Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis
Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves d...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kim, Jae Hyun [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2013 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of materials science - Springer US, 1966, 48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:48 ; year:2013 ; number:10 ; day:12 ; month:02 ; pages:3623-3637 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2046385748 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2046385748 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503124322.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2013 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2046385748 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10853-013-7142-y-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kim, Jae Hyun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Gauge Length | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fiber Diameter | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fiber Length | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Failure Strain | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fiber Strength | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Heckert, N. Alan |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leigh, Stefan D. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kobayashi, Haruki |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McDonough, Walter G. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rice, Kirk D. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Holmes, Gale A. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of materials science |d Springer US, 1966 |g 48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637 |w (DE-627)129546372 |w (DE-600)218324-9 |w (DE-576)014996774 |x 0022-2461 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2013 |g number:10 |g day:12 |g month:02 |g pages:3623-3637 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 48 |j 2013 |e 10 |b 12 |c 02 |h 3623-3637 | ||
| author_variant |
j h k jh jhk n a h na nah s d l sd sdl h k hk w g m wg wgm k d r kd kdr g a h ga gah |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00222461:2013----::fetofbrrpigehdoteigeietnieetnnaae |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2013 |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y doi (DE-627)OLC2046385748 (DE-He213)s10853-013-7142-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Kim, Jae Hyun verfasserin aut Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths. Gauge Length Fiber Diameter Fiber Length Failure Strain Fiber Strength Heckert, N. Alan aut Leigh, Stefan D. aut Kobayashi, Haruki aut McDonough, Walter G. aut Rice, Kirk D. aut Holmes, Gale A. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science Springer US, 1966 48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637 (DE-627)129546372 (DE-600)218324-9 (DE-576)014996774 0022-2461 nnns volume:48 year:2013 number:10 day:12 month:02 pages:3623-3637 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 48 2013 10 12 02 3623-3637 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y doi (DE-627)OLC2046385748 (DE-He213)s10853-013-7142-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Kim, Jae Hyun verfasserin aut Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths. Gauge Length Fiber Diameter Fiber Length Failure Strain Fiber Strength Heckert, N. Alan aut Leigh, Stefan D. aut Kobayashi, Haruki aut McDonough, Walter G. aut Rice, Kirk D. aut Holmes, Gale A. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science Springer US, 1966 48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637 (DE-627)129546372 (DE-600)218324-9 (DE-576)014996774 0022-2461 nnns volume:48 year:2013 number:10 day:12 month:02 pages:3623-3637 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 48 2013 10 12 02 3623-3637 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y doi (DE-627)OLC2046385748 (DE-He213)s10853-013-7142-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Kim, Jae Hyun verfasserin aut Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths. Gauge Length Fiber Diameter Fiber Length Failure Strain Fiber Strength Heckert, N. Alan aut Leigh, Stefan D. aut Kobayashi, Haruki aut McDonough, Walter G. aut Rice, Kirk D. aut Holmes, Gale A. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science Springer US, 1966 48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637 (DE-627)129546372 (DE-600)218324-9 (DE-576)014996774 0022-2461 nnns volume:48 year:2013 number:10 day:12 month:02 pages:3623-3637 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 48 2013 10 12 02 3623-3637 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y doi (DE-627)OLC2046385748 (DE-He213)s10853-013-7142-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Kim, Jae Hyun verfasserin aut Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths. Gauge Length Fiber Diameter Fiber Length Failure Strain Fiber Strength Heckert, N. Alan aut Leigh, Stefan D. aut Kobayashi, Haruki aut McDonough, Walter G. aut Rice, Kirk D. aut Holmes, Gale A. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science Springer US, 1966 48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637 (DE-627)129546372 (DE-600)218324-9 (DE-576)014996774 0022-2461 nnns volume:48 year:2013 number:10 day:12 month:02 pages:3623-3637 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 48 2013 10 12 02 3623-3637 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y doi (DE-627)OLC2046385748 (DE-He213)s10853-013-7142-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 VZ Kim, Jae Hyun verfasserin aut Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis 2013 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths. Gauge Length Fiber Diameter Fiber Length Failure Strain Fiber Strength Heckert, N. Alan aut Leigh, Stefan D. aut Kobayashi, Haruki aut McDonough, Walter G. aut Rice, Kirk D. aut Holmes, Gale A. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science Springer US, 1966 48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637 (DE-627)129546372 (DE-600)218324-9 (DE-576)014996774 0022-2461 nnns volume:48 year:2013 number:10 day:12 month:02 pages:3623-3637 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 48 2013 10 12 02 3623-3637 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of materials science 48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637 volume:48 year:2013 number:10 day:12 month:02 pages:3623-3637 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of materials science 48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637 volume:48 year:2013 number:10 day:12 month:02 pages:3623-3637 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Gauge Length Fiber Diameter Fiber Length Failure Strain Fiber Strength |
| dewey-raw |
670 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of materials science |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kim, Jae Hyun @@aut@@ Heckert, N. Alan @@aut@@ Leigh, Stefan D. @@aut@@ Kobayashi, Haruki @@aut@@ McDonough, Walter G. @@aut@@ Rice, Kirk D. @@aut@@ Holmes, Gale A. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2013-02-12T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129546372 |
| dewey-sort |
3670 |
| id |
OLC2046385748 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2046385748</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503124322.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2013 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2046385748</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10853-013-7142-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, Jae Hyun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gauge Length</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fiber Diameter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fiber Length</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Failure Strain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fiber Strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Heckert, N. Alan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leigh, Stefan D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kobayashi, Haruki</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McDonough, Walter G.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rice, Kirk D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Holmes, Gale A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials science</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1966</subfield><subfield code="g">48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129546372</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)218324-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014996774</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-2461</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">day:12</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3623-3637</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="b">12</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">3623-3637</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kim, Jae Hyun |
| spellingShingle |
Kim, Jae Hyun ddc 670 misc Gauge Length misc Fiber Diameter misc Fiber Length misc Failure Strain misc Fiber Strength Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis |
| authorStr |
Kim, Jae Hyun |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129546372 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
670 - Manufacturing |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0022-2461 |
| topic_title |
670 VZ Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis Gauge Length Fiber Diameter Fiber Length Failure Strain Fiber Strength |
| topic |
ddc 670 misc Gauge Length misc Fiber Diameter misc Fiber Length misc Failure Strain misc Fiber Strength |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 670 misc Gauge Length misc Fiber Diameter misc Fiber Length misc Failure Strain misc Fiber Strength |
| topic_browse |
ddc 670 misc Gauge Length misc Fiber Diameter misc Fiber Length misc Failure Strain misc Fiber Strength |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of materials science |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129546372 |
| dewey-tens |
670 - Manufacturing |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of materials science |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129546372 (DE-600)218324-9 (DE-576)014996774 |
| title |
Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2046385748 (DE-He213)s10853-013-7142-y-p |
| title_full |
Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis |
| author_sort |
Kim, Jae Hyun |
| journal |
Journal of materials science |
| journalStr |
Journal of materials science |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2013 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
3623 |
| author_browse |
Kim, Jae Hyun Heckert, N. Alan Leigh, Stefan D. Kobayashi, Haruki McDonough, Walter G. Rice, Kirk D. Holmes, Gale A. |
| container_volume |
48 |
| class |
670 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kim, Jae Hyun |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y |
| dewey-full |
670 |
| title_sort |
effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: i. non-parametric statistical analysis |
| title_auth |
Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis |
| abstract |
Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths. © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths. © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths. © Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 |
| container_issue |
10 |
| title_short |
Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Heckert, N. Alan Leigh, Stefan D. Kobayashi, Haruki McDonough, Walter G. Rice, Kirk D. Holmes, Gale A. |
| author2Str |
Heckert, N. Alan Leigh, Stefan D. Kobayashi, Haruki McDonough, Walter G. Rice, Kirk D. Holmes, Gale A. |
| ppnlink |
129546372 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T04:57:24.837Z |
| _version_ |
1803623118749564928 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2046385748</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503124322.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2013 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2046385748</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10853-013-7142-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kim, Jae Hyun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of fiber gripping methods on the single fiber tensile test: I. Non-parametric statistical analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Single fiber tensile tests using two different gripping methods were carried out on various fiber lengths. One method (the glue-tab grip method) consists of mounting a fiber onto a rigid tab as specified in ASTM C1557-03 using an adhesive, while the other (the direct grip method) involves directly clamping a fiber using poly(methyl methacrylate) blocks. The tensile moduli obtained by the glue-tab grip as a function of the fiber gauge length are clearly different from those of the direct grip for fiber length between 2 and 10 mm, based on graphical statistical analyses using kernel density and q–q plots. This difference is caused by the gripping effect. In addition, the tensile strains and strengths obtained by the glue-tab grip were different from those of the direct grip at the short fiber gauge lengths (i.e., 2–10 mm). The differences between the tensile properties (i.e., modulus, strain, and strength) for the two grips measured with the 60-mm fiber length were not statistically significant compared to the results with the short fiber lengths.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gauge Length</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fiber Diameter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fiber Length</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Failure Strain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fiber Strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Heckert, N. Alan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Leigh, Stefan D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kobayashi, Haruki</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McDonough, Walter G.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rice, Kirk D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Holmes, Gale A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials science</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1966</subfield><subfield code="g">48(2013), 10 vom: 12. Feb., Seite 3623-3637</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129546372</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)218324-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014996774</subfield><subfield code="x">0022-2461</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">day:12</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3623-3637</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7142-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="b">12</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">3623-3637</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3996353 |