Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process
Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Carland, Jo Ann [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1992 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982, 11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:11 ; year:1992 ; number:2 ; month:02 ; pages:95-104 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/BF00872316 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2044508117 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2044508117 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503010948.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s1992 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF00872316 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2044508117 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)BF00872316-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |a 330 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 3,2 |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a 85.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Carland, Jo Ann |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1992 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic Growth | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review Process | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Peer Review Process | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Publication Process | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Editorial Process | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Carland, James W. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aby, Carroll D. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982 |g 11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104 |w (DE-627)130668133 |w (DE-600)868017-6 |w (DE-576)018279333 |x 0167-4544 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:1992 |g number:2 |g month:02 |g pages:95-104 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872316 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4029 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4082 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4310 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4318 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 85.00 |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 11 |j 1992 |e 2 |c 02 |h 95-104 | ||
| author_variant |
j a c ja jac j w c jw jwc c d a cd cda |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:01674544:1992----::rpsdoiiainftiaynhpb |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1992 |
| bklnumber |
85.00 |
| publishDate |
1992 |
| allfields |
10.1007/BF00872316 doi (DE-627)OLC2044508117 (DE-He213)BF00872316-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Carland, Jo Ann verfasserin aut Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process 1992 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process. Economic Growth Review Process Peer Review Process Publication Process Editorial Process Carland, James W. aut Aby, Carroll D. aut Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982 11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:11 year:1992 number:2 month:02 pages:95-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872316 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4326 85.00 VZ AR 11 1992 2 02 95-104 |
| spelling |
10.1007/BF00872316 doi (DE-627)OLC2044508117 (DE-He213)BF00872316-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Carland, Jo Ann verfasserin aut Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process 1992 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process. Economic Growth Review Process Peer Review Process Publication Process Editorial Process Carland, James W. aut Aby, Carroll D. aut Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982 11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:11 year:1992 number:2 month:02 pages:95-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872316 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4326 85.00 VZ AR 11 1992 2 02 95-104 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/BF00872316 doi (DE-627)OLC2044508117 (DE-He213)BF00872316-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Carland, Jo Ann verfasserin aut Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process 1992 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process. Economic Growth Review Process Peer Review Process Publication Process Editorial Process Carland, James W. aut Aby, Carroll D. aut Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982 11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:11 year:1992 number:2 month:02 pages:95-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872316 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4326 85.00 VZ AR 11 1992 2 02 95-104 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/BF00872316 doi (DE-627)OLC2044508117 (DE-He213)BF00872316-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Carland, Jo Ann verfasserin aut Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process 1992 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process. Economic Growth Review Process Peer Review Process Publication Process Editorial Process Carland, James W. aut Aby, Carroll D. aut Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982 11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:11 year:1992 number:2 month:02 pages:95-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872316 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4326 85.00 VZ AR 11 1992 2 02 95-104 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/BF00872316 doi (DE-627)OLC2044508117 (DE-He213)BF00872316-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Carland, Jo Ann verfasserin aut Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process 1992 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process. Economic Growth Review Process Peer Review Process Publication Process Editorial Process Carland, James W. aut Aby, Carroll D. aut Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982 11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:11 year:1992 number:2 month:02 pages:95-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872316 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4326 85.00 VZ AR 11 1992 2 02 95-104 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of business ethics 11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104 volume:11 year:1992 number:2 month:02 pages:95-104 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of business ethics 11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104 volume:11 year:1992 number:2 month:02 pages:95-104 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Economic Growth Review Process Peer Review Process Publication Process Editorial Process |
| dewey-raw |
300 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of business ethics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Carland, Jo Ann @@aut@@ Carland, James W. @@aut@@ Aby, Carroll D. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1992-02-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130668133 |
| dewey-sort |
3300 |
| id |
OLC2044508117 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2044508117</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503010948.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1992 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00872316</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2044508117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00872316-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="a">0</subfield><subfield code="a">1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carland, Jo Ann</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic Growth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Review Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peer Review Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Publication Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Editorial Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carland, James W.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aby, Carroll D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of business ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982</subfield><subfield code="g">11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130668133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)868017-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)018279333</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-4544</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1992</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:95-104</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872316</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">1992</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">95-104</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Carland, Jo Ann |
| spellingShingle |
Carland, Jo Ann ddc 300 ssgn 3,2 bkl 85.00 misc Economic Growth misc Review Process misc Peer Review Process misc Publication Process misc Editorial Process Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process |
| authorStr |
Carland, Jo Ann |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130668133 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences 330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0167-4544 |
| topic_title |
300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process Economic Growth Review Process Peer Review Process Publication Process Editorial Process |
| topic |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,2 bkl 85.00 misc Economic Growth misc Review Process misc Peer Review Process misc Publication Process misc Editorial Process |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,2 bkl 85.00 misc Economic Growth misc Review Process misc Peer Review Process misc Publication Process misc Editorial Process |
| topic_browse |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,2 bkl 85.00 misc Economic Growth misc Review Process misc Peer Review Process misc Publication Process misc Editorial Process |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of business ethics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130668133 |
| dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology 330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of business ethics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 |
| title |
Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2044508117 (DE-He213)BF00872316-p |
| title_full |
Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process |
| author_sort |
Carland, Jo Ann |
| journal |
Journal of business ethics |
| journalStr |
Journal of business ethics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1992 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
95 |
| author_browse |
Carland, Jo Ann Carland, James W. Aby, Carroll D. |
| container_volume |
11 |
| class |
300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Carland, Jo Ann |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/BF00872316 |
| dewey-full |
300 330 |
| title_sort |
proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process |
| title_auth |
Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process |
| abstract |
Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4326 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872316 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Carland, James W. Aby, Carroll D. |
| author2Str |
Carland, James W. Aby, Carroll D. |
| ppnlink |
130668133 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/BF00872316 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T23:48:53.999Z |
| _version_ |
1803603708739584000 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2044508117</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503010948.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1992 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00872316</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2044508117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00872316-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="a">0</subfield><subfield code="a">1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carland, Jo Ann</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic Growth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Review Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peer Review Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Publication Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Editorial Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carland, James W.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aby, Carroll D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of business ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982</subfield><subfield code="g">11(1992), 2 vom: Feb., Seite 95-104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130668133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)868017-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)018279333</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-4544</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1992</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:95-104</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872316</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">1992</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">95-104</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400337 |