The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation?
Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part o...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Trexler, Mark C. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1998 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, 3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:1998 ; number:1 ; month:01 ; pages:1-58 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1023/A:1009682712682 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2047791839 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2047791839 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503184455.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s1998 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/A:1009682712682 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2047791839 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)A:1009682712682-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 333.7 |a 690 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Trexler, Mark C. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1998 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Emission Reduction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kyoto Protocol | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Emission Trading | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mitigation Option | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Joint Implementation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kosloff, Laura H. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996 |g 3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58 |w (DE-627)216535506 |w (DE-600)1339119-7 |w (DE-576)252453298 |x 1381-2386 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:1998 |g number:1 |g month:01 |g pages:1-58 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682712682 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 3 |j 1998 |e 1 |c 01 |h 1-58 | ||
| author_variant |
m c t mc mct l h k lh lhk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13812386:1998----::h19koortclhtostenopoetaecia |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1998 |
| publishDate |
1998 |
| allfields |
10.1023/A:1009682712682 doi (DE-627)OLC2047791839 (DE-He213)A:1009682712682-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Trexler, Mark C. verfasserin aut The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? 1998 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol. Emission Reduction Kyoto Protocol Emission Trading Mitigation Option Joint Implementation Kosloff, Laura H. aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996 3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:3 year:1998 number:1 month:01 pages:1-58 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682712682 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 3 1998 1 01 1-58 |
| spelling |
10.1023/A:1009682712682 doi (DE-627)OLC2047791839 (DE-He213)A:1009682712682-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Trexler, Mark C. verfasserin aut The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? 1998 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol. Emission Reduction Kyoto Protocol Emission Trading Mitigation Option Joint Implementation Kosloff, Laura H. aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996 3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:3 year:1998 number:1 month:01 pages:1-58 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682712682 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 3 1998 1 01 1-58 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1023/A:1009682712682 doi (DE-627)OLC2047791839 (DE-He213)A:1009682712682-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Trexler, Mark C. verfasserin aut The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? 1998 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol. Emission Reduction Kyoto Protocol Emission Trading Mitigation Option Joint Implementation Kosloff, Laura H. aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996 3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:3 year:1998 number:1 month:01 pages:1-58 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682712682 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 3 1998 1 01 1-58 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1023/A:1009682712682 doi (DE-627)OLC2047791839 (DE-He213)A:1009682712682-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Trexler, Mark C. verfasserin aut The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? 1998 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol. Emission Reduction Kyoto Protocol Emission Trading Mitigation Option Joint Implementation Kosloff, Laura H. aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996 3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:3 year:1998 number:1 month:01 pages:1-58 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682712682 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 3 1998 1 01 1-58 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1023/A:1009682712682 doi (DE-627)OLC2047791839 (DE-He213)A:1009682712682-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Trexler, Mark C. verfasserin aut The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? 1998 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol. Emission Reduction Kyoto Protocol Emission Trading Mitigation Option Joint Implementation Kosloff, Laura H. aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996 3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:3 year:1998 number:1 month:01 pages:1-58 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682712682 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 3 1998 1 01 1-58 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change 3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58 volume:3 year:1998 number:1 month:01 pages:1-58 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change 3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58 volume:3 year:1998 number:1 month:01 pages:1-58 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Emission Reduction Kyoto Protocol Emission Trading Mitigation Option Joint Implementation |
| dewey-raw |
333.7 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Trexler, Mark C. @@aut@@ Kosloff, Laura H. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1998-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
216535506 |
| dewey-sort |
3333.7 |
| id |
OLC2047791839 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2047791839</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503184455.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1998 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1009682712682</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2047791839</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)A:1009682712682-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Trexler, Mark C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emission Reduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kyoto Protocol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emission Trading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mitigation Option</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Joint Implementation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kosloff, Laura H.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)216535506</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1339119-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)252453298</subfield><subfield code="x">1381-2386</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1998</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682712682</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">1998</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">1-58</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Trexler, Mark C. |
| spellingShingle |
Trexler, Mark C. ddc 333.7 misc Emission Reduction misc Kyoto Protocol misc Emission Trading misc Mitigation Option misc Joint Implementation The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? |
| authorStr |
Trexler, Mark C. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)216535506 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
333 - Economics of land & energy 690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1381-2386 |
| topic_title |
333.7 690 VZ The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? Emission Reduction Kyoto Protocol Emission Trading Mitigation Option Joint Implementation |
| topic |
ddc 333.7 misc Emission Reduction misc Kyoto Protocol misc Emission Trading misc Mitigation Option misc Joint Implementation |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 333.7 misc Emission Reduction misc Kyoto Protocol misc Emission Trading misc Mitigation Option misc Joint Implementation |
| topic_browse |
ddc 333.7 misc Emission Reduction misc Kyoto Protocol misc Emission Trading misc Mitigation Option misc Joint Implementation |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
216535506 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 |
| title |
The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2047791839 (DE-He213)A:1009682712682-p |
| title_full |
The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? |
| author_sort |
Trexler, Mark C. |
| journal |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
| journalStr |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1998 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| author_browse |
Trexler, Mark C. Kosloff, Laura H. |
| container_volume |
3 |
| class |
333.7 690 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Trexler, Mark C. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1023/A:1009682712682 |
| dewey-full |
333.7 690 |
| title_sort |
the 1997 kyoto protocol: what does it mean for project-based climate change mitigation? |
| title_auth |
The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? |
| abstract |
Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol. © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682712682 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Kosloff, Laura H. |
| author2Str |
Kosloff, Laura H. |
| ppnlink |
216535506 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1023/A:1009682712682 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T16:19:39.552Z |
| _version_ |
1803575444954415104 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2047791839</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503184455.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1998 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1009682712682</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2047791839</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)A:1009682712682-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Trexler, Mark C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The Kyoto Protocol effectively ends the Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) pilot phase. However, it is premature to conclude that Articles 6 and 12 of the Protocol vindicate joint implementation and successfully conclude the AIJ pilot phase. Rather, Articles 6 and 12 can be seen as part of the price developing countries felt they had to pay to obtain a Protocol. Debate over Articles 6 and 12 is likely to be as contentious as the JI/AIJ debates that preceded it. Indeed, the AIJ pilot phase has not answered many concerns posed by developing countries and other interest groups. While companies and countries participating in AIJ have had wide latitude to pursue almost any projects they wished, it remains to be seen how much of this flexibility will be preserved as Articles 6 and 12 become operational. This will determine whether the importance and cost-effectiveness originally predicted for the joint implementation concept comes to pass. A review of the JI and AIJ literature suggests many potential stumbling blocks to achieving large-scale and cost-effective emissions reductions through project-based mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. This paper identifies these stumbling blocks and systematically assesses their potential implications. The Greenhouse Gas Offset Cost Assessment and Decisionmaking Model (GGOCAD©) is used to qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluate the importance of key criteria and methodological decisions under Articles 6 and 12. It is easy to develop scenarios in which project-based mitigation through Articles 6 and 12 would not be permitted to contribute substantially to achievement of countries’ obligations under Article 3. Overcoming the challenges facing project-based mitigation efforts is important to achieving the larger goals of the Kyoto Protocol.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emission Reduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kyoto Protocol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emission Trading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mitigation Option</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Joint Implementation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kosloff, Laura H.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">3(1998), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 1-58</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)216535506</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1339119-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)252453298</subfield><subfield code="x">1381-2386</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1998</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-58</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682712682</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">1998</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">1-58</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4012003 |