How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study
Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the ty...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Raux, Charles [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2008 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Public choice - Springer US, 1968, 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:139 ; year:2008 ; number:1-2 ; day:31 ; month:12 ; pages:227-240 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC206196205X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC206196205X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230504014807.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200820s2008 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC206196205X | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Raux, Charles |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study |
264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 | ||
520 | |a Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Fairness | |
650 | 4 | |a Attitudes | |
650 | 4 | |a Allocation rules | |
650 | 4 | |a Pricing | |
650 | 4 | |a Empirical survey | |
650 | 4 | |a Transport | |
700 | 1 | |a Souche, Stéphanie |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Croissant, Yves |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Public choice |d Springer US, 1968 |g 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 |w (DE-627)129497630 |w (DE-600)207597-0 |w (DE-576)014896680 |x 0048-5829 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:139 |g year:2008 |g number:1-2 |g day:31 |g month:12 |g pages:227-240 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-POL | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4028 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4193 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4318 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 139 |j 2008 |e 1-2 |b 31 |c 12 |h 227-240 |
author_variant |
c r cr s s ss y c yc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00485829:2008----::ofiipiigecietbae |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2008 |
publishDate |
2008 |
allfields |
10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240 |
spelling |
10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Public choice 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Public choice 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport |
dewey-raw |
330 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Public choice |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Raux, Charles @@aut@@ Souche, Stéphanie @@aut@@ Croissant, Yves @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2008-12-31T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129497630 |
dewey-sort |
3330 |
id |
OLC206196205X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC206196205X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504014807.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2008 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC206196205X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raux, Charles</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fairness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Allocation rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pricing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Empirical survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Souche, Stéphanie</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Croissant, Yves</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Public choice</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1968</subfield><subfield code="g">139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129497630</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)207597-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014896680</subfield><subfield code="x">0048-5829</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:139</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:31</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:227-240</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">139</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="b">31</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">227-240</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Raux, Charles |
spellingShingle |
Raux, Charles ddc 330 misc Fairness misc Attitudes misc Allocation rules misc Pricing misc Empirical survey misc Transport How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study |
authorStr |
Raux, Charles |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129497630 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
330 - Economics |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0048-5829 |
topic_title |
330 VZ How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport |
topic |
ddc 330 misc Fairness misc Attitudes misc Allocation rules misc Pricing misc Empirical survey misc Transport |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 misc Fairness misc Attitudes misc Allocation rules misc Pricing misc Empirical survey misc Transport |
topic_browse |
ddc 330 misc Fairness misc Attitudes misc Allocation rules misc Pricing misc Empirical survey misc Transport |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Public choice |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129497630 |
dewey-tens |
330 - Economics |
hierarchy_top_title |
Public choice |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 |
title |
How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p |
title_full |
How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study |
author_sort |
Raux, Charles |
journal |
Public choice |
journalStr |
Public choice |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2008 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
227 |
author_browse |
Raux, Charles Souche, Stéphanie Croissant, Yves |
container_volume |
139 |
class |
330 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Raux, Charles |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y |
dewey-full |
330 |
title_sort |
how fair is pricing perceived to be? an empirical study |
title_auth |
How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study |
abstract |
Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 |
abstractGer |
Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1-2 |
title_short |
How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Souche, Stéphanie Croissant, Yves |
author2Str |
Souche, Stéphanie Croissant, Yves |
ppnlink |
129497630 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y |
up_date |
2024-07-04T04:51:31.792Z |
_version_ |
1803622748565536768 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC206196205X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504014807.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2008 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC206196205X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raux, Charles</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fairness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Allocation rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pricing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Empirical survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Souche, Stéphanie</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Croissant, Yves</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Public choice</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1968</subfield><subfield code="g">139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129497630</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)207597-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014896680</subfield><subfield code="x">0048-5829</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:139</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:31</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:227-240</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">139</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="b">31</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">227-240</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401719 |