Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area
Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Luè, Alessandro [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2014 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
Multi criteria decision analysis |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Group decision and negotiation - Springer Netherlands, 1992, 24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:24 ; year:2014 ; number:4 ; day:02 ; month:08 ; pages:613-632 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2039373713 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2039373713 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503065840.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2039373713 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10726-014-9403-9-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 150 |a 300 |a 650 |q VZ |
084 | |a 5,2 |a 3,4 |a 3,2 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Luè, Alessandro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 | ||
520 | |a Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Group decision | |
650 | 4 | |a Conflict analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Stakeholder engagement | |
650 | 4 | |a Multi criteria decision analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Environmental impact assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a Multimodal transport systems | |
700 | 1 | |a Colorni, Alberto |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Group decision and negotiation |d Springer Netherlands, 1992 |g 24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632 |w (DE-627)17112684X |w (DE-600)1155213-X |w (DE-576)040094448 |x 0926-2644 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2014 |g number:4 |g day:02 |g month:08 |g pages:613-632 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4029 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 24 |j 2014 |e 4 |b 02 |c 08 |h 613-632 |
author_variant |
a l al a c ac |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:09262644:2014----::ofitnlssoevrnetlmatsesetcssuyftaso |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
publishDate |
2014 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2039373713 (DE-He213)s10726-014-9403-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Luè, Alessandro verfasserin aut Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution. Group decision Conflict analysis Stakeholder engagement Multi criteria decision analysis Environmental impact assessment Multimodal transport systems Colorni, Alberto aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:24 year:2014 number:4 day:02 month:08 pages:613-632 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 24 2014 4 02 08 613-632 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2039373713 (DE-He213)s10726-014-9403-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Luè, Alessandro verfasserin aut Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution. Group decision Conflict analysis Stakeholder engagement Multi criteria decision analysis Environmental impact assessment Multimodal transport systems Colorni, Alberto aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:24 year:2014 number:4 day:02 month:08 pages:613-632 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 24 2014 4 02 08 613-632 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2039373713 (DE-He213)s10726-014-9403-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Luè, Alessandro verfasserin aut Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution. Group decision Conflict analysis Stakeholder engagement Multi criteria decision analysis Environmental impact assessment Multimodal transport systems Colorni, Alberto aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:24 year:2014 number:4 day:02 month:08 pages:613-632 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 24 2014 4 02 08 613-632 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2039373713 (DE-He213)s10726-014-9403-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Luè, Alessandro verfasserin aut Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution. Group decision Conflict analysis Stakeholder engagement Multi criteria decision analysis Environmental impact assessment Multimodal transport systems Colorni, Alberto aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:24 year:2014 number:4 day:02 month:08 pages:613-632 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 24 2014 4 02 08 613-632 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2039373713 (DE-He213)s10726-014-9403-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Luè, Alessandro verfasserin aut Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution. Group decision Conflict analysis Stakeholder engagement Multi criteria decision analysis Environmental impact assessment Multimodal transport systems Colorni, Alberto aut Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation Springer Netherlands, 1992 24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632 (DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 0926-2644 nnns volume:24 year:2014 number:4 day:02 month:08 pages:613-632 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 AR 24 2014 4 02 08 613-632 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation 24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632 volume:24 year:2014 number:4 day:02 month:08 pages:613-632 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Group decision and negotiation 24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632 volume:24 year:2014 number:4 day:02 month:08 pages:613-632 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Group decision Conflict analysis Stakeholder engagement Multi criteria decision analysis Environmental impact assessment Multimodal transport systems |
dewey-raw |
150 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Group decision and negotiation |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Luè, Alessandro @@aut@@ Colorni, Alberto @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-08-02T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
17112684X |
dewey-sort |
3150 |
id |
OLC2039373713 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2039373713</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503065840.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2039373713</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10726-014-9403-9-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luè, Alessandro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Group decision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stakeholder engagement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi criteria decision analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental impact assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multimodal transport systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Colorni, Alberto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Group decision and negotiation</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)17112684X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1155213-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)040094448</subfield><subfield code="x">0926-2644</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:613-632</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">613-632</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Luè, Alessandro |
spellingShingle |
Luè, Alessandro ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 misc Group decision misc Conflict analysis misc Stakeholder engagement misc Multi criteria decision analysis misc Environmental impact assessment misc Multimodal transport systems Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area |
authorStr |
Luè, Alessandro |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)17112684X |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
150 - Psychology 300 - Social sciences 650 - Management & auxiliary services |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0926-2644 |
topic_title |
150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area Group decision Conflict analysis Stakeholder engagement Multi criteria decision analysis Environmental impact assessment Multimodal transport systems |
topic |
ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 misc Group decision misc Conflict analysis misc Stakeholder engagement misc Multi criteria decision analysis misc Environmental impact assessment misc Multimodal transport systems |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 misc Group decision misc Conflict analysis misc Stakeholder engagement misc Multi criteria decision analysis misc Environmental impact assessment misc Multimodal transport systems |
topic_browse |
ddc 150 ssgn 5,2 misc Group decision misc Conflict analysis misc Stakeholder engagement misc Multi criteria decision analysis misc Environmental impact assessment misc Multimodal transport systems |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Group decision and negotiation |
hierarchy_parent_id |
17112684X |
dewey-tens |
150 - Psychology 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology 650 - Management & public relations |
hierarchy_top_title |
Group decision and negotiation |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)17112684X (DE-600)1155213-X (DE-576)040094448 |
title |
Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2039373713 (DE-He213)s10726-014-9403-9-p |
title_full |
Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area |
author_sort |
Luè, Alessandro |
journal |
Group decision and negotiation |
journalStr |
Group decision and negotiation |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
613 |
author_browse |
Luè, Alessandro Colorni, Alberto |
container_volume |
24 |
class |
150 300 650 VZ 5,2 3,4 3,2 ssgn |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Luè, Alessandro |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 |
dewey-full |
150 300 650 |
title_sort |
conflict analysis for environmental impact assessment: a case study of a transportation system in a tourist area |
title_auth |
Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area |
abstract |
Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 |
abstractGer |
Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Colorni, Alberto |
author2Str |
Colorni, Alberto |
ppnlink |
17112684X |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T22:35:02.145Z |
_version_ |
1803599061606989824 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2039373713</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503065840.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2039373713</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10726-014-9403-9-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,2</subfield><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luè, Alessandro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conflict Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of a Transportation System in a Tourist Area</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The paper presents a conflict analysis in an environmental impact assessment. In order to cope with a problem of traffic congestion in a tourist area, alternative transportation services and measures of travel demand management are studied and compared using the multi-attribute value theory. The problem is characterized by the presence of different criteria and conflicting actors who have different interests (expressed by criteria weights) and different decision power, which have been elicited from the actors’ representatives. A group viewpoint is generated through an aggregation of the different actors’ viewpoints, in order to find a group compromise solution. A conflict analysis, conducted on the criteria weights, is performed to examine the level of agreement associated with the compromise solution.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Group decision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stakeholder engagement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi criteria decision analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental impact assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multimodal transport systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Colorni, Alberto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Group decision and negotiation</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2014), 4 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 613-632</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)17112684X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1155213-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)040094448</subfield><subfield code="x">0926-2644</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:613-632</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9403-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">613-632</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399884 |