Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer
Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Gan, Yantai [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2011 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer-Verlag 2011 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The international journal of life cycle assessment - Springer-Verlag, 1996, 17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:17 ; year:2011 ; number:1 ; day:28 ; month:09 ; pages:58-68 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2051197016 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2051197016 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504090412.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2051197016 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11367-011-0337-z-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 650 |a 330 |a 333.7 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Gan, Yantai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer-Verlag 2011 | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Carbon footprint | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Environment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Greenhouse gas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nitrogen management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a NUE | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Yellow mustard | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liang, Chang |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Gaobao |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Malhi, Sukhdev S. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brandt, Stewart A. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The international journal of life cycle assessment |d Springer-Verlag, 1996 |g 17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68 |w (DE-627)211584533 |w (DE-600)1319419-7 |w (DE-576)059728728 |x 0948-3349 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2011 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:09 |g pages:58-68 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2016 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 17 |j 2011 |e 1 |b 28 |c 09 |h 58-68 | ||
| author_variant |
y g yg c l cl g h gh s s m ss ssm s a b sa sab f k m fkm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09483349:2011----::abnotrnocnladutriaucinfh |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z doi (DE-627)OLC2051197016 (DE-He213)s11367-011-0337-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Gan, Yantai verfasserin aut Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2011 Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices. Carbon footprint Environment Greenhouse gas Nitrogen management NUE Yellow mustard Liang, Chang aut Huang, Gaobao aut Malhi, Sukhdev S. aut Brandt, Stewart A. aut Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer-Verlag, 1996 17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:17 year:2011 number:1 day:28 month:09 pages:58-68 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 AR 17 2011 1 28 09 58-68 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z doi (DE-627)OLC2051197016 (DE-He213)s11367-011-0337-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Gan, Yantai verfasserin aut Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2011 Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices. Carbon footprint Environment Greenhouse gas Nitrogen management NUE Yellow mustard Liang, Chang aut Huang, Gaobao aut Malhi, Sukhdev S. aut Brandt, Stewart A. aut Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer-Verlag, 1996 17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:17 year:2011 number:1 day:28 month:09 pages:58-68 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 AR 17 2011 1 28 09 58-68 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z doi (DE-627)OLC2051197016 (DE-He213)s11367-011-0337-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Gan, Yantai verfasserin aut Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2011 Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices. Carbon footprint Environment Greenhouse gas Nitrogen management NUE Yellow mustard Liang, Chang aut Huang, Gaobao aut Malhi, Sukhdev S. aut Brandt, Stewart A. aut Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer-Verlag, 1996 17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:17 year:2011 number:1 day:28 month:09 pages:58-68 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 AR 17 2011 1 28 09 58-68 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z doi (DE-627)OLC2051197016 (DE-He213)s11367-011-0337-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Gan, Yantai verfasserin aut Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2011 Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices. Carbon footprint Environment Greenhouse gas Nitrogen management NUE Yellow mustard Liang, Chang aut Huang, Gaobao aut Malhi, Sukhdev S. aut Brandt, Stewart A. aut Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer-Verlag, 1996 17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:17 year:2011 number:1 day:28 month:09 pages:58-68 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 AR 17 2011 1 28 09 58-68 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z doi (DE-627)OLC2051197016 (DE-He213)s11367-011-0337-z-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Gan, Yantai verfasserin aut Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer 2011 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag 2011 Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices. Carbon footprint Environment Greenhouse gas Nitrogen management NUE Yellow mustard Liang, Chang aut Huang, Gaobao aut Malhi, Sukhdev S. aut Brandt, Stewart A. aut Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer-Verlag, 1996 17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:17 year:2011 number:1 day:28 month:09 pages:58-68 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 AR 17 2011 1 28 09 58-68 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment 17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68 volume:17 year:2011 number:1 day:28 month:09 pages:58-68 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment 17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68 volume:17 year:2011 number:1 day:28 month:09 pages:58-68 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Carbon footprint Environment Greenhouse gas Nitrogen management NUE Yellow mustard |
| dewey-raw |
650 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Gan, Yantai @@aut@@ Liang, Chang @@aut@@ Huang, Gaobao @@aut@@ Malhi, Sukhdev S. @@aut@@ Brandt, Stewart A. @@aut@@ Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2011-09-28T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
211584533 |
| dewey-sort |
3650 |
| id |
OLC2051197016 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2051197016</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504090412.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2051197016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11367-011-0337-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gan, Yantai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Greenhouse gas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nitrogen management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NUE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Yellow mustard</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liang, Chang</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Gaobao</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Malhi, Sukhdev S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brandt, Stewart A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of life cycle assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)211584533</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1319419-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)059728728</subfield><subfield code="x">0948-3349</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:58-68</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">58-68</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Gan, Yantai |
| spellingShingle |
Gan, Yantai ddc 650 ddc 690 misc Carbon footprint misc Environment misc Greenhouse gas misc Nitrogen management misc NUE misc Yellow mustard Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer |
| authorStr |
Gan, Yantai |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)211584533 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
650 - Management & auxiliary services 330 - Economics 333 - Economics of land & energy 690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0948-3349 |
| topic_title |
650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer Carbon footprint Environment Greenhouse gas Nitrogen management NUE Yellow mustard |
| topic |
ddc 650 ddc 690 misc Carbon footprint misc Environment misc Greenhouse gas misc Nitrogen management misc NUE misc Yellow mustard |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 650 ddc 690 misc Carbon footprint misc Environment misc Greenhouse gas misc Nitrogen management misc NUE misc Yellow mustard |
| topic_browse |
ddc 650 ddc 690 misc Carbon footprint misc Environment misc Greenhouse gas misc Nitrogen management misc NUE misc Yellow mustard |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
211584533 |
| dewey-tens |
650 - Management & public relations 330 - Economics 690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 |
| title |
Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2051197016 (DE-He213)s11367-011-0337-z-p |
| title_full |
Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer |
| author_sort |
Gan, Yantai |
| journal |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| journalStr |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2011 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
58 |
| author_browse |
Gan, Yantai Liang, Chang Huang, Gaobao Malhi, Sukhdev S. Brandt, Stewart A. Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas |
| container_volume |
17 |
| class |
650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Gan, Yantai |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z |
| dewey-full |
650 330 333.7 690 |
| title_sort |
carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of n fertilizer |
| title_auth |
Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer |
| abstract |
Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices. © Springer-Verlag 2011 |
| abstractGer |
Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices. © Springer-Verlag 2011 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices. © Springer-Verlag 2011 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Liang, Chang Huang, Gaobao Malhi, Sukhdev S. Brandt, Stewart A. Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas |
| author2Str |
Liang, Chang Huang, Gaobao Malhi, Sukhdev S. Brandt, Stewart A. Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas |
| ppnlink |
211584533 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T03:48:07.239Z |
| _version_ |
1803618759203618816 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2051197016</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504090412.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2011 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2051197016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11367-011-0337-z-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gan, Yantai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Carbon footprint of canola and mustard is a function of the rate of N fertilizer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose Best agricultural practices can be adopted to increase crop productivity and lower carbon footprint of grain products. The aims of this study were to provide a quantitative estimate of the carbon footprint of selected oilseed crops grown on the semiarid northern Great Plains and to determine the effects of N fertilization and environments on the carbon footprint. Materials and methods Five oilseed crops, Brassica napus canola, Brassica rapa canola, Brassica juncea canola, B. juncea mustard, and Sinapis alba mustard, were grown under the N rates of 0, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $ at eight environsites (location × year combinations) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Straw and root decomposition and various production inputs were used to calculate greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints. Results and discussion Emissions from the production, transportation, storage, and delivery of N fertilizer to farm gates accounted for 42% of the total greenhouse gas emissions, and the direct and indirect emission from the application of N fertilizer in oilseed production added another 31% to the total emission. Emissions from N fertilization were nine times the emission from the use of pesticides and 11 times that of farming operations. Straw and root decomposition emitted 120 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, contributing 10% to the total emission. Carbon footprint increased slightly as N rates increased from 0 to 50 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, but as N rates increased from 50 to 250 kg N $ ha^{−1} $, carbon footprint increased substantially for all five oilseed crops evaluated. Oilseeds grown at the humid Melfort site emitted 1,355 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ ha^{−1} $, 30% greater than emissions at the drier sites of Scott and Swift Current. Oilseeds grown at Melfort had their carbon footprint of 0.52 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed, 45% greater than that at Scott (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed), and 25% greater than that at Swift Current (0.45 kg $ CO_{2} $eq $ kg^{−1} $ of oilseed). Conclusions Carbon footprint of oilseeds was a function of the rate of N fertilizer, and the intensity of the functionality varied between environments. Key to lower carbon footprint in oilseeds is to improve N management practices.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon footprint</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Greenhouse gas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nitrogen management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NUE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Yellow mustard</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liang, Chang</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Gaobao</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Malhi, Sukhdev S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brandt, Stewart A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katepa-Mupondwa, Felicitas</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of life cycle assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2011), 1 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 58-68</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)211584533</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1319419-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)059728728</subfield><subfield code="x">0948-3349</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:58-68</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0337-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">58-68</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.40077 |