Argument by Analogy

Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and funct...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Juthe, A. [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2005

Schlagwörter:	analogue analogy argument by analogy assigned-predicate conclusive analogy counterpart different-domain-analogy inconclusive analogy one-to-one correspondence same-domain-analogy target-subject

Anmerkung:	© Springer 2005

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Argumentation - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987, 19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:19 ; year:2005 ; number:1 ; month:03 ; pages:1-27

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9

Katalog-ID:	OLC2062558503

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	OLC2062558503
003	DE-627
005	20230502210559.0
007	tu
008	200820s2005 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC2062558503
035			\|a (DE-He213)s10503-005-2314-9-p
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 400 \|a 100 \|q VZ
084			\|a 7,11 \|a 5,1 \|2 ssgn
084			\|a LING \|q DE-30 \|2 fid
084			\|a PHILOS \|q DE-12 \|2 fid
100	1		\|a Juthe, A. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Argument by Analogy
264		1	\|c 2005
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Springer 2005
520			\|a Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered.
650		4	\|a analogue
650		4	\|a analogy
650		4	\|a argument by analogy
650		4	\|a assigned-predicate
650		4	\|a conclusive analogy
650		4	\|a counterpart
650		4	\|a different-domain-analogy
650		4	\|a inconclusive analogy
650		4	\|a one-to-one correspondence
650		4	\|a same-domain-analogy
650		4	\|a target-subject
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Argumentation \|d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987 \|g 19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27 \|w (DE-627)165801050 \|w (DE-600)18188-2 \|w (DE-576)034177094 \|x 0920-427X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:19 \|g year:2005 \|g number:1 \|g month:03 \|g pages:1-27
856	4	1	\|u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a FID-LING
912			\|a FID-PHILOS
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHI
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_130
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2093
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4082
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 19 \|j 2005 \|e 1 \|c 03 \|h 1-27

Indexfelder

author_variant	a j aj
matchkey_str	article:0920427X:2005----::ruetyn
hierarchy_sort_str	2005
publishDate	2005
allfields	10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2062558503 (DE-He213)s10503-005-2314-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 100 VZ 7,11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid PHILOS DE-12 fid Juthe, A. verfasserin aut Argument by Analogy 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer 2005 Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered. analogue analogy argument by analogy assigned-predicate conclusive analogy counterpart different-domain-analogy inconclusive analogy one-to-one correspondence same-domain-analogy target-subject Enthalten in Argumentation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987 19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27 (DE-627)165801050 (DE-600)18188-2 (DE-576)034177094 0920-427X nnns volume:19 year:2005 number:1 month:03 pages:1-27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 19 2005 1 03 1-27
spelling	10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2062558503 (DE-He213)s10503-005-2314-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 100 VZ 7,11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid PHILOS DE-12 fid Juthe, A. verfasserin aut Argument by Analogy 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer 2005 Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered. analogue analogy argument by analogy assigned-predicate conclusive analogy counterpart different-domain-analogy inconclusive analogy one-to-one correspondence same-domain-analogy target-subject Enthalten in Argumentation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987 19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27 (DE-627)165801050 (DE-600)18188-2 (DE-576)034177094 0920-427X nnns volume:19 year:2005 number:1 month:03 pages:1-27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 19 2005 1 03 1-27
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2062558503 (DE-He213)s10503-005-2314-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 100 VZ 7,11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid PHILOS DE-12 fid Juthe, A. verfasserin aut Argument by Analogy 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer 2005 Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered. analogue analogy argument by analogy assigned-predicate conclusive analogy counterpart different-domain-analogy inconclusive analogy one-to-one correspondence same-domain-analogy target-subject Enthalten in Argumentation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987 19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27 (DE-627)165801050 (DE-600)18188-2 (DE-576)034177094 0920-427X nnns volume:19 year:2005 number:1 month:03 pages:1-27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 19 2005 1 03 1-27
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2062558503 (DE-He213)s10503-005-2314-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 100 VZ 7,11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid PHILOS DE-12 fid Juthe, A. verfasserin aut Argument by Analogy 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer 2005 Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered. analogue analogy argument by analogy assigned-predicate conclusive analogy counterpart different-domain-analogy inconclusive analogy one-to-one correspondence same-domain-analogy target-subject Enthalten in Argumentation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987 19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27 (DE-627)165801050 (DE-600)18188-2 (DE-576)034177094 0920-427X nnns volume:19 year:2005 number:1 month:03 pages:1-27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 19 2005 1 03 1-27
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 doi (DE-627)OLC2062558503 (DE-He213)s10503-005-2314-9-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 400 100 VZ 7,11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid PHILOS DE-12 fid Juthe, A. verfasserin aut Argument by Analogy 2005 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer 2005 Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered. analogue analogy argument by analogy assigned-predicate conclusive analogy counterpart different-domain-analogy inconclusive analogy one-to-one correspondence same-domain-analogy target-subject Enthalten in Argumentation Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987 19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27 (DE-627)165801050 (DE-600)18188-2 (DE-576)034177094 0920-427X nnns volume:19 year:2005 number:1 month:03 pages:1-27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112 AR 19 2005 1 03 1-27
language	English
source	Enthalten in Argumentation 19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27 volume:19 year:2005 number:1 month:03 pages:1-27
sourceStr	Enthalten in Argumentation 19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27 volume:19 year:2005 number:1 month:03 pages:1-27
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	analogue analogy argument by analogy assigned-predicate conclusive analogy counterpart different-domain-analogy inconclusive analogy one-to-one correspondence same-domain-analogy target-subject
dewey-raw	400
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Argumentation
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Juthe, A. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2005-03-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	165801050
dewey-sort	3400
id	OLC2062558503
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2062558503</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502210559.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2005 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2062558503</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10503-005-2314-9-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">400</subfield><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,11</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juthe, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Argument by Analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer 2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">analogue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">argument by analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">assigned-predicate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">conclusive analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">counterpart</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">different-domain-analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inconclusive analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">one-to-one correspondence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">same-domain-analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">target-subject</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)165801050</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)18188-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)034177094</subfield><subfield code="x">0920-427X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-27</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1-27</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Juthe, A.
spellingShingle	Juthe, A. ddc 400 ssgn 7,11 fid LING fid PHILOS misc analogue misc analogy misc argument by analogy misc assigned-predicate misc conclusive analogy misc counterpart misc different-domain-analogy misc inconclusive analogy misc one-to-one correspondence misc same-domain-analogy misc target-subject Argument by Analogy
authorStr	Juthe, A.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)165801050
format	Article
dewey-ones	400 - Language 100 - Philosophy & psychology
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0920-427X
topic_title	400 100 VZ 7,11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid PHILOS DE-12 fid Argument by Analogy analogue analogy argument by analogy assigned-predicate conclusive analogy counterpart different-domain-analogy inconclusive analogy one-to-one correspondence same-domain-analogy target-subject
topic	ddc 400 ssgn 7,11 fid LING fid PHILOS misc analogue misc analogy misc argument by analogy misc assigned-predicate misc conclusive analogy misc counterpart misc different-domain-analogy misc inconclusive analogy misc one-to-one correspondence misc same-domain-analogy misc target-subject
topic_unstemmed	ddc 400 ssgn 7,11 fid LING fid PHILOS misc analogue misc analogy misc argument by analogy misc assigned-predicate misc conclusive analogy misc counterpart misc different-domain-analogy misc inconclusive analogy misc one-to-one correspondence misc same-domain-analogy misc target-subject
topic_browse	ddc 400 ssgn 7,11 fid LING fid PHILOS misc analogue misc analogy misc argument by analogy misc assigned-predicate misc conclusive analogy misc counterpart misc different-domain-analogy misc inconclusive analogy misc one-to-one correspondence misc same-domain-analogy misc target-subject
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	Argumentation
hierarchy_parent_id	165801050
dewey-tens	400 - Language 100 - Philosophy
hierarchy_top_title	Argumentation
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)165801050 (DE-600)18188-2 (DE-576)034177094
title	Argument by Analogy
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC2062558503 (DE-He213)s10503-005-2314-9-p
title_full	Argument by Analogy
author_sort	Juthe, A.
journal	Argumentation
journalStr	Argumentation
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	400 - Language 100 - Philosophy & psychology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2005
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	1
author_browse	Juthe, A.
container_volume	19
class	400 100 VZ 7,11 5,1 ssgn LING DE-30 fid PHILOS DE-12 fid
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Juthe, A.
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9
dewey-full	400 100
title_sort	argument by analogy
title_auth	Argument by Analogy
abstract	Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered. © Springer 2005
abstractGer	Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered. © Springer 2005
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered. © Springer 2005
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC FID-LING FID-PHILOS SSG-OLC-PHI GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_130 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4082 GBV_ILN_4112
container_issue	1
title_short	Argument by Analogy
url	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	165801050
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9
up_date	2024-07-03T15:31:37.250Z
_version_	1803572422642761728
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2062558503</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502210559.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2005 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2062558503</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10503-005-2314-9-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">400</subfield><subfield code="a">100</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,11</subfield><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LING</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHILOS</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juthe, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Argument by Analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer 2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">analogue</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">argument by analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">assigned-predicate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">conclusive analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">counterpart</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">different-domain-analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">inconclusive analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">one-to-one correspondence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">same-domain-analogy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">target-subject</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2005), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-27</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)165801050</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)18188-2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)034177094</subfield><subfield code="x">0920-427X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-27</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-LING</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-PHILOS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1-27</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400467

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Argument by Analogy

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?