Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team
Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s ai...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Döös, Marianne [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2012 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Quality & quantity - Springer Netherlands, 1967, 48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:48 ; year:2012 ; number:2 ; day:12 ; month:12 ; pages:1089-1106 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2063494754 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2063494754 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504020036.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2063494754 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11135-012-9816-y-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 050 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 3,4 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Döös, Marianne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Analytical generalisation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Qualitative data analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intersubjective analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaphor | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Qualitative research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Team analysis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wilhelmson, Lena |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Quality & quantity |d Springer Netherlands, 1967 |g 48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106 |w (DE-627)129084328 |w (DE-600)4140-3 |w (DE-576)014417715 |x 0033-5177 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2012 |g number:2 |g day:12 |g month:12 |g pages:1089-1106 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SOW | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_754 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4029 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 48 |j 2012 |e 2 |b 12 |c 12 |h 1089-1106 | ||
| author_variant |
m d md l w lw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:00335177:2012----::rxmtaditnehssfnesbetvqaiaieaan |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y doi (DE-627)OLC2063494754 (DE-He213)s11135-012-9816-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 VZ 3,4 ssgn Döös, Marianne verfasserin aut Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails. Analytical generalisation Qualitative data analysis Intersubjective analysis Metaphor Qualitative research Team analysis Wilhelmson, Lena aut Enthalten in Quality & quantity Springer Netherlands, 1967 48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106 (DE-627)129084328 (DE-600)4140-3 (DE-576)014417715 0033-5177 nnns volume:48 year:2012 number:2 day:12 month:12 pages:1089-1106 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2012 2 12 12 1089-1106 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y doi (DE-627)OLC2063494754 (DE-He213)s11135-012-9816-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 VZ 3,4 ssgn Döös, Marianne verfasserin aut Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails. Analytical generalisation Qualitative data analysis Intersubjective analysis Metaphor Qualitative research Team analysis Wilhelmson, Lena aut Enthalten in Quality & quantity Springer Netherlands, 1967 48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106 (DE-627)129084328 (DE-600)4140-3 (DE-576)014417715 0033-5177 nnns volume:48 year:2012 number:2 day:12 month:12 pages:1089-1106 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2012 2 12 12 1089-1106 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y doi (DE-627)OLC2063494754 (DE-He213)s11135-012-9816-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 VZ 3,4 ssgn Döös, Marianne verfasserin aut Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails. Analytical generalisation Qualitative data analysis Intersubjective analysis Metaphor Qualitative research Team analysis Wilhelmson, Lena aut Enthalten in Quality & quantity Springer Netherlands, 1967 48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106 (DE-627)129084328 (DE-600)4140-3 (DE-576)014417715 0033-5177 nnns volume:48 year:2012 number:2 day:12 month:12 pages:1089-1106 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2012 2 12 12 1089-1106 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y doi (DE-627)OLC2063494754 (DE-He213)s11135-012-9816-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 VZ 3,4 ssgn Döös, Marianne verfasserin aut Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails. Analytical generalisation Qualitative data analysis Intersubjective analysis Metaphor Qualitative research Team analysis Wilhelmson, Lena aut Enthalten in Quality & quantity Springer Netherlands, 1967 48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106 (DE-627)129084328 (DE-600)4140-3 (DE-576)014417715 0033-5177 nnns volume:48 year:2012 number:2 day:12 month:12 pages:1089-1106 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2012 2 12 12 1089-1106 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y doi (DE-627)OLC2063494754 (DE-He213)s11135-012-9816-y-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 050 VZ 3,4 ssgn Döös, Marianne verfasserin aut Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team 2012 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails. Analytical generalisation Qualitative data analysis Intersubjective analysis Metaphor Qualitative research Team analysis Wilhelmson, Lena aut Enthalten in Quality & quantity Springer Netherlands, 1967 48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106 (DE-627)129084328 (DE-600)4140-3 (DE-576)014417715 0033-5177 nnns volume:48 year:2012 number:2 day:12 month:12 pages:1089-1106 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2012 2 12 12 1089-1106 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Quality & quantity 48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106 volume:48 year:2012 number:2 day:12 month:12 pages:1089-1106 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Quality & quantity 48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106 volume:48 year:2012 number:2 day:12 month:12 pages:1089-1106 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Analytical generalisation Qualitative data analysis Intersubjective analysis Metaphor Qualitative research Team analysis |
| dewey-raw |
050 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Quality & quantity |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Döös, Marianne @@aut@@ Wilhelmson, Lena @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-12-12T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
129084328 |
| dewey-sort |
250 |
| id |
OLC2063494754 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2063494754</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504020036.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2063494754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11135-012-9816-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">050</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Döös, Marianne</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analytical generalisation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Qualitative data analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intersubjective analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metaphor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Qualitative research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Team analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilhelmson, Lena</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Quality & quantity</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1967</subfield><subfield code="g">48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129084328</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)4140-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014417715</subfield><subfield code="x">0033-5177</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:12</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1089-1106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">12</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1089-1106</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Döös, Marianne |
| spellingShingle |
Döös, Marianne ddc 050 ssgn 3,4 misc Analytical generalisation misc Qualitative data analysis misc Intersubjective analysis misc Metaphor misc Qualitative research misc Team analysis Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team |
| authorStr |
Döös, Marianne |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129084328 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
050 - General serial publications |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0033-5177 |
| topic_title |
050 VZ 3,4 ssgn Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team Analytical generalisation Qualitative data analysis Intersubjective analysis Metaphor Qualitative research Team analysis |
| topic |
ddc 050 ssgn 3,4 misc Analytical generalisation misc Qualitative data analysis misc Intersubjective analysis misc Metaphor misc Qualitative research misc Team analysis |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 050 ssgn 3,4 misc Analytical generalisation misc Qualitative data analysis misc Intersubjective analysis misc Metaphor misc Qualitative research misc Team analysis |
| topic_browse |
ddc 050 ssgn 3,4 misc Analytical generalisation misc Qualitative data analysis misc Intersubjective analysis misc Metaphor misc Qualitative research misc Team analysis |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Quality & quantity |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
129084328 |
| dewey-tens |
050 - Magazines, journals & serials |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Quality & quantity |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129084328 (DE-600)4140-3 (DE-576)014417715 |
| title |
Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2063494754 (DE-He213)s11135-012-9816-y-p |
| title_full |
Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team |
| author_sort |
Döös, Marianne |
| journal |
Quality & quantity |
| journalStr |
Quality & quantity |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2012 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1089 |
| author_browse |
Döös, Marianne Wilhelmson, Lena |
| container_volume |
48 |
| class |
050 VZ 3,4 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Döös, Marianne |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y |
| dewey-full |
050 |
| title_sort |
proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team |
| title_auth |
Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team |
| abstract |
Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_754 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Wilhelmson, Lena |
| author2Str |
Wilhelmson, Lena |
| ppnlink |
129084328 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:15:07.583Z |
| _version_ |
1803586484395048960 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2063494754</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504020036.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2063494754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11135-012-9816-y-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">050</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3,4</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Döös, Marianne</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In qualitative field studies, researchers frequently deal with comprehending a multifaceted reality. Large quantities of data are collected for analysis at a later stage. Alternation between proximity and distance is a crucial mechanism in the analysis of qualitative data. This article’s aim is to make intersubjective analysis of qualitative data comprehensible through the investigation and description of phases and key components in a case of productive team co-operation. The argument is methodological, and addresses how empirical data can make a difference within a certain theoretical framework in analytical generalisation. Experiences from a case of intersubjective analysis work between four researchers are described and made sense of. Phases and key components are discussed. Close co-operation of a research team is suggested as a possibility in qualitative fieldwork and analysis. It is concluded that: (a) the idea of collectivity has hitherto been an underdeveloped possibility for qualitative research; (b) purposely intertwining data collection with analysis can be a powerful route for gaining reliable qualitative research; and (c) data analysis as close teamwork is promising as a means of keeping an openness to discoveries, thus gaining validity in the qualitative research endeavour. Coordinating with others in concentrated teamwork may defend the analytical task against other demands an academic post entails.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analytical generalisation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Qualitative data analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intersubjective analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metaphor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Qualitative research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Team analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilhelmson, Lena</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Quality & quantity</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 1967</subfield><subfield code="g">48(2012), 2 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 1089-1106</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129084328</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)4140-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014417715</subfield><subfield code="x">0033-5177</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:12</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1089-1106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">12</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">1089-1106</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4007196 |