How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study

Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the ty...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Raux, Charles [verfasserIn] Souche, Stéphanie Croissant, Yves

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2008

Schlagwörter:	Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport

Anmerkung:	© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Public choice - Springer US, 1968, 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:139 ; year:2008 ; number:1-2 ; day:31 ; month:12 ; pages:227-240

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y

Katalog-ID:	OLC206196205X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	OLC206196205X
003	DE-627
005	20230504014807.0
007	tu
008	200820s2008 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC206196205X
035			\|a (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 330 \|q VZ
100	1		\|a Raux, Charles \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study
264		1	\|c 2008
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008
520			\|a Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule.
650		4	\|a Fairness
650		4	\|a Attitudes
650		4	\|a Allocation rules
650		4	\|a Pricing
650		4	\|a Empirical survey
650		4	\|a Transport
700	1		\|a Souche, Stéphanie \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Croissant, Yves \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Public choice \|d Springer US, 1968 \|g 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 \|w (DE-627)129497630 \|w (DE-600)207597-0 \|w (DE-576)014896680 \|x 0048-5829 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:139 \|g year:2008 \|g number:1-2 \|g day:31 \|g month:12 \|g pages:227-240
856	4	1	\|u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-POL
912			\|a SSG-OLC-WIW
912			\|a GBV_ILN_26
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4028
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4193
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4318
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 139 \|j 2008 \|e 1-2 \|b 31 \|c 12 \|h 227-240

Indexfelder

author_variant	c r cr s s ss y c yc
matchkey_str	article:00485829:2008----::ofiipiigecietbae
hierarchy_sort_str	2008
publishDate	2008
allfields	10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240
spelling	10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y doi (DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 VZ Raux, Charles verfasserin aut How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study 2008 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport Souche, Stéphanie aut Croissant, Yves aut Enthalten in Public choice Springer US, 1968 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 (DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680 0048-5829 nnns volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 139 2008 1-2 31 12 227-240
language	English
source	Enthalten in Public choice 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240
sourceStr	Enthalten in Public choice 139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240 volume:139 year:2008 number:1-2 day:31 month:12 pages:227-240
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport
dewey-raw	330
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Public choice
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Raux, Charles @@aut@@ Souche, Stéphanie @@aut@@ Croissant, Yves @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2008-12-31T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	129497630
dewey-sort	3330
id	OLC206196205X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC206196205X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504014807.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2008 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC206196205X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raux, Charles</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fairness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Allocation rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pricing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Empirical survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Souche, Stéphanie</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Croissant, Yves</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Public choice</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1968</subfield><subfield code="g">139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129497630</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)207597-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014896680</subfield><subfield code="x">0048-5829</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:139</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:31</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:227-240</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">139</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="b">31</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">227-240</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Raux, Charles
spellingShingle	Raux, Charles ddc 330 misc Fairness misc Attitudes misc Allocation rules misc Pricing misc Empirical survey misc Transport How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study
authorStr	Raux, Charles
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)129497630
format	Article
dewey-ones	330 - Economics
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0048-5829
topic_title	330 VZ How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study Fairness Attitudes Allocation rules Pricing Empirical survey Transport
topic	ddc 330 misc Fairness misc Attitudes misc Allocation rules misc Pricing misc Empirical survey misc Transport
topic_unstemmed	ddc 330 misc Fairness misc Attitudes misc Allocation rules misc Pricing misc Empirical survey misc Transport
topic_browse	ddc 330 misc Fairness misc Attitudes misc Allocation rules misc Pricing misc Empirical survey misc Transport
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Public choice
hierarchy_parent_id	129497630
dewey-tens	330 - Economics
hierarchy_top_title	Public choice
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)129497630 (DE-600)207597-0 (DE-576)014896680
title	How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC206196205X (DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p
title_full	How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study
author_sort	Raux, Charles
journal	Public choice
journalStr	Public choice
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2008
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	227
author_browse	Raux, Charles Souche, Stéphanie Croissant, Yves
container_volume	139
class	330 VZ
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Raux, Charles
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y
dewey-full	330
title_sort	how fair is pricing perceived to be? an empirical study
title_auth	How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study
abstract	Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008
abstractGer	Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4193 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1-2
title_short	How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study
url	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y
remote_bool	false
author2	Souche, Stéphanie Croissant, Yves
author2Str	Souche, Stéphanie Croissant, Yves
ppnlink	129497630
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y
up_date	2024-07-04T04:51:31.792Z
_version_	1803622748565536768
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC206196205X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504014807.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2008 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC206196205X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11127-008-9390-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raux, Charles</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of “good”; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fairness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Allocation rules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pricing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Empirical survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Souche, Stéphanie</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Croissant, Yves</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Public choice</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1968</subfield><subfield code="g">139(2008), 1-2 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 227-240</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129497630</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)207597-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014896680</subfield><subfield code="x">0048-5829</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:139</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1-2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:31</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:227-240</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">139</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">1-2</subfield><subfield code="b">31</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">227-240</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401719

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?