A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations
Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ivarsson, Martin [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2010 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Empirical software engineering - Springer US, 1996, 16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:2010 ; number:3 ; day:06 ; month:10 ; pages:365-395 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC2071660706 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2071660706 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503052511.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2071660706 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10664-010-9146-4-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 004 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Ivarsson, Martin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Requirements engineering | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Technology evaluation | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gorschek, Tony |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Empirical software engineering |d Springer US, 1996 |g 16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395 |w (DE-627)235946516 |w (DE-600)1401304-6 |w (DE-576)102432406 |x 1382-3256 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2010 |g number:3 |g day:06 |g month:10 |g pages:365-395 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2010 |e 3 |b 06 |c 10 |h 365-395 | ||
| author_variant |
m i mi t g tg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13823256:2010----::mtofrvlaigioadnutileeacot |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2071660706 (DE-He213)s10664-010-9146-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Ivarsson, Martin verfasserin aut A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time. Systematic review Requirements engineering Technology evaluation Gorschek, Tony aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:16 year:2010 number:3 day:06 month:10 pages:365-395 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 AR 16 2010 3 06 10 365-395 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2071660706 (DE-He213)s10664-010-9146-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Ivarsson, Martin verfasserin aut A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time. Systematic review Requirements engineering Technology evaluation Gorschek, Tony aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:16 year:2010 number:3 day:06 month:10 pages:365-395 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 AR 16 2010 3 06 10 365-395 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2071660706 (DE-He213)s10664-010-9146-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Ivarsson, Martin verfasserin aut A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time. Systematic review Requirements engineering Technology evaluation Gorschek, Tony aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:16 year:2010 number:3 day:06 month:10 pages:365-395 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 AR 16 2010 3 06 10 365-395 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2071660706 (DE-He213)s10664-010-9146-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Ivarsson, Martin verfasserin aut A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time. Systematic review Requirements engineering Technology evaluation Gorschek, Tony aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:16 year:2010 number:3 day:06 month:10 pages:365-395 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 AR 16 2010 3 06 10 365-395 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 doi (DE-627)OLC2071660706 (DE-He213)s10664-010-9146-4-p DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 VZ Ivarsson, Martin verfasserin aut A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations 2010 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time. Systematic review Requirements engineering Technology evaluation Gorschek, Tony aut Enthalten in Empirical software engineering Springer US, 1996 16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395 (DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 1382-3256 nnns volume:16 year:2010 number:3 day:06 month:10 pages:365-395 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 AR 16 2010 3 06 10 365-395 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Empirical software engineering 16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395 volume:16 year:2010 number:3 day:06 month:10 pages:365-395 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Empirical software engineering 16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395 volume:16 year:2010 number:3 day:06 month:10 pages:365-395 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Systematic review Requirements engineering Technology evaluation |
| dewey-raw |
004 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Empirical software engineering |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ivarsson, Martin @@aut@@ Gorschek, Tony @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-10-06T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
235946516 |
| dewey-sort |
14 |
| id |
OLC2071660706 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2071660706</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503052511.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2071660706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10664-010-9146-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ivarsson, Martin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systematic review</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Requirements engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technology evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gorschek, Tony</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Empirical software engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)235946516</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1401304-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)102432406</subfield><subfield code="x">1382-3256</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:06</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:365-395</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">06</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">365-395</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ivarsson, Martin |
| spellingShingle |
Ivarsson, Martin ddc 004 misc Systematic review misc Requirements engineering misc Technology evaluation A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations |
| authorStr |
Ivarsson, Martin |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)235946516 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
004 - Data processing & computer science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1382-3256 |
| topic_title |
004 VZ A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations Systematic review Requirements engineering Technology evaluation |
| topic |
ddc 004 misc Systematic review misc Requirements engineering misc Technology evaluation |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 004 misc Systematic review misc Requirements engineering misc Technology evaluation |
| topic_browse |
ddc 004 misc Systematic review misc Requirements engineering misc Technology evaluation |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Empirical software engineering |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
235946516 |
| dewey-tens |
000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Empirical software engineering |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)235946516 (DE-600)1401304-6 (DE-576)102432406 |
| title |
A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC2071660706 (DE-He213)s10664-010-9146-4-p |
| title_full |
A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations |
| author_sort |
Ivarsson, Martin |
| journal |
Empirical software engineering |
| journalStr |
Empirical software engineering |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2010 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
365 |
| author_browse |
Ivarsson, Martin Gorschek, Tony |
| container_volume |
16 |
| class |
004 VZ |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ivarsson, Martin |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 |
| dewey-full |
004 |
| title_sort |
a method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations |
| title_auth |
A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations |
| abstract |
Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_100 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Gorschek, Tony |
| author2Str |
Gorschek, Tony |
| ppnlink |
235946516 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T03:56:36.431Z |
| _version_ |
1803619293130129408 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC2071660706</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503052511.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200819s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC2071660706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-He213)s10664-010-9146-4-p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ivarsson, Martin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract One of the main goals of an applied research field such as software engineering is the transfer and widespread use of research results in industry. To impact industry, researchers developing technologies in academia need to provide tangible evidence of the advantages of using them. This can be done trough step-wise validation, enabling researchers to gradually test and evaluate technologies to finally try them in real settings with real users and applications. The evidence obtained, together with detailed information on how the validation was conducted, offers rich decision support material for industry practitioners seeking to adopt new technologies and researchers looking for an empirical basis on which to build new or refined technologies. This paper presents model for evaluating the rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations in software engineering. The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals. The aim is to show the applicability of the model and to characterize how evaluations are carried out and reported to evaluate the state-of-research. The review shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering. The findings from applying the model also show that the majority of technology evaluations in requirements engineering lack both industrial relevance and rigor. In addition, the research field does not show any improvements in terms of industrial relevance over time.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Systematic review</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Requirements engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technology evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gorschek, Tony</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Empirical software engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer US, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2010), 3 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 365-395</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)235946516</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1401304-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)102432406</subfield><subfield code="x">1382-3256</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:06</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:365-395</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9146-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">06</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">365-395</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4000244 |