Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies
Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisc...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Huang, Can [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2010 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2010 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The journal of technology transfer - Springer US, 1984, 36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:36 ; year:2010 ; number:2 ; day:28 ; month:01 ; pages:145-172 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC204174622X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC204174622X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503161223.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC204174622X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10961-009-9149-8-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 600 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 3,2 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Huang, Can |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2010 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Nanotechnology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research and development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Productivity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Publications | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patents | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bibliometric analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Data mining | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Search strategy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Notten, Ad |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rasters, Nico |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of technology transfer |d Springer US, 1984 |g 36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172 |w (DE-627)130846082 |w (DE-600)1022920-6 |w (DE-576)371054540 |x 0892-9912 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2010 |g number:2 |g day:28 |g month:01 |g pages:145-172 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 36 |j 2010 |e 2 |b 28 |c 01 |h 145-172 | ||
| author_variant |
c h ch a n an n r nr |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:08929912:2010----::aocecadehooyulctosnptnsrveoscasine |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 doi (DE-627)OLC204174622X (DE-He213)s10961-009-9149-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 VZ 3,2 ssgn Huang, Can verfasserin aut Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically. Nanotechnology Research and development Productivity Publications Patents Bibliometric analysis Data mining Search strategy Notten, Ad aut Rasters, Nico aut Enthalten in The journal of technology transfer Springer US, 1984 36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172 (DE-627)130846082 (DE-600)1022920-6 (DE-576)371054540 0892-9912 nnns volume:36 year:2010 number:2 day:28 month:01 pages:145-172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_70 AR 36 2010 2 28 01 145-172 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 doi (DE-627)OLC204174622X (DE-He213)s10961-009-9149-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 VZ 3,2 ssgn Huang, Can verfasserin aut Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically. Nanotechnology Research and development Productivity Publications Patents Bibliometric analysis Data mining Search strategy Notten, Ad aut Rasters, Nico aut Enthalten in The journal of technology transfer Springer US, 1984 36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172 (DE-627)130846082 (DE-600)1022920-6 (DE-576)371054540 0892-9912 nnns volume:36 year:2010 number:2 day:28 month:01 pages:145-172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_70 AR 36 2010 2 28 01 145-172 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 doi (DE-627)OLC204174622X (DE-He213)s10961-009-9149-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 VZ 3,2 ssgn Huang, Can verfasserin aut Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically. Nanotechnology Research and development Productivity Publications Patents Bibliometric analysis Data mining Search strategy Notten, Ad aut Rasters, Nico aut Enthalten in The journal of technology transfer Springer US, 1984 36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172 (DE-627)130846082 (DE-600)1022920-6 (DE-576)371054540 0892-9912 nnns volume:36 year:2010 number:2 day:28 month:01 pages:145-172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_70 AR 36 2010 2 28 01 145-172 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 doi (DE-627)OLC204174622X (DE-He213)s10961-009-9149-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 VZ 3,2 ssgn Huang, Can verfasserin aut Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically. Nanotechnology Research and development Productivity Publications Patents Bibliometric analysis Data mining Search strategy Notten, Ad aut Rasters, Nico aut Enthalten in The journal of technology transfer Springer US, 1984 36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172 (DE-627)130846082 (DE-600)1022920-6 (DE-576)371054540 0892-9912 nnns volume:36 year:2010 number:2 day:28 month:01 pages:145-172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_70 AR 36 2010 2 28 01 145-172 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 doi (DE-627)OLC204174622X (DE-He213)s10961-009-9149-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 VZ 3,2 ssgn Huang, Can verfasserin aut Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2010 Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically. Nanotechnology Research and development Productivity Publications Patents Bibliometric analysis Data mining Search strategy Notten, Ad aut Rasters, Nico aut Enthalten in The journal of technology transfer Springer US, 1984 36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172 (DE-627)130846082 (DE-600)1022920-6 (DE-576)371054540 0892-9912 nnns volume:36 year:2010 number:2 day:28 month:01 pages:145-172 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_70 AR 36 2010 2 28 01 145-172 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The journal of technology transfer 36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172 volume:36 year:2010 number:2 day:28 month:01 pages:145-172 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The journal of technology transfer 36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172 volume:36 year:2010 number:2 day:28 month:01 pages:145-172 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Nanotechnology Research and development Productivity Publications Patents Bibliometric analysis Data mining Search strategy |
| dewey-raw |
600 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The journal of technology transfer |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Huang, Can @@aut@@ Notten, Ad @@aut@@ Rasters, Nico @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-01-28T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130846082 |
| dewey-sort |
3600 |
| id |
OLC204174622X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC204174622X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503161223.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC204174622X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10961-009-9149-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Can</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nanotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research and development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Productivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Publications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bibliometric analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Data mining</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Search strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Notten, Ad</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rasters, Nico</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of technology transfer</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130846082</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1022920-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)371054540</subfield><subfield code="x">0892-9912</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:145-172</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">145-172</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Huang, Can |
| spellingShingle |
Huang, Can ddc 600 ssgn 3,2 misc Nanotechnology misc Research and development misc Productivity misc Publications misc Patents misc Bibliometric analysis misc Data mining misc Search strategy Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies |
| authorStr |
Huang, Can |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130846082 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
600 - Technology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0892-9912 |
| topic_title |
600 VZ 3,2 ssgn Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies Nanotechnology Research and development Productivity Publications Patents Bibliometric analysis Data mining Search strategy |
| topic |
ddc 600 ssgn 3,2 misc Nanotechnology misc Research and development misc Productivity misc Publications misc Patents misc Bibliometric analysis misc Data mining misc Search strategy |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 600 ssgn 3,2 misc Nanotechnology misc Research and development misc Productivity misc Publications misc Patents misc Bibliometric analysis misc Data mining misc Search strategy |
| topic_browse |
ddc 600 ssgn 3,2 misc Nanotechnology misc Research and development misc Productivity misc Publications misc Patents misc Bibliometric analysis misc Data mining misc Search strategy |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The journal of technology transfer |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130846082 |
| dewey-tens |
600 - Technology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The journal of technology transfer |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130846082 (DE-600)1022920-6 (DE-576)371054540 |
| title |
Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC204174622X (DE-He213)s10961-009-9149-8-p |
| title_full |
Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies |
| author_sort |
Huang, Can |
| journal |
The journal of technology transfer |
| journalStr |
The journal of technology transfer |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2010 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
145 |
| author_browse |
Huang, Can Notten, Ad Rasters, Nico |
| container_volume |
36 |
| class |
600 VZ 3,2 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Huang, Can |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 |
| dewey-full |
600 |
| title_sort |
nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies |
| title_auth |
Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies |
| abstract |
Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically. © The Author(s) 2010 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically. © The Author(s) 2010 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically. © The Author(s) 2010 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Notten, Ad Rasters, Nico |
| author2Str |
Notten, Ad Rasters, Nico |
| ppnlink |
130846082 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T05:22:05.045Z |
| _version_ |
1803624670863294464 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC204174622X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503161223.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC204174622X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10961-009-9149-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Can</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract We undertake a comprehensive review of more than 120 social science studies on nanotechnology, 90% of which are based on the analyses of the nanotechnology publications and patents. We discussed four intellectual debates formed by these studies, namely whether nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary field, whether nanoscience and nanotechnology are closely interlinked, whether nanotechnology development is path dependent and who is winning the global nanorace. We also conduct a comparative analysis of bibliometric search strategies used in the literature to harvest the publications and patents, including lexical queries, evolutionary lexical queries, citation analysis, and the use of core journal sets to identify nanotechnology articles. Because most of the compared strategies, except the one using 10 core journals in the field, share a core set of keywords and thus harvest a common batch of publications, they produce very similar ranking tables of the top subject areas and journals and the most prolific countries and institutions. Moreover, the core journal strategy does not provide a robust delineation of an emerging field such as nanotechnology due to the fact that nanotechnology related articles are published in a wide range of journals. Also, the different criteria for selecting the core journals will affect the analytical results dramatically.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nanotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research and development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Productivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Publications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bibliometric analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Data mining</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Search strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Notten, Ad</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rasters, Nico</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of technology transfer</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2010), 2 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 145-172</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130846082</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1022920-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)371054540</subfield><subfield code="x">0892-9912</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:145-172</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9149-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">145-172</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397563 |