Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding
Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses rang...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Lv, Jiuming [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2018 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© ASM International 2018 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of materials engineering and performance - Springer US, 1992, 27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:27 ; year:2018 ; number:9 ; day:20 ; month:08 ; pages:4672-4679 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2053071257 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2053071257 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230401132234.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200820s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2053071257 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s11665-018-3578-1-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |a 660 |a 670 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Lv, Jiuming |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © ASM International 2018 | ||
520 | |a Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results. | ||
650 | 4 | |a annealing | |
650 | 4 | |a cold roll | |
650 | 4 | |a feature size effect | |
650 | 4 | |a grinding | |
650 | 4 | |a pure copper | |
650 | 4 | |a tensile yield strength | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhan, Xiaofei |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Xinping |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dong, Xuehua |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of materials engineering and performance |d Springer US, 1992 |g 27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679 |w (DE-627)131147366 |w (DE-600)1129075-4 |w (DE-576)033027250 |x 1059-9495 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2018 |g number:9 |g day:20 |g month:08 |g pages:4672-4679 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 27 |j 2018 |e 9 |b 20 |c 08 |h 4672-4679 |
author_variant |
j l jl x z xz x z xz x d xd |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:10599495:2018----::otaitrfaueiefetiteeslyedteghfuhesrdcdsndfeeteunei |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
publishDate |
2018 |
allfields |
10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2053071257 (DE-He213)s11665-018-3578-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 660 670 VZ Lv, Jiuming verfasserin aut Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © ASM International 2018 Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results. annealing cold roll feature size effect grinding pure copper tensile yield strength Zhan, Xiaofei aut Zhang, Xinping aut Dong, Xuehua aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance Springer US, 1992 27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679 (DE-627)131147366 (DE-600)1129075-4 (DE-576)033027250 1059-9495 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:9 day:20 month:08 pages:4672-4679 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 AR 27 2018 9 20 08 4672-4679 |
spelling |
10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2053071257 (DE-He213)s11665-018-3578-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 660 670 VZ Lv, Jiuming verfasserin aut Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © ASM International 2018 Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results. annealing cold roll feature size effect grinding pure copper tensile yield strength Zhan, Xiaofei aut Zhang, Xinping aut Dong, Xuehua aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance Springer US, 1992 27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679 (DE-627)131147366 (DE-600)1129075-4 (DE-576)033027250 1059-9495 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:9 day:20 month:08 pages:4672-4679 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 AR 27 2018 9 20 08 4672-4679 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2053071257 (DE-He213)s11665-018-3578-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 660 670 VZ Lv, Jiuming verfasserin aut Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © ASM International 2018 Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results. annealing cold roll feature size effect grinding pure copper tensile yield strength Zhan, Xiaofei aut Zhang, Xinping aut Dong, Xuehua aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance Springer US, 1992 27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679 (DE-627)131147366 (DE-600)1129075-4 (DE-576)033027250 1059-9495 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:9 day:20 month:08 pages:4672-4679 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 AR 27 2018 9 20 08 4672-4679 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2053071257 (DE-He213)s11665-018-3578-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 660 670 VZ Lv, Jiuming verfasserin aut Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © ASM International 2018 Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results. annealing cold roll feature size effect grinding pure copper tensile yield strength Zhan, Xiaofei aut Zhang, Xinping aut Dong, Xuehua aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance Springer US, 1992 27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679 (DE-627)131147366 (DE-600)1129075-4 (DE-576)033027250 1059-9495 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:9 day:20 month:08 pages:4672-4679 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 AR 27 2018 9 20 08 4672-4679 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 doi (DE-627)OLC2053071257 (DE-He213)s11665-018-3578-1-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 660 670 VZ Lv, Jiuming verfasserin aut Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding 2018 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © ASM International 2018 Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results. annealing cold roll feature size effect grinding pure copper tensile yield strength Zhan, Xiaofei aut Zhang, Xinping aut Dong, Xuehua aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance Springer US, 1992 27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679 (DE-627)131147366 (DE-600)1129075-4 (DE-576)033027250 1059-9495 nnns volume:27 year:2018 number:9 day:20 month:08 pages:4672-4679 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 AR 27 2018 9 20 08 4672-4679 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance 27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679 volume:27 year:2018 number:9 day:20 month:08 pages:4672-4679 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance 27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679 volume:27 year:2018 number:9 day:20 month:08 pages:4672-4679 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
annealing cold roll feature size effect grinding pure copper tensile yield strength |
dewey-raw |
620 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of materials engineering and performance |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Lv, Jiuming @@aut@@ Zhan, Xiaofei @@aut@@ Zhang, Xinping @@aut@@ Dong, Xuehua @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-08-20T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
131147366 |
dewey-sort |
3620 |
id |
OLC2053071257 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2053071257</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230401132234.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2053071257</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11665-018-3578-1-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lv, Jiuming</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© ASM International 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">annealing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cold roll</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">feature size effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grinding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pure copper</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tensile yield strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhan, Xiaofei</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Xinping</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong, Xuehua</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials engineering and performance</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)131147366</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1129075-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)033027250</subfield><subfield code="x">1059-9495</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:4672-4679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">4672-4679</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Lv, Jiuming |
spellingShingle |
Lv, Jiuming ddc 620 misc annealing misc cold roll misc feature size effect misc grinding misc pure copper misc tensile yield strength Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding |
authorStr |
Lv, Jiuming |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)131147366 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
620 - Engineering & allied operations 660 - Chemical engineering 670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1059-9495 |
topic_title |
620 660 670 VZ Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding annealing cold roll feature size effect grinding pure copper tensile yield strength |
topic |
ddc 620 misc annealing misc cold roll misc feature size effect misc grinding misc pure copper misc tensile yield strength |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 620 misc annealing misc cold roll misc feature size effect misc grinding misc pure copper misc tensile yield strength |
topic_browse |
ddc 620 misc annealing misc cold roll misc feature size effect misc grinding misc pure copper misc tensile yield strength |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of materials engineering and performance |
hierarchy_parent_id |
131147366 |
dewey-tens |
620 - Engineering 660 - Chemical engineering 670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of materials engineering and performance |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)131147366 (DE-600)1129075-4 (DE-576)033027250 |
title |
Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2053071257 (DE-He213)s11665-018-3578-1-p |
title_full |
Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding |
author_sort |
Lv, Jiuming |
journal |
Journal of materials engineering and performance |
journalStr |
Journal of materials engineering and performance |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
4672 |
author_browse |
Lv, Jiuming Zhan, Xiaofei Zhang, Xinping Dong, Xuehua |
container_volume |
27 |
class |
620 660 670 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Lv, Jiuming |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 |
dewey-full |
620 660 670 |
title_sort |
contradictory feature size effects in the tensile yield strength of cu sheets produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding |
title_auth |
Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding |
abstract |
Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results. © ASM International 2018 |
abstractGer |
Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results. © ASM International 2018 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results. © ASM International 2018 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 |
container_issue |
9 |
title_short |
Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Zhan, Xiaofei Zhang, Xinping Dong, Xuehua |
author2Str |
Zhan, Xiaofei Zhang, Xinping Dong, Xuehua |
ppnlink |
131147366 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T17:54:10.731Z |
_version_ |
1803581391617654784 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2053071257</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230401132234.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2018 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2053071257</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11665-018-3578-1-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lv, Jiuming</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contradictory Feature Size Effects in the Tensile Yield Strength of Cu Sheets Produced Using Different Sequences Involving Annealing, Rolling, and Grinding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© ASM International 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The feature size effect is significant research interest in the field of microforming. It is assumed that the size effect is influenced by the material preparation process. To verify this, the feature size effects associated with the tensile yield strength of Cu sheets with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 200 μm, produced using different sequences involving annealing, rolling, and grinding, were studied. Differing feature size effects were observed in the Cu specimens, and it was confirmed that the size effect was indeed influenced by the specimen preparation sequence. The tensile yield strengths of the annealed–ground–rolled and annealed–rolled specimens increased as the specimen thicknesses decreased. However, an opposing size effect was observed in the case of the annealed–rolled–annealed, annealed–ground, and annealed–rolled–ground specimens. The reduction ratio did not alter the trend associated with the size effect, but influenced the intensity of the size effect. It is believed that the reinforcement and erosion of the surface-hardened layer introduced during rolling resulted in the contradictory results.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">annealing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cold roll</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">feature size effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grinding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pure copper</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tensile yield strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhan, Xiaofei</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Xinping</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong, Xuehua</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials engineering and performance</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2018), 9 vom: 20. Aug., Seite 4672-4679</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)131147366</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1129075-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)033027250</subfield><subfield code="x">1059-9495</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:4672-4679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3578-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">4672-4679</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399967 |