Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US
Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Manouchehrinejad, Maryam [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The international journal of life cycle assessment - Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996, 25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:2019 ; number:1 ; day:16 ; month:08 ; pages:89-104 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2051210012 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2051210012 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504090604.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2019 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2051210012 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11367-019-01667-x-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 650 |a 330 |a 333.7 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Manouchehrinejad, Maryam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Electricity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Napier grass | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Life cycle assessment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Minimum selling price | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pellets | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Techno-economic analysis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sahoo, Kamalakanta |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kaliyan, Nalladurai |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Singh, Hari |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mani, Sudhagar |0 (orcid)0000-0003-1920-8381 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The international journal of life cycle assessment |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996 |g 25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104 |w (DE-627)211584533 |w (DE-600)1319419-7 |w (DE-576)059728728 |x 0948-3349 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g day:16 |g month:08 |g pages:89-104 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2016 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 2019 |e 1 |b 16 |c 08 |h 89-104 | ||
| author_variant |
m m mm k s ks n k nk h s hs s m sm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09483349:2019----::cnmcnevrnetlmatsesetoatnaoeairrsfrdobndetnpwre |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x doi (DE-627)OLC2051210012 (DE-He213)s11367-019-01667-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Manouchehrinejad, Maryam verfasserin aut Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation. Electricity Napier grass Life cycle assessment Minimum selling price Pellets Techno-economic analysis Sahoo, Kamalakanta aut Kaliyan, Nalladurai aut Singh, Hari aut Mani, Sudhagar (orcid)0000-0003-1920-8381 aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996 25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:1 day:16 month:08 pages:89-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 25 2019 1 16 08 89-104 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x doi (DE-627)OLC2051210012 (DE-He213)s11367-019-01667-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Manouchehrinejad, Maryam verfasserin aut Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation. Electricity Napier grass Life cycle assessment Minimum selling price Pellets Techno-economic analysis Sahoo, Kamalakanta aut Kaliyan, Nalladurai aut Singh, Hari aut Mani, Sudhagar (orcid)0000-0003-1920-8381 aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996 25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:1 day:16 month:08 pages:89-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 25 2019 1 16 08 89-104 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x doi (DE-627)OLC2051210012 (DE-He213)s11367-019-01667-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Manouchehrinejad, Maryam verfasserin aut Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation. Electricity Napier grass Life cycle assessment Minimum selling price Pellets Techno-economic analysis Sahoo, Kamalakanta aut Kaliyan, Nalladurai aut Singh, Hari aut Mani, Sudhagar (orcid)0000-0003-1920-8381 aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996 25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:1 day:16 month:08 pages:89-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 25 2019 1 16 08 89-104 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x doi (DE-627)OLC2051210012 (DE-He213)s11367-019-01667-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Manouchehrinejad, Maryam verfasserin aut Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation. Electricity Napier grass Life cycle assessment Minimum selling price Pellets Techno-economic analysis Sahoo, Kamalakanta aut Kaliyan, Nalladurai aut Singh, Hari aut Mani, Sudhagar (orcid)0000-0003-1920-8381 aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996 25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:1 day:16 month:08 pages:89-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 25 2019 1 16 08 89-104 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x doi (DE-627)OLC2051210012 (DE-He213)s11367-019-01667-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Manouchehrinejad, Maryam verfasserin aut Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US 2019 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation. Electricity Napier grass Life cycle assessment Minimum selling price Pellets Techno-economic analysis Sahoo, Kamalakanta aut Kaliyan, Nalladurai aut Singh, Hari aut Mani, Sudhagar (orcid)0000-0003-1920-8381 aut Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996 25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104 (DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 0948-3349 nnns volume:25 year:2019 number:1 day:16 month:08 pages:89-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 25 2019 1 16 08 89-104 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment 25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104 volume:25 year:2019 number:1 day:16 month:08 pages:89-104 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The international journal of life cycle assessment 25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104 volume:25 year:2019 number:1 day:16 month:08 pages:89-104 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Electricity Napier grass Life cycle assessment Minimum selling price Pellets Techno-economic analysis |
| dewey-raw |
650 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Manouchehrinejad, Maryam @@aut@@ Sahoo, Kamalakanta @@aut@@ Kaliyan, Nalladurai @@aut@@ Singh, Hari @@aut@@ Mani, Sudhagar @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-08-16T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
211584533 |
| dewey-sort |
3650 |
| id |
OLC2051210012 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2051210012</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504090604.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2019 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2051210012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11367-019-01667-x-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manouchehrinejad, Maryam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electricity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Napier grass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Life cycle assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Minimum selling price</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pellets</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Techno-economic analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sahoo, Kamalakanta</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kaliyan, Nalladurai</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Hari</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mani, Sudhagar</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1920-8381</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of life cycle assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)211584533</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1319419-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)059728728</subfield><subfield code="x">0948-3349</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:89-104</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">89-104</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Manouchehrinejad, Maryam |
| spellingShingle |
Manouchehrinejad, Maryam ddc 650 ddc 690 misc Electricity misc Napier grass misc Life cycle assessment misc Minimum selling price misc Pellets misc Techno-economic analysis Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US |
| authorStr |
Manouchehrinejad, Maryam |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)211584533 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
650 - Management & auxiliary services 330 - Economics 333 - Economics of land & energy 690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0948-3349 |
| topic_title |
650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US Electricity Napier grass Life cycle assessment Minimum selling price Pellets Techno-economic analysis |
| topic |
ddc 650 ddc 690 misc Electricity misc Napier grass misc Life cycle assessment misc Minimum selling price misc Pellets misc Techno-economic analysis |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 650 ddc 690 misc Electricity misc Napier grass misc Life cycle assessment misc Minimum selling price misc Pellets misc Techno-economic analysis |
| topic_browse |
ddc 650 ddc 690 misc Electricity misc Napier grass misc Life cycle assessment misc Minimum selling price misc Pellets misc Techno-economic analysis |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
211584533 |
| dewey-tens |
650 - Management & public relations 330 - Economics 690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)211584533 (DE-600)1319419-7 (DE-576)059728728 |
| title |
Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2051210012 (DE-He213)s11367-019-01667-x-p |
| title_full |
Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US |
| author_sort |
Manouchehrinejad, Maryam |
| journal |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| journalStr |
The international journal of life cycle assessment |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
89 |
| author_browse |
Manouchehrinejad, Maryam Sahoo, Kamalakanta Kaliyan, Nalladurai Singh, Hari Mani, Sudhagar |
| container_volume |
25 |
| class |
650 330 333.7 VZ 690 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Manouchehrinejad, Maryam |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-1920-8381 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-1920-8381 |
| dewey-full |
650 330 333.7 690 |
| title_sort |
economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern us |
| title_auth |
Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US |
| abstract |
Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 |
| abstractGer |
Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-ARC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4277 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Sahoo, Kamalakanta Kaliyan, Nalladurai Singh, Hari Mani, Sudhagar |
| author2Str |
Sahoo, Kamalakanta Kaliyan, Nalladurai Singh, Hari Mani, Sudhagar |
| ppnlink |
211584533 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T03:50:37.092Z |
| _version_ |
1803618916343218176 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2051210012</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504090604.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2019 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2051210012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11367-019-01667-x-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">333.7</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manouchehrinejad, Maryam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose Napier grass, one of the high yield perennial energy crops can be grown on marginal lands with minimal inputs, but with increased soil carbon sequestration in the southeastern US. The sustainable use of Napier grass for bioenergy applications such as combined heat and power at low cost to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions needs to be investigated. Methods In this study, an integrated life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis approach were used to estimate the energy use, environmental emissions, and minimum selling price (MSP) of electricity and thermal heat produced from Napier grass and compared with a coal or natural gas-fired combined heat and power generation plant. Results and discussion The use of Napier grass as a feedstock decreased the global warming potential (GWP) of the medium-sized CHP (i.e., 13 MWe) plant by 73–92 % compared to that of a coal and natural gas-fired CHP plants. Other environmental impacts were also reduced by 24–100 %. Eutrophication was the only impact comparable to that of the coal-fired CHP plant. The energy return on investment (EROI) was around 5:1. The minimum selling price of electricity generated from the CHP plant was US$0.05–0.4 $ MJ_{e} $−1 (US$0.13–0.18 $ kWh^{−1} $) considering the credits for steam production, renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC), and carbon footprint from the fossil fuel-based electricity generation. Conclusions Although the pelleting of Napier grass for the CHP plant increased the cost and GHG emissions by 38% and 55% over the non-pelleted system, the pelleting process can ensure consistent quality and uninterrupted supply of the feedstock for heat and power generation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electricity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Napier grass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Life cycle assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Minimum selling price</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pellets</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Techno-economic analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sahoo, Kamalakanta</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kaliyan, Nalladurai</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Hari</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mani, Sudhagar</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1920-8381</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The international journal of life cycle assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2019), 1 vom: 16. Aug., Seite 89-104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)211584533</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1319419-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)059728728</subfield><subfield code="x">0948-3349</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:89-104</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-ARC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">89-104</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4024982 |