On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda
Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Martinez, Fabien [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2017 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics - Springer Netherlands, 1982, 155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:155 ; year:2017 ; number:3 ; day:24 ; month:04 ; pages:787-807 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2044576031 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2044576031 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503011746.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2044576031 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10551-017-3540-4-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |a 330 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 3,2 |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a 85.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Martinez, Fabien |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2017 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Corporate sustainability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Faith development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intentional faith | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Relational faith | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Generativity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Redemption | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Springer Netherlands, 1982 |g 155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807 |w (DE-627)130668133 |w (DE-600)868017-6 |w (DE-576)018279333 |x 0167-4544 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:155 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g day:24 |g month:04 |g pages:787-807 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 85.00 |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 155 |j 2017 |e 3 |b 24 |c 04 |h 787-807 | ||
| author_variant |
f m fm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:01674544:2017----::nhrlofihnutiaiiyaaeetcnetam |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
85.00 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2044576031 (DE-He213)s10551-017-3540-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Martinez, Fabien verfasserin aut On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2017 Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society. Corporate sustainability Faith development Intentional faith Relational faith Generativity Redemption Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Springer Netherlands, 1982 155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:155 year:2017 number:3 day:24 month:04 pages:787-807 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 85.00 VZ AR 155 2017 3 24 04 787-807 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2044576031 (DE-He213)s10551-017-3540-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Martinez, Fabien verfasserin aut On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2017 Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society. Corporate sustainability Faith development Intentional faith Relational faith Generativity Redemption Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Springer Netherlands, 1982 155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:155 year:2017 number:3 day:24 month:04 pages:787-807 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 85.00 VZ AR 155 2017 3 24 04 787-807 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2044576031 (DE-He213)s10551-017-3540-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Martinez, Fabien verfasserin aut On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2017 Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society. Corporate sustainability Faith development Intentional faith Relational faith Generativity Redemption Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Springer Netherlands, 1982 155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:155 year:2017 number:3 day:24 month:04 pages:787-807 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 85.00 VZ AR 155 2017 3 24 04 787-807 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2044576031 (DE-He213)s10551-017-3540-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Martinez, Fabien verfasserin aut On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2017 Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society. Corporate sustainability Faith development Intentional faith Relational faith Generativity Redemption Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Springer Netherlands, 1982 155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:155 year:2017 number:3 day:24 month:04 pages:787-807 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 85.00 VZ AR 155 2017 3 24 04 787-807 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2044576031 (DE-He213)s10551-017-3540-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl Martinez, Fabien verfasserin aut On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda 2017 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2017 Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society. Corporate sustainability Faith development Intentional faith Relational faith Generativity Redemption Enthalten in Journal of business ethics Springer Netherlands, 1982 155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807 (DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 0167-4544 nnns volume:155 year:2017 number:3 day:24 month:04 pages:787-807 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 85.00 VZ AR 155 2017 3 24 04 787-807 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of business ethics 155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807 volume:155 year:2017 number:3 day:24 month:04 pages:787-807 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of business ethics 155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807 volume:155 year:2017 number:3 day:24 month:04 pages:787-807 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Corporate sustainability Faith development Intentional faith Relational faith Generativity Redemption |
| dewey-raw |
300 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of business ethics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Martinez, Fabien @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-04-24T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130668133 |
| dewey-sort |
3300 |
| id |
OLC2044576031 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2044576031</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503011746.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2044576031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10551-017-3540-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="a">0</subfield><subfield code="a">1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martinez, Fabien</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corporate sustainability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Faith development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intentional faith</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relational faith</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Generativity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Redemption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of business ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1982</subfield><subfield code="g">155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130668133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)868017-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)018279333</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-4544</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:155</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:24</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:787-807</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">155</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">24</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">787-807</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Martinez, Fabien |
| spellingShingle |
Martinez, Fabien ddc 300 ssgn 3,2 bkl 85.00 misc Corporate sustainability misc Faith development misc Intentional faith misc Relational faith misc Generativity misc Redemption On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda |
| authorStr |
Martinez, Fabien |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130668133 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences 330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0167-4544 |
| topic_title |
300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda Corporate sustainability Faith development Intentional faith Relational faith Generativity Redemption |
| topic |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,2 bkl 85.00 misc Corporate sustainability misc Faith development misc Intentional faith misc Relational faith misc Generativity misc Redemption |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,2 bkl 85.00 misc Corporate sustainability misc Faith development misc Intentional faith misc Relational faith misc Generativity misc Redemption |
| topic_browse |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,2 bkl 85.00 misc Corporate sustainability misc Faith development misc Intentional faith misc Relational faith misc Generativity misc Redemption |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of business ethics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130668133 |
| dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology 330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of business ethics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130668133 (DE-600)868017-6 (DE-576)018279333 |
| title |
On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2044576031 (DE-He213)s10551-017-3540-4-p |
| title_full |
On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda |
| author_sort |
Martinez, Fabien |
| journal |
Journal of business ethics |
| journalStr |
Journal of business ethics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
787 |
| author_browse |
Martinez, Fabien |
| container_volume |
155 |
| class |
300 330 VZ 3,2 0 1 ssgn 85.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Martinez, Fabien |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 |
| dewey-full |
300 330 |
| title_sort |
on the role of faith in sustainability management: a conceptual model and research agenda |
| title_auth |
On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda |
| abstract |
Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society. © The Author(s) 2017 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society. © The Author(s) 2017 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society. © The Author(s) 2017 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
130668133 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:02:32.613Z |
| _version_ |
1803604567118577664 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2044576031</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503011746.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2044576031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10551-017-3540-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,2</subfield><subfield code="a">0</subfield><subfield code="a">1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martinez, Fabien</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corporate sustainability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Faith development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intentional faith</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relational faith</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Generativity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Redemption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of business ethics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1982</subfield><subfield code="g">155(2017), 3 vom: 24. Apr., Seite 787-807</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130668133</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)868017-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)018279333</subfield><subfield code="x">0167-4544</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:155</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:24</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:787-807</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">155</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">24</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">787-807</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399967 |