Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector
Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology i...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Beccari Barreto, Beatriz [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer Nature B.V. 2019 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change - Springer Netherlands, 1996, 25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:2019 ; number:2 ; day:02 ; month:03 ; pages:165-183 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2047802660 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2047802660 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230504145957.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s2019 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2047802660 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s11027-019-09853-w-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 333.7 |a 690 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Beccari Barreto, Beatriz |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-4193-0242 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 | ||
520 | |a Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Cement | |
650 | 4 | |a CO | |
650 | 4 | |a storage | |
650 | 4 | |a Carbon capture and storage | |
650 | 4 | |a Carbonation | |
650 | 4 | |a Submarine storage | |
700 | 1 | |a Caserini, Stefano |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dolci, Giovanni |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Grosso, Mario |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |d Springer Netherlands, 1996 |g 25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183 |w (DE-627)216535506 |w (DE-600)1339119-7 |w (DE-576)252453298 |x 1381-2386 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g day:02 |g month:03 |g pages:165-183 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_601 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 25 |j 2019 |e 2 |b 02 |c 03 |h 165-183 |
author_variant |
b b b bb bbb s c sc g d gd m g mg |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:13812386:2019----::abnixdsbaietrgigasotiesieylassmnadotnlssfo |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w doi (DE-627)OLC2047802660 (DE-He213)s11027-019-09853-w-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Beccari Barreto, Beatriz verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4193-0242 aut Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials. Cement CO storage Carbon capture and storage Carbonation Submarine storage Caserini, Stefano aut Dolci, Giovanni aut Grosso, Mario aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Springer Netherlands, 1996 25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:165-183 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_601 AR 25 2019 2 02 03 165-183 |
spelling |
10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w doi (DE-627)OLC2047802660 (DE-He213)s11027-019-09853-w-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Beccari Barreto, Beatriz verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4193-0242 aut Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials. Cement CO storage Carbon capture and storage Carbonation Submarine storage Caserini, Stefano aut Dolci, Giovanni aut Grosso, Mario aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Springer Netherlands, 1996 25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:165-183 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_601 AR 25 2019 2 02 03 165-183 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w doi (DE-627)OLC2047802660 (DE-He213)s11027-019-09853-w-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Beccari Barreto, Beatriz verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4193-0242 aut Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials. Cement CO storage Carbon capture and storage Carbonation Submarine storage Caserini, Stefano aut Dolci, Giovanni aut Grosso, Mario aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Springer Netherlands, 1996 25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:165-183 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_601 AR 25 2019 2 02 03 165-183 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w doi (DE-627)OLC2047802660 (DE-He213)s11027-019-09853-w-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Beccari Barreto, Beatriz verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4193-0242 aut Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials. Cement CO storage Carbon capture and storage Carbonation Submarine storage Caserini, Stefano aut Dolci, Giovanni aut Grosso, Mario aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Springer Netherlands, 1996 25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:165-183 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_601 AR 25 2019 2 02 03 165-183 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w doi (DE-627)OLC2047802660 (DE-He213)s11027-019-09853-w-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 333.7 690 VZ Beccari Barreto, Beatriz verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4193-0242 aut Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials. Cement CO storage Carbon capture and storage Carbonation Submarine storage Caserini, Stefano aut Dolci, Giovanni aut Grosso, Mario aut Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Springer Netherlands, 1996 25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183 (DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 1381-2386 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:165-183 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_601 AR 25 2019 2 02 03 165-183 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change 25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183 volume:25 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:165-183 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change 25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183 volume:25 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:165-183 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Cement CO storage Carbon capture and storage Carbonation Submarine storage |
dewey-raw |
333.7 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Beccari Barreto, Beatriz @@aut@@ Caserini, Stefano @@aut@@ Dolci, Giovanni @@aut@@ Grosso, Mario @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-03-02T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
216535506 |
dewey-sort |
3333.7 |
id |
OLC2047802660 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2047802660</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504145957.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2019 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2047802660</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11027-019-09853-w-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beccari Barreto, Beatriz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4193-0242</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon capture and storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbonation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Submarine storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caserini, Stefano</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dolci, Giovanni</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grosso, Mario</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)216535506</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1339119-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)252453298</subfield><subfield code="x">1381-2386</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:165-183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_601</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">165-183</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Beccari Barreto, Beatriz |
spellingShingle |
Beccari Barreto, Beatriz ddc 333.7 misc Cement misc CO misc storage misc Carbon capture and storage misc Carbonation misc Submarine storage Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector |
authorStr |
Beccari Barreto, Beatriz |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)216535506 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
333 - Economics of land & energy 690 - Buildings |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1381-2386 |
topic_title |
333.7 690 VZ Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector Cement CO storage Carbon capture and storage Carbonation Submarine storage |
topic |
ddc 333.7 misc Cement misc CO misc storage misc Carbon capture and storage misc Carbonation misc Submarine storage |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 333.7 misc Cement misc CO misc storage misc Carbon capture and storage misc Carbonation misc Submarine storage |
topic_browse |
ddc 333.7 misc Cement misc CO misc storage misc Carbon capture and storage misc Carbonation misc Submarine storage |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
hierarchy_parent_id |
216535506 |
dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 690 - Building & construction |
hierarchy_top_title |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)216535506 (DE-600)1339119-7 (DE-576)252453298 |
title |
Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2047802660 (DE-He213)s11027-019-09853-w-p |
title_full |
Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector |
author_sort |
Beccari Barreto, Beatriz |
journal |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
journalStr |
Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
165 |
author_browse |
Beccari Barreto, Beatriz Caserini, Stefano Dolci, Giovanni Grosso, Mario |
container_volume |
25 |
class |
333.7 690 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Beccari Barreto, Beatriz |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-4193-0242 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-4193-0242 |
dewey-full |
333.7 690 |
title_sort |
carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: life cycle assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector |
title_auth |
Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector |
abstract |
Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials. © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 |
abstractGer |
Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials. © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials. © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-FOR SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_601 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Caserini, Stefano Dolci, Giovanni Grosso, Mario |
author2Str |
Caserini, Stefano Dolci, Giovanni Grosso, Mario |
ppnlink |
216535506 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w |
up_date |
2024-07-03T16:22:46.602Z |
_version_ |
1803575641088458752 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2047802660</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504145957.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2019 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2047802660</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11027-019-09853-w-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beccari Barreto, Beatriz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4193-0242</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Carbon dioxide submarine storage in glass containers: Life Cycle Assessment and cost analysis of four case studies in the cement sector</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Nature B.V. 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper describes the potential application of a new patented technology for the storage of carbon dioxide ($ CO_{2} $) in glass containers into the deep seabed (confined submarine carbon storage (CSCS)) to cement plants located in four different locations in the world. This technology is based on the bottling of liquid $ CO_{2} $ at high pressure inside capsules made of glass that are delivered to the bottom of the ocean via a proper pipeline. A Life Cycle Assessment that considers all the stages of the process and 13 impact categories, with a focus on climate change, shows an impact in the four case studies between 0.084 and 0.132 ton of $ CO_{2} $ equivalent (eq) per ton of $ CO_{2} $ stored. Since carbonation of cement materials over their life cycle is a significant and growing net sink of $ CO_{2} $, the capture and storage of $ CO_{2} $ emissions generated during the production of cement might lead to negative emissions. A cost analysis was also performed, including the capital costs and the operational costs, even considering the funding structure through financing and equity. The costs of the four case studies are from 16 to 29 $/$ tCO_{2} $. Although further work is needed to assess in detail some aspects of the design, the result of this stage of the research allows concluding that the application of the CSCS in cement plants is an interesting option for achieving negative emissions, even if limited due the slowness of $ CO_{2} $ uptake during the lifetime of cement materials.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon capture and storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbonation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Submarine storage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caserini, Stefano</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dolci, Giovanni</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grosso, Mario</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2019), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 165-183</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)216535506</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1339119-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)252453298</subfield><subfield code="x">1381-2386</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:165-183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09853-w</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_601</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">165-183</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3973074 |