An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making
Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an accepta...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Nabukenya, Josephine [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2009 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Group decision and negotiation - Springer Netherlands, 1992, 20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:20 ; year:2009 ; number:4 ; day:04 ; month:10 ; pages:465-488 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2039371613 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2039371613 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503065829.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2039371613 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10726-009-9177-7-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 150 |a 300 |a 650 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 5,2 |a 3,4 |a 3,2 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nabukenya, Josephine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Collaboration engineering | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Collaborative organizational policy-making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van Bommel, Patrick |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Proper, H. A. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a De Vreede, Gert-Jan |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Group decision and negotiation |d Springer Netherlands, 1992 |g 20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488 |w (DE-627)17112684X |w (DE-600)1155213-X |w (DE-576)040094448 |x 0926-2644 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2009 |g number:4 |g day:04 |g month:10 |g pages:465-488 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4029 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 20 |j 2009 |e 4 |b 04 |c 10 |h 465-488 | ||
| author_variant |
j n jn b p v bp bpv h a p ha hap v g j d vgj vgjd |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09262644:2009----::nvlainntuetoclaoaiercseapiainor |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2009 |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2039371613 (DE-He213)s10726-009-9177-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Nabukenya, Josephine verfasserin aut An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization. Collaboration engineering Collaborative organizational policy-making Evaluation Van Bommel, Patrick aut Proper, H. A. aut De Vreede, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:20 year:2009 number:4 day:04 month:10 pages:465-488 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 20 2009 4 04 10 465-488 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2039371613 (DE-He213)s10726-009-9177-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Nabukenya, Josephine verfasserin aut An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization. Collaboration engineering Collaborative organizational policy-making Evaluation Van Bommel, Patrick aut Proper, H. A. aut De Vreede, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:20 year:2009 number:4 day:04 month:10 pages:465-488 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 20 2009 4 04 10 465-488 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2039371613 (DE-He213)s10726-009-9177-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Nabukenya, Josephine verfasserin aut An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization. Collaboration engineering Collaborative organizational policy-making Evaluation Van Bommel, Patrick aut Proper, H. A. aut De Vreede, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:20 year:2009 number:4 day:04 month:10 pages:465-488 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 20 2009 4 04 10 465-488 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2039371613 (DE-He213)s10726-009-9177-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Nabukenya, Josephine verfasserin aut An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization. Collaboration engineering Collaborative organizational policy-making Evaluation Van Bommel, Patrick aut Proper, H. A. aut De Vreede, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:20 year:2009 number:4 day:04 month:10 pages:465-488 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 20 2009 4 04 10 465-488 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 doi (DE-627)OLC2039371613 (DE-He213)s10726-009-9177-7-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Nabukenya, Josephine verfasserin aut An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making 2009 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization. Collaboration engineering Collaborative organizational policy-making Evaluation Van Bommel, Patrick aut Proper, H. A. aut De Vreede, Gert-Jan aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:20 year:2009 number:4 day:04 month:10 pages:465-488 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 20 2009 4 04 10 465-488 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation 20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488 volume:20 year:2009 number:4 day:04 month:10 pages:465-488 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation 20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488 volume:20 year:2009 number:4 day:04 month:10 pages:465-488 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Collaboration engineering Collaborative organizational policy-making Evaluation |
| dewey-raw |
150 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Group decision and negotiation |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Nabukenya, Josephine @@aut@@ Van Bommel, Patrick @@aut@@ Proper, H. A. @@aut@@ De Vreede, Gert-Jan @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2009-10-04T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
17112684X |
| dewey-sort |
3150 |
| id |
OLC2039371613 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2039371613</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503065829.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2039371613</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10726-009-9177-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nabukenya, Josephine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Collaboration engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Collaborative organizational policy-making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Van Bommel, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Proper, H. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Vreede, Gert-Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Group decision and negotiation</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)17112684X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1155213-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)040094448</subfield><subfield code="x">0926-2644</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:465-488</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">465-488</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Nabukenya, Josephine |
| spellingShingle |
Nabukenya, Josephine ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 misc Collaboration engineering misc Collaborative organizational policy-making misc Evaluation An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making |
| authorStr |
Nabukenya, Josephine |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)17112684X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
150 - Psychology 300 - Social sciences 650 - Management & auxiliary services |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0926-2644 |
| topic_title |
150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making Collaboration engineering Collaborative organizational policy-making Evaluation |
| topic |
ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 misc Collaboration engineering misc Collaborative organizational policy-making misc Evaluation |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 misc Collaboration engineering misc Collaborative organizational policy-making misc Evaluation |
| topic_browse |
ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 misc Collaboration engineering misc Collaborative organizational policy-making misc Evaluation |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Group decision and negotiation |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
17112684X |
| dewey-tens |
150 - Psychology 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology 650 - Management & public relations |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Group decision and negotiation |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 |
| title |
An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2039371613 (DE-He213)s10726-009-9177-7-p |
| title_full |
An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making |
| author_sort |
Nabukenya, Josephine |
| journal |
Group decision and negotiation |
| journalStr |
Group decision and negotiation |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2009 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
465 |
| author_browse |
Nabukenya, Josephine Van Bommel, Patrick Proper, H. A. De Vreede, Gert-Jan |
| container_volume |
20 |
| class |
150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Nabukenya, Josephine |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 |
| dewey-full |
150 300 650 |
| title_sort |
an evaluation instrument for collaborative processes: application to organizational policy-making |
| title_auth |
An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making |
| abstract |
Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Van Bommel, Patrick Proper, H. A. De Vreede, Gert-Jan |
| author2Str |
Van Bommel, Patrick Proper, H. A. De Vreede, Gert-Jan |
| ppnlink |
17112684X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:34:30.002Z |
| _version_ |
1803599027924631552 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2039371613</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503065829.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2009 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2039371613</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10726-009-9177-7-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nabukenya, Josephine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An Evaluation Instrument for Collaborative Processes: Application to Organizational Policy-Making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Decision-making in organizations is guided by policies. Organizational policy-making is a complex process in which several parties are involved, with multiple backgrounds, incompatible interests, and diverging areas of interest, yet they all have to be brought together to produce an acceptable policy result. Therefore, we propose to use techniques from collaboration engineering (CE) in this context. There is hardly any experience with CE in the field of organizational policy-making. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of CE in organizational policy-making, it is important to have a systematic evaluation instrument. We distinguish between general and domain-specific indicators. Moreover, we consider measurement means and operationalization tools, such that organizational policy-making stakeholders can apply our instrument in their own organization.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Collaboration engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Collaborative organizational policy-making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Van Bommel, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Proper, H. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Vreede, Gert-Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Group decision and negotiation</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2009), 4 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 465-488</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)17112684X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1155213-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)040094448</subfield><subfield code="x">0926-2644</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:465-488</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9177-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">465-488</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3998623 |