Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy
Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible a...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Cultural studies of science education - Springer Netherlands, 2006, 9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:9 ; year:2014 ; number:3 ; day:01 ; month:05 ; pages:663-674 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2071195663 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2071195663 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504092526.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2071195663 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s11422-014-9596-x-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 900 |a 370 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 5,3 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Global warming | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Climate change | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Socio-scientific issues | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Scientific literacy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political literacy | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cultural studies of science education |d Springer Netherlands, 2006 |g 9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674 |w (DE-627)53405742X |w (DE-600)2364775-9 |w (DE-576)9534057428 |x 1871-1502 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:05 |g pages:663-674 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-BIF | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 9 |j 2014 |e 3 |b 01 |c 05 |h 663-674 | ||
| author_variant |
s w l p d swlp swlpd |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18711502:2014----::eaenlblamnaaoisiniiisecectahnt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x doi (DE-627)OLC2071195663 (DE-He213)s11422-014-9596-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 900 370 VZ 5,3 ssgn dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira verfasserin aut Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change. Global warming Climate change Socio-scientific issues Scientific literacy Political literacy Enthalten in Cultural studies of science education Springer Netherlands, 2006 9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674 (DE-627)53405742X (DE-600)2364775-9 (DE-576)9534057428 1871-1502 nnns volume:9 year:2014 number:3 day:01 month:05 pages:663-674 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF AR 9 2014 3 01 05 663-674 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x doi (DE-627)OLC2071195663 (DE-He213)s11422-014-9596-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 900 370 VZ 5,3 ssgn dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira verfasserin aut Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change. Global warming Climate change Socio-scientific issues Scientific literacy Political literacy Enthalten in Cultural studies of science education Springer Netherlands, 2006 9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674 (DE-627)53405742X (DE-600)2364775-9 (DE-576)9534057428 1871-1502 nnns volume:9 year:2014 number:3 day:01 month:05 pages:663-674 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF AR 9 2014 3 01 05 663-674 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x doi (DE-627)OLC2071195663 (DE-He213)s11422-014-9596-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 900 370 VZ 5,3 ssgn dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira verfasserin aut Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change. Global warming Climate change Socio-scientific issues Scientific literacy Political literacy Enthalten in Cultural studies of science education Springer Netherlands, 2006 9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674 (DE-627)53405742X (DE-600)2364775-9 (DE-576)9534057428 1871-1502 nnns volume:9 year:2014 number:3 day:01 month:05 pages:663-674 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF AR 9 2014 3 01 05 663-674 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x doi (DE-627)OLC2071195663 (DE-He213)s11422-014-9596-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 900 370 VZ 5,3 ssgn dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira verfasserin aut Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change. Global warming Climate change Socio-scientific issues Scientific literacy Political literacy Enthalten in Cultural studies of science education Springer Netherlands, 2006 9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674 (DE-627)53405742X (DE-600)2364775-9 (DE-576)9534057428 1871-1502 nnns volume:9 year:2014 number:3 day:01 month:05 pages:663-674 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF AR 9 2014 3 01 05 663-674 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x doi (DE-627)OLC2071195663 (DE-He213)s11422-014-9596-x-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 900 370 VZ 5,3 ssgn dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira verfasserin aut Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy 2014 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change. Global warming Climate change Socio-scientific issues Scientific literacy Political literacy Enthalten in Cultural studies of science education Springer Netherlands, 2006 9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674 (DE-627)53405742X (DE-600)2364775-9 (DE-576)9534057428 1871-1502 nnns volume:9 year:2014 number:3 day:01 month:05 pages:663-674 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF AR 9 2014 3 01 05 663-674 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Cultural studies of science education 9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674 volume:9 year:2014 number:3 day:01 month:05 pages:663-674 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Cultural studies of science education 9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674 volume:9 year:2014 number:3 day:01 month:05 pages:663-674 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Global warming Climate change Socio-scientific issues Scientific literacy Political literacy |
| dewey-raw |
900 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Cultural studies of science education |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-05-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
53405742X |
| dewey-sort |
3900 |
| id |
OLC2071195663 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2071195663</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504092526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2071195663</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11422-014-9596-x-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">900</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Global warming</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Climate change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Socio-scientific issues</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Scientific literacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political literacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Cultural studies of science education</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 2006</subfield><subfield code="g">9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)53405742X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2364775-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9534057428</subfield><subfield code="x">1871-1502</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:663-674</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BIF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">663-674</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira |
| spellingShingle |
dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira ddc 900 ssgn 5,3 misc Global warming misc Climate change misc Socio-scientific issues misc Scientific literacy misc Political literacy Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy |
| authorStr |
dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)53405742X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
900 - History & geography 370 - Education |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1871-1502 |
| topic_title |
900 370 VZ 5,3 ssgn Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy Global warming Climate change Socio-scientific issues Scientific literacy Political literacy |
| topic |
ddc 900 ssgn 5,3 misc Global warming misc Climate change misc Socio-scientific issues misc Scientific literacy misc Political literacy |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 900 ssgn 5,3 misc Global warming misc Climate change misc Socio-scientific issues misc Scientific literacy misc Political literacy |
| topic_browse |
ddc 900 ssgn 5,3 misc Global warming misc Climate change misc Socio-scientific issues misc Scientific literacy misc Political literacy |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Cultural studies of science education |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
53405742X |
| dewey-tens |
900 - History 370 - Education |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Cultural studies of science education |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)53405742X (DE-600)2364775-9 (DE-576)9534057428 |
| title |
Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2071195663 (DE-He213)s11422-014-9596-x-p |
| title_full |
Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy |
| author_sort |
dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira |
| journal |
Cultural studies of science education |
| journalStr |
Cultural studies of science education |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
900 - History & geography 300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
663 |
| author_browse |
dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira |
| container_volume |
9 |
| class |
900 370 VZ 5,3 ssgn |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x |
| dewey-full |
900 370 |
| title_sort |
debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy |
| title_auth |
Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy |
| abstract |
Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-BIF |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
53405742X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T03:09:05.606Z |
| _version_ |
1803616303834988544 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2071195663</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230504092526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200820s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2071195663</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s11422-014-9596-x-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">900</subfield><subfield code="a">370</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,3</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">dos Santos, Wildson Luiz Pereira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The focus of this response to the original article by Tom G. H. Bryce and Stephen P. Day (Cult Stud Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9407-1, 2013) is the use of empirical data to illustrate and expand the understanding of key points of their argument. Initially, I seek to discuss possible answers to the three questions posed by the authors related to: (1) the concerns to be addressed and the scientific knowledge to be taken into account in the climate change debate, (2) the attention to be paid to perspectives taken by “alarmists” and “deniers,” and (3) the approaches to be used to conduct controversial global warming debate. In this discussion, I seek to contribute to the debate proposed by the original paper, illustrating various points commented on by the authors and expanding to other possibilities, which highlight the importance of political issues in the debate. Therefore, I argue that socio-political issues must be taken into account when I aim for a scientific literacy that can enhance students’ political education. Likewise, I extend the debate presented in the original article, emphasizing the attention that should be paid to these aspects and approaching science education from a critical perspective. Highlighting only the confirmation bias without considering political implications of the debate can induce a reductionist and empiricist view of science, detached from the political power that acts on scientific activity. In conclusion, I support the idea that for a critical science education, the discussion of political issues should be involved in any controversial debate, a view, which goes beyond the confirmation bias proposed by Bryce and Day for the global warming debate. These issues are indeed vital and science teachers should take them into account when preparing their lessons for the debate on climate change.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Global warming</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Climate change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Socio-scientific issues</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Scientific literacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political literacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Cultural studies of science education</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands, 2006</subfield><subfield code="g">9(2014), 3 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 663-674</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)53405742X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2364775-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9534057428</subfield><subfield code="x">1871-1502</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:663-674</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9596-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BIF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">663-674</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4005556 |