Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany

Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits consid...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Coppock, Rob [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	1985

Schlagwörter:	Economic Policy Scientific Knowledge Policy Decision Fundamental Attribute Fundamental Aspect

Anmerkung:	© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Policy sciences - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970, 18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:18 ; year:1985 ; number:4 ; month:12 ; pages:371-390

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/BF00135920

Katalog-ID:	OLC2049251947

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	OLC2049251947
003	DE-627
005	20230503233147.0
007	tu
008	200820s1985 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/BF00135920 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC2049251947
035			\|a (DE-He213)BF00135920-p
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 320 \|q VZ
084			\|a 3,6 \|2 ssgn
100	1		\|a Coppock, Rob \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany
264		1	\|c 1985
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985
520			\|a Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed.
650		4	\|a Economic Policy
650		4	\|a Scientific Knowledge
650		4	\|a Policy Decision
650		4	\|a Fundamental Attribute
650		4	\|a Fundamental Aspect
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Policy sciences \|d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 \|g 18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390 \|w (DE-627)129083437 \|w (DE-600)3928-7 \|w (DE-576)014416700 \|x 0032-2687 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:18 \|g year:1985 \|g number:4 \|g month:12 \|g pages:371-390
856	4	1	\|u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135920 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-POL
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_26
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_754
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2002
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2018
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4029
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4082
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4103
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4266
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4310
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4318
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 18 \|j 1985 \|e 4 \|c 12 \|h 371-390

Indexfelder

author_variant	r c rc
matchkey_str	article:00322687:1985----::neatosewesinitadulcfiilaoprsnfhuefcecirgltrpor
hierarchy_sort_str	1985
publishDate	1985
allfields	10.1007/BF00135920 doi (DE-627)OLC2049251947 (DE-He213)BF00135920-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 VZ 3,6 ssgn Coppock, Rob verfasserin aut Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany 1985 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985 Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed. Economic Policy Scientific Knowledge Policy Decision Fundamental Attribute Fundamental Aspect Enthalten in Policy sciences Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390 (DE-627)129083437 (DE-600)3928-7 (DE-576)014416700 0032-2687 nnns volume:18 year:1985 number:4 month:12 pages:371-390 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 1985 4 12 371-390
spelling	10.1007/BF00135920 doi (DE-627)OLC2049251947 (DE-He213)BF00135920-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 VZ 3,6 ssgn Coppock, Rob verfasserin aut Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany 1985 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985 Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed. Economic Policy Scientific Knowledge Policy Decision Fundamental Attribute Fundamental Aspect Enthalten in Policy sciences Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390 (DE-627)129083437 (DE-600)3928-7 (DE-576)014416700 0032-2687 nnns volume:18 year:1985 number:4 month:12 pages:371-390 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 1985 4 12 371-390
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/BF00135920 doi (DE-627)OLC2049251947 (DE-He213)BF00135920-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 VZ 3,6 ssgn Coppock, Rob verfasserin aut Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany 1985 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985 Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed. Economic Policy Scientific Knowledge Policy Decision Fundamental Attribute Fundamental Aspect Enthalten in Policy sciences Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390 (DE-627)129083437 (DE-600)3928-7 (DE-576)014416700 0032-2687 nnns volume:18 year:1985 number:4 month:12 pages:371-390 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 1985 4 12 371-390
allfieldsGer	10.1007/BF00135920 doi (DE-627)OLC2049251947 (DE-He213)BF00135920-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 VZ 3,6 ssgn Coppock, Rob verfasserin aut Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany 1985 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985 Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed. Economic Policy Scientific Knowledge Policy Decision Fundamental Attribute Fundamental Aspect Enthalten in Policy sciences Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390 (DE-627)129083437 (DE-600)3928-7 (DE-576)014416700 0032-2687 nnns volume:18 year:1985 number:4 month:12 pages:371-390 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 1985 4 12 371-390
allfieldsSound	10.1007/BF00135920 doi (DE-627)OLC2049251947 (DE-He213)BF00135920-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 VZ 3,6 ssgn Coppock, Rob verfasserin aut Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany 1985 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985 Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed. Economic Policy Scientific Knowledge Policy Decision Fundamental Attribute Fundamental Aspect Enthalten in Policy sciences Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390 (DE-627)129083437 (DE-600)3928-7 (DE-576)014416700 0032-2687 nnns volume:18 year:1985 number:4 month:12 pages:371-390 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 1985 4 12 371-390
language	English
source	Enthalten in Policy sciences 18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390 volume:18 year:1985 number:4 month:12 pages:371-390
sourceStr	Enthalten in Policy sciences 18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390 volume:18 year:1985 number:4 month:12 pages:371-390
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Economic Policy Scientific Knowledge Policy Decision Fundamental Attribute Fundamental Aspect
dewey-raw	320
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Policy sciences
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Coppock, Rob @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	1985-12-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	129083437
dewey-sort	3320
id	OLC2049251947
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2049251947</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503233147.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s1985 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00135920</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2049251947</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00135920-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,6</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Coppock, Rob</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1985</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic Policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Scientific Knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policy Decision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fundamental Attribute</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fundamental Aspect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970</subfield><subfield code="g">18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129083437</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3928-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014416700</subfield><subfield code="x">0032-2687</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1985</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:371-390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135920</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">1985</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">371-390</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Coppock, Rob
spellingShingle	Coppock, Rob ddc 320 ssgn 3,6 misc Economic Policy misc Scientific Knowledge misc Policy Decision misc Fundamental Attribute misc Fundamental Aspect Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany
authorStr	Coppock, Rob
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)129083437
format	Article
dewey-ones	320 - Political science
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0032-2687
topic_title	320 VZ 3,6 ssgn Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany Economic Policy Scientific Knowledge Policy Decision Fundamental Attribute Fundamental Aspect
topic	ddc 320 ssgn 3,6 misc Economic Policy misc Scientific Knowledge misc Policy Decision misc Fundamental Attribute misc Fundamental Aspect
topic_unstemmed	ddc 320 ssgn 3,6 misc Economic Policy misc Scientific Knowledge misc Policy Decision misc Fundamental Attribute misc Fundamental Aspect
topic_browse	ddc 320 ssgn 3,6 misc Economic Policy misc Scientific Knowledge misc Policy Decision misc Fundamental Attribute misc Fundamental Aspect
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Policy sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	129083437
dewey-tens	320 - Political science
hierarchy_top_title	Policy sciences
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)129083437 (DE-600)3928-7 (DE-576)014416700
title	Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC2049251947 (DE-He213)BF00135920-p
title_full	Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany
author_sort	Coppock, Rob
journal	Policy sciences
journalStr	Policy sciences
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	1985
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	371
author_browse	Coppock, Rob
container_volume	18
class	320 VZ 3,6 ssgn
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Coppock, Rob
doi_str_mv	10.1007/BF00135920
dewey-full	320
title_sort	interactions between scientists and public officials: a comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the united states and west germany
title_auth	Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany
abstract	Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed. © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985
abstractGer	Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed. © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed. © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2002 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2035 GBV_ILN_2150 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4027 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4266 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4
title_short	Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany
url	https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135920
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	129083437
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/BF00135920
up_date	2024-07-03T22:03:33.848Z
_version_	1803597081581977600
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2049251947</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503233147.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s1985 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00135920</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2049251947</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00135920-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,6</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Coppock, Rob</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1985</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1985</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This essay compares and contrasts important attributes of the use of scientific knowledge and judgment in regulatory decisions in the United States and West Germany. It decribes the broader historical context for such decisions in each country. Although the system in America exhibits considerable conflict and assumption of adversarial positions, it is argued that a more fundamental attribute of the system is that policy decisions are reviewed according to rules of evidence and its interpretation. Similarly, although the German system involves a great deal of consultation, a more fundamental aspect of policy decisions there is that of the determination of the social obligation to act. In the United States, it is more important that a decisionmaker has properly developed and interpreted the evidence than that he or she has consulted with all the relevant parties. In Germany, the order of importance of the two is reversed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic Policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Scientific Knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policy Decision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fundamental Attribute</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fundamental Aspect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Policy sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970</subfield><subfield code="g">18(1985), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 371-390</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129083437</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3928-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014416700</subfield><subfield code="x">0032-2687</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1985</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:371-390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135920</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">1985</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">371-390</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.397312

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?