A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning
Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide s...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Fell, Patrick J. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1980 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin géodésique - Springer-Verlag, 1922, 54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:54 ; year:1980 ; number:4 ; month:12 ; pages:564-574 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/BF02530714 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2058924177 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2058924177 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230323143951.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200820s1980 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF02530714 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2058924177 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)BF02530714-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Fell, Patrick J. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1980 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Global Position System | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Satellite Clock | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Global Position System Satellite | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Clock Error | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Receiver Clock | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin géodésique |d Springer-Verlag, 1922 |g 54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574 |w (DE-627)129600881 |w (DE-600)241340-1 |w (DE-576)015094448 |x 0007-4632 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:54 |g year:1980 |g number:4 |g month:12 |g pages:564-574 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530714 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GEO | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2016 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2416 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 54 |j 1980 |e 4 |c 12 |h 564-574 | ||
| author_variant |
p j f pj pjf |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00074632:1980----::cmaaienlssfprneopeadnefrmtiosrain |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1980 |
| publishDate |
1980 |
| allfields |
10.1007/BF02530714 doi (DE-627)OLC2058924177 (DE-He213)BF02530714-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ Fell, Patrick J. verfasserin aut A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning 1980 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies. Global Position System Satellite Clock Global Position System Satellite Clock Error Receiver Clock Enthalten in Bulletin géodésique Springer-Verlag, 1922 54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574 (DE-627)129600881 (DE-600)241340-1 (DE-576)015094448 0007-4632 nnns volume:54 year:1980 number:4 month:12 pages:564-574 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530714 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2416 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 54 1980 4 12 564-574 |
| spelling |
10.1007/BF02530714 doi (DE-627)OLC2058924177 (DE-He213)BF02530714-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ Fell, Patrick J. verfasserin aut A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning 1980 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies. Global Position System Satellite Clock Global Position System Satellite Clock Error Receiver Clock Enthalten in Bulletin géodésique Springer-Verlag, 1922 54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574 (DE-627)129600881 (DE-600)241340-1 (DE-576)015094448 0007-4632 nnns volume:54 year:1980 number:4 month:12 pages:564-574 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530714 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2416 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 54 1980 4 12 564-574 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/BF02530714 doi (DE-627)OLC2058924177 (DE-He213)BF02530714-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ Fell, Patrick J. verfasserin aut A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning 1980 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies. Global Position System Satellite Clock Global Position System Satellite Clock Error Receiver Clock Enthalten in Bulletin géodésique Springer-Verlag, 1922 54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574 (DE-627)129600881 (DE-600)241340-1 (DE-576)015094448 0007-4632 nnns volume:54 year:1980 number:4 month:12 pages:564-574 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530714 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2416 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 54 1980 4 12 564-574 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/BF02530714 doi (DE-627)OLC2058924177 (DE-He213)BF02530714-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ Fell, Patrick J. verfasserin aut A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning 1980 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies. Global Position System Satellite Clock Global Position System Satellite Clock Error Receiver Clock Enthalten in Bulletin géodésique Springer-Verlag, 1922 54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574 (DE-627)129600881 (DE-600)241340-1 (DE-576)015094448 0007-4632 nnns volume:54 year:1980 number:4 month:12 pages:564-574 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530714 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2416 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 54 1980 4 12 564-574 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/BF02530714 doi (DE-627)OLC2058924177 (DE-He213)BF02530714-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ Fell, Patrick J. verfasserin aut A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning 1980 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies. Global Position System Satellite Clock Global Position System Satellite Clock Error Receiver Clock Enthalten in Bulletin géodésique Springer-Verlag, 1922 54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574 (DE-627)129600881 (DE-600)241340-1 (DE-576)015094448 0007-4632 nnns volume:54 year:1980 number:4 month:12 pages:564-574 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530714 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2416 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 54 1980 4 12 564-574 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Bulletin géodésique 54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574 volume:54 year:1980 number:4 month:12 pages:564-574 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin géodésique 54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574 volume:54 year:1980 number:4 month:12 pages:564-574 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Global Position System Satellite Clock Global Position System Satellite Clock Error Receiver Clock |
| dewey-raw |
550 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Bulletin géodésique |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Fell, Patrick J. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1980-12-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129600881 |
| dewey-sort |
3550 |
| id |
OLC2058924177 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2058924177</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230323143951.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s1980 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02530714</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2058924177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF02530714-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fell, Patrick J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1980</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Global Position System</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Satellite Clock</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Global Position System Satellite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Clock Error</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Receiver Clock</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin géodésique</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1922</subfield><subfield code="g">54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129600881</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)241340-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015094448</subfield><subfield code="x">0007-4632</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1980</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:564-574</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530714</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">1980</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">564-574</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Fell, Patrick J. |
| spellingShingle |
Fell, Patrick J. ddc 550 misc Global Position System misc Satellite Clock misc Global Position System Satellite misc Clock Error misc Receiver Clock A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning |
| authorStr |
Fell, Patrick J. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129600881 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
550 - Earth sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0007-4632 |
| topic_title |
550 VZ A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning Global Position System Satellite Clock Global Position System Satellite Clock Error Receiver Clock |
| topic |
ddc 550 misc Global Position System misc Satellite Clock misc Global Position System Satellite misc Clock Error misc Receiver Clock |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 550 misc Global Position System misc Satellite Clock misc Global Position System Satellite misc Clock Error misc Receiver Clock |
| topic_browse |
ddc 550 misc Global Position System misc Satellite Clock misc Global Position System Satellite misc Clock Error misc Receiver Clock |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin géodésique |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129600881 |
| dewey-tens |
550 - Earth sciences & geology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin géodésique |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129600881 (DE-600)241340-1 (DE-576)015094448 |
| title |
A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2058924177 (DE-He213)BF02530714-p |
| title_full |
A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning |
| author_sort |
Fell, Patrick J. |
| journal |
Bulletin géodésique |
| journalStr |
Bulletin géodésique |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1980 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
564 |
| author_browse |
Fell, Patrick J. |
| container_volume |
54 |
| class |
550 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Fell, Patrick J. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/BF02530714 |
| dewey-full |
550 |
| title_sort |
a comparative analysis of gps range, doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning |
| title_auth |
A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning |
| abstract |
Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies. © Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies. © Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies. © Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2016 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2416 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530714 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
129600881 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/BF02530714 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:47:47.887Z |
| _version_ |
1803592314798473216 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2058924177</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230323143951.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s1980 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02530714</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2058924177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF02530714-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fell, Patrick J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A comparative analysis of GPS range, Doppler and interferometric observations for geodetic positioning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1980</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Bureau Central de L'Association Internationale de Géodésie 1980</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Geodetic positioning accuracies obtained from range, integrated Doppler and double differenced interferometric phase observations from a constellation of twenty-four Global Positioning System satellites are presented. It is demonstrated that GPS range and Doppler observations will provide sufficient accuracy for the estimation of geodetic coordinates. However the instability of the receiver atomic oscillator will limit the usefulness of these observations in providing rapid first-order baseline determination. Interferometric phase measurements twice differenced to eliminate clock error appear as an alternate procedure for providing such accuracies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Global Position System</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Satellite Clock</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Global Position System Satellite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Clock Error</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Receiver Clock</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin géodésique</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1922</subfield><subfield code="g">54(1980), 4 vom: Dez., Seite 564-574</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129600881</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)241340-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015094448</subfield><subfield code="x">0007-4632</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1980</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:564-574</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530714</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">1980</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">564-574</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397312 |