Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking
Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Duarte, Rosa [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2014 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Mind & society - Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000, 13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:13 ; year:2014 ; number:2 ; day:01 ; month:01 ; pages:183-194 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2062320213 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2062320213 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230504081248.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2062320213 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s11299-013-0135-3-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Duarte, Rosa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 | ||
520 | |a Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Tobacco consumption | |
650 | 4 | |a Adolescents | |
650 | 4 | |a Peer effect | |
650 | 4 | |a Peer group | |
700 | 1 | |a Escario, José-Julián |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Molina, José-Alberto |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Mind & society |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000 |g 13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194 |w (DE-627)359785212 |w (DE-600)2098109-0 |w (DE-576)251709388 |x 1593-7879 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2014 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:01 |g pages:183-194 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-WIW | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_26 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2014 |e 2 |b 01 |c 01 |h 183-194 |
author_variant |
r d rd j j e jje j a m jam |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:15937879:2014----::raevrucoescaitrc |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
publishDate |
2014 |
allfields |
10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2062320213 (DE-He213)s11299-013-0135-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 300 VZ Duarte, Rosa verfasserin aut Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions. Tobacco consumption Adolescents Peer effect Peer group Escario, José-Julián aut Molina, José-Alberto aut Enthalten in Mind & society Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000 13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194 (DE-627)359785212 (DE-600)2098109-0 (DE-576)251709388 1593-7879 nnns volume:13 year:2014 number:2 day:01 month:01 pages:183-194 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 13 2014 2 01 01 183-194 |
spelling |
10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2062320213 (DE-He213)s11299-013-0135-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 300 VZ Duarte, Rosa verfasserin aut Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions. Tobacco consumption Adolescents Peer effect Peer group Escario, José-Julián aut Molina, José-Alberto aut Enthalten in Mind & society Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000 13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194 (DE-627)359785212 (DE-600)2098109-0 (DE-576)251709388 1593-7879 nnns volume:13 year:2014 number:2 day:01 month:01 pages:183-194 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 13 2014 2 01 01 183-194 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2062320213 (DE-He213)s11299-013-0135-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 300 VZ Duarte, Rosa verfasserin aut Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions. Tobacco consumption Adolescents Peer effect Peer group Escario, José-Julián aut Molina, José-Alberto aut Enthalten in Mind & society Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000 13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194 (DE-627)359785212 (DE-600)2098109-0 (DE-576)251709388 1593-7879 nnns volume:13 year:2014 number:2 day:01 month:01 pages:183-194 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 13 2014 2 01 01 183-194 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2062320213 (DE-He213)s11299-013-0135-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 300 VZ Duarte, Rosa verfasserin aut Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions. Tobacco consumption Adolescents Peer effect Peer group Escario, José-Julián aut Molina, José-Alberto aut Enthalten in Mind & society Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000 13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194 (DE-627)359785212 (DE-600)2098109-0 (DE-576)251709388 1593-7879 nnns volume:13 year:2014 number:2 day:01 month:01 pages:183-194 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 13 2014 2 01 01 183-194 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 doi (DE-627)OLC2062320213 (DE-He213)s11299-013-0135-3-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 VZ 300 VZ Duarte, Rosa verfasserin aut Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions. Tobacco consumption Adolescents Peer effect Peer group Escario, José-Julián aut Molina, José-Alberto aut Enthalten in Mind & society Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000 13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194 (DE-627)359785212 (DE-600)2098109-0 (DE-576)251709388 1593-7879 nnns volume:13 year:2014 number:2 day:01 month:01 pages:183-194 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 AR 13 2014 2 01 01 183-194 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Mind & society 13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194 volume:13 year:2014 number:2 day:01 month:01 pages:183-194 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Mind & society 13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194 volume:13 year:2014 number:2 day:01 month:01 pages:183-194 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Tobacco consumption Adolescents Peer effect Peer group |
dewey-raw |
300 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Mind & society |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Duarte, Rosa @@aut@@ Escario, José-Julián @@aut@@ Molina, José-Alberto @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
359785212 |
dewey-sort |
3300 |
id |
OLC2062320213 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2062320213</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504081248.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2062320213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11299-013-0135-3-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duarte, Rosa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tobacco consumption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adolescents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peer effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peer group</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Escario, José-Julián</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Molina, José-Alberto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Mind & society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)359785212</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2098109-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)251709388</subfield><subfield code="x">1593-7879</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:183-194</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">183-194</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Duarte, Rosa |
spellingShingle |
Duarte, Rosa ddc 300 misc Tobacco consumption misc Adolescents misc Peer effect misc Peer group Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking |
authorStr |
Duarte, Rosa |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)359785212 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1593-7879 |
topic_title |
300 VZ Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking Tobacco consumption Adolescents Peer effect Peer group |
topic |
ddc 300 misc Tobacco consumption misc Adolescents misc Peer effect misc Peer group |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 misc Tobacco consumption misc Adolescents misc Peer effect misc Peer group |
topic_browse |
ddc 300 misc Tobacco consumption misc Adolescents misc Peer effect misc Peer group |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Mind & society |
hierarchy_parent_id |
359785212 |
dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Mind & society |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)359785212 (DE-600)2098109-0 (DE-576)251709388 |
title |
Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2062320213 (DE-He213)s11299-013-0135-3-p |
title_full |
Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking |
author_sort |
Duarte, Rosa |
journal |
Mind & society |
journalStr |
Mind & society |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
183 |
author_browse |
Duarte, Rosa Escario, José-Julián Molina, José-Alberto |
container_volume |
13 |
class |
300 VZ |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Duarte, Rosa |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 |
dewey-full |
300 |
title_sort |
broader versus closer social interactions in smoking |
title_auth |
Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking |
abstract |
Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 |
abstractGer |
Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-WIW GBV_ILN_26 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4277 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Escario, José-Julián Molina, José-Alberto |
author2Str |
Escario, José-Julián Molina, José-Alberto |
ppnlink |
359785212 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:38:26.355Z |
_version_ |
1803569076740554752 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2062320213</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504081248.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2062320213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11299-013-0135-3-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duarte, Rosa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Broader versus closer social interactions in smoking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this paper, we examine the importance of two different peer effects as determinants in the adolescent’s decision whether or not to smoke. One is measured at the class level and the other reflects the smoking behaviour of the adolescent’s best friends. A nationally representative wave of Spanish data, collected in different state and private centres of secondary education and vocational training (14–18 years), and several linear probability models are used to estimate the role of peer effects. We find that a 10 % increase in the proportion of classmates is associated with a 3.6 points increment in the probability of smoking. Similarly, if the smoker’s friends go from “only some” to “the majority”, the probability of smoking increases by 39 points. Although both peer effects are significant if introduced separately, the class peer variable is not significant once the closer peer effect is introduced. Our work provides evidence to support the hypothesis that peer effects are important determinants of smoking among adolescents. This has implications for policy-makers, since the existence of peer effects would amplify the effects of interventions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tobacco consumption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adolescents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peer effect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peer group</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Escario, José-Julián</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Molina, José-Alberto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Mind & society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2014), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 183-194</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)359785212</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2098109-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)251709388</subfield><subfield code="x">1593-7879</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:183-194</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0135-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-WIW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">183-194</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401412 |