Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter
Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three ca...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kakaboura, A. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2007 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine - Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990, 18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:18 ; year:2007 ; number:1 ; month:01 ; pages:155-163 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2066803219 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2066803219 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230518092633.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2007 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2066803219 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10856-006-0675-8-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |a 670 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kakaboura, A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Atomic Force Microscopy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surface Quality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Atomic Force Microscopy Image | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surface Texture | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Resin Composite | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fragouli, M. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rahiotis, C. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Silikas, N. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine |d Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990 |g 18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163 |w (DE-627)130865028 |w (DE-600)1031752-1 |w (DE-576)023107537 |x 0957-4530 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2007 |g number:1 |g month:01 |g pages:155-163 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 18 |j 2007 |e 1 |c 01 |h 155-163 | ||
| author_variant |
a k ak m f mf c r cr n s ns |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09574530:2007----::vlainfufccaatrsisfetlopstssnpoioersanneetoa |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2007 |
| publishDate |
2007 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2066803219 (DE-He213)s10856-006-0675-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 670 VZ Kakaboura, A. verfasserin aut Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM. Atomic Force Microscopy Surface Quality Atomic Force Microscopy Image Surface Texture Resin Composite Fragouli, M. aut Rahiotis, C. aut Silikas, N. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990 18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163 (DE-627)130865028 (DE-600)1031752-1 (DE-576)023107537 0957-4530 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:1 month:01 pages:155-163 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 18 2007 1 01 155-163 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2066803219 (DE-He213)s10856-006-0675-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 670 VZ Kakaboura, A. verfasserin aut Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM. Atomic Force Microscopy Surface Quality Atomic Force Microscopy Image Surface Texture Resin Composite Fragouli, M. aut Rahiotis, C. aut Silikas, N. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990 18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163 (DE-627)130865028 (DE-600)1031752-1 (DE-576)023107537 0957-4530 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:1 month:01 pages:155-163 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 18 2007 1 01 155-163 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2066803219 (DE-He213)s10856-006-0675-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 670 VZ Kakaboura, A. verfasserin aut Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM. Atomic Force Microscopy Surface Quality Atomic Force Microscopy Image Surface Texture Resin Composite Fragouli, M. aut Rahiotis, C. aut Silikas, N. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990 18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163 (DE-627)130865028 (DE-600)1031752-1 (DE-576)023107537 0957-4530 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:1 month:01 pages:155-163 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 18 2007 1 01 155-163 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2066803219 (DE-He213)s10856-006-0675-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 670 VZ Kakaboura, A. verfasserin aut Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM. Atomic Force Microscopy Surface Quality Atomic Force Microscopy Image Surface Texture Resin Composite Fragouli, M. aut Rahiotis, C. aut Silikas, N. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990 18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163 (DE-627)130865028 (DE-600)1031752-1 (DE-576)023107537 0957-4530 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:1 month:01 pages:155-163 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 18 2007 1 01 155-163 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 doi (DE-627)OLC2066803219 (DE-He213)s10856-006-0675-8-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 670 VZ Kakaboura, A. verfasserin aut Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter 2007 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM. Atomic Force Microscopy Surface Quality Atomic Force Microscopy Image Surface Texture Resin Composite Fragouli, M. aut Rahiotis, C. aut Silikas, N. aut Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990 18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163 (DE-627)130865028 (DE-600)1031752-1 (DE-576)023107537 0957-4530 nnns volume:18 year:2007 number:1 month:01 pages:155-163 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 AR 18 2007 1 01 155-163 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine 18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163 volume:18 year:2007 number:1 month:01 pages:155-163 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine 18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163 volume:18 year:2007 number:1 month:01 pages:155-163 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Atomic Force Microscopy Surface Quality Atomic Force Microscopy Image Surface Texture Resin Composite |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kakaboura, A. @@aut@@ Fragouli, M. @@aut@@ Rahiotis, C. @@aut@@ Silikas, N. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130865028 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
OLC2066803219 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2066803219</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518092633.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2007 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2066803219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10856-006-0675-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kakaboura, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Atomic Force Microscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Surface Quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Atomic Force Microscopy Image</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Surface Texture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resin Composite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fragouli, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rahiotis, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silikas, N.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130865028</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1031752-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023107537</subfield><subfield code="x">0957-4530</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:155-163</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">155-163</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kakaboura, A. |
| spellingShingle |
Kakaboura, A. ddc 610 misc Atomic Force Microscopy misc Surface Quality misc Atomic Force Microscopy Image misc Surface Texture misc Resin Composite Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter |
| authorStr |
Kakaboura, A. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130865028 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 670 - Manufacturing |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0957-4530 |
| topic_title |
610 670 VZ Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter Atomic Force Microscopy Surface Quality Atomic Force Microscopy Image Surface Texture Resin Composite |
| topic |
ddc 610 misc Atomic Force Microscopy misc Surface Quality misc Atomic Force Microscopy Image misc Surface Texture misc Resin Composite |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 misc Atomic Force Microscopy misc Surface Quality misc Atomic Force Microscopy Image misc Surface Texture misc Resin Composite |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 misc Atomic Force Microscopy misc Surface Quality misc Atomic Force Microscopy Image misc Surface Texture misc Resin Composite |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130865028 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 670 - Manufacturing |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130865028 (DE-600)1031752-1 (DE-576)023107537 |
| title |
Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2066803219 (DE-He213)s10856-006-0675-8-p |
| title_full |
Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter |
| author_sort |
Kakaboura, A. |
| journal |
Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine |
| journalStr |
Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2007 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
155 |
| author_browse |
Kakaboura, A. Fragouli, M. Rahiotis, C. Silikas, N. |
| container_volume |
18 |
| class |
610 670 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kakaboura, A. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 |
| dewey-full |
610 670 |
| title_sort |
evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter |
| title_auth |
Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter |
| abstract |
Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OLC-DE-84 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4219 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4323 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Fragouli, M. Rahiotis, C. Silikas, N. |
| author2Str |
Fragouli, M. Rahiotis, C. Silikas, N. |
| ppnlink |
130865028 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T05:20:55.487Z |
| _version_ |
1803624597926445056 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2066803219</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230518092633.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2007 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2066803219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10856-006-0675-8-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kakaboura, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at $ 60^{∘} $ was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Atomic Force Microscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Surface Quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Atomic Force Microscopy Image</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Surface Texture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resin Composite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fragouli, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rahiotis, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silikas, N.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials science / Materials in medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2007), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 155-163</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130865028</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1031752-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023107537</subfield><subfield code="x">0957-4530</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:155-163</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-DE-84</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4219</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">155-163</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.39888 |