Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World
Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hellemans, Staf [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2020 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The American sociologist - Springer US, 1965, 51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:51 ; year:2020 ; number:2 ; day:29 ; month:04 ; pages:124-147 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC206207882X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC206207882X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504153225.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC206207882X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s12108-020-09449-x-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 3,4 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a 71.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hellemans, Staf |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-3578-5891 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2020 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Pillarization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Verzuiling | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Belgium | |
| 650 | 4 | |a The Netherlands | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Modern world | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Divided societies | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The American sociologist |d Springer US, 1965 |g 51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147 |w (DE-627)129481920 |w (DE-600)204562-X |w (DE-576)014865041 |x 0003-1232 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |g day:29 |g month:04 |g pages:124-147 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SOW | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 71.00 |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 51 |j 2020 |e 2 |b 29 |c 04 |h 124-147 | ||
| author_variant |
s h sh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00031232:2020----::ilrztovrulnoognzdefotiewr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| bklnumber |
71.00 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x doi (DE-627)OLC206207882X (DE-He213)s12108-020-09449-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn 71.00 bkl Hellemans, Staf verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3578-5891 aut Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies. Pillarization Verzuiling Belgium The Netherlands Modern world Divided societies Enthalten in The American sociologist Springer US, 1965 51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147 (DE-627)129481920 (DE-600)204562-X (DE-576)014865041 0003-1232 nnns volume:51 year:2020 number:2 day:29 month:04 pages:124-147 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW 71.00 VZ AR 51 2020 2 29 04 124-147 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x doi (DE-627)OLC206207882X (DE-He213)s12108-020-09449-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn 71.00 bkl Hellemans, Staf verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3578-5891 aut Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies. Pillarization Verzuiling Belgium The Netherlands Modern world Divided societies Enthalten in The American sociologist Springer US, 1965 51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147 (DE-627)129481920 (DE-600)204562-X (DE-576)014865041 0003-1232 nnns volume:51 year:2020 number:2 day:29 month:04 pages:124-147 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW 71.00 VZ AR 51 2020 2 29 04 124-147 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x doi (DE-627)OLC206207882X (DE-He213)s12108-020-09449-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn 71.00 bkl Hellemans, Staf verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3578-5891 aut Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies. Pillarization Verzuiling Belgium The Netherlands Modern world Divided societies Enthalten in The American sociologist Springer US, 1965 51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147 (DE-627)129481920 (DE-600)204562-X (DE-576)014865041 0003-1232 nnns volume:51 year:2020 number:2 day:29 month:04 pages:124-147 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW 71.00 VZ AR 51 2020 2 29 04 124-147 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x doi (DE-627)OLC206207882X (DE-He213)s12108-020-09449-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn 71.00 bkl Hellemans, Staf verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3578-5891 aut Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies. Pillarization Verzuiling Belgium The Netherlands Modern world Divided societies Enthalten in The American sociologist Springer US, 1965 51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147 (DE-627)129481920 (DE-600)204562-X (DE-576)014865041 0003-1232 nnns volume:51 year:2020 number:2 day:29 month:04 pages:124-147 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW 71.00 VZ AR 51 2020 2 29 04 124-147 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x doi (DE-627)OLC206207882X (DE-He213)s12108-020-09449-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 3,4 ssgn 71.00 bkl Hellemans, Staf verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-3578-5891 aut Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World 2020 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies. Pillarization Verzuiling Belgium The Netherlands Modern world Divided societies Enthalten in The American sociologist Springer US, 1965 51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147 (DE-627)129481920 (DE-600)204562-X (DE-576)014865041 0003-1232 nnns volume:51 year:2020 number:2 day:29 month:04 pages:124-147 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW 71.00 VZ AR 51 2020 2 29 04 124-147 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The American sociologist 51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147 volume:51 year:2020 number:2 day:29 month:04 pages:124-147 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The American sociologist 51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147 volume:51 year:2020 number:2 day:29 month:04 pages:124-147 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Pillarization Verzuiling Belgium The Netherlands Modern world Divided societies |
| dewey-raw |
300 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The American sociologist |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hellemans, Staf @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-04-29T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129481920 |
| dewey-sort |
3300 |
| id |
OLC206207882X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC206207882X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504153225.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC206207882X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s12108-020-09449-x-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hellemans, Staf</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-3578-5891</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pillarization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Verzuiling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Belgium</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Netherlands</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Modern world</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Divided societies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The American sociologist</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1965</subfield><subfield code="g">51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129481920</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)204562-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014865041</subfield><subfield code="x">0003-1232</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:124-147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">124-147</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Hellemans, Staf |
| spellingShingle |
Hellemans, Staf ddc 300 ssgn 3,4 bkl 71.00 misc Pillarization misc Verzuiling misc Belgium misc The Netherlands misc Modern world misc Divided societies Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World |
| authorStr |
Hellemans, Staf |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129481920 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0003-1232 |
| topic_title |
300 VZ 3,4 ssgn 71.00 bkl Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World Pillarization Verzuiling Belgium The Netherlands Modern world Divided societies |
| topic |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,4 bkl 71.00 misc Pillarization misc Verzuiling misc Belgium misc The Netherlands misc Modern world misc Divided societies |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,4 bkl 71.00 misc Pillarization misc Verzuiling misc Belgium misc The Netherlands misc Modern world misc Divided societies |
| topic_browse |
ddc 300 ssgn 3,4 bkl 71.00 misc Pillarization misc Verzuiling misc Belgium misc The Netherlands misc Modern world misc Divided societies |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The American sociologist |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129481920 |
| dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The American sociologist |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129481920 (DE-600)204562-X (DE-576)014865041 |
| title |
Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC206207882X (DE-He213)s12108-020-09449-x-p |
| title_full |
Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World |
| author_sort |
Hellemans, Staf |
| journal |
The American sociologist |
| journalStr |
The American sociologist |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
124 |
| author_browse |
Hellemans, Staf |
| container_volume |
51 |
| class |
300 VZ 3,4 ssgn 71.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hellemans, Staf |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-3578-5891 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-3578-5891 |
| dewey-full |
300 |
| title_sort |
pillarization (‘verzuiling’). on organized ‘self-contained worlds’ in the modern world |
| title_auth |
Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World |
| abstract |
Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies. © The Author(s) 2020 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies. © The Author(s) 2020 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies. © The Author(s) 2020 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
129481920 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T13:39:35.417Z |
| _version_ |
1803565374287904768 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC206207882X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504153225.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC206207882X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s12108-020-09449-x-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hellemans, Staf</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-3578-5891</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Movements and groups abound in modern society. Sometimes, a movement or group succeeds in mobilizing a large section of the population and thoroughly knitting it together, by building a pervasive subculture and by setting up a vast interrelated network of organizations, resulting in a seemingly impenetrable and powerful bloc. This happened to different degrees in most Western countries, including the United States and Canada. It is also occurring now in the non-Western world. Belgium and the Netherlands were particularly affected by extensive bloc building. In both countries, Catholic, Socialist, and Liberal pillars – plus a Protestant pillar in the Netherlands – divided society and determined political and social life from the late nineteenth century up to the late twentieth century. As a consequence, the phenomenon has been studied there more thoroughly and under a specific label, ‘verzuiling’ (pillarization). The first section of this article offers a review of pillarization theory in the Netherlands, Belgium and elsewhere. In the second part, to advance the study of organized blocs all over the world, I argue for a broad, international perspective on pillarization against the particularistic tendencies of many pillarization researchers, especially in the Netherlands. In a shorter third part, I address the isolation of pillarization theory from general sociological theory. Self-reinforcing processes of segregation and organization in large population groupings were and still are a common feature in the modern world. They have resulted in more than one case in divided societies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pillarization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Verzuiling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Belgium</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Netherlands</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Modern world</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Divided societies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The American sociologist</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1965</subfield><subfield code="g">51(2020), 2 vom: 29. Apr., Seite 124-147</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129481920</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)204562-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014865041</subfield><subfield code="x">0003-1232</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:124-147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">124-147</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3999443 |