Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009
Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote eco...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Pizzola, Brandon [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of regulatory economics - Springer US, 1989, 53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:53 ; year:2018 ; number:3 ; day:11 ; month:05 ; pages:243-255 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2048943586 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2048943586 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504023352.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2048943586 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11149-018-9356-z-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Pizzola, Brandon |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-2754-8554 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Investment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Business regulation | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of regulatory economics |d Springer US, 1989 |g 53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255 |w (DE-627)170221695 |w (DE-600)1027173-9 |w (DE-576)023101695 |x 0922-680X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g day:11 |g month:05 |g pages:243-255 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 53 |j 2018 |e 3 |b 11 |c 05 |h 243-255 | ||
| author_variant |
b p bp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:0922680X:2018----::uieseuainnbsnsivsmneiecfoum |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z doi (DE-627)OLC2048943586 (DE-He213)s11149-018-9356-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Pizzola, Brandon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2754-8554 aut Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment. Investment Business regulation Enthalten in Journal of regulatory economics Springer US, 1989 53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255 (DE-627)170221695 (DE-600)1027173-9 (DE-576)023101695 0922-680X nnns volume:53 year:2018 number:3 day:11 month:05 pages:243-255 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 53 2018 3 11 05 243-255 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z doi (DE-627)OLC2048943586 (DE-He213)s11149-018-9356-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Pizzola, Brandon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2754-8554 aut Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment. Investment Business regulation Enthalten in Journal of regulatory economics Springer US, 1989 53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255 (DE-627)170221695 (DE-600)1027173-9 (DE-576)023101695 0922-680X nnns volume:53 year:2018 number:3 day:11 month:05 pages:243-255 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 53 2018 3 11 05 243-255 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z doi (DE-627)OLC2048943586 (DE-He213)s11149-018-9356-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Pizzola, Brandon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2754-8554 aut Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment. Investment Business regulation Enthalten in Journal of regulatory economics Springer US, 1989 53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255 (DE-627)170221695 (DE-600)1027173-9 (DE-576)023101695 0922-680X nnns volume:53 year:2018 number:3 day:11 month:05 pages:243-255 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 53 2018 3 11 05 243-255 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z doi (DE-627)OLC2048943586 (DE-He213)s11149-018-9356-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Pizzola, Brandon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2754-8554 aut Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment. Investment Business regulation Enthalten in Journal of regulatory economics Springer US, 1989 53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255 (DE-627)170221695 (DE-600)1027173-9 (DE-576)023101695 0922-680X nnns volume:53 year:2018 number:3 day:11 month:05 pages:243-255 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 53 2018 3 11 05 243-255 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z doi (DE-627)OLC2048943586 (DE-He213)s11149-018-9356-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Pizzola, Brandon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2754-8554 aut Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment. Investment Business regulation Enthalten in Journal of regulatory economics Springer US, 1989 53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255 (DE-627)170221695 (DE-600)1027173-9 (DE-576)023101695 0922-680X nnns volume:53 year:2018 number:3 day:11 month:05 pages:243-255 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 AR 53 2018 3 11 05 243-255 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of regulatory economics 53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255 volume:53 year:2018 number:3 day:11 month:05 pages:243-255 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of regulatory economics 53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255 volume:53 year:2018 number:3 day:11 month:05 pages:243-255 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Investment Business regulation |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of regulatory economics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Pizzola, Brandon @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-05-11T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
170221695 |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
OLC2048943586 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2048943586</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504023352.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2048943586</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11149-018-9356-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pizzola, Brandon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2754-8554</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Business regulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of regulatory economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1989</subfield><subfield code="g">53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170221695</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1027173-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023101695</subfield><subfield code="x">0922-680X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:53</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:243-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">53</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">243-255</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Pizzola, Brandon |
| spellingShingle |
Pizzola, Brandon ddc 330 misc Investment misc Business regulation Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 |
| authorStr |
Pizzola, Brandon |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)170221695 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0922-680X |
| topic_title |
330 VZ Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 Investment Business regulation |
| topic |
ddc 330 misc Investment misc Business regulation |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 misc Investment misc Business regulation |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 misc Investment misc Business regulation |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of regulatory economics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
170221695 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of regulatory economics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)170221695 (DE-600)1027173-9 (DE-576)023101695 |
| title |
Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2048943586 (DE-He213)s11149-018-9356-z-p |
| title_full |
Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 |
| author_sort |
Pizzola, Brandon |
| journal |
Journal of regulatory economics |
| journalStr |
Journal of regulatory economics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
243 |
| author_browse |
Pizzola, Brandon |
| container_volume |
53 |
| class |
330 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Pizzola, Brandon |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-2754-8554 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-2754-8554 |
| dewey-full |
330 |
| title_sort |
business regulation and business investment: evidence from us manufacturing 1970–2009 |
| title_auth |
Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 |
| abstract |
Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
170221695 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:51:14.076Z |
| _version_ |
1803592531013795840 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2048943586</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504023352.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2048943586</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11149-018-9356-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pizzola, Brandon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2754-8554</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Business regulation and business investment: evidence from US manufacturing 1970–2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Regulation is often portrayed as placing a substantial burden on US businesses and the overall US economy. Moreover, policy options of “cutting red tape” and “reducing federal bureaucracy” are often asserted to be a way to stimulate investment and, through this channel, a way to promote economic growth. This paper examines the relationship between growth in regulatory restrictions in the Code of Federal Regulations and manufacturing investment in the United States over the 1970–2009 period. An industry-level dataset is constructed by mapping the novel industry-specific RegData dataset from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University to the comprehensive industry-specific manufacturing data in the NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database. In total, the constructed dataset includes 337 manufacturing industries. This approach yields substantial evidence that increased business regulation is associated with decreased business investment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Business regulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of regulatory economics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1989</subfield><subfield code="g">53(2018), 3 vom: 11. Mai, Seite 243-255</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)170221695</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1027173-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023101695</subfield><subfield code="x">0922-680X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:53</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:243-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-018-9356-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">53</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">243-255</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.40158 |