A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys
Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coeffici...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Avasthi, D. N. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
1974 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Pure and applied geophysics - Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1964, 112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:112 ; year:1974 ; number:5 ; month:09 ; pages:845-854 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/BF00876959 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC2069456749 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2069456749 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230323111917.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s1974 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF00876959 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2069456749 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)BF00876959-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q VZ |
084 | |a 16,13 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Avasthi, D. N. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys |
264 | 1 | |c 1974 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 | ||
520 | |a Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Reflection Coefficient | |
650 | 4 | |a Signal Amplitude | |
650 | 4 | |a Normal Incidence | |
650 | 4 | |a Large Angle | |
650 | 4 | |a Seismic Reflection | |
700 | 1 | |a Agrawal, M. C. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Pure and applied geophysics |d Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1964 |g 112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854 |w (DE-627)129538353 |w (DE-600)216719-0 |w (DE-576)014971038 |x 0033-4553 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:112 |g year:1974 |g number:5 |g month:09 |g pages:845-854 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876959 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHY | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-GEO | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-GGO | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-GEO | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_30 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_47 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_601 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4028 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4029 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 112 |j 1974 |e 5 |c 09 |h 845-854 |
author_variant |
d n a dn dna m c a mc mca |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:00334553:1974----::sotpedofgrtofrapndpigoiosnel |
hierarchy_sort_str |
1974 |
publishDate |
1974 |
allfields |
10.1007/BF00876959 doi (DE-627)OLC2069456749 (DE-He213)BF00876959-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 550 VZ 16,13 ssgn Avasthi, D. N. verfasserin aut A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons. Reflection Coefficient Signal Amplitude Normal Incidence Large Angle Seismic Reflection Agrawal, M. C. aut Enthalten in Pure and applied geophysics Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1964 112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854 (DE-627)129538353 (DE-600)216719-0 (DE-576)014971038 0033-4553 nnns volume:112 year:1974 number:5 month:09 pages:845-854 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876959 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_47 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 112 1974 5 09 845-854 |
spelling |
10.1007/BF00876959 doi (DE-627)OLC2069456749 (DE-He213)BF00876959-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 550 VZ 16,13 ssgn Avasthi, D. N. verfasserin aut A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons. Reflection Coefficient Signal Amplitude Normal Incidence Large Angle Seismic Reflection Agrawal, M. C. aut Enthalten in Pure and applied geophysics Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1964 112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854 (DE-627)129538353 (DE-600)216719-0 (DE-576)014971038 0033-4553 nnns volume:112 year:1974 number:5 month:09 pages:845-854 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876959 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_47 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 112 1974 5 09 845-854 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/BF00876959 doi (DE-627)OLC2069456749 (DE-He213)BF00876959-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 550 VZ 16,13 ssgn Avasthi, D. N. verfasserin aut A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons. Reflection Coefficient Signal Amplitude Normal Incidence Large Angle Seismic Reflection Agrawal, M. C. aut Enthalten in Pure and applied geophysics Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1964 112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854 (DE-627)129538353 (DE-600)216719-0 (DE-576)014971038 0033-4553 nnns volume:112 year:1974 number:5 month:09 pages:845-854 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876959 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_47 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 112 1974 5 09 845-854 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/BF00876959 doi (DE-627)OLC2069456749 (DE-He213)BF00876959-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 550 VZ 16,13 ssgn Avasthi, D. N. verfasserin aut A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons. Reflection Coefficient Signal Amplitude Normal Incidence Large Angle Seismic Reflection Agrawal, M. C. aut Enthalten in Pure and applied geophysics Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1964 112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854 (DE-627)129538353 (DE-600)216719-0 (DE-576)014971038 0033-4553 nnns volume:112 year:1974 number:5 month:09 pages:845-854 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876959 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_47 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 112 1974 5 09 845-854 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/BF00876959 doi (DE-627)OLC2069456749 (DE-He213)BF00876959-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 VZ 550 VZ 16,13 ssgn Avasthi, D. N. verfasserin aut A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys 1974 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons. Reflection Coefficient Signal Amplitude Normal Incidence Large Angle Seismic Reflection Agrawal, M. C. aut Enthalten in Pure and applied geophysics Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1964 112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854 (DE-627)129538353 (DE-600)216719-0 (DE-576)014971038 0033-4553 nnns volume:112 year:1974 number:5 month:09 pages:845-854 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876959 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_47 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 AR 112 1974 5 09 845-854 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Pure and applied geophysics 112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854 volume:112 year:1974 number:5 month:09 pages:845-854 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Pure and applied geophysics 112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854 volume:112 year:1974 number:5 month:09 pages:845-854 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Reflection Coefficient Signal Amplitude Normal Incidence Large Angle Seismic Reflection |
dewey-raw |
550 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Pure and applied geophysics |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Avasthi, D. N. @@aut@@ Agrawal, M. C. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
1974-09-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
129538353 |
dewey-sort |
3550 |
id |
OLC2069456749 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2069456749</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230323111917.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1974 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00876959</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2069456749</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00876959-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">16,13</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Avasthi, D. N.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reflection Coefficient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Signal Amplitude</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Normal Incidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Large Angle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Seismic Reflection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Agrawal, M. C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Pure and applied geophysics</subfield><subfield code="d">Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1964</subfield><subfield code="g">112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129538353</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)216719-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014971038</subfield><subfield code="x">0033-4553</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:112</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1974</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:845-854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876959</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_47</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_601</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">112</subfield><subfield code="j">1974</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">845-854</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Avasthi, D. N. |
spellingShingle |
Avasthi, D. N. ddc 550 ssgn 16,13 misc Reflection Coefficient misc Signal Amplitude misc Normal Incidence misc Large Angle misc Seismic Reflection A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys |
authorStr |
Avasthi, D. N. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)129538353 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
550 - Earth sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0033-4553 |
topic_title |
550 VZ 16,13 ssgn A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys Reflection Coefficient Signal Amplitude Normal Incidence Large Angle Seismic Reflection |
topic |
ddc 550 ssgn 16,13 misc Reflection Coefficient misc Signal Amplitude misc Normal Incidence misc Large Angle misc Seismic Reflection |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 550 ssgn 16,13 misc Reflection Coefficient misc Signal Amplitude misc Normal Incidence misc Large Angle misc Seismic Reflection |
topic_browse |
ddc 550 ssgn 16,13 misc Reflection Coefficient misc Signal Amplitude misc Normal Incidence misc Large Angle misc Seismic Reflection |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Pure and applied geophysics |
hierarchy_parent_id |
129538353 |
dewey-tens |
550 - Earth sciences & geology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Pure and applied geophysics |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)129538353 (DE-600)216719-0 (DE-576)014971038 |
title |
A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2069456749 (DE-He213)BF00876959-p |
title_full |
A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys |
author_sort |
Avasthi, D. N. |
journal |
Pure and applied geophysics |
journalStr |
Pure and applied geophysics |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
1974 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
845 |
author_browse |
Avasthi, D. N. Agrawal, M. C. |
container_volume |
112 |
class |
550 VZ 16,13 ssgn |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Avasthi, D. N. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/BF00876959 |
dewey-full |
550 |
title_sort |
a short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys |
title_auth |
A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys |
abstract |
Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons. © Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 |
abstractGer |
Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons. © Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons. © Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-PHY SSG-OLC-GEO SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-GEO GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_21 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_30 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_47 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_601 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4028 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 |
container_issue |
5 |
title_short |
A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876959 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
Agrawal, M. C. |
author2Str |
Agrawal, M. C. |
ppnlink |
129538353 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/BF00876959 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T22:14:53.916Z |
_version_ |
1803597794683912192 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2069456749</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230323111917.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s1974 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00876959</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2069456749</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)BF00876959-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">16,13</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Avasthi, D. N.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A short-spread configuration for mapping dipping horizons in reflection seismic surveys</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Birkhäuser-Verlag 1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Summary In areas of steeply dipping seismic horizons, the conventional split-spread seismic reflection method may yield poor seismograms. In order to develop a suitable field technique to improve the record quality in such areas, an analysis of the effect of spherical divergence, reflection coefficient, and absorption on the amplitude of the signal reflected from a dipping interface has been carried out. It has been found that for a dipping interface the reflected signal amplitude in many cases may be higher for the larger angles of incidence at the reflecting bed than for the normal incidence. Thus, a suitable inline-offset spread in the updip direction is likely to increase the recorded reflected signal amplidute and improve the signal-to-noisre ratio in areas of dipping reflectors. The design of such a shot-spread configuration has been developed in this paper, and a field method using this configuration is suggested for continuous mapping of subsurface horizons.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reflection Coefficient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Signal Amplitude</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Normal Incidence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Large Angle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Seismic Reflection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Agrawal, M. C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Pure and applied geophysics</subfield><subfield code="d">Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1964</subfield><subfield code="g">112(1974), 5 vom: Sept., Seite 845-854</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)129538353</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)216719-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)014971038</subfield><subfield code="x">0033-4553</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:112</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1974</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:845-854</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876959</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_30</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_47</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_601</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">112</subfield><subfield code="j">1974</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">845-854</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3994837 |