Presupposition and the a priori
Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Charlow, Nate [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2012 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Philosophical studies - Springer Netherlands, 1950, 165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:165 ; year:2012 ; number:2 ; day:06 ; month:06 ; pages:509-526 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2040368248 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2040368248 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504003301.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2040368248 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11098-012-9965-9-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a PHILOS |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a LING |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Charlow, Nate |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Presupposition and the a priori |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a A priori | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Semantic presupposition | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contingent a priori | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Necessary a posteriori | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kripke | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemology of logic | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophical studies |d Springer Netherlands, 1950 |g 165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526 |w (DE-627)129094803 |w (DE-600)7320-9 |w (DE-576)014430851 |x 0031-8116 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:165 |g year:2012 |g number:2 |g day:06 |g month:06 |g pages:509-526 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-PHILOS | ||
| 912 | |a FID-LING | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHI | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_72 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_130 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4082 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 165 |j 2012 |e 2 |b 06 |c 06 |h 509-526 | ||
| author_variant |
n c nc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00318116:2012----::rspoiinnt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2040368248 (DE-He213)s11098-012-9965-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Charlow, Nate verfasserin aut Presupposition and the a priori 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori. A priori Semantic presupposition Contingent a priori Necessary a posteriori Kripke Epistemology of logic Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:165 year:2012 number:2 day:06 month:06 pages:509-526 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 165 2012 2 06 06 509-526 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2040368248 (DE-He213)s11098-012-9965-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Charlow, Nate verfasserin aut Presupposition and the a priori 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori. A priori Semantic presupposition Contingent a priori Necessary a posteriori Kripke Epistemology of logic Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:165 year:2012 number:2 day:06 month:06 pages:509-526 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 165 2012 2 06 06 509-526 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2040368248 (DE-He213)s11098-012-9965-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Charlow, Nate verfasserin aut Presupposition and the a priori 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori. A priori Semantic presupposition Contingent a priori Necessary a posteriori Kripke Epistemology of logic Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:165 year:2012 number:2 day:06 month:06 pages:509-526 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 165 2012 2 06 06 509-526 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2040368248 (DE-He213)s11098-012-9965-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Charlow, Nate verfasserin aut Presupposition and the a priori 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori. A priori Semantic presupposition Contingent a priori Necessary a posteriori Kripke Epistemology of logic Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:165 year:2012 number:2 day:06 month:06 pages:509-526 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 165 2012 2 06 06 509-526 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2040368248 (DE-He213)s11098-012-9965-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Charlow, Nate verfasserin aut Presupposition and the a priori 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori. A priori Semantic presupposition Contingent a priori Necessary a posteriori Kripke Epistemology of logic Enthalten in Philosophical studies Springer Netherlands, 1950 165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526 (DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 0031-8116 nnns volume:165 year:2012 number:2 day:06 month:06 pages:509-526 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 165 2012 2 06 06 509-526 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Philosophical studies 165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526 volume:165 year:2012 number:2 day:06 month:06 pages:509-526 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Philosophical studies 165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526 volume:165 year:2012 number:2 day:06 month:06 pages:509-526 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
A priori Semantic presupposition Contingent a priori Necessary a posteriori Kripke Epistemology of logic |
| dewey-raw |
100 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Philosophical studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Charlow, Nate @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-06-06T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129094803 |
| dewey-sort |
3100 |
| id |
OLC2040368248 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2040368248</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504003301.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2040368248</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11098-012-9965-9-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Charlow, Nate</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Presupposition and the a priori</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">A priori</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Semantic presupposition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Contingent a priori</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Necessary a posteriori</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kripke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Epistemology of logic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Philosophical studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1950</subfield><subfield code="g">165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129094803</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)7320-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014430851</subfield><subfield code="x">0031-8116</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:165</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:06</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:509-526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">165</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">06</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">509-526</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Charlow, Nate |
| spellingShingle |
Charlow, Nate ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc A priori misc Semantic presupposition misc Contingent a priori misc Necessary a posteriori misc Kripke misc Epistemology of logic Presupposition and the a priori |
| authorStr |
Charlow, Nate |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129094803 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0031-8116 |
| topic_title |
100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid Presupposition and the a priori A priori Semantic presupposition Contingent a priori Necessary a posteriori Kripke Epistemology of logic |
| topic |
ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc A priori misc Semantic presupposition misc Contingent a priori misc Necessary a posteriori misc Kripke misc Epistemology of logic |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc A priori misc Semantic presupposition misc Contingent a priori misc Necessary a posteriori misc Kripke misc Epistemology of logic |
| topic_browse |
ddc 100 ssgn 5,1 fid PHILOS fid LING misc A priori misc Semantic presupposition misc Contingent a priori misc Necessary a posteriori misc Kripke misc Epistemology of logic |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Philosophical studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129094803 |
| dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Philosophical studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129094803 (DE-600)7320-9 (DE-576)014430851 |
| title |
Presupposition and the a priori |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2040368248 (DE-He213)s11098-012-9965-9-p |
| title_full |
Presupposition and the a priori |
| author_sort |
Charlow, Nate |
| journal |
Philosophical studies |
| journalStr |
Philosophical studies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2012 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
509 |
| author_browse |
Charlow, Nate |
| container_volume |
165 |
| class |
100 VZ 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid LING DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Charlow, Nate |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 |
| dewey-full |
100 |
| title_sort |
presupposition and the a priori |
| title_auth |
Presupposition and the a priori |
| abstract |
Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS FID-LING SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Presupposition and the a priori |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
129094803 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T02:00:36.872Z |
| _version_ |
1803611995501494272 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2040368248</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504003301.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2040368248</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11098-012-9965-9-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Charlow, Nate</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Presupposition and the a priori</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper argues for and explores the implications of the following epistemological principle for knowability a priori (with ‘$$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}$$’ abbreviating ‘it is knowable a priori that’).(AK) For all ϕ, ψ such that ϕ semantically presupposes ψ: if $$\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\phi, \,\mathcal{K}_\mathcal{A}\psi .$$Well-known arguments for the contingent a priori and a priori knowledge of logical truth founder when the semantic presuppositions of the putative items of knowledge are made explicit. Likewise, certain kinds of analytic truth turn out to carry semantic presuppositions that make them ineligible as items of a priori knowledge. On a happier note, I argue that (AK) offers an appealing, theory-neutral explanation of the a posteriori character of certain necessary identities, as well as an interesting rationalization for a commonplace linguistic maneuver in philosophical work on the a priori.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">A priori</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Semantic presupposition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Contingent a priori</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Necessary a posteriori</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kripke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Epistemology of logic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Philosophical studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1950</subfield><subfield code="g">165(2012), 2 vom: 06. Juni, Seite 509-526</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129094803</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)7320-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014430851</subfield><subfield code="x">0031-8116</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:165</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:06</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:509-526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9965-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">165</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">06</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">509-526</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4024153 |