 360 - Social problems & services; associations |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0929-1261 |
| topic_title |
340 330 360 VZ Autonomy and private ordering in contract law Legal Issue Economic Approach Legal Theory Contract Theory Balance Position |
| topic |
ddc 340 misc Legal Issue misc Economic Approach misc Legal Theory misc Contract Theory misc Balance Position |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 misc Legal Issue misc Economic Approach misc Legal Theory misc Contract Theory misc Balance Position |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 misc Legal Issue misc Economic Approach misc Legal Theory misc Contract Theory misc Balance Position |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
European journal of law and economics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
184980658 |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law 330 - Economics 360 - Social problems & social services |
| hierarchy_top_title |
European journal of law and economics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)184980658 (DE-600)1231592-8 (DE-576)046704884 |
| title |
Autonomy and private ordering in contract law |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2038352011 (DE-He213)BF01552471-p |
| title_full |
Autonomy and private ordering in contract law |
| author_sort |
Parisi, Francesco |
| journal |
European journal of law and economics |
| journalStr |
European journal of law and economics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1994 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
213 |
| author_browse |
Parisi, Francesco |
| container_volume |
1 |
| class |
340 330 360 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Parisi, Francesco |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/BF01552471 |
| dewey-full |
340 330 360 |
| title_sort |
autonomy and private ordering in contract law |
| title_auth |
Autonomy and private ordering in contract law |
| abstract |
Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_2062 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4326 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Autonomy and private ordering in contract law |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552471 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
184980658 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/BF01552471 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T18:37:18.782Z |
| _version_ |
1803584105386868736 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2038352011</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503050400.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1994 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01552471</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2038352011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF01552471-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">360</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parisi, Francesco</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Autonomy and private ordering in contract law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This essay reviews Michael J. Trebilcock's book,The Limits of Freedom of Contract (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), examining crucial and controversial social issues within the rigorous framework of the law and economics of contract. The idea that private markets are the primary institutions for the allocation of limited resources is central to any private ordering model of contract law. Yet such a premise leaves a number of fundamental questions unanswered. Trebilcock is critical of the insufficiency and ambiguity of current contract theory in addressing fundamental legal issues relating to the limits of freedom of contract. Pushing the frontiers of current legal theory, Trebilcock revisits the slippery notion of freedom of contract and tests the actual reach of economic analysis in providing a coherent answer to compelling social questions. The author pursues his ambitious task by examining the conclusions reached by competing paradigms of analysis. In spite of his declared trust in the economic approach to law, Trebilcock pays close attention to alternative analytical traditions, comparing the conclusions of various intellectual perspectives with those suggested by an economic framework of private ordering. The book objectively examines strengths and weaknesses of competing views, affording the reader a balanced position from which to conclude for herself, by illustrating the practical implications of the various approaches. In a number of instances, Trebilcock shows how different theoretical premises may indeed be conducive to similar institutional outcomes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legal Issue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic Approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legal Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Contract Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Balance Position</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">European journal of law and economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994</subfield><subfield code="g">1(1994), 3 vom: Nov., Seite 213-227</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)184980658</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1231592-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)046704884</subfield><subfield code="x">0929-1261</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1994</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:213-227</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552471</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">1994</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">213-227</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4018335 |