On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice
Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Dasgupta, Partha [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1974 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Theory and decision - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970, 4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:4 ; year:1974 ; number:3-4 ; month:02 ; pages:325-344 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/BF00136653 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2054335908 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2054335908 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504060852.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s1974 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF00136653 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2054335908 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)BF00136653-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 100 |a 300 |a 330 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 3,4 |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a PHILOS |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dasgupta, Partha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1974 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Specific Aspect | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Original Position | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Distributive Justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Individual Decision | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Difference Principle | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theory and decision |d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 |g 4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344 |w (DE-627)129415049 |w (DE-600)189247-2 |w (DE-576)014793571 |x 0040-5833 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:1974 |g number:3-4 |g month:02 |g pages:325-344 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136653 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-PHILOS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SOW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHI | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_72 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2410 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4029 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4082 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4103 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4310 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4311 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4318 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4319 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 4 |j 1974 |e 3-4 |c 02 |h 325-344 | ||
| author_variant |
p d pd |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00405833:1974----::noerbesrsnfopoesralcnetoo |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1974 |
| publishDate |
1974 |
| allfields |
10.1007/BF00136653 doi (DE-627)OLC2054335908 (DE-He213)BF00136653-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 300 330 VZ 3,4 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid Dasgupta, Partha verfasserin aut On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency. Specific Aspect Original Position Distributive Justice Individual Decision Difference Principle Enthalten in Theory and decision Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344 (DE-627)129415049 (DE-600)189247-2 (DE-576)014793571 0040-5833 nnns volume:4 year:1974 number:3-4 month:02 pages:325-344 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136653 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 1974 3-4 02 325-344 |
| spelling |
10.1007/BF00136653 doi (DE-627)OLC2054335908 (DE-He213)BF00136653-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 300 330 VZ 3,4 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid Dasgupta, Partha verfasserin aut On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency. Specific Aspect Original Position Distributive Justice Individual Decision Difference Principle Enthalten in Theory and decision Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344 (DE-627)129415049 (DE-600)189247-2 (DE-576)014793571 0040-5833 nnns volume:4 year:1974 number:3-4 month:02 pages:325-344 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136653 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 1974 3-4 02 325-344 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/BF00136653 doi (DE-627)OLC2054335908 (DE-He213)BF00136653-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 300 330 VZ 3,4 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid Dasgupta, Partha verfasserin aut On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency. Specific Aspect Original Position Distributive Justice Individual Decision Difference Principle Enthalten in Theory and decision Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344 (DE-627)129415049 (DE-600)189247-2 (DE-576)014793571 0040-5833 nnns volume:4 year:1974 number:3-4 month:02 pages:325-344 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136653 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 1974 3-4 02 325-344 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/BF00136653 doi (DE-627)OLC2054335908 (DE-He213)BF00136653-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 300 330 VZ 3,4 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid Dasgupta, Partha verfasserin aut On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency. Specific Aspect Original Position Distributive Justice Individual Decision Difference Principle Enthalten in Theory and decision Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344 (DE-627)129415049 (DE-600)189247-2 (DE-576)014793571 0040-5833 nnns volume:4 year:1974 number:3-4 month:02 pages:325-344 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136653 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 1974 3-4 02 325-344 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/BF00136653 doi (DE-627)OLC2054335908 (DE-He213)BF00136653-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 100 300 330 VZ 3,4 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid Dasgupta, Partha verfasserin aut On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency. Specific Aspect Original Position Distributive Justice Individual Decision Difference Principle Enthalten in Theory and decision Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970 4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344 (DE-627)129415049 (DE-600)189247-2 (DE-576)014793571 0040-5833 nnns volume:4 year:1974 number:3-4 month:02 pages:325-344 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136653 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 1974 3-4 02 325-344 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Theory and decision 4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344 volume:4 year:1974 number:3-4 month:02 pages:325-344 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Theory and decision 4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344 volume:4 year:1974 number:3-4 month:02 pages:325-344 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Specific Aspect Original Position Distributive Justice Individual Decision Difference Principle |
| dewey-raw |
100 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Theory and decision |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Dasgupta, Partha @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1974-02-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129415049 |
| dewey-sort |
3100 |
| id |
OLC2054335908 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2054335908</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504060852.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1974 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00136653</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2054335908</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00136653-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dasgupta, Partha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Specific Aspect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Original Position</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Distributive Justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Individual Decision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Difference Principle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Theory and decision</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970</subfield><subfield code="g">4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129415049</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)189247-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014793571</subfield><subfield code="x">0040-5833</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1974</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:325-344</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136653</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2410</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">1974</subfield><subfield code="e">3-4</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">325-344</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Dasgupta, Partha |
| spellingShingle |
Dasgupta, Partha ddc 100 ssgn 3,4 fid PHILOS misc Specific Aspect misc Original Position misc Distributive Justice misc Individual Decision misc Difference Principle On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice |
| authorStr |
Dasgupta, Partha |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129415049 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 300 - Social sciences 330 - Economics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0040-5833 |
| topic_title |
100 300 330 VZ 3,4 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice Specific Aspect Original Position Distributive Justice Individual Decision Difference Principle |
| topic |
ddc 100 ssgn 3,4 fid PHILOS misc Specific Aspect misc Original Position misc Distributive Justice misc Individual Decision misc Difference Principle |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 100 ssgn 3,4 fid PHILOS misc Specific Aspect misc Original Position misc Distributive Justice misc Individual Decision misc Difference Principle |
| topic_browse |
ddc 100 ssgn 3,4 fid PHILOS misc Specific Aspect misc Original Position misc Distributive Justice misc Individual Decision misc Difference Principle |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Theory and decision |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129415049 |
| dewey-tens |
100 - Philosophy 300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology 330 - Economics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Theory and decision |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129415049 (DE-600)189247-2 (DE-576)014793571 |
| title |
On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2054335908 (DE-He213)BF00136653-p |
| title_full |
On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice |
| author_sort |
Dasgupta, Partha |
| journal |
Theory and decision |
| journalStr |
Theory and decision |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1974 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
325 |
| author_browse |
Dasgupta, Partha |
| container_volume |
4 |
| class |
100 300 330 VZ 3,4 5,1 ssgn PHILOS DE-12 fid |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Dasgupta, Partha |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/BF00136653 |
| dewey-full |
100 300 330 |
| title_sort |
on some problems arising from professor rawls' conception of distributive justice |
| title_auth |
On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice |
| abstract |
Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency. © D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency. © D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency. © D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OLC-PHI SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2410 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4103 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4310 GBV_ILN_4311 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4319 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
3-4 |
| title_short |
On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136653 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
129415049 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/BF00136653 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:45:48.061Z |
| _version_ |
1803599738895859712 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2054335908</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504060852.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1974 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00136653</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2054335908</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00136653-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dasgupta, Partha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract This paper is concerned with two specific aspects of Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice. In Section I Rawls' controversial difference principle is discussed in the context of individual decision under uncertainty, as well as the problem of interpersonal comparison of utilities. It is noted that, contrary to some recent accounts, Rawls' conception of the original position is considerably different from that to be found in the works of Harsanyi. In Section II an attempt is made to articulate in a precise way Rawls' intergenerational savings principle. While it is noted that the Rawlsian savings rule possesses a number of attractive properties, it is demonstrated that it conflicts with the principle of intertemporal Pareto efficiency.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Specific Aspect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Original Position</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Distributive Justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Individual Decision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Difference Principle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Theory and decision</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1970</subfield><subfield code="g">4(1974), 3-4 vom: Feb., Seite 325-344</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129415049</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)189247-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014793571</subfield><subfield code="x">0040-5833</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1974</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:325-344</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136653</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2410</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4103</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4310</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">1974</subfield><subfield code="e">3-4</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">325-344</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401127 |