The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges
Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Grassi, Giacomo [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2012 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Systematik: |
|
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2012 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Climatic change - Springer Netherlands, 1977, 115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:115 ; year:2012 ; number:3-4 ; day:02 ; month:10 ; pages:873-881 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2062608977 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2062608977 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230503024235.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2062608977 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s10584-012-0584-4-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q VZ |
084 | |a 14 |2 ssgn | ||
084 | |a RA 1000 |q VZ |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Grassi, Giacomo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2012 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Forest Management | |
650 | 4 | |a Kyoto Protocol | |
650 | 4 | |a Emission Level | |
650 | 4 | |a Additional Action | |
650 | 4 | |a Commitment Period | |
700 | 1 | |a den Elzen, Michel G. J. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hof, Andries F. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pilli, Roberto |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Federici, Sandro |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Climatic change |d Springer Netherlands, 1977 |g 115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881 |w (DE-627)130479020 |w (DE-600)751086-X |w (DE-576)016068610 |x 0165-0009 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:115 |g year:2012 |g number:3-4 |g day:02 |g month:10 |g pages:873-881 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-UMW | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_154 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_601 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
936 | r | v | |a RA 1000 |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 115 |j 2012 |e 3-4 |b 02 |c 10 |h 873-881 |
author_variant |
g g gg e m g j d emgj emgjd a f h af afh r p rp s f sf |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:01650009:2012----::hrloteadslnuehnenfrsrscoiaheig |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
publishDate |
2012 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2062608977 (DE-He213)s10584-012-0584-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn RA 1000 VZ rvk Grassi, Giacomo verfasserin aut The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions. Forest Management Kyoto Protocol Emission Level Additional Action Commitment Period den Elzen, Michel G. J. aut Hof, Andries F. aut Pilli, Roberto aut Federici, Sandro aut Enthalten in Climatic change Springer Netherlands, 1977 115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881 (DE-627)130479020 (DE-600)751086-X (DE-576)016068610 0165-0009 nnns volume:115 year:2012 number:3-4 day:02 month:10 pages:873-881 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_154 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4325 RA 1000 AR 115 2012 3-4 02 10 873-881 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2062608977 (DE-He213)s10584-012-0584-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn RA 1000 VZ rvk Grassi, Giacomo verfasserin aut The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions. Forest Management Kyoto Protocol Emission Level Additional Action Commitment Period den Elzen, Michel G. J. aut Hof, Andries F. aut Pilli, Roberto aut Federici, Sandro aut Enthalten in Climatic change Springer Netherlands, 1977 115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881 (DE-627)130479020 (DE-600)751086-X (DE-576)016068610 0165-0009 nnns volume:115 year:2012 number:3-4 day:02 month:10 pages:873-881 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_154 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4325 RA 1000 AR 115 2012 3-4 02 10 873-881 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2062608977 (DE-He213)s10584-012-0584-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn RA 1000 VZ rvk Grassi, Giacomo verfasserin aut The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions. Forest Management Kyoto Protocol Emission Level Additional Action Commitment Period den Elzen, Michel G. J. aut Hof, Andries F. aut Pilli, Roberto aut Federici, Sandro aut Enthalten in Climatic change Springer Netherlands, 1977 115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881 (DE-627)130479020 (DE-600)751086-X (DE-576)016068610 0165-0009 nnns volume:115 year:2012 number:3-4 day:02 month:10 pages:873-881 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_154 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4325 RA 1000 AR 115 2012 3-4 02 10 873-881 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2062608977 (DE-He213)s10584-012-0584-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn RA 1000 VZ rvk Grassi, Giacomo verfasserin aut The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions. Forest Management Kyoto Protocol Emission Level Additional Action Commitment Period den Elzen, Michel G. J. aut Hof, Andries F. aut Pilli, Roberto aut Federici, Sandro aut Enthalten in Climatic change Springer Netherlands, 1977 115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881 (DE-627)130479020 (DE-600)751086-X (DE-576)016068610 0165-0009 nnns volume:115 year:2012 number:3-4 day:02 month:10 pages:873-881 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_154 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4325 RA 1000 AR 115 2012 3-4 02 10 873-881 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2062608977 (DE-He213)s10584-012-0584-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 14 ssgn RA 1000 VZ rvk Grassi, Giacomo verfasserin aut The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2012 Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions. Forest Management Kyoto Protocol Emission Level Additional Action Commitment Period den Elzen, Michel G. J. aut Hof, Andries F. aut Pilli, Roberto aut Federici, Sandro aut Enthalten in Climatic change Springer Netherlands, 1977 115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881 (DE-627)130479020 (DE-600)751086-X (DE-576)016068610 0165-0009 nnns volume:115 year:2012 number:3-4 day:02 month:10 pages:873-881 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_154 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4325 RA 1000 AR 115 2012 3-4 02 10 873-881 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Climatic change 115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881 volume:115 year:2012 number:3-4 day:02 month:10 pages:873-881 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Climatic change 115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881 volume:115 year:2012 number:3-4 day:02 month:10 pages:873-881 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Forest Management Kyoto Protocol Emission Level Additional Action Commitment Period |
dewey-raw |
550 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Climatic change |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Grassi, Giacomo @@aut@@ den Elzen, Michel G. J. @@aut@@ Hof, Andries F. @@aut@@ Pilli, Roberto @@aut@@ Federici, Sandro @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-10-02T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130479020 |
dewey-sort |
3550 |
id |
OLC2062608977 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2062608977</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503024235.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2062608977</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10584-012-0584-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RA 1000</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grassi, Giacomo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forest Management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kyoto Protocol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emission Level</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Additional Action</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Commitment Period</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">den Elzen, Michel G. J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hof, Andries F.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pilli, Roberto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Federici, Sandro</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Climatic change</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130479020</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)751086-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016068610</subfield><subfield code="x">0165-0009</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:115</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:873-881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_154</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_601</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">RA 1000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">115</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">3-4</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">873-881</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Grassi, Giacomo |
spellingShingle |
Grassi, Giacomo ddc 550 ssgn 14 rvk RA 1000 misc Forest Management misc Kyoto Protocol misc Emission Level misc Additional Action misc Commitment Period The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges |
authorStr |
Grassi, Giacomo |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130479020 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
550 - Earth sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0165-0009 |
topic_title |
550 VZ 14 ssgn RA 1000 VZ rvk The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges Forest Management Kyoto Protocol Emission Level Additional Action Commitment Period |
topic |
ddc 550 ssgn 14 rvk RA 1000 misc Forest Management misc Kyoto Protocol misc Emission Level misc Additional Action misc Commitment Period |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 550 ssgn 14 rvk RA 1000 misc Forest Management misc Kyoto Protocol misc Emission Level misc Additional Action misc Commitment Period |
topic_browse |
ddc 550 ssgn 14 rvk RA 1000 misc Forest Management misc Kyoto Protocol misc Emission Level misc Additional Action misc Commitment Period |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Climatic change |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130479020 |
dewey-tens |
550 - Earth sciences & geology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Climatic change |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130479020 (DE-600)751086-X (DE-576)016068610 |
title |
The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2062608977 (DE-He213)s10584-012-0584-4-p |
title_full |
The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges |
author_sort |
Grassi, Giacomo |
journal |
Climatic change |
journalStr |
Climatic change |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2012 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
873 |
author_browse |
Grassi, Giacomo den Elzen, Michel G. J. Hof, Andries F. Pilli, Roberto Federici, Sandro |
container_volume |
115 |
class |
550 VZ 14 ssgn RA 1000 VZ rvk |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Grassi, Giacomo |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 |
dewey-full |
550 |
title_sort |
the role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving annex i reduction pledges |
title_auth |
The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges |
abstract |
Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions. © The Author(s) 2012 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions. © The Author(s) 2012 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions. © The Author(s) 2012 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-UMW SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OLC-IBL SSG-OPC-GGO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_154 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4325 |
container_issue |
3-4 |
title_short |
The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
den Elzen, Michel G. J. Hof, Andries F. Pilli, Roberto Federici, Sandro |
author2Str |
den Elzen, Michel G. J. Hof, Andries F. Pilli, Roberto Federici, Sandro |
ppnlink |
130479020 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:45:04.276Z |
_version_ |
1803573268865613824 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2062608977</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503024235.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2062608977</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10584-012-0584-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RA 1000</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grassi, Giacomo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The role of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Annex I Parties may receive credits or debits from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) activities, contributing to achieving individual emission reduction targets. In the Durban climate negotiations, Parties agreed new LULUCF accounting rules for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (CP2). By using these new rules, this paper presents key differences among Parties at the minimum (assuming no additional action) and potential (assuming additional actions) contribution of the forest-related LULUCF activities in achieving the pledges for 2020. Overall, the potential contribution of LULUCF is relatively modest (up to about 2 % of 1990 emissions) for the EU, the Annex I Parties likely joining the CP2, and for the Annex I Parties that joined the CP1 as a whole. However, for specific Parties, LULUCF can make a substantial contribution to achieving the pledges. For New Zealand, for instance, the potential contribution of future LULUCF credits may equal 33 % of its 1990 emission level. For Australia, the pledges are expressed relative to 2000 emission levels including LULUCF emissions. Given that LULUCF emissions have strongly declined between 1990 and 2000, and a further decline in foreseen by 2020 (based on Australia’s projections), the minimum contribution of LULUCF to meet the Australian pledges appears to be about 19 % and 7 % relative to its 1990 and 2000 emission level, respectively. A further 3 % potential contribution is estimated from additional actions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forest Management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kyoto Protocol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emission Level</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Additional Action</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Commitment Period</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">den Elzen, Michel G. J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hof, Andries F.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pilli, Roberto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Federici, Sandro</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Climatic change</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">115(2012), 3-4 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 873-881</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130479020</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)751086-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)016068610</subfield><subfield code="x">0165-0009</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:115</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:873-881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0584-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-UMW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_154</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_601</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="r" ind2="v"><subfield code="a">RA 1000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">115</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">3-4</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">873-881</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4006968 |